|
AMD Athlon II X2 270 vs Phenom II X4 945 (95W, rev. C2)
Mini Review
AMD Athlon II X2 270 advantages
 |
- The AMD Athlon II X2 270 is 4% faster when running single-threaded tasks. It can be up to 11% faster in some benchmarks.
- Power consumption of the AMD 270 is lower.
|
AMD Phenom II X4 945 (95W, rev. C2) advantages
Picture is not available |
- The Phenom II X4 945 has 68% better performance in multi-threaded tasks.
- Memory performance of the Phenom II X4 945 CPU is better.
|
270 vs 945 performance comparison
The charts below show performance of Athlon II X2 270 and Phenom II X4 945 (95W, rev. C2) processors in a few different kinds of applications. The results in the charts are based on a number of benchmarks, that you can see in the "Benchmarks" tab. As such, the displayed results may differ from results, that you may receive in individual tests. We also averaged the numbers for application type specific benchmarks and all-around performance benchmarks, and presented them in the 'Overall performance' chart. |
Single-threaded performance Higher is better |
Multi-threaded performance Higher is better |
Memory-intensive applications Higher is better |
Discrete Graphics performance Higher is better |
Overall performance Higher is better |
|
- AMD Athlon II X2 270 - AMD Phenom II X4 945 (95W, rev. C2)
Full list of benchmarks, that demonstrate performance difference between AMD Athlon II X2 270 and AMD 945 in various types of programs, can be seen in the "Benchmarks" tab.
270 vs 945 power consumption comparison
Thermal Design Power Lower is better |
|
|
Detailed side by side comparison of AMD Athlon II X2 270 vs Phenom II X4 945 (95W, rev. C2) specs can be found in the "Specifications" tab. Even more detailed comparison of low level features of both microprocessors you will find in the "CPUIDs" tab.
Pros and Cons summary
| |
| Athlon II X2 270 | Phenom II X4 945 (95W, rev. C2) |
General recommendations: A bit higher performance in single-threaded programs, More energy efficient
|
General recommendations: Performs somewhat faster in all task types
|
Drawbacks: Not as fast in general
|
Drawbacks: Performs slightly worse in single-threaded programs, Higher power consumption
|
Similar processors
| |
| Athlon II X2 270 | Phenom II X4 945 (95W, rev. C2) |
|
|
|
Similar CPUs use the same socket and architecture as 270 and AMD Phenom II X4 945 (95W, rev. C2), however their performance and other characteristics are a bit different.
Specifications
| | AMD Athlon II X2 270 | AMD Phenom II X4 945 (95W, rev. C2) |
| | Basic details |
| Market segment | Desktop |
| Manufacturer | AMD |
| Family | AMD Athlon II X2 | AMD Phenom II X4 |
| Model number | 270 | 945 |
| CPU part number | ADX270OCK23GM | HDX945WFK4DGI |
| Box part number | ADX270OCGMBOX | HDX945WFGIBOX |
| Introduction date | June 30, 2011 | July 22, 2009 |
| |
| | CPU features |
| Core name | Regor | Deneb |
| Platform name | | Dragon |
| Microarchitecture | K10 |
| Technology (micron) | 0.045 |
| Data width (bits) | 64 |
| Socket | Socket AM2+ / Socket AM3 |
| Frequency (MHz) | 3400 | 3000 |
| Bus speed (MHz) | 2000 (HT/QPI) |
| Clock Multiplier | 17 | 15 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (code) / 128 KB (data) | 256 KB (code) / 256 KB (data) |
| L2 cache (KB) | 2048 |
| L3 cache (KB) | | 6144 |
| Max temperature (°C) | | 55 - 71 |
| TDP (Watt) | 65 | 95 |
| Core voltage (V) | | 0.85 - 1.425 |
| Cores | 2 | 4 |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Multiprocessing | 1 |
| |
| | Instruction set extensions |
| 3DNow! | + |
| AMD64 / EM64T 64-bit technology | + |
| MMX | + |
| SSE | + |
| SSE2 | + |
| SSE3 | + |
| |
| | Supported technologies |
| PowerNow! / Enhanced SpeedStep | + |
| Virtualization | + |
| Virus Protection / Execute Disable bit | + |
| |
| | Integrated Graphics |
| GPU Type | None |
Notes:
Rows with different specifications or features are highlighted.
For detailed specifications of "AMD Athlon II X2 270" or "AMD Phenom II X4 945 (95W, rev. C2)" parts please click on the links in the table header.
Benchmarks
System setup
AMD Athlon II X2 270 and 945 (95W, rev. C2) processors were tested using different system
components, that are identified by MB, RAM and VID columns
in the tables below. The numbers in each of these columns correspond
to one of motherboards (MB), memory configurations (RAM) or graphics
adapters (VID), listed below:
MB - Motherboard(s):
1. ASROCK M3A780GXH/128M
2. MSI K9A2 PLATINUM
RAM - Memory:
1. 2 GB DUAL-CHANNEL CORSAIR CM3X1024-1333C9 DDR3
2. 2GB DUAL-CHANNEL CORSAIR CM2X1024-6400C4
VID - Video card(s):
1. POWERCOLOR 24PRO256M DDR2 (ATI RADEON HD2400)
All tests were performed at default frequency and voltage, using manufacturer's stock fan/heatsink. None of the components were overclocked. Motherboard BIOS options were left at default settings.
The results of all benchmarks are broken into four categories: multi-threaded, single-threaded, memory intensive and graphics / gaming.
Athlon II X2 270 vs 945 (95W, rev. C2) single-threaded benchmarks
Single-threaded benchmarks run on a single CPU core, and do not depend
on such features as the number of cores, or Hyper-Threading
technology. Additionally, they do not utilize on-chip caches,
dedicated to other cores.
| | | | | |
AMD Athlon II X2 270
AMD Phenom II X4 945 (95W, rev. C2)
|
3DMark03 CPU score benchmark
|
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 99.9% | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| 91.8% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
CINEBENCH R10 CPU score (1 core) benchmark
|
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 91.2% | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| 89.4% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
PCMark2002 CPU score benchmark
|
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 89.3% | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| 89.0% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Super PI (1M) benchmark
|
Shorter is better | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| 100% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 97.2% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Athlon II X2 270 vs 945 (95W, rev. C2) multi-threaded benchmarks
Multi-threaded benchmarks utilize all CPU cores and other on-chip
resources (on-chip caches, internal buffers, etc). Intel's
Hyper-Threading feature also helps to improve multi-threading
performance.
| | | | | |
AMD Athlon II X2 270
AMD Phenom II X4 945 (95W, rev. C2)
|
CINEBENCH R10 CPU score benchmark
|
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| 99.2% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 59.6% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
CINEBENCH R10 render time (seconds) benchmark
|
Shorter is better | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| 99.2% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 59.6% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Euler3D benchmark
|
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 97.3% | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| 60.7% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) benchmark
|
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| 99.8% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 56.5% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Sandra MultiMedia Floating Point (it/s) benchmark
|
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| 99.7% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 56.6% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
AMD Athlon II X2 270
AMD Phenom II X4 945 (95W, rev. C2)
|
Sandra MultiMedia Integer (it/s) benchmark
|
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| 99.8% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 56.1% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) benchmark
|
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| 99.8% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 56.6% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Sandra Whetstone SSE2 (MFLOPS) benchmark
|
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| 99.8% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 56.4% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
wPrime v1.55 (32M) benchmark
|
Shorter is better | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| 100% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 56.7% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Athlon II X2 270 vs 945 (95W, rev. C2) graphics benchmarks
Graphics benchmarks depend on the type of integrated or discrete
graphics adapter, and to less extent on the processor performance.
Because these benchmarks are synthetic, they may not truly represent
gaming performance. However, they still can used to estimate whether
one processor will perform faster or slower in games than another CPU.
| | | | | |
AMD Athlon II X2 270
AMD Phenom II X4 945 (95W, rev. C2)
|
3DMark03 game score benchmark
|
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 99.8% | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| 99.8% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
3DMark2001 score benchmark
|
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| 99.6% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 99.3% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
CINEBENCH R10 OpenGL score benchmark
|
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| 99.2% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 98.3% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Athlon II X2 270 vs 945 (95W, rev. C2) memory performance
Memory-intensive tests or programs move large amounts of data to/from
memory, and they depend more on memory throughput and the size of
on-chip caches, rather than on CPU integer/FP/SIMD performance.
| | | | | |
AMD Athlon II X2 270
AMD Phenom II X4 945 (95W, rev. C2)
|
7Zip compressing/decompressing speed benchmark
|
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 89.9% | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| 89.8% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
PCMark2002 Memory score benchmark
|
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| 99.5% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 69.2% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
WinRAR compressing/decompressing speed benchmark
|
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 96.6% | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| 59.1% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
CPUIDs
The table below compares two random CPUID records for AMD Athlon II X2 270 and AMD Phenom II X4 945 (95W, rev. C2)
microprocessors, that were submitted to our CPUID database.
| |
CPUID 1 |
CPUID 2 |
| Manufacturer | AMD |
| CPU Family | Athlon II X2 | Phenom II X4 |
| Model / Processor Number | 270 | 945 |
| Frequency | 3392 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| CWID version | 0.4 | 0.3 |
| Part number | ADX270OCK23GM | HDX945WFK4DGI |
| S-Spec / Stepping Code | AAEKC AE 1025CPA | CACYC AC 0932DPMW |
| |
| General information |
| Vendor | AuthenticAMD |
| Processor name (BIOS) | AMD Athlon(tm) II X2 270 Processor | AMD Phenom(tm) II X4 945 Processor |
| Cores | 2 | 4 |
| Logical processors | 2 | 4 |
| Processor type | Original OEM Processor |
| Core stepping | DA-C3 | RB-C2 |
| CPUID signature | 100F63 | 100F42 |
| Family | 16 (010h) |
| Model | 6 (06h) | 4 (04h) |
| Stepping | 3 (03h) | 2 (02h) |
| |
| Cache |
| L1 data: Associativity | 2-way set associative |
| L1 data: Line size | 64 bytes |
| L1 data: Lines per tag | 1 |
| L1 data: Size | 2 x 64 KB | 4 x 64 KB |
| L1 instruction: Associativity | 2-way set associative |
| L1 instruction: Line size | 64 bytes |
| L1 instruction: Lines per tag | 1 |
| L1 instruction: Size | 2 x 64 KB | 4 x 64 KB |
| L2: Associativity | 16-way set associative |
| L2: Line size | 64 bytes |
| L2: Lines per tag | 1 |
| L2: Size | 2 x 1 MB | 4 x 512 KB |
| L3: Associativity | | 48-way set associative |
| L3: Line size | | 64 bytes |
| L3: Lines per tag | | 1 |
| L3: Size | | 6 MB |
| |
| Instruction set extensions |
| 3DNow! | + |
| AMD extensions to MMX | + |
| Extensions to 3DNow! | + |
| MMX | + |
| SSE | + |
| SSE2 | + |
| SSE3 | + |
| SSE4A | + |
| |
| Additional instructions |
| Advanced Bit manipulation | + |
| CLFLUSH | + |
| CMOV | + |
| CMPXCHG16B | + |
| CMPXCHG8B | + |
| FXSAVE/FXRSTORE | + |
| MONITOR/MWAIT | + |
| POPCNT | + |
| PREFETCH/PREFETCHW | + |
| RDTSCP | + |
| SKINIT / STGI support | + |
| SYSCALL/SYSRET | + |
| SYSENTER/SYSEXIT | + |
| |
| Major features |
| 64-bit / Intel 64 | + |
| NX bit/XD-bit | + |
| On-chip Floating Point Unit | + |
| PowerNow! / Cool'n'Quiet | + |
| Secure Virtual Machine (Virtualization) | + |
| |
| Other features |
| 1 GB large page support | + |
| 100MHz multiplier control | + |
| 128-bit SSE instructions | + |
| 36-bit page-size extensions | + |
| Advanced programmable interrupt controller | + |
| Core multi-processing legacy mode | + |
| Debugging extensions | + |
| Extended APIC space | + |
| Hardware P-state control | + |
| Hardware thermal control | + |
| Instruction based sampling | + |
| LAHF / SAHF support in 64-bit mode | + |
| LBR virtualization | + |
| LOCK MOV CR0 means MOV CR8 | + |
| Machine check architecture | + |
| Machine check exception | + |
| Memory-type range registers | + |
| Misaligned SSE mode | + |
| Model-specific registers | + |
| Nested page tables | + |
| OS visible workaround | + |
| Page attribute table | + |
| Page global extension | + |
| Page-size extensions (4MB pages) | + |
| Physical address extensions | + |
| SVM lock | + |
| Software thermal control | + |
| Support for NRIP save | + |
| THERMTRIP | + |
| TSC rate is ensured to be invariant across all states | + |
| Temperature sensor | + |
| Time stamp counter | + |
| Virtual 8086-mode enhancements | + |
| Watchdog timer support | + |
+ - feature is supported
- - feature is not supported
Features, not supported by all processors in the table, are not displayed
Compare with ...
Compare AMD Athlon II X2 270 with...
Compare AMD Phenom II X4 945 (95W, rev. C2) with...
Note: To see differences with any CPU, type in
any combination of the following into the "Any CPU" field: manufacturer name,
full or partial family name, model number, part number, core name,
socket name, operating frequency, bus speed (must have FSB suffix),
and the last level cache. Here are some valid searches:
i5-3570K
Intel Celeron 2 GHz
Ivy Bridge
Pentium 4 800FSB
AMD 3.3GHz 8MB
|
|