|
Intel Core 2 Duo E7600 vs Pentium P6100
Mini Review
Intel Core 2 Duo E7600 advantages
Picture is not available |
- Single-threaded performance of the CPU is better.
- The Intel Core 2 Duo E7600 performs 27% faster when running multi-threaded programs.
- Memory performance of the processor is better.
- The microprocessor supports hardware acceleration of virtualized tasks.
- The Intel E7600 processor incorporates SSE4.1 instructions.
|
Intel Pentium P6100 advantages
 |
- Like many modern microprocessors, the P6100 microprocessor integrates Graphics Processing Unit. This Graphics Processing Unit can be used for casual gaming and 3D applications.
- The Pentium P6100 is 46% more energy efficient.
|
E7600 vs P6100 performance comparison
The charts below demonstrate performance of Core 2 Duo E7600 and Pentium P6100 processors in a number of different kinds of programs. To calculate displayed numbers we averaged results for several benchmarks for each specific type of program. As such, the shown results may differ from results, that you may receive in individual tests. The 'Overall performance' chart shows an average of all-around performance benchmarks, and benchmarks, specific to each task type. |
Single-threaded performance Higher is better |
Multi-threaded performance Higher is better |
Memory-intensive applications Higher is better |
Overall performance Higher is better |
- Intel Core 2 Duo E7600 - Intel Pentium P6100
Please see the "Benchmarks" tab for complete list of benchmarks, demonstrating difference in performance between Core 2 Duo E7600 and Intel P6100 in various types of programs.
E7600 vs P6100 power consumption comparison
Thermal Design Power Lower is better |
|
Detailed side by side comparison of Intel Core 2 Duo E7600 vs Intel Pentium P6100 specs can be found in the "Specifications" tab. Even more detailed comparison of internal features of both microprocessors you will find in the "CPUIDs" tab.
Pros and Cons summary
| |
| Core 2 Duo E7600 | Pentium P6100 |
General recommendations: Faster in all application types, Supports SSE4.1 instructions
|
General recommendations: Has integrated HD (Nehalem) GPU, Somewhat lower power
|
Drawbacks: Lacks on-chip GPU, Significantly higher power consumption
|
Drawbacks: Rather slow, Does not support some instructions
|
Similar processors
| |
| Core 2 Duo E7600 | Pentium P6100 |
|
|
|
Similar CPUs use the same socket and architecture as Intel Core 2 Duo E7600 and Intel P6100.
Where to buy
The processors are obsolete. For this reason the best place to look for them is eBay. Marketplace sellers at Amazon may also carry them. |
|
|
Specifications
| | Intel Core 2 Duo E7600 | Intel Pentium P6100 |
| | Basic details |
| Market segment | Desktop | Mobile |
| Manufacturer | Intel |
| Family | Intel Core 2 Duo | Intel Pentium Dual-Core Mobile |
| Model number | E7600 | P6100 |
| CPU part number | AT80571PH0833ML | CP80617004125AL |
| Box part number | BX80571E7600 BXC80571E7600 | |
| Introduction date | June 2, 2009 | September 26, 2010 |
| |
| | CPU features |
| Core name | Wolfdale | Arrandale |
| Platform name | | Calpella |
| Microarchitecture | Core | Nehalem |
| Technology (micron) | 0.045 | 0.032 |
| Data width (bits) | 64 |
| Socket | Socket 775 | Socket G1 |
| Frequency (MHz) | 3067 | 2000 |
| Bus speed (MHz) | 1066 | |
| Clock Multiplier | 11.5 | 15 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (code) / 64 KB (data) |
| L2 cache (KB) | 3072 | 512 |
| L3 cache (KB) | | 3072 |
| Max temperature (°C) | 74.1 | 90 |
| TDP (Watt) | 65 | 35 |
| Core voltage (V) | 0.85 - 1.3625 | |
| Cores | 2 |
| Threads | 2 |
| Multiprocessing | 1 |
| |
| | Instruction set extensions |
| AMD64 / EM64T 64-bit technology | + |
| MMX | + |
| SSE | + |
| SSE2 | + |
| SSE3 | + |
| SSE4.1 | + | - |
| SSSE3 / Supplemental SSE3 | + |
| |
| | Supported technologies |
| PowerNow! / Enhanced SpeedStep | + |
| Virtualization | + | - |
| Virus Protection / Execute Disable bit | + |
| |
| | Integrated Graphics |
| GPU Type | None | HD (Nehalem) |
| |
| | Integrated Memory Controller(s) |
| The number of controllers | 0 | 1 |
Notes:
Rows with different specifications or features are highlighted.
For detailed specifications of "Intel Core 2 Duo E7600" or "Intel Pentium P6100" parts please click on the links in the table header.
Benchmarks
System setup
Intel Core 2 Duo E7600 and Pentium P6100 processors were tested using different system
components, that are identified by MB, RAM and VID columns
in the tables below. The numbers in each of these columns correspond
to one of motherboards (MB), memory configurations (RAM) or graphics
adapters (VID), listed below:
MB - Motherboard(s):
1. ASROCK 4CORE1600TWINS-P35
2. JETWAY NF98-QM57-LF
RAM - Memory:
1. 2 GB DUAL-CHANNEL CORSAIR CM3X1024-1333C9 DDR3
2. 2 GB DUAL-CHANNEL CRUCIAL CT2KIT12864BC1339 DDR3-1333 SODIMM
VID - Video card(s):
1. POWERCOLOR 24PRO256M DDR2 (ATI RADEON HD2400)
2. MSI R6670 1GB GDDR5 (ATI RADEON)
3. INTEGRATED ON-CHIP INTEL WESTMERE GRAPHICS
All tests were performed at default frequency and voltage, using manufacturer's stock fan/heatsink. None of the components were overclocked. Motherboard BIOS options were left at default settings.
The results of all benchmarks are broken into four categories: multi-threaded, single-threaded, memory intensive and graphics / gaming.
Core 2 Duo E7600 vs Pentium P6100 single-threaded benchmarks
Single-threaded benchmarks run on a single CPU core, and do not depend
on such features as the number of cores, or Hyper-Threading
technology. Additionally, they do not utilize on-chip caches,
dedicated to other cores.
| | | | | |
Intel Core 2 Duo E7600
Intel Pentium P6100
|
3DMark03 CPU score benchmark
|
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 93.1% | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| 41.1% | 2 | 2 | 3 |
CINEBENCH R10 CPU score (1 core) benchmark
|
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 68.6% | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| 68.5% | 2 | 2 | 3 |
PCMark2002 CPU score benchmark
|
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 66.0% | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 65.4% | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Super PI (1M) benchmark
|
Shorter is better | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 79.4% | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 79.3% | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Core 2 Duo E7600 vs Pentium P6100 multi-threaded benchmarks
Multi-threaded benchmarks utilize all CPU cores and other on-chip
resources (on-chip caches, internal buffers, etc). Intel's
Hyper-Threading feature also helps to improve multi-threading
performance.
| | | | | |
Intel Core 2 Duo E7600
Intel Pentium P6100
|
CINEBENCH R10 CPU score benchmark
|
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 69.8% | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 69.4% | 2 | 2 | 2 |
CINEBENCH R10 render time (seconds) benchmark
|
Shorter is better | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 69.8% | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 69.4% | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Euler3D benchmark
|
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 87.1% | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| 87.1% | 2 | 2 | 3 |
Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) benchmark
|
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 68.5% | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| 68.5% | 2 | 2 | 3 |
Sandra MultiMedia Floating Point (it/s) benchmark
|
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 70.2% | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 70.1% | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Intel Core 2 Duo E7600
Intel Pentium P6100
|
Sandra MultiMedia Integer (it/s) benchmark
|
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 57.7% | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| 57.6% | 2 | 2 | 3 |
Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) benchmark
|
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 63.5% | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| 63.5% | 2 | 2 | 3 |
Sandra Whetstone SSE2 (MFLOPS) benchmark
|
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 65.7% | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 65.4% | 2 | 2 | 2 |
wPrime v1.55 (32M) benchmark
|
Shorter is better | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 81.2% | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 81.0% | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Core 2 Duo E7600 vs Pentium P6100 graphics benchmarks
Graphics benchmarks depend on the type of integrated or discrete
graphics adapter, and to less extent on the processor performance.
Because these benchmarks are synthetic, they may not truly represent
gaming performance. However, they still can used to estimate whether
one processor will perform faster or slower in games than another CPU.
Important! The processors were tested using different types of graphics adapters, that may not be suitable for comparison.
| | | | | |
Intel Core 2 Duo E7600
Intel Pentium P6100
|
3DMark03 game score benchmark
|
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| 12.4% | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 9.5% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
3DMark2001 score benchmark
|
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| 35.7% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 32.3% | 2 | 2 | 3 |
CINEBENCH R10 OpenGL score benchmark
|
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| 57.3% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 25.5% | 2 | 2 | 3 |
Core 2 Duo E7600 vs Pentium P6100 memory performance
Memory-intensive tests or programs move large amounts of data to/from
memory, and they depend more on memory throughput and the size of
on-chip caches, rather than on CPU integer/FP/SIMD performance.
| | | | | |
Intel Core 2 Duo E7600
Intel Pentium P6100
|
7Zip compressing/decompressing speed benchmark
|
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 68.9% | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 68.4% | 2 | 2 | 2 |
PCMark2002 Memory score benchmark
|
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 74.6% | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 73.1% | 2 | 2 | 2 |
WinRAR compressing/decompressing speed benchmark
|
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 78.0% | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 77.5% | 2 | 2 | 2 |
CPUIDs
The table below compares two random CPUID records for Intel Core 2 Duo E7600 and Intel Pentium P6100
microprocessors, that were submitted to our CPUID database.
Please note that different steppings of Intel processors, identified
by S-spec numbers or CPUID, may have slightly different features. For
that reason the comparison table below only applies to CPUs with
specific S-Spec number / CPUID.
| |
CPUID 1 |
CPUID 2 |
| Manufacturer | Intel |
| CPU Family | Core 2 Duo | Pentium Dual-Core Mobile |
| Model / Processor Number | E7600 | P6100 |
| Frequency | 3895 MHz | 1994 MHz |
| CWID version | 0.3 | 0.4 |
| Part number | AT80571PH0833ML | CP80617004125AL |
| S-Spec / Stepping Code | SLGTD | SLBUR |
| |
| General information |
| Vendor | GenuineIntel |
| Processor name (BIOS) | Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E7600 @ 3.06GHz | Intel(R) Pentium(R) CPU P6100 @ 2.00GHz |
| Cores | 2 |
| Logical processors | 2 |
| Processor type | Original OEM Processor |
| CPUID signature | 1067A | 20655 |
| Family | 6 (06h) |
| Model | 23 (017h) | 37 (025h) |
| Stepping | 10 (0Ah) | 5 (05h) |
| TLB/Cache details | 64-byte Prefetching
Data TLB: 4-KB Pages, 4-way set associative, 256 entries
Data TLB: 4-MB Pages, 4-way set associative, 32 entries
Instruction TLB: 2-MB pages, 4-way, 8 entries or 4M pages, 4-way, 4 entries
Instruction TLB: 4-KB Pages, 4-way set associative, 128 entries
L1 Data TLB: 4-KB pages, 4-way set associative, 16 entries
L1 Data TLB: 4-MB pages, 4-way set associative, 16 entries | 64-byte Prefetching
Data TLB0: 2-MB or 4-MB pages, 4-way associative, 32 entries
Data TLB: 4-KB Pages, 4-way set associative, 64 entries
Instruction TLB: 2-MB or 4-MB pages, fully associative, 7 entries
Instruction TLB: 4-KB Pages, 4-way set associative, 128 entries
Shared 2nd-level TLB: 4 KB pages, 4-way set associative, 512 entries |
| |
| Cache |
| L1 data: Associativity | 8-way set associative |
| L1 data: Comments | | Direct-mapped |
| L1 data: Line size | 64 bytes |
| L1 data: Size | 32 KB | 2 x 32 KB |
| L1 instruction: Associativity | 8-way set associative | 4-way set associative |
| L1 instruction: Comments | | Direct-mapped |
| L1 instruction: Line size | 64 bytes |
| L1 instruction: Size | 32 KB | 2 x 32 KB |
| L2: Associativity | 8-way set associative |
| L2: Comments | unified on-die | Non-inclusive|Direct-mapped |
| L2: Line size | 64 bytes |
| L2: Size | 3 MB | 2 x 256 KB |
| L3: Associativity | | 12-way set associative |
| L3: Comments | | Inclusive|Direct-mapped|Shared between all cores |
| L3: Line size | | 64 bytes |
| L3: Size | | 3 MB |
| |
| Instruction set extensions |
| MMX | + |
| SSE | + |
| SSE2 | + |
| SSE3 | + |
| SSE4.1 | + | - |
| SSSE3 | + |
| |
| Additional instructions |
| CLFLUSH | + |
| CMOV | + |
| CMPXCHG16B | + |
| CMPXCHG8B | + |
| FXSAVE/FXRSTORE | + |
| MONITOR/MWAIT | + |
| POPCNT | - | + |
| RDTSCP | - | + |
| SYSENTER/SYSEXIT | + |
| XSAVE / XRESTORE states | + | - |
| |
| Major features |
| 64-bit / Intel 64 | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep | + |
| Intel Virtualization | + | - |
| NX bit/XD-bit | - | + |
| On-chip Floating Point Unit | + |
| |
| Other features |
| 36-bit page-size extensions | + |
| 64-bit debug store | + |
| Advanced programmable interrupt controller | + |
| CPL qualified debug store | + |
| Debug store | + |
| Debugging extensions | + |
| Digital Thermal Sensor capability | + |
| LAHF / SAHF support in 64-bit mode | + |
| Machine check architecture | + |
| Machine check exception | + |
| Memory-type range registers | + |
| Model-specific registers | + |
| Page attribute table | + |
| Page global extension | + |
| Page-size extensions (4MB pages) | + |
| Pending break enable | + |
| Perfmon and Debug capability | + |
| Physical address extensions | + |
| Process context identifiers | - | + |
| Self-snoop | + |
| TSC rate is ensured to be invariant across all states | - | + |
| Thermal monitor | + |
| Thermal monitor 2 | + |
| Thermal monitor and software controlled clock facilities | + |
| Time stamp counter | + |
| Virtual 8086-mode enhancements | + |
| xTPR Update Control | + |
+ - feature is supported
- - feature is not supported
Features, not supported by all processors in the table, are not displayed
Compare with ...
Compare Intel Core 2 Duo E7600 with...
Compare Intel Pentium P6100 with...
Note: To see differences with any CPU, type in
any combination of the following into the "Any CPU" field: manufacturer name,
full or partial family name, model number, part number, core name,
socket name, operating frequency, bus speed (must have FSB suffix),
and the last level cache. Here are some valid searches:
i5-3570K
Intel Celeron 2 GHz
Ivy Bridge
Pentium 4 800FSB
AMD 3.3GHz 8MB
|
|