|
AMD A8-3820 vs Intel Core i3-540
Mini Review
AMD A8-3820 advantages
 |
- The A8-3820 has 20% better performance in multi-threaded tasks.
- The CPU performs 17% faster in memory-intensive programs.
- The A8-3820 microprocessor incorporates 3DNow! instructions. While the 3DNow! technology may boost performance of certain old games and software, it is now obsolete, and it is no longer used in modern applications.
- Power consumption of this CPU is lower.
|
Intel Core i3-540 advantages
Picture is not available |
- Single-threaded performance of the processor is higher.
- The Core i3-540 includes SSSE3, SSE4.1 and SSE4.2 instructions.
|
A8-3820 vs i3-540 performance comparison
The charts in the table below demonstrate relative performance of A8-3820 and Core i3-540 CPUs in various types of programs. To calculate displayed numbers we averaged results for a few tests for each specific application type. As a result, performance in individual benchmarks may be lower or higher than what you see in the charts here. We also averaged the numbers for task type specific benchmarks and all-around performance benchmarks, and presented them in the 'Overall performance' chart. |
Single-threaded performance Higher is better |
Multi-threaded performance Higher is better |
Memory-intensive applications Higher is better |
Overall performance Higher is better |
- AMD A8-3820 - Intel Core i3-540
Please see the "Benchmarks" tab for complete list of benchmarks, showing performance difference between AMD A8-3820 and Core i3-540 in various types of programs.
A8-3820 vs i3-540 power consumption comparison
Thermal Design Power Lower is better |
|
Detailed side by side comparison of AMD A8-3820 vs Intel Core i3-540 specs can be found in the "Specifications" tab. Much more detailed comparison of low level features of both microprocessors you will find in the "CPUIDs" tab.
Pros and Cons summary
| |
| A8-3820 | Core i3-540 |
General recommendations: A bit faster in all program types, More energy efficient
|
General recommendations: Performs somewhat better in single-threaded applications, Features SSE4.1 / SSE4.2 instructions
|
Drawbacks: Worse performance in single-threaded tasks, Lacks some instructions
|
Drawbacks: Performs insignificantly worse in all kinds of tasks, Less energy efficient
|
Similar processors
Similar processors use the same socket and architecture as A8-3820 and Core i3-540, however their performance and other characteristics are a bit different.
Specifications
| | AMD A8-3820 | Intel Core i3-540 |
| | Basic details |
| Market segment | Desktop |
| Manufacturer | AMD | Intel |
| Family | AMD A8-Series | Intel Core i3 |
| Model number | A8-3820 | i3-540 |
| CPU part number | AD3820OJZ43GX | CM80616003060AE |
| Box part number | AD3820OJGXBOX | BX80616I3540 BXC80616I3540 |
| Introduction date | December 20, 2011 | January 7, 2010 |
| Current official price | $101 (as of Apr 2013) | |
| |
| | CPU features |
| Core name | Llano | Clarkdale |
| Platform name | Lynx | |
| Microarchitecture | K10 | Nehalem |
| Technology (micron) | 0.032 |
| Data width (bits) | 64 |
| Socket | Socket FM1 | Socket 1156 |
| Frequency (MHz) | 2500 | 3067 |
| Turbo Frequency (MHz) | 2800 | |
| L1 cache | 256 KB (code) / 256 KB (data) | 64 KB (code) / 64 KB (data) |
| L2 cache (KB) | 4096 | 512 |
| L3 cache (KB) | | 4096 |
| Max temperature (°C) | 70.5 | 72.6 |
| TDP (Watt) | 65 | 73 |
| Max power dissipation (Watt) | | 170.83 |
| Core voltage (V) | 0.45 - 1.4125 | 0.65 - 1.4 |
| Cores | 4 | 2 |
| Threads | 4 |
| Multiprocessing | 1 |
| |
| | Instruction set extensions |
| 3DNow! | + | - |
| AMD64 / EM64T 64-bit technology | + |
| MMX | + |
| SSE | + |
| SSE2 | + |
| SSE3 | + |
| SSE4.1 | - | + |
| SSE4.2 | - | + |
| SSSE3 / Supplemental SSE3 | - | + |
| |
| | Supported technologies |
| Hyper-Threading | - | + |
| PowerNow! / Enhanced SpeedStep | + |
| Turbo Core / Turbo Boost | + | - |
| Virtualization | + |
| Virus Protection / Execute Disable bit | + |
| |
| | Integrated Graphics |
| GPU Type | Radeon HD 6550D | HD (Nehalem) |
| Base frequency (MHz) | 600 | 733 |
| |
| | Integrated Memory Controller(s) |
| The number of controllers | 1 |
| Memory channels | 2 |
| Supported memory | DDR3-1866 | DDR3-1333 |
Notes:
Rows with different specifications or features are highlighted.
For detailed specifications of "AMD A8-3820" or "Intel Core i3-540" parts please click on the links in the table header.
Benchmarks
System setup
AMD A8-3820 and Intel Core i3-540 processors were tested using different system
components, that are identified by MB, RAM and VID columns
in the tables below. The numbers in each of these columns correspond
to one of motherboards (MB), memory configurations (RAM) or graphics
adapters (VID), listed below:
MB - Motherboard(s):
1. ASUS F1A75-V PRO
2. ASUS P7P55D
RAM - Memory:
1. 4GB DUAL-CHANNEL CRUCIAL BALLISTIXPC3-14900 (DDR3-1866)
2. 2 GB DUAL-CHANNEL CORSAIR TR3X3G1600C9 DDR3
VID - Video card(s):
1. MSI R6670 1GB GDDR5 (ATI RADEON)
2. INTEGRATED ON-CHIP ATI RADEON 6000-SERIES GRAPHICS
3. POWERCOLOR 24PRO256M DDR2 (ATI RADEON HD2400)
All tests were performed at default frequency and voltage, using manufacturer's stock fan/heatsink. None of the components were overclocked. Motherboard BIOS options were left at default settings.
The results of all benchmarks are broken into four categories: multi-threaded, single-threaded, memory intensive and graphics / gaming.
A8-3820 vs Intel Core i3-540 single-threaded benchmarks
Single-threaded benchmarks run on a single CPU core, and do not depend
on such features as the number of cores, or Hyper-Threading
technology. Additionally, they do not utilize on-chip caches,
dedicated to other cores.
| | | | | |
AMD A8-3820
Intel Core i3-540
|
3DMark03 CPU score benchmark
|
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 92.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| 71.1% | 2 | 2 | 3 |
CINEBENCH R10 CPU score (1 core) benchmark
|
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 74.9% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 74.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 |
FLAC encoding - single process benchmark
|
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 86.4% | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| 86.4% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
H.264 video encoding - single process benchmark
|
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 79.3% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 79.2% | 1 | 1 | 2 |
LAME MP3 encoding - single process benchmark
|
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 75.2% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 74.9% | 1 | 1 | 2 |
AMD A8-3820
Intel Core i3-540
|
PCMark2002 CPU score benchmark
|
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 83.8% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 82.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Super PI (1M) benchmark
|
Shorter is better | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 53.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| 53.2% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
XVid video encoding - single process benchmark
|
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 82.9% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 82.8% | 1 | 1 | 2 |
A8-3820 vs Intel Core i3-540 multi-threaded benchmarks
Multi-threaded benchmarks utilize all CPU cores and other on-chip
resources (on-chip caches, internal buffers, etc). Intel's
Hyper-Threading feature also helps to improve multi-threading
performance.
| | | | | |
AMD A8-3820
Intel Core i3-540
|
Apache web server - dynamic pages benchmark
|
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 59.8% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 59.1% | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Apache web server - static pages benchmark
|
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 70.6% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 70.6% | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Blowfish encryption benchmark
|
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| 100% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 76.0% | 2 | 2 | 3 |
CINEBENCH R10 CPU score benchmark
|
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| 99.8% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 93.3% | 2 | 2 | 3 |
CINEBENCH R10 render time (seconds) benchmark
|
Shorter is better | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| 99.8% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 93.2% | 2 | 2 | 3 |
AMD A8-3820
Intel Core i3-540
|
CrystalMark ALU benchmark
|
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| 99.6% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 92.5% | 2 | 2 | 3 |
CrystalMark FPU benchmark
|
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| 99.3% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 83.3% | 2 | 2 | 3 |
Euler3D benchmark
|
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| 100% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 85.8% | 2 | 2 | 3 |
FLAC encoding - multiple processes benchmark
|
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 100% | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| 72.3% | 2 | 2 | 3 |
Fritz Chess Benchmark benchmark
|
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 100% | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| 86.9% | 2 | 2 | 3 |
AMD A8-3820
Intel Core i3-540
|
H.264 video encoding - multiple processes benchmark
|
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| 100% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 82.4% | 2 | 2 | 3 |
H.264 video encoding - multithreaded benchmark
|
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 96.2% | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| 96.1% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
LAME MP3 encoding - multiple processes benchmark
|
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| 100% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 94.2% | 2 | 2 | 3 |
Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) benchmark
|
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 100% | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| 78.3% | 2 | 2 | 3 |
Sandra MultiMedia Floating Point (it/s) benchmark
|
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 82.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| 82.2% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
AMD A8-3820
Intel Core i3-540
|
Sandra MultiMedia Integer (it/s) benchmark
|
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 99.8% | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| 57.9% | 2 | 2 | 3 |
Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) benchmark
|
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 99.9% | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| 93.2% | 2 | 2 | 3 |
Sandra Whetstone SSE2 (MFLOPS) benchmark
|
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 91.2% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 91.1% | 1 | 1 | 2 |
XVid video encoding - multiple processes benchmark
|
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| 99.9% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 74.5% | 2 | 2 | 3 |
wPrime v1.55 (32M) benchmark
|
Shorter is better | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| 99.6% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 88.7% | 2 | 2 | 3 |
A8-3820 vs Intel Core i3-540 graphics benchmarks
Graphics benchmarks depend on the type of integrated or discrete
graphics adapter, and to less extent on the processor performance.
Because these benchmarks are synthetic, they may not truly represent
gaming performance. However, they still can used to estimate whether
one processor will perform faster or slower in games than another CPU.
Important! The processors were tested using different types of graphics adapters, that may not be suitable for comparison.
| | | | | |
AMD A8-3820
Intel Core i3-540
|
3DMark03 game score benchmark
|
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 65.1% | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| 9.4% | 2 | 2 | 3 |
3DMark2001 score benchmark
|
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 77.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| 32.7% | 2 | 2 | 3 |
CINEBENCH R10 OpenGL score benchmark
|
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 96.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| 43.2% | 2 | 2 | 3 |
A8-3820 vs Intel Core i3-540 memory performance
Memory-intensive tests or programs move large amounts of data to/from
memory, and they depend more on memory throughput and the size of
on-chip caches, rather than on CPU integer/FP/SIMD performance.
| | | | | |
AMD A8-3820
Intel Core i3-540
|
7Zip compressing/decompressing speed benchmark
|
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 99.8% | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| 82.5% | 2 | 2 | 3 |
CrystalMark Memory benchmark
|
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 95.9% | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| 74.7% | 2 | 2 | 3 |
PCMark2002 Memory score benchmark
|
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 59.1% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 58.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 |
WinRAR compressing/decompressing speed benchmark
|
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| 99.7% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 85.4% | 2 | 2 | 3 |
CPUIDs
The table below compares two random CPUID records for AMD A8-3820 and Intel Core i3-540
microprocessors, that were submitted to our CPUID database.
Please note that different steppings of Intel processors, identified
by S-spec numbers or CPUID, may have slightly different features. For
that reason the comparison table below only applies to CPUs with
specific S-Spec number / CPUID.
| |
CPUID 1 |
CPUID 2 |
| Manufacturer | AMD | Intel |
| CPU Family | A8-Series | Core i3 |
| Model / Processor Number | A8-3820 | i3-540 |
| Frequency | 3130 MHz | 3076 MHz |
| CWID version | 0.4 |
| Part number | AD3820OJZ43GX | CM80616003060AE |
| S-Spec / Stepping Code | DA 1151PGT | SLBMQ |
| |
| General information |
| Vendor | AuthenticAMD | GenuineIntel |
| Processor name (BIOS) | AMD A8-3820 APU with Radeon(tm) HD Graphics | Intel(R) Core(TM) i3 CPU 540 @ 3.07GHz |
| Cores | 4 | 2 |
| Logical processors | 4 |
| Processor type | Original OEM Processor |
| CPUID signature | LN-B0 | 20652 |
| Family | 300F10 | 6 (06h) |
| Model | 18 (012h) | 37 (025h) |
| Stepping | 1 (01h) | 2 (02h) |
| TLB/Cache details | 0 (00h) | 64-byte Prefetching
Data TLB0: 2-MB or 4-MB pages, 4-way associative, 32 entries
Data TLB: 4-KB Pages, 4-way set associative, 64 entries
Instruction TLB: 2-MB or 4-MB pages, fully associative, 7 entries
Instruction TLB: 4-KB pages, 4-way set associative, 64 entries
Shared 2nd-level TLB: 4 KB pages, 4-way set associative, 512 entries |
| |
| Cache |
| L1 data: Associativity | 2-way set associative | 8-way set associative |
| L1 data: Comments | | Direct-mapped |
| L1 data: Line size | 64 bytes |
| L1 data: Lines per tag | 1 | |
| L1 data: Size | 4 x 64 KB | 2 x 32 KB |
| L1 instruction: Associativity | 2-way set associative | 4-way set associative |
| L1 instruction: Comments | | Direct-mapped |
| L1 instruction: Line size | 64 bytes |
| L1 instruction: Lines per tag | 1 | |
| L1 instruction: Size | 4 x 64 KB | 2 x 32 KB |
| L2: Associativity | 16-way set associative | 8-way set associative |
| L2: Comments | | Non-inclusive|Direct-mapped |
| L2: Line size | 64 bytes |
| L2: Lines per tag | 1 | |
| L2: Size | 4 x 1 MB | 2 x 256 KB |
| L3: Associativity | | 16-way set associative |
| L3: Comments | | Inclusive|Direct-mapped|Shared between all cores |
| L3: Line size | | 64 bytes |
| L3: Size | | 4 MB |
| |
| Instruction set extensions |
| 3DNow! | + | - |
| AMD extensions to MMX | + | - |
| Extensions to 3DNow! | + | - |
| MMX | + |
| SSE | + |
| SSE2 | + |
| SSE3 | + |
| SSE4.1 | - | + |
| SSE4.2 | - | + |
| SSE4A | + | - |
| SSSE3 | - | + |
| |
| Additional instructions |
| Advanced Bit manipulation | + | - |
| CLFLUSH | + |
| CMOV | + |
| CMPXCHG16B | + |
| CMPXCHG8B | + |
| FXSAVE/FXRSTORE | + |
| MONITOR/MWAIT | + |
| POPCNT | + |
| PREFETCH/PREFETCHW | + | - |
| RDTSCP | + |
| SKINIT / STGI support | + | - |
| SYSCALL/SYSRET | + | - |
| SYSENTER/SYSEXIT | + |
| |
| Major features |
| 64-bit / Intel 64 | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep | - | + |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | + |
| Intel Virtualization | - | + |
| NX bit/XD-bit | + |
| On-chip Floating Point Unit | + |
| PowerNow! / Cool'n'Quiet | + | - |
| Secure Virtual Machine (Virtualization) | + | - |
| Turbo Core | + | - |
| |
| Other features |
| 1 GB large page support | + | - |
| 100MHz multiplier control | + | - |
| 128-bit SSE instructions | + | - |
| 36-bit page-size extensions | + |
| 64-bit debug store | - | + |
| Advanced programmable interrupt controller | + |
| CPL qualified debug store | - | + |
| Core multi-processing legacy mode | + | - |
| Debug store | - | + |
| Debugging extensions | + |
| Digital Thermal Sensor capability | - | + |
| Extended APIC space | + | - |
| Hardware P-state control | + | - |
| Hardware thermal control | + | - |
| Instruction based sampling | + | - |
| LAHF / SAHF support in 64-bit mode | + |
| LBR virtualization | + | - |
| LOCK MOV CR0 means MOV CR8 | + | - |
| Machine check architecture | + |
| Machine check exception | + |
| Memory-type range registers | + |
| Misaligned SSE mode | + | - |
| Model-specific registers | + |
| Nested page tables | + | - |
| OS visible workaround | + | - |
| Page attribute table | + |
| Page global extension | + |
| Page-size extensions (4MB pages) | + |
| Pending break enable | - | + |
| Perfmon and Debug capability | - | + |
| Physical address extensions | + |
| SVM lock | + | - |
| Self-snoop | - | + |
| Software thermal control | + | - |
| Support for NRIP save | + | - |
| THERMTRIP | + | - |
| TSC rate is ensured to be invariant across all states | + |
| Temperature sensor | + | - |
| Thermal monitor | - | + |
| Thermal monitor 2 | - | + |
| Thermal monitor and software controlled clock facilities | - | + |
| Time stamp counter | + |
| Virtual 8086-mode enhancements | + |
| Watchdog timer support | + | - |
| xTPR Update Control | - | + |
+ - feature is supported
- - feature is not supported
Features, not supported by all processors in the table, are not displayed
Compare with ...
Compare AMD A8-3820 with...
Compare Intel Core i3-540 with...
Note: To see differences with any CPU, type in
any combination of the following into the "Any CPU" field: manufacturer name,
full or partial family name, model number, part number, core name,
socket name, operating frequency, bus speed (must have FSB suffix),
and the last level cache. Here are some valid searches:
i5-3570K
Intel Celeron 2 GHz
Ivy Bridge
Pentium 4 800FSB
AMD 3.3GHz 8MB
|
|