AMD A10-5700 vs FX-8350
Mini Review
AMD A10-5700 advantages
 |
|
AMD FX-8350 advantages
Picture is not available |
|
A10-5700 vs FX-8350 performance comparison
The charts demonstrate relative performance of A10-5700 and FX-8350 CPUs in a number of different kinds of tasks. The numbers for 'Single-threaded performance' and 'Multi-threaded performance' charts are calculated as an average of several related benchmarks, that you can find in the "Benchmarks" tab. As a result, the displayed results may differ from results, that you may see in individual tests. We also averaged the numbers for application type specific benchmarks and all-around performance benchmarks, and presented them in the 'Overall performance' chart. The 'Price-performance ratio' chart shows how much more performance you will get per dollar spent. The cost of other system components is not included in this ratio. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Higher is better |
Higher is better |
Higher is better |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Higher is better |
Higher is better |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please see the "Benchmarks" tab for exhaustive list of benchmarks, demonstrating performance difference between AMD A10-5700 and FX-8350 in various types of applications.
A10-5700 vs FX-8350 power consumption and price comparison
Lower is better |
Lower is better |
Detailed side by side comparison of AMD A10-5700 vs AMD FX-8350 specs can be found in the "Specifications" tab. Even more detailed comparison of low level features of both CPUs you will find in the "CPUIDs" tab.
Pros and Cons summary
| A10-5700 | FX-8350 |
|
General recommendations: Has on-chip Radeon HD 7660D GPU,
Somewhat more energy efficient, Less expensive, Somewhat better price / performance ratio |
General recommendations: Somewhat faster overall,
Can be effortlessly overclocked |
|
Drawbacks: Somewhat slow
|
Drawbacks: No integrated GPU,
Less energy efficient, Much more expensive, Worse price / performance ratio |
Similar processors
| A10-5700 | FX-8350 |
Similar CPUs use the same socket and architecture as AMD A10-5700 and AMD FX-8350, but their performance and other characteristics are a bit different.
Specifications
| AMD A10-5700 | AMD FX-8350 | |
| Basic details | ||
| Market segment | Desktop | |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | |
| Family | AMD A10-Series | AMD FX-Series |
| Model number | A10-5700 | FX-8350 |
| CPU part number | AD5700OKA44HJ | FD8350FRW8KHK |
| Box part number | AD5700OKHJBOX | FD8350FRHKBOX |
| Introduction date | July 31, 2012 | October 23, 2012 |
| Current official price | $122 (as of Apr 2013) | $195 (as of Apr 2013) |
| CPU features | ||
| Core name | Trinity | Vishera |
| Platform name | Virgo | Volan |
| Microarchitecture | Piledriver | |
| Technology (micron) | 0.032 | |
| Data width (bits) | 64 | |
| Socket | Socket FM2 | Socket AM3+ |
| Frequency (MHz) | 3400 | 4000 |
| Turbo Frequency (MHz) | 4000 | 4200 |
| Bus speed (MHz) | 2600 (HT/QPI) | |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (code) / 64 KB (data) | 256 KB (code) / 128 KB (data) |
| L2 cache (KB) | 4096 | 8192 |
| L3 cache (KB) | 8192 | |
| Max temperature (°C) | 71.3 | |
| TDP (Watt) | 65 | 125 |
| Core voltage (V) | 0.825 - 1.475 | |
| Cores | 4 | 8 |
| Threads | 4 | 8 |
| Multiprocessing | 1 | |
| Instruction set extensions | ||
| AES / Advanced Encryption Standard | + | |
| AMD64 / EM64T 64-bit technology | + | |
| AVX / Advanced Vector Extensions | + | |
| F16C / 16-bit Floating-Point conversion | + | |
| FMA3 / 3-operand Fused Multiply-Add | + | |
| FMA4 / 4-operand Fused Multiply-Add | + | |
| MMX | + | |
| SSE | + | |
| SSE2 | + | |
| SSE3 | + | |
| SSE4.1 | + | |
| SSE4.2 | + | |
| SSSE3 / Supplemental SSE3 | + | |
| XOP / eXtended Operations | + | |
| Supported technologies | ||
| PowerNow! / Enhanced SpeedStep | + | |
| Turbo Core / Turbo Boost | + | |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
| Virtualization | + | |
| Virus Protection / Execute Disable bit | + | |
| Integrated Graphics | ||
| GPU Type | Radeon HD 7660D | None |
| Integrated Memory Controller(s) | ||
| The number of controllers | 1 | |
| Memory channels | 2 | |
| Supported memory | DDR3-1866 | |
Rows with different specifications or features are highlighted.
For detailed specifications of "AMD A10-5700" or "AMD FX-8350" parts please click on the links in the table header.
Benchmarks
System setup
Below is a complete set of AMD A10-5700 and FX-8350 benchmarks from our CPU benchmark database. The former processor was tested on ASRock FM2A75 Pro4-M motherboard with 4GB dual-channel Crucial BallistixPC3-14900 (DDR3-1866) memory, and Integrated on-chip ATI Radeon 7000-series graphics. The latter processor was tested on ASUS Sabertooth 990FX motherboard, that had 4GB dual-channel Crucial BallistixPC3-14900 (DDR3-1866) memory, and MSI R6670 1GB GDDR5 (ATI Radeon) graphics.
All tests were performed at default frequency and voltage, using manufacturer's stock fan/heatsink. None of the components were overclocked. Motherboard BIOS options were left at default settings.
The results of all benchmarks are broken into four categories: multi-threaded, single-threaded, memory intensive and graphics / gaming.
A10-5700 vs FX-8350 single-threaded benchmarks
Single-threaded benchmarks run on a single CPU core, and do not depend on such features as the number of cores, or Hyper-Threading technology. Additionally, they do not utilize on-chip caches, dedicated to other cores.
AMD A10-5700 AMD FX-8350 | ||
3DMark03 CPU score benchmark | ||
Longer is better  | ||
|---|---|---|
| 100% | ||
| 70.8% | ||
CINEBENCH R10 CPU score (1 core) benchmark | ||
| Longer is better | ||
| 100% | ||
| 93.6% | ||
FLAC encoding - single process benchmark | ||
| Longer is better | ||
| 100% | ||
| 96.0% | ||
H.264 video encoding - single process benchmark | ||
| Longer is better | ||
| 100% | ||
| 92.2% | ||
LAME MP3 encoding - single process benchmark | ||
| Longer is better | ||
| 100% | ||
| 96.5% | ||
AMD A10-5700 AMD FX-8350 | ||
PCMark2002 CPU score benchmark | ||
| Longer is better | ||
| 100% | ||
| 94.8% | ||
Super PI (1M) benchmark | ||
 Shorter is better | ||
| 100% | ||
| 91.8% | ||
XVid video encoding - single process benchmark | ||
| Longer is better | ||
| 100% | ||
| 90.6% | ||
A10-5700 vs FX-8350 multi-threaded benchmarks
Multi-threaded benchmarks utilize all CPU cores and other on-chip resources (on-chip caches, internal buffers, etc). Intel's Hyper-Threading feature also helps to improve multi-threading performance.
AMD A10-5700 AMD FX-8350 | ||
3DMark06 CPU score benchmark | ||
| Longer is better | ||
|---|---|---|
| 100% | ||
| 60.4% | ||
Apache web server - dynamic pages benchmark | ||
| Longer is better | ||
| 100% | ||
| 96.3% | ||
Apache web server - static pages benchmark | ||
| Longer is better | ||
| 100% | ||
| 83.3% | ||
Blowfish encryption benchmark | ||
| Longer is better | ||
| 100% | ||
| 44.4% | ||
CINEBENCH R10 CPU score benchmark | ||
| Longer is better | ||
| 100% | ||
| 50.0% | ||
AMD A10-5700 AMD FX-8350 | ||
CINEBENCH R10 render time (seconds) benchmark | ||
| Shorter is better | ||
| 100% | ||
| 50.0% | ||
CrystalMark ALU benchmark | ||
| Longer is better | ||
| 100% | ||
| 84.0% | ||
CrystalMark FPU benchmark | ||
| Longer is better | ||
| 100% | ||
| 77.7% | ||
Euler3D benchmark | ||
| Longer is better | ||
| 100% | ||
| 49.5% | ||
FLAC encoding - multiple processes benchmark | ||
| Longer is better | ||
| 100% | ||
| 43.6% | ||
AMD A10-5700 AMD FX-8350 | ||
Fritz Chess Benchmark benchmark | ||
| Longer is better | ||
| 100% | ||
| 48.3% | ||
H.264 video encoding - multiple processes benchmark | ||
| Longer is better | ||
| 100% | ||
| 43.4% | ||
H.264 video encoding - multithreaded benchmark | ||
| Longer is better | ||
| 100% | ||
| 47.9% | ||
LAME MP3 encoding - multiple processes benchmark | ||
| Longer is better | ||
| 100% | ||
| 43.4% | ||
MySQL 5.0.96 - selecting data benchmark | ||
| Longer is better | ||
| 100% | ||
| 56.4% | ||
AMD A10-5700 AMD FX-8350 | ||
PCMark05 CPU score benchmark | ||
| Longer is better | ||
| 100% | ||
| 90.5% | ||
PCMark05 score benchmark | ||
| Longer is better | ||
| 100% | ||
| 88.3% | ||
Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) benchmark | ||
| Longer is better | ||
| 100% | ||
| 45.4% | ||
Sandra MultiMedia Floating Point (it/s) benchmark | ||
| Longer is better | ||
| 100% | ||
| 44.3% | ||
Sandra MultiMedia Integer (it/s) benchmark | ||
| Longer is better | ||
| 100% | ||
| 44.9% | ||
AMD A10-5700 AMD FX-8350 | ||
Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) benchmark | ||
| Longer is better | ||
| 100% | ||
| 44.9% | ||
Sandra Whetstone SSE2 (MFLOPS) benchmark | ||
| Longer is better | ||
| 100% | ||
| 44.8% | ||
XVid video encoding - multiple processes benchmark | ||
| Longer is better | ||
| 100% | ||
| 44.2% | ||
wPrime v1.55 (32M) benchmark | ||
| Shorter is better | ||
| 100% | ||
| 46.1% | ||
A10-5700 vs FX-8350 graphics benchmarks
Graphics benchmarks depend on the type of integrated or discrete graphics adapter, and to less extent on the processor performance. Because these benchmarks are synthetic, they may not truly represent gaming performance. However, they still can used to estimate whether one processor will perform faster or slower in games than another CPU.
AMD A10-5700 AMD FX-8350 | ||
3DMark03 game score benchmark | ||
| Longer is better | ||
|---|---|---|
| 100% | ||
| 76.7% | ||
3DMark06 3DMark score benchmark | ||
| Longer is better | ||
| 100% | ||
| 73.0% | ||
3DMark2001 score benchmark | ||
| Longer is better | ||
| 100% | ||
| 73.2% | ||
CINEBENCH R10 OpenGL score benchmark | ||
| Longer is better | ||
| 100% | ||
| 83.4% | ||
PCMark05 Graphics score benchmark | ||
| Longer is better | ||
| 100% | ||
| 82.3% | ||
A10-5700 vs FX-8350 memory performance
Memory-intensive tests or programs move large amounts of data to/from memory, and they depend more on memory throughput and the size of on-chip caches, rather than on CPU integer/FP/SIMD performance.
AMD A10-5700 AMD FX-8350 | ||
7Zip compressing/decompressing speed benchmark | ||
| Longer is better | ||
|---|---|---|
| 100% | ||
| 90.7% | ||
CrystalMark Memory benchmark | ||
| Longer is better | ||
| 100% | ||
| 69.6% | ||
PCMark05 Memory score benchmark | ||
| Longer is better | ||
| 100% | ||
| 84.5% | ||
PCMark2002 Memory score benchmark | ||
| Longer is better | ||
| 100% | ||
| 80.4% | ||
WinRAR compressing/decompressing speed benchmark | ||
| Longer is better | ||
| 100% | ||
| 57.0% | ||
CPUIDs
The table below compares two random CPUID records for AMD A10-5700 and AMD FX-8350 microprocessors, that were submitted to our CPUID database.
| CPUID 1 | CPUID 2 | |
| Manufacturer | AMD | |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Family | A10-Series | FX-Series |
| Model / Processor Number | A10-5700 | FX-8350 |
| Frequency | 2966 MHz | 4013 MHz |
| CWID version | 0.4 | |
| Part number | AD5700OKA44HJ | FD8350FRW8KHK |
| S-Spec / Stepping Code | GA 1236SUT | FA 1236PGN |
| General information | ||
| Vendor | AuthenticAMD | |
| Processor name (BIOS) | AMD A10-5700 APU with Radeon(tm) HD Graphics | AMD FX(tm)-8350 Eight-Core Processor |
| Cores | 4 | 8 |
| Compute units | 2 | 4 |
| Logical processors | 4 | 8 |
| Processor type | Original OEM Processor | |
| CPUID signature | TN-A1 | 600F20 |
| Family | 610F01 | 21 (015h) |
| Model | 21 (015h) | 2 (02h) |
| Stepping | 16 (010h) | 0 (00h) |
| Socket | 1 (01h) | AM3+ |
| Socket | FM2 | |
| Cache | ||
| L1 data: Associativity | 4-way set associative | |
| L1 data: Line size | 64 bytes | |
| L1 data: Lines per tag | 1 | |
| L1 data: Size | 4 x 16 KB | 8 x 16 KB |
| L1 instruction: Associativity | 2-way set associative | |
| L1 instruction: Comments | 1 cache per 2 cores | |
| L1 instruction: Line size | 64 bytes | |
| L1 instruction: Lines per tag | 1 | |
| L1 instruction: Size | 2 x 64 KB | 4 x 64 KB |
| L2: Associativity | 16-way set associative | |
| L2: Comments | 1 cache per 2 cores | |
| L2: Line size | 64 bytes | |
| L2: Lines per tag | 1 | |
| L2: Size | 2 x 2 MB | 4 x 2 MB |
| L3: Associativity | 64-way set associative | |
| L3: Line size | 64 bytes | |
| L3: Lines per tag | 1 | |
| L3: Size | 8 MB | |
| Instruction set extensions | ||
| AES | + | |
| AMD extensions to MMX | + | |
| AVX | + | |
| BMI | + | |
| F16C | + | |
| FMA | + | |
| FMA4 | + | |
| MMX | + | |
| SSE | + | |
| SSE2 | + | |
| SSE3 | + | |
| SSE4.1 | + | |
| SSE4.2 | + | |
| SSE4A | + | |
| SSSE3 | + | |
| TBM | + | |
| XOP | + | |
| Additional instructions | ||
| Advanced Bit manipulation | + | |
| CLFLUSH | + | |
| CMOV | + | |
| CMPXCHG16B | + | |
| CMPXCHG8B | + | |
| FXSAVE/FXRSTORE | + | |
| MONITOR/MWAIT | + | |
| PCLMULDQ | + | |
| POPCNT | + | |
| PREFETCH/PREFETCHW | + | |
| RDTSCP | + | |
| SKINIT / STGI support | + | |
| SYSCALL/SYSRET | + | |
| SYSENTER/SYSEXIT | + | |
| XSAVE / XRESTORE states | + | |
| Major features | ||
| 64-bit / Intel 64 | + | |
| NX bit/XD-bit | + | |
| On-chip Floating Point Unit | + | |
| PowerNow! / Cool'n'Quiet | + | |
| Secure Virtual Machine (Virtualization) | + | |
| Turbo Core | + | |
| Other features | ||
| 1 GB large page support | + | |
| 100MHz multiplier control | + | |
| 128-bit SSE instructions | + | |
| 36-bit page-size extensions | + | |
| Advanced programmable interrupt controller | + | |
| Core multi-processing legacy mode | + | |
| Debugging extensions | + | |
| Extended APIC space | + | |
| Hardware P-state control | + | |
| Hardware thermal control | + | |
| Instruction based sampling | + | |
| LAHF / SAHF support in 64-bit mode | + | |
| LBR virtualization | + | |
| LOCK MOV CR0 means MOV CR8 | + | |
| Lightweight profiling support | + | |
| Machine check architecture | + | |
| Machine check exception | + | |
| Memory-type range registers | + | |
| Misaligned SSE mode | + | |
| Model-specific registers | + | |
| Nested page tables | + | |
| OS visible workaround | + | |
| Page attribute table | + | |
| Page global extension | + | |
| Page-size extensions (4MB pages) | + | |
| Physical address extensions | + | |
| SVM lock | + | |
| Support for NRIP save | + | |
| THERMTRIP | + | |
| TSC rate is ensured to be invariant across all states | + | |
| Temperature sensor | + | |
| Time stamp counter | + | |
| Virtual 8086-mode enhancements | + | |
| Watchdog timer support | + | |
- - feature is not supported
Features, not supported by all processors in the table, are not displayed
Compare with ...
i5-3570K
Intel Celeron 2 GHz
Ivy Bridge
Pentium 4 800FSB
AMD 3.3GHz 8MB
| Terms and Conditions · Privacy Policy · Contact Us | (c) Copyright 2003 - 2010 Gennadiy Shvets |