Search CPU-World

Search site contents:

AMD Sempron 145 vs Intel Celeron 2.8 GHz

Mini Review

AMD Sempron 145 advantages



AMD Sempron 145
  • In single-threaded programs, the AMD Sempron 145 is about 195% faster.
  • Memory performance of the microprocessor is better.
  • Enhanced Virus Protection feature, available on this chip, can protect from certain types of computer viruses.
  • The processor incorporates AMD64 technology, that allows it to run 64-bit operating systems.
  • The AMD Sempron 145 provides hardware acceleration of virtualized applications.
  • The Sempron 145 has 3DNow! technology enabled. Although the 3DNow! instructions may boost performance of some old games, they are now obsolete, and they are not utilized by modern programs.
  • The CPU supports SSE3 instructions.
  • Power consumption of the microprocessor is lower.

Intel Celeron 2.8 GHz advantages



Picture
is not
available
  • None

Sempron 145 vs Celeron 2.8 GHz performance comparison

The charts in the section below show performance of Sempron 145 and Celeron 2.8 GHz CPUs in several different types of programs. The numbers for 'Single-threaded performance' charts are calculated as an average of several related benchmarks, that you can see in the "Benchmarks" tab. Consequentally, the shown results may differ from results, that you may receive in individual tests. The 'Overall performance' chart displays an average of all-around performance benchmarks, and benchmarks, specific to each type of application.
Single-threaded performance
4
3.2
2.4
1.6
0.8
0
 
 
2.95
 
1
 
 
Higher is better
Memory-intensive applications
4
3.2
2.4
1.6
0.8
0
 
 
2.96
 
1
 
 
Higher is better
Overall performance
4
3.2
2.4
1.6
0.8
0
 
 
2.95
 
1
 
 
Higher is better
 

  - AMD Sempron 145       - Intel Celeron 2.8 GHz

Please see the "Benchmarks" tab for exhaustive list of benchmarks, showing performance difference between 145 and Celeron 2.8 GHz in various types of programs.


Sempron 145 vs Celeron 2.8 GHz power consumption comparison

Thermal Design Power
80
64
48
32
16
0
 
 
45W
 
68.4W
 
 
Lower is better
 

Detailed side by side comparison of Sempron 145 vs Celeron 2.8 GHz specs can be found in the "Specifications" tab. More detailed comparison of low level features of both microprocessors is located in the "CPUIDs" tab.


Pros and Cons summary

Sempron 145 Celeron 2.8 GHz
General recommendations:
Significantly faster in all kinds of tasks,
Helps protect computer from viruses,
64-bit operating system support,
Features SSE3 instructions,
Needs less power
  General recommendations:
None

Drawbacks:

None
 

Drawbacks:

Poor overall performance,
Lacks some instructions,
Considerably higher power consumption
Jump to:
  • Benchmarks
  • CPUIDs
  • Comments
 

Compare CPUs

Compare AMD Sempron 145 with...

Other Celeron CPU:

Any CPU:


Compare Intel Celeron 2.8 GHz with...

Other Sempron CPU:

Any CPU:


Note: To see differences with any CPU, type in any combination of the following into the "Any CPU" field: manufacturer name, full or partial family name, model number, part number, core name, socket name, operating frequency, bus speed (must have FSB suffix), and the last level cache. Here are some valid searches:

  i5-3570K
  Intel Celeron 2 GHz
  K10
  Pentium 4 800FSB
  AMD 3.3GHz 8MB

Specifications

Please visit AMD Sempron 145 and Intel Celeron 2.8 GHz pages for more detailed specifications of both microprocessors.

 AMD Sempron 145Intel Celeron 2.8 GHz
Market segmentDesktop
ManufacturerAMDIntel
FamilySempronCeleron
Basic details
Model number145 
CPU part numberSDX145HBK13GMRK80532RC072128
Box part numberSDX145HBGMBOXBX80532RC2800B
Introduction dateMay 31, 2010 
 
CPU features
Core nameSargasNorthwood
MicroarchitectureK10Netburst
Technology (micron)0.0450.13
Data width (bits)6432
SocketSocket AM2+ / Socket AM3Socket 478
Frequency (MHz)2800
Bus speed (MHz)2000 (HT/QPI)400
Clock Multiplier1428
L1 cache64 KB (code) / 64 KB (data)12K micro-ops (trace) / 8 KB (data)
L2 cache (KB)1024128
Max temperature (°C)6375
TDP (Watt)4568.4
Max power dissipation (Watt) 79.31
Core voltage (V)0.825 - 1.351.475 - 1.525
Cores1
Threads1
Multiprocessing1 
 
Instruction set extensions
3DNow!+-
AMD64 / EM64T 64-bit technology+-
MMX+
SSE+
SSE2+
SSE3+-
 
Supported technologies
PowerNow! / Enhanced SpeedStep+-
Virtualization+-
Virus Protection / Execute Disable bit+-
 
Integrated Graphics
GPU TypeNone
Notes:

Rows with different specifications or features are highlighted.

For detailed specifications of "AMD Sempron 145" or "Intel Celeron 2.8 GHz" parts please click on the links in the table header.

Benchmarks

System setup

AMD Sempron 145 and Celeron 2.8 GHz processors were tested using different system components, that are identified by MB, RAM and VID columns in the tables below. The numbers in each of these columns correspond to one of motherboards (MB), memory configurations (RAM) or graphics adapters (VID), listed below:

MB - Motherboard(s):
1. ASROCK M3A780GXH/128M
2. ASUS P4B533

RAM - Memory:
1. 2 GB DUAL-CHANNEL CORSAIR CM3X1024-1333C9 DDR3
2. 2GB CORSAIR CMX1024-3200C2PT

VID - Video card(s):
1. MSI R6670 1GB GDDR5 (ATI RADEON)
2. POWERCOLOR 24PRO256M DDR2 (ATI RADEON HD2400)
3. VISIONTEK 2400 PRO 256 MB AGP (4X AGP) (ATI RADEON HD2400)

All tests were performed at default frequency and voltage, using manufacturer's stock fan/heatsink. None of the components were overclocked. Motherboard BIOS options were left at default settings.

The results of all benchmarks are broken into four categories: multi-threaded, single-threaded, memory intensive and graphics / gaming.


Sempron 145 vs Celeron 2.8 GHz CPU performance

These benchmarks primarily depend on CPU's integer, floating-point or SIMD performance.

     

    AMD Sempron 145           Intel Celeron 2.8 GHz

3DMark03 CPU score benchmark

Uses DirectX software vertex shader to run Wings of Fury and Trolls' Lair games, and calculates a 3DMark03 CPU score based on averaged number of frames per second, achieved by the CPU/GPU combination.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
78.9%112
23.0%223

CINEBENCH R10 CPU score benchmark

Measures performance of multi-core rendering of a photo-realistic 3D image using CINEMA 4D software engine.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%112
99.9%111
41.6%223

CINEBENCH R10 CPU score (1 core) benchmark

Measures performance of a single-core rendering of a photo-realistic 3D image using CINEMA 4D software engine.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%112
99.9%111
41.6%223

CINEBENCH R10 render time (seconds) benchmark

Measures time taken to render a photo-realistic 3D image using CINEMA 4D software engine.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%112
99.9%111
41.5%223

Euler3D benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%112
100%111
25.4%223

    AMD Sempron 145           Intel Celeron 2.8 GHz

PCMark2002 CPU score benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%112
98.6%111
65.8%223

Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) benchmark

Runs Dhrystone test on all cores, and reports estimated integer performance in MIPS (Millions of Instructions Per Second).
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%112
100%111
54.5%223

Sandra MultiMedia Floating Point (it/s) benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
100%112
63.4%223

Sandra MultiMedia Integer (it/s) benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
100%112
47.5%223

Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) benchmark

Runs Whetstone test on all cores, and reports estimated floating-point performance in MFLOPS (Millions of Floating-Point Operations Per Second).
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%112
99.8%111
47.1%223

    AMD Sempron 145           Intel Celeron 2.8 GHz

Sandra Whetstone SSE2 (MFLOPS) benchmark

Runs SSE2-enabled Whetstone test on all cores, and reports estimated floating-point performance in MFLOPS (Millions of Floating-Point Operations Per Second).
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
100%112
65.4%223

Super PI (1M) benchmark

Measures time, required to calculate the first 1 million digits after the decimal point in the number Pi.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%112
99.6%111
28.6%223

wPrime v1.55 (32M) benchmark

wPrime benchmark measures time taken to calculate square roots of numbers from 1 to 33554431.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
99.8%112
47.1%223


Sempron 145 vs Celeron 2.8 GHz graphics benchmarks

Graphics benchmarks depend on the type of integrated or discrete graphics adapter, and to less extent on the processor performance. Because these benchmarks are synthetic, they may not truly represent gaming performance. However, they still can be used to estimate whether one processor will perform faster or slower than another CPU in games and other 3D tasks.

Important! The processors were tested using different types of graphics adapters, that may not be suitable for comparison.
     

    AMD Sempron 145           Intel Celeron 2.8 GHz

3DMark03 game score benchmark

Measures graphics and 3D game performance of discrete and integrated GPUs using 4 different game simulations, that have varying level of DirectX support from version 7 to version 9.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
10.1%223
9.6%112

3DMark2001 score benchmark

Runs a series of game simulations and feature tests to measure graphics and 3D game performance of discrete and integrated GPUs. It utilizes a single CPU core, and it is compatible with DirectX 8 and later APIs.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
33.3%112
20.2%223

CINEBENCH R10 OpenGL score benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
43.8%112
19.9%223


Sempron 145 vs Celeron 2.8 GHz memory performance

Memory-intensive tests or programs move large amounts of data to/from memory, and they depend more on memory throughput and the size of on-chip caches, rather than on CPU integer/FP/SIMD performance.

     

    AMD Sempron 145           Intel Celeron 2.8 GHz

7Zip compressing/decompressing speed (1 thread) benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%112
99.8%111
36.7%223

PCMark2002 Memory score benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%112
97.6%111
20.4%223

WinRAR compressing/decompressing speed benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%112
98.5%111
33.6%223

CPUIDs

The table below compares two random CPUID records for AMD Sempron 145 and Intel Celeron 2.8 GHz microprocessors, that were submitted to our CPUID database. Please note that different steppings of Intel processors, identified by S-spec numbers or CPUID, may have slightly different features. For that reason the comparison table below only applies to CPUs with specific S-Spec number / CPUID.

  CPUID 1 CPUID 2
ManufacturerAMDIntel
CPU FamilySempronCeleron
Model / Processor Number1452.80 GHz
Frequency2793 MHz2827 MHz
CWID version0.40.3
Part numberSDX145HBK13GMRK80532RC072128
S-Spec / Stepping CodeAAEGC AE 0945APMWSL77T
 
General information
VendorAuthenticAMDGenuineIntel
Processor name (BIOS)AMD Sempron(tm) Processor 145 Processor Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 2.80GHz
Processor name (CWID)AMD Sempron(tm) 145 Processor 
Cores1 
Logical processors1
Processor typeOriginal OEM Processor
Core steppingDA-C3 
CPUID signature100F63F29
Family16 (010h)15 (0Fh)
Model 6 (06h) 2 (02h)
Stepping 3 (03h) 9 (09h)
TLB/Cache details Data TLB: 4-KB or 4-MB pages, fully associative, 64 entries
Instruction TLB: 4-KB, 2-MB or 4-MB pages, fully associative, 128 entries
No 2nd-level cache or, if processor contains a valid 2nd-level cache, no 3rd-level cache
 
Cache
L1 data: Associativity2-way set associative4-way set associative
L1 data: Comments sectored cache
L1 data: Line size64 bytes
L1 data: Lines per tag1 
L1 data: Size64 KB8 KB
L1 instruction: Associativity2-way set associative8-way set associative
L1 instruction: Line size64 bytes 
L1 instruction: Lines per tag1 
L1 instruction: Size64 KB12K uops
L2: Associativity16-way set associative2-way set associative
L2: Comments sectored cache
L2: Line size64 bytes
L2: Lines per tag1 
L2: Size1 MB128 KB
 
Instruction set extensions
3DNow!+-
AMD extensions to MMX+-
Extensions to 3DNow!+-
MMX+
SSE+
SSE2+
SSE3+-
SSE4A+-
 
Additional instructions
Advanced Bit manipulation+-
CLFLUSH+
CMOV+
CMPXCHG16B+-
CMPXCHG8B+
FXSAVE/FXRSTORE+
MONITOR/MWAIT+-
POPCNT+-
PREFETCH/PREFETCHW+-
RDTSCP+-
SKINIT/STGI support+-
SYSCALL/SYSRET+-
SYSENTER/SYSEXIT+
 
Major features
64-bit / Intel 64+-
NX bit/XD-bit+-
On-chip Floating Point Unit+
PowerNow! / Cool'n'Quiet+-
Secure Virtual Machine (Virtualization)+-
 
Other features
1 GB large page support+-
100MHz multiplier control+-
128-bit SSE instructions+-
36-bit page-size extensions+
Advanced programmable interrupt controller+
Debug store-+
Debugging extensions+
Extended APIC space+-
FXSAVE/FXRSTOR optimizations+-
Hardware P-state control+-
Hardware thermal control+-
Instruction based sampling+-
L1 context ID-+
LAHF/SAHF support in 64-bit mode+-
LBR virtualization+-
LOCK MOV CR0 means MOV CR8+-
Machine check architecture+
Machine check exception+
Memory-type range registers+
Misaligned SSE mode+-
Model-specific registers+
Nested page tables+-
OS visible workaround+-
Page attribute table+
Page global extension+
Page-size extensions (4MB pages)+
Pending break enable-+
Physical address extensions+
SVM lock+-
Self-snoop-+
Software thermal control+-
Support for NRIP save+-
THERMTRIP+-
TSC rate is ensured to be invariant across all states+-
Temperature sensor+-
Thermal monitor-+
Thermal monitor and software controlled clock facilities-+
Time stamp counter+
Virtual 8086-mode enhancements+
Watchdog timer support+-
xTPR Update Control-+
+ - feature is supported
- - feature is not supported
Features, not supported by all processors in the table, are not displayed

Comments (0)
Terms and Conditions · Privacy Policy · Contact Us (c) Copyright 2003 - 2010 Gennadiy Shvets