Search CPU-World

Search site contents:

Intel Core 2 Duo E6320 vs Pentium G620

Mini Review

Intel Core 2 Duo E6320 advantages



Picture
is not
available
  • None

Intel Pentium G620 advantages



Intel Pentium G620
  • This processor has 80% better performance when running single-threaded applications.
  • Multi-threaded performance of the Intel Pentium G620 is higher.
  • The G620 microprocessor is 39% faster in memory-intensive programs.
  • SSE4.1 and SSE4.2 instructions are enabled on this processor.
  • The G620 features integrated HD (Sandy Bridge) GPU. This graphics unit replaces low-end graphics card, and thus lowers the cost of the system.

E6320 vs G620 performance comparison

The charts demonstrate relative performance of Core 2 Duo E6320 and Pentium G620 CPUs in various kinds of applications. To calculate displayed numbers we averaged results for several benchmarks for each specific type of task. As such, performance in individual benchmarks may be lower or higher than what you see in the charts on this page. The 'Overall performance' displays an average of all-around performance benchmarks, and benchmarks, specific to each application type.
Single-threaded performance
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1
 
1.8
 
 
Higher is better
Multi-threaded performance
3
2.4
1.8
1.2
0.6
0
 
 
1
 
1.89
 
 
Higher is better
Memory-intensive applications
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1
 
1.39
 
 
Higher is better
Overall performance
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1
 
1.66
 
 
Higher is better

  - Intel Core 2 Duo E6320       - Intel Pentium G620

Exhaustive list of benchmarks, that show difference in performance between Intel Core 2 Duo E6320 and Intel Pentium G620 in various types of programs, can be seen in the "Benchmarks" tab.


E6320 vs G620 power consumption comparison

Thermal Design Power
80
64
48
32
16
0
 
 
65W
 
65W
 
 
Lower is better
 

Detailed side by side comparison of Intel Core 2 Duo E6320 vs G620 specs can be found in the "Specifications" tab. More detailed comparison of internal features of both processors you will find in the "CPUIDs" tab.


Pros and Cons summary

Core 2 Duo E6320 Pentium G620
General recommendations:
None
  General recommendations:
Much better performance in all types of tasks,
Supports SSE4.1 / SSE4.2 instructions,
Comes with HD (Sandy Bridge) GPU

Drawbacks:

Slow,
Does not support some instructions,
Does not have on-chip graphics,
No products planned for the socket
 

Drawbacks:

None

Similar processors

Core 2 Duo E6320 Pentium G620
 

Similar microprocessors use the same socket and architecture as Core 2 Duo E6320 and Intel Pentium G620.


Where to buy


These processors are no longer produced. For this reason the best place to look for them is eBay. Marketplace sellers at Amazon may also have them for sale.
Jump to:
  • Benchmarks
  • CPUIDs
  • Comments
 

More comparisons

Compare Intel Core 2 Duo E6320 with...

Other Pentium Dual-Core CPU:

Any CPU:


Compare Intel Pentium G620 with...

Other Core 2 Duo CPU:

Any CPU:


Note: To see differences with any CPU, type in any combination of the following into the "Any CPU" field: manufacturer name, full or partial family name, model number, part number, core name, socket name, operating frequency, bus speed (must have FSB suffix), and the last level cache. Here are some valid searches:

  i5-3570K
  Intel Celeron 2 GHz
  Core
  Pentium 4 800FSB
  AMD 3.3GHz 8MB

Specifications

Please visit Intel Core 2 Duo E6320 and Intel Pentium G620 pages for more detailed specifications of both microprocessors.

 Intel Core 2 Duo E6320Intel Pentium G620
Market segmentDesktop
ManufacturerIntel
FamilyCore 2 DuoPentium Dual-Core
Basic details
Model numberE6320G620
CPU part numberHH80557PH0364MCM8062301046304
Box part numberBX80557E6320BX80623G620
BXC80623G620
Introduction dateApril 22, 2007May 22, 2011
 
CPU features
Core nameConroeSandy Bridge
MicroarchitectureCoreSandy Bridge
Technology (micron)0.0650.032
Data width (bits)64
SocketSocket 775Socket 1155
Frequency (MHz)18672600
Bus speed (MHz)1066 
Clock Multiplier726
L1 cache64 KB (code) / 64 KB (data)
L2 cache (KB)4096512
L3 cache (KB) 3072
Max temperature (°C)60.169.1
TDP (Watt)65
Max power dissipation (Watt)105.15 
Core voltage (V)0.85 - 1.5 
Cores2
Threads2
Multiprocessing1
 
Instruction set extensions
AMD64 / EM64T 64-bit technology+
MMX+
SSE+
SSE2+
SSE3+
SSE4.1-+
SSE4.2-+
SSSE3 / Supplemental SSE3+
 
Supported technologies
PowerNow! / Enhanced SpeedStep+
Virtualization+
Virus Protection / Execute Disable bit+
 
Integrated Graphics
GPU TypeNoneHD (Sandy Bridge)
 
Integrated Memory Controller(s)
The number of controllers01
Notes:

Rows with different specifications or features are highlighted.

For detailed specifications of "Intel Core 2 Duo E6320" or "Intel Pentium G620" parts please click on the links in the table header.

Benchmarks

System setup

Intel Core 2 Duo E6320 and Pentium G620 processors were tested using different system components, that are identified by MB, RAM and VID columns in the tables below. The numbers in each of these columns correspond to one of motherboards (MB), memory configurations (RAM) or graphics adapters (VID), listed below:

MB - Motherboard(s):
1. ASUS P8P67
2. ASROCK 4CORE1600TWINS-P35
3. INTEL DP965LT
4. ASUS P8H61-M

RAM - Memory:
1. 2 GB DUAL-CHANNEL CORSAIR TR3X3G1600C9 DDR3
2. 2 GB DUAL-CHANNEL CORSAIR CM3X1024-1333C9 DDR3
3. 2GB DUAL-CHANNEL CORSAIR CM2X1024-6400C4

VID - Video card(s):
1. MSI R6670 1GB GDDR5 (ATI RADEON)
2. POWERCOLOR 24PRO256M DDR2 (ATI RADEON HD2400)
3. INTEGRATED ON-CHIP INTEL SANDY BRIDGE GRAPHICS

All tests were performed at default frequency and voltage, using manufacturer's stock fan/heatsink. None of the components were overclocked. Motherboard BIOS options were left at default settings.

The results of all benchmarks are broken into four categories: multi-threaded, single-threaded, memory intensive and graphics / gaming.


Core 2 Duo E6320 vs Pentium G620 single-threaded benchmarks

Single-threaded benchmarks run on a single CPU core, and do not depend on such features as the number of cores, or Hyper-Threading technology. Additionally, they do not utilize on-chip caches, dedicated to other cores.

     

    Intel Core 2 Duo E6320           Intel Pentium G620

3DMark03 CPU score benchmark

Uses DirectX software vertex shader to run Wings of Fury and Trolls' Lair games, and calculates a 3DMark03 CPU score based on averaged number of frames per second, achieved by the CPU/GPU combination.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
54.3%222
54.3%332
45.3%423

CINEBENCH R10 CPU score (1 core) benchmark

Measures performance of a single-core rendering of a photo-realistic 3D image using CINEMA 4D software engine.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%423
99.8%111
55.6%332
55.6%222

PCMark2002 CPU score benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%423
99.8%111
69.2%332
69.2%222

Super PI (1M) benchmark

Measures time, required to calculate the first 1 million digits after the decimal point in the number Pi.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
99.4%423
55.2%332
55.2%222


Core 2 Duo E6320 vs Pentium G620 multi-threaded benchmarks

Multi-threaded benchmarks utilize all CPU cores and other on-chip resources (on-chip caches, internal buffers, etc). Intel's Hyper-Threading feature also helps to improve multi-threading performance.

     

    Intel Core 2 Duo E6320           Intel Pentium G620

CINEBENCH R10 CPU score benchmark

Measures performance of multi-core rendering of a photo-realistic 3D image using CINEMA 4D software engine.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
99.0%423
54.3%222
54.1%332

CINEBENCH R10 render time (seconds) benchmark

Measures time taken to render a photo-realistic 3D image using CINEMA 4D software engine.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
98.9%423
54.3%222
54.1%332

Euler3D benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
99.1%423
52.1%332
52.1%222

Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) benchmark

Runs Dhrystone test on all cores, and reports estimated integer performance in MIPS (Millions of Instructions Per Second).
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%423
99.6%111
65.3%222
65.2%332

Sandra MultiMedia Floating Point (it/s) benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%423
99.5%111
68.6%222
68.5%332

    Intel Core 2 Duo E6320           Intel Pentium G620

Sandra MultiMedia Integer (it/s) benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%423
99.6%111
85.2%222
85.0%332

Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) benchmark

Runs Whetstone test on all cores, and reports estimated floating-point performance in MFLOPS (Millions of Floating-Point Operations Per Second).
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%423
99.6%111
70.6%222
70.3%332

Sandra Whetstone SSE2 (MFLOPS) benchmark

Runs SSE2-enabled Whetstone test on all cores, and reports estimated floating-point performance in MFLOPS (Millions of Floating-Point Operations Per Second).
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%423
99.7%111
63.1%222
62.9%332

wPrime v1.55 (32M) benchmark

wPrime benchmark measures time taken to calculate square roots of numbers from 1 to 33554431.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
99.6%423
52.1%222
51.6%332


Core 2 Duo E6320 vs Pentium G620 graphics benchmarks

Graphics benchmarks depend on the type of integrated or discrete graphics adapter, and to less extent on the processor performance. Because these benchmarks are synthetic, they may not truly represent gaming performance. However, they still can be used to estimate whether one processor will perform faster or slower than another CPU in games and other 3D tasks.

Important! The processors were tested using different types of graphics adapters, that may not be suitable for comparison.
     

    Intel Core 2 Duo E6320           Intel Pentium G620

3DMark03 game score benchmark

Measures graphics and 3D game performance of discrete and integrated GPUs using 4 different game simulations, that have varying level of DirectX support from version 7 to version 9.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
20.3%423
9.0%222
9.0%332

3DMark2001 score benchmark

Runs a series of game simulations and feature tests to measure graphics and 3D game performance of discrete and integrated GPUs. It utilizes a single CPU core, and it is compatible with DirectX 8 and later APIs.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
34.5%423
25.9%332
25.6%222

CINEBENCH R10 OpenGL score benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
30.6%332
30.5%222
21.8%423


Core 2 Duo E6320 vs Pentium G620 memory performance

Memory-intensive tests or programs move large amounts of data to/from memory, and they depend more on memory throughput and the size of on-chip caches, rather than on CPU integer/FP/SIMD performance.

     

    Intel Core 2 Duo E6320           Intel Pentium G620

7Zip compressing/decompressing speed (1 thread) benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
99.1%423
69.0%222
68.7%332

PCMark2002 Memory score benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
98.9%423
60.6%222
60.3%332

WinRAR compressing/decompressing speed benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
98.1%423
73.2%332
69.5%222

CPUIDs

The table below compares two random CPUID records for Intel Core 2 Duo E6320 and Intel Pentium G620 microprocessors, that were submitted to our CPUID database. Please note that different steppings of Intel processors, identified by S-spec numbers or CPUID, may have slightly different features. For that reason the comparison table below only applies to CPUs with specific S-Spec number / CPUID.

  CPUID 1 CPUID 2
ManufacturerIntel
CPU FamilyCore 2 DuoPentium Dual-Core
Model / Processor NumberE6320G620
Frequency1864 MHz2593 MHz
CWID version0.30.4
Part numberHH80557PH0364MCM8062301046304
S-Spec / Stepping CodeSLA4USR05R
 
General information
VendorGenuineIntel
Processor name (BIOS)Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6320 @ 1.86GHz Intel(R) Pentium(R) CPU G620 @ 2.60GHz
Cores2
Logical processors2
Processor typeOriginal OEM Processor
CPUID signature6F6206A7
Family 6 (06h)
Model15 (0Fh)42 (02Ah)
Stepping 6 (06h) 7 (07h)
TLB/Cache details3rd-level cache: 4-MB, 16-way set associative, 64-byte line size (Intel Xeon processor MP, Family 0Fh, Model 06h), 2nd-level cache: 4-MB, 16-way set associative, 64-byte line size
64-byte Prefetching
Data TLB: 4-KB Pages, 4-way set associative, 256 entries
Data TLB: 4-MB Pages, 4-way set associative, 32 entries
Instruction TLB: 2-MB pages, 4-way, 8 entries or 4M pages, 4-way, 4 entries
Instruction TLB: 4-KB Pages, 4-way set associative, 128 entries
L1 Data TLB: 4-KB pages, 4-way set associative, 16 entries
L1 Data TLB: 4-MB pages, 4-way set associative, 16 entries
64-byte Prefetching
Data TLB0: 2-MB or 4-MB pages, 4-way set associative, 32 entries
Data TLB: 4-KB Pages, 4-way set associative, 64 entries
Instruction TLB: 4-KB Pages, 4-way set associative, 128 entries
L2 TLB: 1-MB, 4-way set associative, 64-byte line size
Shared 2nd-level TLB: 4 KB pages, 4-way set associative, 512 entries
 
Cache
L1 data: Associativity8-way set associative
L1 data: Comments Direct-mapped
L1 data: Line size64 bytes
L1 data: Size32 KB2 x 32 KB
L1 instruction: Associativity8-way set associative
L1 instruction: Comments Direct-mapped
L1 instruction: Line size64 bytes
L1 instruction: Size32 KB2 x 32 KB
L2: Associativity16-way set associative8-way set associative
L2: Comments Non-inclusive|Direct-mapped
L2: Line size64 bytes
L2: Size4 MB2 x 256 KB
L3: Associativity 12-way set associative
L3: Comments Inclusive|Shared between all cores
L3: Line size 64 bytes
L3: Size 3 MB
 
Instruction set extensions
MMX+
SSE+
SSE2+
SSE3+
SSE4.1-+
SSE4.2-+
SSSE3+
 
Additional instructions
CLFLUSH+
CMOV+
CMPXCHG16B+
CMPXCHG8B+
FXSAVE/FXRSTORE+
MONITOR/MWAIT+
PCLMULDQ-+
POPCNT-+
RDTSCP-+
SYSENTER/SYSEXIT+
XSAVE/XRESTORE states-+
 
Major features
64-bit / Intel 64+
Enhanced SpeedStep+
Intel Virtualization+
NX bit/XD-bit+
On-chip Floating Point Unit+
 
Other features
36-bit page-size extensions+
64-bit debug store+
Advanced programmable interrupt controller+
CPL qualified debug store+
Debug store+
Debugging extensions+
Digital Thermal Sensor capability+
LAHF/SAHF support in 64-bit mode+
Machine check architecture+
Machine check exception+
Memory-type range registers+
Model-specific registers+
Page attribute table+
Page global extension+
Page-size extensions (4MB pages)+
Pending break enable+
Perfmon and Debug capability+
Physical address extensions+
Power Limit Notification capability-+
Process context identifiers-+
Self-snoop+
TSC rate is ensured to be invariant across all states-+
Thermal monitor+
Thermal monitor 2+
Thermal monitor and software controlled clock facilities+
Time stamp counter+
Timestamp counter deadline-+
Virtual 8086-mode enhancements+
xTPR Update Control+
+ - feature is supported
- - feature is not supported
Features, not supported by all processors in the table, are not displayed

Comments (0)
Terms and Conditions · Privacy Policy · Contact Us (c) Copyright 2003 - 2010 Gennadiy Shvets