Search CPU-World

Search site contents:

Intel Celeron E3300 vs Core i5-760

Mini Review

Intel Celeron E3300 advantages



Intel Celeron E3300
  • The CPU is 32% more energy efficient than the i5-760 processor.

Intel Core i5-760 advantages



Intel Core i5-760
  • Single-threaded performance of the microprocessor is higher.
  • In multi-threaded applications, this CPU is about 176% faster.
  • Memory performance of the Intel i5-760 is better.
  • The Core i5-760 has SSE4.1 and SSE4.2 instructions enabled.

E3300 vs i5-760 performance comparison

The charts in the section below illustrate performance of Celeron E3300 and Core i5-760 CPUs in several different kinds of programs. To calculate displayed numbers we averaged results for a number of tests for each specific program type. Consequentally, performance in individual benchmarks may be higher or lower than what you see in the charts here. We also averaged the numbers for application type specific benchmarks and all-around performance benchmarks, and presented them in the 'Overall performance' chart.
Single-threaded performance
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1
 
1.63
 
 
Higher is better
Multi-threaded performance
4
3.2
2.4
1.6
0.8
0
 
 
1
 
2.76
 
 
Higher is better
Memory-intensive applications
3
2.4
1.8
1.2
0.6
0
 
 
1
 
2.57
 
 
Higher is better
Discrete Graphics performance
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1
 
1
 
 
Higher is better
Overall performance
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1
 
1.69
 
 
Higher is better
 

  - Intel Celeron E3300       - Intel Core i5-760

Exhaustive list of benchmarks, that show difference in performance between Intel Celeron E3300 and i5-760 in various types of applications, can be found in the "Benchmarks" tab.


E3300 vs i5-760 power consumption comparison

Thermal Design Power
110
88
66
44
22
0
 
 
65W
 
95W
 
 
Lower is better
 

Detailed side by side comparison of Intel Celeron E3300 vs i5-760 specs can be found in the "Specifications" tab. Even more detailed comparison of low level features of both microprocessors you will find in the "CPUIDs" tab.


Pros and Cons summary

Celeron E3300 Core i5-760
General recommendations:
Somewhat lower power consumption
  General recommendations:
Significantly faster overall,
Supports SSE4.1 / SSE4.2 instructions

Drawbacks:

Performs significantly worse in all task types,
Does not support some instructions
 

Drawbacks:

Requires somewhat more power

Similar processors

Celeron E3300 Core i5-760
 

Similar processors use the same core and fit the same socket as E3300 and Core i5-760.


Where to buy


These microprocessors are no longer manufactured. Hence, the best place to search for them is eBay. Marketplace vendors at Amazon may also carry them.
Jump to:
  • Benchmarks
  • CPUIDs
  • Comments
 

More comparisons

Compare Intel Celeron E3300 with...

Other Core i5 CPU:

Any CPU:


Compare Intel Core i5-760 with...

Other Celeron Dual-Core CPU:

Any CPU:


Note: To see differences with any CPU, type in any combination of the following into the "Any CPU" field: manufacturer name, full or partial family name, model number, part number, core name, socket name, operating frequency, bus speed (must have FSB suffix), and the last level cache. Here are some valid searches:

  i5-3570K
  Intel Celeron 2 GHz
  Core
  Pentium 4 800FSB
  AMD 3.3GHz 8MB

Specifications

Please visit Intel Celeron E3300 and Intel Core i5-760 pages for more detailed specifications of both microprocessors.

 Intel Celeron E3300Intel Core i5-760
Market segmentDesktop
ManufacturerIntel
FamilyCeleron Dual-CoreCore i5
Basic details
Model numberE3300i5-760
CPU part numberAT80571RG0601MLBV80605001908AN
Box part numberBX80571E3300
BXC80571E3300
BX80605I5760
BXC80605I5760
Introduction dateAugust 31, 2009July 18, 2010
 
CPU features
Core nameWolfdaleLynnfield
MicroarchitectureCoreNehalem
Technology (micron)0.045
Data width (bits)64
SocketSocket 775Socket 1156
Frequency (MHz)25002800
Turbo Frequency (MHz) 3467 / 3333 / 2933 / 2933
Bus speed (MHz)800 
Clock Multiplier12.521
L1 cache64 KB (code) / 64 KB (data)128 KB (code) / 128 KB (data)
L2 cache (KB)1024
L3 cache (KB) 8192
Max temperature (°C)74.172.7
TDP (Watt)6595
Max power dissipation (Watt)98.89 
Core voltage (V)0.85 - 1.36250.65 - 1.4
Cores24
Threads24
Multiprocessing1
 
Instruction set extensions
AMD64 / EM64T 64-bit technology+
MMX+
SSE+
SSE2+
SSE3+
SSE4.1-+
SSE4.2-+
SSSE3 / Supplemental SSE3+
 
Supported technologies
PowerNow! / Enhanced SpeedStep+
Turbo Core / Turbo Boost-+
Virtualization+
Virus Protection / Execute Disable bit+
 
Integrated Graphics
GPU TypeNone
 
Integrated Memory Controller(s)
The number of controllers01
Notes:

Rows with different specifications or features are highlighted.

For detailed specifications of "Intel Celeron E3300" or "Intel Core i5-760" parts please click on the links in the table header.

Benchmarks

System setup

Below is a complete set of Intel Celeron E3300 and Core i5-760 benchmarks from our CPU benchmark database. The former processor was tested on ASRock 4Core1600Twins-P35 motherboard with 2 GB dual-channel Corsair CM3X1024-1333C9 DDR3 memory, and Powercolor 24PRO256M DDR2 (ATI Radeon HD2400). The latter processor was tested on ASUS P7P55D motherboard, that had 2 GB dual-channel Corsair TR3X3G1600C9 DDR3 memory, and Powercolor 24PRO256M DDR2 (ATI Radeon HD2400) graphics.

All tests were performed at default frequency and voltage, using manufacturer's stock fan/heatsink. None of the components were overclocked. Motherboard BIOS options were left at default settings.

The results of all benchmarks are broken into four categories: multi-threaded, single-threaded, memory intensive and graphics / gaming.


Celeron E3300 vs Core i5-760 single-threaded benchmarks

Single-threaded benchmarks run on a single CPU core, and do not depend on such features as the number of cores, or Hyper-Threading technology. Additionally, they do not utilize on-chip caches, dedicated to other cores.


    Intel Celeron E3300           Intel Core i5-760

3DMark03 CPU score benchmark

Uses DirectX software vertex shader to run Wings of Fury and Trolls' Lair games, and calculates a 3DMark03 CPU score based on averaged number of frames per second, achieved by the CPU/GPU combination.
100%
82.4%

CINEBENCH R10 CPU score (1 core) benchmark

Measures performance of a single-core rendering of a photo-realistic 3D image using CINEMA 4D software engine.
100%
68.5%

PCMark2002 CPU score benchmark

100%
77.7%

Super PI (1M) benchmark

Measures time, required to calculate the first 1 million digits after the decimal point in the number Pi.
100%
53.9%


Celeron E3300 vs Core i5-760 multi-threaded benchmarks

Multi-threaded benchmarks utilize all CPU cores and other on-chip resources (on-chip caches, internal buffers, etc). Intel's Hyper-Threading feature also helps to improve multi-threading performance.


    Intel Celeron E3300           Intel Core i5-760

CINEBENCH R10 CPU score benchmark

Measures performance of multi-core rendering of a photo-realistic 3D image using CINEMA 4D software engine.
100%
40.6%

CINEBENCH R10 render time (seconds) benchmark

Measures time taken to render a photo-realistic 3D image using CINEMA 4D software engine.
100%
40.6%

Euler3D benchmark

100%
32.6%

Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) benchmark

Runs Dhrystone test on all cores, and reports estimated integer performance in MIPS (Millions of Instructions Per Second).
100%
39.4%

Sandra MultiMedia Floating Point (it/s) benchmark

100%
39.5%

    Intel Celeron E3300           Intel Core i5-760

Sandra MultiMedia Integer (it/s) benchmark

100%
47.9%

Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) benchmark

Runs Whetstone test on all cores, and reports estimated floating-point performance in MFLOPS (Millions of Floating-Point Operations Per Second).
100%
46.4%

Sandra Whetstone SSE2 (MFLOPS) benchmark

Runs SSE2-enabled Whetstone test on all cores, and reports estimated floating-point performance in MFLOPS (Millions of Floating-Point Operations Per Second).
100%
47.1%

wPrime v1.55 (32M) benchmark

wPrime benchmark measures time taken to calculate square roots of numbers from 1 to 33554431.
100%
35.5%


Celeron E3300 vs Core i5-760 graphics benchmarks

Graphics benchmarks depend on the type of integrated or discrete graphics adapter, and to less extent on the processor performance. Because these benchmarks are synthetic, they may not truly represent gaming performance. However, they still can be used to estimate whether one processor will perform faster or slower than another CPU in games and other 3D tasks.


    Intel Celeron E3300           Intel Core i5-760

3DMark03 game score benchmark

Measures graphics and 3D game performance of discrete and integrated GPUs using 4 different game simulations, that have varying level of DirectX support from version 7 to version 9.
100%
99.7%

3DMark2001 score benchmark

Runs a series of game simulations and feature tests to measure graphics and 3D game performance of discrete and integrated GPUs. It utilizes a single CPU core, and it is compatible with DirectX 8 and later APIs.
100%
97.7%

CINEBENCH R10 OpenGL score benchmark

100%
89.0%


Celeron E3300 vs Core i5-760 memory performance

Memory-intensive tests or programs move large amounts of data to/from memory, and they depend more on memory throughput and the size of on-chip caches, rather than on CPU integer/FP/SIMD performance.


    Intel Celeron E3300           Intel Core i5-760

7Zip compressing/decompressing speed (1 thread) benchmark

100%
76.2%

PCMark2002 Memory score benchmark

100%
27.8%

WinRAR compressing/decompressing speed benchmark

100%
38.8%

CPUIDs

The table below compares two random CPUID records for Intel Celeron E3300 and Intel Core i5-760 microprocessors, that were submitted to our CPUID database. Please note that different steppings of Intel processors, identified by S-spec numbers or CPUID, may have slightly different features. For that reason the comparison table below only applies to CPUs with specific S-Spec number / CPUID.

  CPUID 1 CPUID 2
ManufacturerIntel
CPU FamilyCeleron Dual-CoreCore i5
Model / Processor NumberE3300i5-760
Frequency2500 MHz2808 MHz
CWID version0.30.4
Part numberAT80571RG0601MLBV80605001908AN
S-Spec / Stepping CodeSLGU4SLBRP
 
General information
VendorGenuineIntel
Processor name (BIOS)Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU E3300 @ 2.50GHzIntel(R) Core(TM) i5 CPU 760 @ 2.80GHz
Cores24
Logical processors24
Processor typeOriginal OEM Processor
CPUID signature1067A106E5
Family 6 (06h)
Model23 (017h)30 (01Eh)
Stepping10 (0Ah) 5 (05h)
TLB/Cache details64-byte Prefetching
Data TLB: 4-KB Pages, 4-way set associative, 256 entries
Data TLB: 4-MB Pages, 4-way set associative, 32 entries
Instruction TLB: 2-MB pages, 4-way, 8 entries or 4M pages, 4-way, 4 entries
Instruction TLB: 4-KB Pages, 4-way set associative, 128 entries
L1 Data TLB: 4-KB pages, 4-way set associative, 16 entries
L1 Data TLB: 4-MB pages, 4-way set associative, 16 entries
64-byte Prefetching
Data TLB0: 2-MB or 4-MB pages, 4-way set associative, 32 entries
Data TLB: 4-KB Pages, 4-way set associative, 64 entries
Instruction TLB: 2-MB or 4-MB pages, fully associative, 7 entries
Instruction TLB: 4-KB Pages, 4-way set associative, 128 entries
Shared 2nd-level TLB: 4 KB pages, 4-way set associative, 512 entries
 
Cache
L1 data: Associativity8-way set associative
L1 data: Comments Direct-mapped
L1 data: Line size64 bytes
L1 data: Size32 KB4 x 32 KB
L1 instruction: Associativity8-way set associative4-way set associative
L1 instruction: Comments Direct-mapped
L1 instruction: Line size64 bytes
L1 instruction: Size32 KB4 x 32 KB
L2: Associativity4-way set associative8-way set associative
L2: Comments Non-inclusive|Direct-mapped
L2: Line size64 bytes
L2: Size1 MB4 x 256 KB
L3: Associativity 16-way set associative
L3: Comments Inclusive|Direct-mapped|Shared between all cores
L3: Line size 64 bytes
L3: Size 8 MB
 
Instruction set extensions
MMX+
SSE+
SSE2+
SSE3+
SSE4.1-+
SSE4.2-+
SSSE3+
 
Additional instructions
CLFLUSH+
CMOV+
CMPXCHG16B+
CMPXCHG8B+
FXSAVE/FXRSTORE+
MONITOR/MWAIT+
POPCNT-+
RDTSCP-+
SYSENTER/SYSEXIT+
XSAVE/XRESTORE states+-
 
Major features
64-bit / Intel 64+
Enhanced SpeedStep+
Intel Trusted Execution technology-+
Intel Virtualization+
NX bit/XD-bit-+
On-chip Floating Point Unit+
Turbo Boost-+
 
Other features
36-bit page-size extensions+
64-bit debug store+
Advanced programmable interrupt controller+
CPL qualified debug store+
Debug store+
Debugging extensions+
Digital Thermal Sensor capability+
LAHF/SAHF support in 64-bit mode+
Machine check architecture+
Machine check exception+
Memory-type range registers+
Model-specific registers+
Page attribute table+
Page global extension+
Page-size extensions (4MB pages)+
Pending break enable+
Perfmon and Debug capability+
Physical address extensions+
Self-snoop+
TSC rate is ensured to be invariant across all states-+
Thermal monitor+
Thermal monitor 2+
Thermal monitor and software controlled clock facilities+
Time stamp counter+
Virtual 8086-mode enhancements+
xTPR Update Control+
+ - feature is supported
- - feature is not supported
Features, not supported by all processors in the table, are not displayed

Comments (0)
Terms and Conditions · Privacy Policy · Contact Us (c) Copyright 2003 - 2010 Gennadiy Shvets