Search CPU-World

Search site contents:

Intel Core 2 Duo E7600 vs Pentium P6100

Mini Review

Intel Core 2 Duo E7600 advantages



Picture
is not
available
  • Single-threaded performance of the CPU is better.
  • The Intel Core 2 Duo E7600 performs 27% faster when running multi-threaded applications. The performance advantage depends on specific program. In some of them this microprocessor could be up to 44% faster.
  • Memory performance of the CPU is better.
  • The Intel E7600 processor supports hardware acceleration of virtualized programs.
  • The Intel E7600 has SSE4.1 instructions enabled.

Intel Pentium P6100 advantages



Intel Pentium P6100
  • Like many modern microprocessors, the microprocessor includes graphics unit. This GPU can be used for casual gaming and 3D apps.
  • The Pentium P6100 is 46% more energy efficient than the Intel Core 2 Duo E7600.

E7600 vs P6100 performance comparison

The charts demonstrate relative performance of Core 2 Duo E7600 and Pentium P6100 CPUs in a number of different application types. The numbers for 'Single-threaded performance' and 'Multi-threaded performance' charts are calculated as an average of several related benchmarks, that you can find in the "Benchmarks" tab. Consequentally, performance in individual benchmarks may be higher or lower than what you see in the charts below. The 'Overall performance' shows an average of all-around performance benchmarks, and benchmarks, specific to each type of task.
Single-threaded performance
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1.36
 
1
 
 
Higher is better
Multi-threaded performance
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1.27
 
1
 
 
Higher is better
Memory-intensive applications
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1.29
 
1
 
 
Higher is better
Overall performance
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1.31
 
1
 
 
Higher is better

  - Intel Core 2 Duo E7600       - Intel Pentium P6100

Please see the "Benchmarks" tab for exhaustive list of benchmarks, showing performance difference between Core 2 Duo E7600 and Intel Pentium P6100 in various types of tests.


E7600 vs P6100 power consumption comparison

Thermal Design Power
80
64
48
32
16
0
 
 
65W
 
35W
 
 
Lower is better
 

Detailed side by side comparison of Intel E7600 vs Intel P6100 specs can be found in the "Specifications" tab. Much more detailed comparison of internal features of both microprocessors is located in the "CPUIDs" tab.


Pros and Cons summary

Core 2 Duo E7600 Pentium P6100
General recommendations:
Somewhat faster in all kinds of tasks,
Features SSE4.1 instructions
  General recommendations:
Integrates HD (Nehalem) graphics,
Lower power

Drawbacks:

Lacks on-chip GPU,
Significantly higher power consumption
 

Drawbacks:

Worse performance,
Does not support some instructions

Similar processors

Core 2 Duo E7600 Pentium P6100
 

Similar processors use the same socket and architecture as Intel E7600 and P6100, but their performance and other characteristics are slightly different.

Jump to:
  • Benchmarks
  • CPUIDs

More comparisons

Compare Intel Core 2 Duo E7600 with...

Other Pentium Dual-Core Mobile CPU:

Any CPU:


Compare Intel Pentium P6100 with...

Other Core 2 Duo CPU:

Any CPU:


Note: To see differences with any CPU, type in any combination of the following into the "Any CPU" field: manufacturer name, full or partial family name, model number, part number, core name, socket name, operating frequency, bus speed (must have FSB suffix), and the last level cache. Here are some valid searches:

  i5-3570K
  Intel Celeron 2 GHz
  Core
  Pentium 4 800FSB
  AMD 3.3GHz 8MB

Specifications

Please visit Intel Core 2 Duo E7600 and Intel Pentium P6100 pages for more detailed specifications of both microprocessors.

 Intel Core 2 Duo E7600Intel Pentium P6100
Market segmentDesktopMobile
ManufacturerIntel
FamilyCore 2 DuoPentium Dual-Core Mobile
Basic details
Model numberE7600P6100
CPU part numberAT80571PH0833MLCP80617004125AL
Box part numberBX80571E7600
BXC80571E7600
 
Introduction dateJune 2, 2009September 26, 2010
 
CPU features
Core nameWolfdaleArrandale
Platform name Calpella
MicroarchitectureCoreNehalem
Technology (micron)0.0450.032
Data width (bits)64
SocketSocket 775Socket G1
Frequency (MHz)30672000
Bus speed (MHz)1066 
Clock Multiplier11.515
L1 cache64 KB (code) / 64 KB (data)
L2 cache (KB)3072512
L3 cache (KB) 3072
Max temperature (°C)74.190
TDP (Watt)6535
Core voltage (V)0.85 - 1.3625 
Cores2
Threads2
Multiprocessing1
 
Instruction set extensions
AMD64 / EM64T 64-bit technology+
MMX+
SSE+
SSE2+
SSE3+
SSE4.1+-
SSSE3 / Supplemental SSE3+
 
Supported technologies
PowerNow! / Enhanced SpeedStep+
Virtualization+-
Virus Protection / Execute Disable bit+
 
Integrated Graphics
GPU TypeNoneHD (Nehalem)
 
Integrated Memory Controller(s)
The number of controllers01
Notes:

Rows with different specifications or features are highlighted.

For detailed specifications of "Intel Core 2 Duo E7600" or "Intel Pentium P6100" parts please click on the links in the table header.

Benchmarks

System setup

Intel Core 2 Duo E7600 and Pentium P6100 processors were tested using different system components, that are identified by MB, RAM and VID columns in the tables below. The numbers in each of these columns correspond to one of motherboards (MB), memory configurations (RAM) or graphics adapters (VID), listed below:

MB - Motherboard(s):
1. ASROCK 4CORE1600TWINS-P35
2. JETWAY NF98-QM57-LF

RAM - Memory:
1. 2 GB DUAL-CHANNEL CORSAIR CM3X1024-1333C9 DDR3
2. 2 GB DUAL-CHANNEL CRUCIAL CT2KIT12864BC1339 DDR3-1333 SODIMM

VID - Video card(s):
1. POWERCOLOR 24PRO256M DDR2 (ATI RADEON HD2400)
2. MSI R6670 1GB GDDR5 (ATI RADEON)
3. INTEGRATED ON-CHIP INTEL WESTMERE GRAPHICS

All tests were performed at default frequency and voltage, using manufacturer's stock fan/heatsink. None of the components were overclocked. Motherboard BIOS options were left at default settings.

The results of all benchmarks are broken into four categories: multi-threaded, single-threaded, memory intensive and graphics / gaming.


Core 2 Duo E7600 vs Pentium P6100 single-threaded benchmarks

Single-threaded benchmarks run on a single CPU core, and do not depend on such features as the number of cores, or Hyper-Threading technology. Additionally, they do not utilize on-chip caches, dedicated to other cores.

     

    Intel Core 2 Duo E7600           Intel Pentium P6100

3DMark03 CPU score benchmark

Uses DirectX software vertex shader to run Wings of Fury and Trolls' Lair games, and calculates a 3DMark03 CPU score based on averaged number of frames per second, achieved by the CPU/GPU combination.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
93.1%222
41.1%223

CINEBENCH R10 CPU score (1 core) benchmark

Measures performance of a single-core rendering of a photo-realistic 3D image using CINEMA 4D software engine.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
68.6%222
68.5%223

PCMark2002 CPU score benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
66.0%223
65.4%222

Super PI (1M) benchmark

Measures time, required to calculate the first 1 million digits after the decimal point in the number Pi.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
79.4%223
79.3%222


Core 2 Duo E7600 vs Pentium P6100 multi-threaded benchmarks

Multi-threaded benchmarks utilize all CPU cores and other on-chip resources (on-chip caches, internal buffers, etc). Intel's Hyper-Threading feature also helps to improve multi-threading performance.

     

    Intel Core 2 Duo E7600           Intel Pentium P6100

CINEBENCH R10 CPU score benchmark

Measures performance of multi-core rendering of a photo-realistic 3D image using CINEMA 4D software engine.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
69.8%223
69.4%222

CINEBENCH R10 render time (seconds) benchmark

Measures time taken to render a photo-realistic 3D image using CINEMA 4D software engine.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
69.8%223
69.4%222

Euler3D benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
87.1%222
87.1%223

Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) benchmark

Runs Dhrystone test on all cores, and reports estimated integer performance in MIPS (Millions of Instructions Per Second).
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
68.5%222
68.5%223

Sandra MultiMedia Floating Point (it/s) benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
70.2%223
70.1%222

    Intel Core 2 Duo E7600           Intel Pentium P6100

Sandra MultiMedia Integer (it/s) benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
57.7%222
57.6%223

Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) benchmark

Runs Whetstone test on all cores, and reports estimated floating-point performance in MFLOPS (Millions of Floating-Point Operations Per Second).
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
63.5%222
63.5%223

Sandra Whetstone SSE2 (MFLOPS) benchmark

Runs SSE2-enabled Whetstone test on all cores, and reports estimated floating-point performance in MFLOPS (Millions of Floating-Point Operations Per Second).
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
65.7%223
65.4%222

wPrime v1.55 (32M) benchmark

wPrime benchmark measures time taken to calculate square roots of numbers from 1 to 33554431.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
81.2%223
81.0%222


Core 2 Duo E7600 vs Pentium P6100 graphics benchmarks

Graphics benchmarks depend on the type of integrated or discrete graphics adapter, and to less extent on the processor performance. Because these benchmarks are synthetic, they may not truly represent gaming performance. However, they still can be used to estimate whether one processor will perform faster or slower than another CPU in games and other 3D tasks.

Important! The processors were tested using different types of graphics adapters, that may not be suitable for comparison.
     

    Intel Core 2 Duo E7600           Intel Pentium P6100

3DMark03 game score benchmark

Measures graphics and 3D game performance of discrete and integrated GPUs using 4 different game simulations, that have varying level of DirectX support from version 7 to version 9.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%222
12.4%223
9.5%111

3DMark2001 score benchmark

Runs a series of game simulations and feature tests to measure graphics and 3D game performance of discrete and integrated GPUs. It utilizes a single CPU core, and it is compatible with DirectX 8 and later APIs.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%222
35.7%111
32.3%223

CINEBENCH R10 OpenGL score benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%222
57.3%111
25.5%223


Core 2 Duo E7600 vs Pentium P6100 memory performance

Memory-intensive tests or programs move large amounts of data to/from memory, and they depend more on memory throughput and the size of on-chip caches, rather than on CPU integer/FP/SIMD performance.

     

    Intel Core 2 Duo E7600           Intel Pentium P6100

7Zip compressing/decompressing speed (1 thread) benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
68.9%223
68.4%222

PCMark2002 Memory score benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
74.6%223
73.1%222

WinRAR compressing/decompressing speed benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
78.0%223
77.5%222

CPUIDs

The table below compares two random CPUID records for Intel Core 2 Duo E7600 and Intel Pentium P6100 microprocessors, that were submitted to our CPUID database. Please note that different steppings of Intel processors, identified by S-spec numbers or CPUID, may have slightly different features. For that reason the comparison table below only applies to CPUs with specific S-Spec number / CPUID.

  CPUID 1 CPUID 2
ManufacturerIntel
CPU FamilyCore 2 DuoPentium Dual-Core Mobile
Model / Processor NumberE7600P6100
Frequency3895 MHz1994 MHz
CWID version0.30.4
Part numberAT80571PH0833MLCP80617004125AL
S-Spec / Stepping CodeSLGTDSLBUR
 
General information
VendorGenuineIntel
Processor name (BIOS)Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E7600 @ 3.06GHzIntel(R) Pentium(R) CPU P6100 @ 2.00GHz
Cores2
Logical processors2
Processor typeOriginal OEM Processor
CPUID signature1067A20655
Family 6 (06h)
Model23 (017h)37 (025h)
Stepping10 (0Ah) 5 (05h)
TLB/Cache details64-byte Prefetching
Data TLB: 4-KB Pages, 4-way set associative, 256 entries
Data TLB: 4-MB Pages, 4-way set associative, 32 entries
Instruction TLB: 2-MB pages, 4-way, 8 entries or 4M pages, 4-way, 4 entries
Instruction TLB: 4-KB Pages, 4-way set associative, 128 entries
L1 Data TLB: 4-KB pages, 4-way set associative, 16 entries
L1 Data TLB: 4-MB pages, 4-way set associative, 16 entries
64-byte Prefetching
Data TLB0: 2-MB or 4-MB pages, 4-way set associative, 32 entries
Data TLB: 4-KB Pages, 4-way set associative, 64 entries
Instruction TLB: 2-MB or 4-MB pages, fully associative, 7 entries
Instruction TLB: 4-KB Pages, 4-way set associative, 128 entries
Shared 2nd-level TLB: 4 KB pages, 4-way set associative, 512 entries
 
Cache
L1 data: Associativity8-way set associative
L1 data: Comments Direct-mapped
L1 data: Line size64 bytes
L1 data: Size32 KB2 x 32 KB
L1 instruction: Associativity8-way set associative4-way set associative
L1 instruction: Comments Direct-mapped
L1 instruction: Line size64 bytes
L1 instruction: Size32 KB2 x 32 KB
L2: Associativity8-way set associative
L2: Commentsunified on-dieNon-inclusive|Direct-mapped
L2: Line size64 bytes
L2: Size3 MB2 x 256 KB
L3: Associativity 12-way set associative
L3: Comments Inclusive|Direct-mapped|Shared between all cores
L3: Line size 64 bytes
L3: Size 3 MB
 
Instruction set extensions
MMX+
SSE+
SSE2+
SSE3+
SSE4.1+-
SSSE3+
 
Additional instructions
CLFLUSH+
CMOV+
CMPXCHG16B+
CMPXCHG8B+
FXSAVE/FXRSTORE+
MONITOR/MWAIT+
POPCNT-+
RDTSCP-+
SYSENTER/SYSEXIT+
XSAVE/XRESTORE states+-
 
Major features
64-bit / Intel 64+
Enhanced SpeedStep+
Intel Virtualization+-
NX bit/XD-bit-+
On-chip Floating Point Unit+
 
Other features
36-bit page-size extensions+
64-bit debug store+
Advanced programmable interrupt controller+
CPL qualified debug store+
Debug store+
Debugging extensions+
Digital Thermal Sensor capability+
LAHF/SAHF support in 64-bit mode+
Machine check architecture+
Machine check exception+
Memory-type range registers+
Model-specific registers+
Page attribute table+
Page global extension+
Page-size extensions (4MB pages)+
Pending break enable+
Perfmon and Debug capability+
Physical address extensions+
Process context identifiers-+
Self-snoop+
TSC rate is ensured to be invariant across all states-+
Thermal monitor+
Thermal monitor 2+
Thermal monitor and software controlled clock facilities+
Time stamp counter+
Virtual 8086-mode enhancements+
xTPR Update Control+
+ - feature is supported
- - feature is not supported
Features, not supported by all processors in the table, are not displayed

Comments

Please post all comments on the Intel Core 2 Duo E7600 or Intel Pentium P6100 pages

Terms and Conditions · Privacy Policy · Contact Us (c) Copyright 2003 - 2010 Gennadiy Shvets