|
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 vs Pentium G630
Mini Review
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 advantages
Intel Pentium G630 advantages
 |
- In single-threaded tasks, the processor has 8% better performance.
- The CPU performs 17% faster in multi-threaded applications.
- Memory performance of the Intel Pentium G630 CPU is better.
- The CPU features SSE4.2 instructions.
- The G630 CPU has on-chip HD (Sandy Bridge) GPU. While this graphics is not powerful enough to play latest games at full resolution, it can be used for casual gaming and 3D apps.
|
E8400 vs G630 performance comparison
The charts in the table below show relative performance of Core 2 Duo E8400 and Pentium G630 processors in different task types. To determine displayed numbers we averaged results for several benchmarks for each specific program type. As a result, performance in individual benchmarks may be lower or higher than what you see in the charts on this page. We also averaged the numbers for application type specific benchmarks and all-around performance benchmarks, and presented them in the 'Overall performance' chart. |
Single-threaded performance Higher is better |
Multi-threaded performance Higher is better |
Memory-intensive applications Higher is better |
Overall performance Higher is better |
- Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 - Intel Pentium G630
Exhaustive list of benchmarks, that demonstrate performance difference between Intel E8400 and Pentium G630 in various types of tests, can be seen in the "Benchmarks" tab.
E8400 vs G630 power consumption comparison
Thermal Design Power Lower is better |
|
Detailed side by side comparison of Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 vs Pentium G630 specs can be found in the "Specifications" tab. Much more detailed comparison of internal features of both CPUs you will find in the "CPUIDs" tab.
Pros and Cons summary
| |
| Core 2 Duo E8400 | Pentium G630 |
General recommendations: None
|
General recommendations: Faster overall, Supports SSE4.2 instructions, Integrates HD (Sandy Bridge) GPU
|
Drawbacks: Rather lower performance in all kinds of programs, Does not support some instructions, Comes without integrated GPU
|
Drawbacks: None
|
Similar processors
| |
| Core 2 Duo E8400 | Pentium G630 |
|
|
|
Similar CPUs use the same socket and architecture as Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 and G630, however their performance and other characteristics are slightly different.
Specifications
| | Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 | Intel Pentium G630 |
| | Basic details |
| Market segment | Desktop |
| Manufacturer | Intel |
| Family | Intel Core 2 Duo | Intel Pentium Dual-Core |
| Model number | E8400 | G630 |
| CPU part number | AT80570PJ0806M EU80570PJ0806M | CM8062301046404 |
| Box part number | BX80570E8400 BXC80570E8400 BX80570E8400A | BX80623G630 BXC80623G630 |
| Introduction date | January 7, 2008 | September 4, 2011 |
| Current official price | | $64 (as of Jan 2013) |
| |
| | CPU features |
| Core name | Wolfdale | Sandy Bridge |
| Microarchitecture | Core | Sandy Bridge |
| Technology (micron) | 0.045 | 0.032 |
| Data width (bits) | 64 |
| Socket | Socket 775 | Socket 1155 |
| Frequency (MHz) | 3000 | 2700 |
| Bus speed (MHz) | 1333 | |
| Clock Multiplier | 9 | 27 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (code) / 64 KB (data) |
| L2 cache (KB) | 6144 | 512 |
| L3 cache (KB) | | 3072 |
| Max temperature (°C) | 72.4 | 69.1 |
| TDP (Watt) | 65 |
| Max power dissipation (Watt) | 100.31 | |
| Core voltage (V) | 0.85 - 1.3625 | |
| Cores | 2 |
| Threads | 2 |
| Multiprocessing | 1 |
| |
| | Instruction set extensions |
| AMD64 / EM64T 64-bit technology | + |
| MMX | + |
| SSE | + |
| SSE2 | + |
| SSE3 | + |
| SSE4.1 | + |
| SSE4.2 | - | + |
| SSSE3 / Supplemental SSE3 | + |
| |
| | Supported technologies |
| PowerNow! / Enhanced SpeedStep | + |
| Trusted Execution | + | - |
| Virtualization | + |
| Virus Protection / Execute Disable bit | + |
| |
| | Integrated Graphics |
| GPU Type | None | HD (Sandy Bridge) |
| |
| | Integrated Memory Controller(s) |
| The number of controllers | 0 | 1 |
Notes:
Rows with different specifications or features are highlighted.
For detailed specifications of "Intel Core 2 Duo E8400" or "Intel Pentium G630" parts please click on the links in the table header.
Benchmarks
System setup
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 and Pentium G630 processors were tested using different system
components, that are identified by MB, RAM and VID columns
in the tables below. The numbers in each of these columns correspond
to one of motherboards (MB), memory configurations (RAM) or graphics
adapters (VID), listed below:
MB - Motherboard(s):
1. ASUS P8P67
2. ASUS P8H61-M
3. ASROCK 4CORE1600TWINS-P35
RAM - Memory:
1. 2 GB DUAL-CHANNEL CORSAIR TR3X3G1600C9 DDR3
2. 2 GB DUAL-CHANNEL CORSAIR CM3X1024-1333C9 DDR3
VID - Video card(s):
1. MSI R6670 1GB GDDR5 (ATI RADEON)
2. INTEGRATED ON-CHIP INTEL SANDY BRIDGE GRAPHICS
3. POWERCOLOR 24PRO256M DDR2 (ATI RADEON HD2400)
All tests were performed at default frequency and voltage, using manufacturer's stock fan/heatsink. None of the components were overclocked. Motherboard BIOS options were left at default settings.
The results of all benchmarks are broken into four categories: multi-threaded, single-threaded, memory intensive and graphics / gaming.
Core 2 Duo E8400 vs Pentium G630 single-threaded benchmarks
Single-threaded benchmarks run on a single CPU core, and do not depend
on such features as the number of cores, or Hyper-Threading
technology. Additionally, they do not utilize on-chip caches,
dedicated to other cores.
| | | | | |
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
Intel Pentium G630
|
CINEBENCH R10 CPU score (1 core) benchmark
|
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 99.8% | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| 91.7% | 3 | 2 | 3 |
Super PI (1M) benchmark
|
Shorter is better | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 99.3% | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| 92.6% | 3 | 2 | 3 |
Core 2 Duo E8400 vs Pentium G630 multi-threaded benchmarks
Multi-threaded benchmarks utilize all CPU cores and other on-chip
resources (on-chip caches, internal buffers, etc). Intel's
Hyper-Threading feature also helps to improve multi-threading
performance.
| | | | | |
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
Intel Pentium G630
|
CINEBENCH R10 CPU score benchmark
|
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 99.2% | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| 90.7% | 3 | 2 | 3 |
CINEBENCH R10 render time (seconds) benchmark
|
Shorter is better | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 99.2% | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| 90.7% | 3 | 2 | 3 |
Euler3D benchmark
|
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 98.6% | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| 78.2% | 3 | 2 | 3 |
Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) benchmark
|
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 3 | 2 | 3 |
| 98.5% | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| 98.0% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Sandra MultiMedia Floating Point (it/s) benchmark
|
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 3 | 2 | 3 |
| 93.8% | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| 93.7% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
Intel Pentium G630
|
Sandra MultiMedia Integer (it/s) benchmark
|
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 3 | 2 | 3 |
| 75.9% | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| 75.6% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) benchmark
|
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 3 | 2 | 3 |
| 85.2% | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| 84.9% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Sandra Whetstone SSE2 (MFLOPS) benchmark
|
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 3 | 2 | 3 |
| 91.4% | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| 91.0% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
wPrime v1.55 (32M) benchmark
|
Shorter is better | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 99.6% | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| 86.0% | 3 | 2 | 3 |
Core 2 Duo E8400 vs Pentium G630 graphics benchmarks
Graphics benchmarks depend on the type of integrated or discrete
graphics adapter, and to less extent on the processor performance.
Because these benchmarks are synthetic, they may not truly represent
gaming performance. However, they still can used to estimate whether
one processor will perform faster or slower in games than another CPU.
Important! The processors were tested using different types of graphics adapters, that may not be suitable for comparison.
| | | | | |
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
Intel Pentium G630
|
3DMark2001 score benchmark
|
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 33.6% | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| 26.1% | 3 | 2 | 3 |
CINEBENCH R10 OpenGL score benchmark
|
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 34.0% | 3 | 2 | 3 |
| 21.9% | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Core 2 Duo E8400 vs Pentium G630 memory performance
Memory-intensive tests or programs move large amounts of data to/from
memory, and they depend more on memory throughput and the size of
on-chip caches, rather than on CPU integer/FP/SIMD performance.
| | | | | |
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
Intel Pentium G630
|
7Zip compressing/decompressing speed benchmark
|
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 3 | 2 | 3 |
| 97.7% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 95.7% | 2 | 2 | 2 |
WinRAR compressing/decompressing speed benchmark
|
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID |
| 100% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 97.7% | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| 89.4% | 3 | 2 | 3 |
CPUIDs
The table below compares two random CPUID records for Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 and Intel Pentium G630
microprocessors, that were submitted to our CPUID database.
Please note that different steppings of Intel processors, identified
by S-spec numbers or CPUID, may have slightly different features. For
that reason the comparison table below only applies to CPUs with
specific S-Spec number / CPUID.
| |
CPUID 1 |
CPUID 2 |
| Manufacturer | Intel |
| CPU Family | Core 2 Duo | Pentium Dual-Core |
| Model / Processor Number | E8400 | G630 |
| Frequency |   | 2693 MHz |
| CWID version | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Part number | EU80570PJ0806M | CM8062301046404 |
| S-Spec / Stepping Code | SLAPL | SR05S |
| |
| General information |
| Vendor | GenuineIntel |
| Processor name (BIOS) | Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E8400 @ 3.00GHz | Intel(R) Pentium(R) CPU G630 @ 2.70GHz |
| Cores | 2 |
| Logical processors | 2 |
| Processor type | Original OEM Processor |
| CPUID signature | 10676 | 206A7 |
| Family | 6 (06h) |
| Model | 23 (017h) | 42 (02Ah) |
| Stepping | 6 (06h) | 7 (07h) |
| TLB/Cache details | 64-byte Prefetching
Data TLB: 4-KB Pages, 4-way set associative, 256 entries
Data TLB: 4-MB Pages, 4-way set associative, 32 entries
Instruction TLB: 2-MB pages, 4-way, 8 entries or 4M pages, 4-way, 4 entries
Instruction TLB: 4-KB Pages, 4-way set associative, 128 entries
L1 Data TLB: 4-KB pages, 4-way set associative, 16 entries
L1 Data TLB: 4-MB pages, 4-way set associative, 16 entries | 64-byte Prefetching
Data TLB0: 2-MB or 4-MB pages, 4-way associative, 32 entries
Data TLB: 4-KB Pages, 4-way set associative, 64 entries
Instruction TLB: 4-KB Pages, 4-way set associative, 128 entries
L2 TLB: 1-MB, 4-way set associative, 64-byte line size
Shared 2nd-level TLB: 4 KB pages, 4-way set associative, 512 entries |
| |
| Cache |
| L1 data: Associativity | 8-way set associative |
| L1 data: Comments | | Direct-mapped |
| L1 data: Line size | 64 bytes |
| L1 data: Size | 32 KB | 2 x 32 KB |
| L1 instruction: Associativity | 8-way set associative |
| L1 instruction: Comments | | Direct-mapped |
| L1 instruction: Line size | 64 bytes |
| L1 instruction: Size | 32 KB | 2 x 32 KB |
| L2: Associativity | 16-way set associative | 8-way set associative |
| L2: Comments | | Non-inclusive|Direct-mapped |
| L2: Line size | 64 bytes |
| L2: Size | 6 MB | 2 x 256 KB |
| L3: Associativity | | 12-way set associative |
| L3: Comments | | Inclusive|Shared between all cores |
| L3: Line size | | 64 bytes |
| L3: Size | | 3 MB |
| |
| Instruction set extensions |
| MMX | + |
| SSE | + |
| SSE2 | + |
| SSE3 | + |
| SSE4.1 | + |
| SSE4.2 | - | + |
| SSSE3 | + |
| |
| Additional instructions |
| CLFLUSH | + |
| CMOV | + |
| CMPXCHG16B | + |
| CMPXCHG8B | + |
| FXSAVE/FXRSTORE | + |
| MONITOR/MWAIT | + |
| PCLMULDQ | - | + |
| POPCNT | - | + |
| RDTSCP | - | + |
| SYSENTER/SYSEXIT | + |
| XSAVE / XRESTORE states | - | + |
| |
| Major features |
| 64-bit / Intel 64 | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep | + |
| Intel Trusted Execution technology | + | - |
| Intel Virtualization | + |
| NX bit/XD-bit | + |
| On-chip Floating Point Unit | + |
| |
| Other features |
| 36-bit page-size extensions | + |
| 64-bit debug store | + |
| Advanced programmable interrupt controller | + |
| CPL qualified debug store | + |
| Debug store | + |
| Debugging extensions | + |
| Digital Thermal Sensor capability | + |
| LAHF / SAHF support in 64-bit mode | + |
| Machine check architecture | + |
| Machine check exception | + |
| Memory-type range registers | + |
| Model-specific registers | + |
| Page attribute table | + |
| Page global extension | + |
| Page-size extensions (4MB pages) | + |
| Pending break enable | + |
| Perfmon and Debug capability | + |
| Physical address extensions | + |
| Power Limit Notification capability | - | + |
| Process context identifiers | - | + |
| Self-snoop | + |
| TSC rate is ensured to be invariant across all states | - | + |
| Thermal monitor | + |
| Thermal monitor 2 | + |
| Thermal monitor and software controlled clock facilities | + |
| Time stamp counter | + |
| Timestamp counter deadline | - | + |
| Virtual 8086-mode enhancements | + |
| xTPR Update Control | + |
+ - feature is supported
- - feature is not supported
Features, not supported by all processors in the table, are not displayed
Compare with ...
Compare Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 with...
Compare Intel Pentium G630 with...
Note: To see differences with any CPU, type in
any combination of the following into the "Any CPU" field: manufacturer name,
full or partial family name, model number, part number, core name,
socket name, operating frequency, bus speed (must have FSB suffix),
and the last level cache. Here are some valid searches:
i5-3570K
Intel Celeron 2 GHz
Ivy Bridge
Pentium 4 800FSB
AMD 3.3GHz 8MB
|
|