Intel Celeron B800 vs P4600
Mini Review
Intel Celeron B800 advantages
 |
|
Intel Celeron P4600 advantages
 |
|
B800 vs P4600 performance comparison
The charts in the table below illustrate performance of Celeron B800 and Celeron P4600 processors in several different types of programs. To calculate displayed numbers we averaged results for a number of tests for each specific program type. As a result, the shown results may differ from results, that you may receive in individual benchmarks. We also averaged the numbers for task type specific benchmarks and all-around performance benchmarks, and presented them in the 'Overall performance' chart. The 'Price-performance ratio' calculates how much more performance you will get per dollar spent. This ratio does not take into account the cost of other system parts. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Higher is better |
Higher is better |
Higher is better |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Higher is better |
Higher is better |
Higher is better |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full list of benchmarks, that demonstrate difference in performance between Intel B800 and Intel P4600 in various types of programs, can be found in the "Benchmarks" tab.
B800 vs P4600 power consumption and price comparison
Lower is better |
Lower is better |
Detailed side by side comparison of B800 vs P4600 specs can be found in the "Specifications" tab. Even more detailed comparison of low level features of both CPUs is located in the "CPUIDs" tab.
Pros and Cons summary
| Celeron B800 | Celeron P4600 |
|
General recommendations: A bit faster in all application types,
Performs better in graphics applications, Supports SSE4.1 / SSE4.2 instructions, Insignificantly cheaper, Better price / performance ratio |
General recommendations: Better single- and multi-threaded performance
|
|
Drawbacks: None
|
Drawbacks: Performs a bit worse in all kinds of tasks,
Worse performance in graphics applications, Lacks some instructions, Slightly more expensive, Worse price / performance ratio |
Similar processors
| Celeron B800 | Celeron P4600 |
Similar CPUs use the same socket and architecture as B800 and Intel Celeron P4600.
Where to buy
These CPUs are available only as tray CPUs. They are not offered by big computer shops, although they may be available from smaller stores. | |
| The official price of the Intel B800 CPU is $ 80. | The official price of the B800 is $ 86. |
Specifications
| Intel Celeron B800 | Intel Celeron P4600 | |
| Basic details | ||
| Market segment | Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Intel | |
| Family | Intel Mobile Celeron Dual-Core | |
| Model number | B800 | P4600 |
| CPU part number | FF8062701142600 | CP80617005307AB |
| Introduction date | June 19, 2011 | September 26, 2010 |
| Current official price | $80 (as of Apr 2013) | $86 (as of Jan 2013) |
| CPU features | ||
| Core name | Sandy Bridge | Arrandale |
| Microarchitecture | Sandy Bridge | Nehalem |
| Technology (micron) | 0.032 | |
| Data width (bits) | 64 | |
| Socket | Socket G2 | Socket G1 |
| Frequency (MHz) | 1500 | 2000 |
| Clock Multiplier | 15 | |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (code) / 64 KB (data) | |
| L2 cache (KB) | 512 | |
| L3 cache (KB) | 2048 | |
| Max temperature (°C) | 100 | 90 |
| TDP (Watt) | 35 | |
| Cores | 2 | |
| Threads | 2 | |
| Multiprocessing | 1 | |
| Instruction set extensions | ||
| AMD64 / EM64T 64-bit technology | + | |
| MMX | + | |
| SSE | + | |
| SSE2 | + | |
| SSE3 | + | |
| SSE4.1 | + | - |
| SSE4.2 | + | - |
| SSSE3 / Supplemental SSE3 | + | |
| Supported technologies | ||
| PowerNow! / Enhanced SpeedStep | + | |
| Virtualization | + | |
| Virus Protection / Execute Disable bit | + | |
| Integrated Graphics | ||
| GPU Type | HD (Sandy Bridge) | HD (Nehalem) |
| Base frequency (MHz) | 650 | 500 |
| Maximum frequency (MHz) | 1000 | 667 |
| Integrated Memory Controller(s) | ||
| The number of controllers | 1 | |
| Memory channels | 2 | |
| Supported memory | DDR3-1066 DDR3-1333 | DDR3-800 DDR3-1066 |
Rows with different specifications or features are highlighted.
For detailed specifications of "Intel Celeron B800" or "Intel Celeron P4600" parts please click on the links in the table header.
Benchmarks
System setup
Below is a partial set of Intel Celeron B800 and P4600 benchmarks from our CPU benchmark database. The former processor was tested on Supermicro X9SCV-Q motherboard with 2 GB dual-channel Crucial CT2KIT12864BC1339 DDR3-1333 SODIMM memory, and Integrated on-chip Intel Sandy Bridge graphics. The latter processor was tested on Jetway NF98-QM57-LF motherboard, that had 2 GB dual-channel Crucial CT2KIT12864BC1339 DDR3-1333 SODIMM memory, and Integrated on-chip Intel Westmere graphics. For different system configurations please see tests of Celeron B800 and P4600 CPUs in our benchmark database.
All tests were performed at default frequency and voltage, using manufacturer's stock fan/heatsink. None of the components were overclocked. Motherboard BIOS options were left at default settings.
The results of all benchmarks are broken into four categories: multi-threaded, single-threaded, memory intensive and graphics / gaming.
Celeron B800 vs P4600 single-threaded benchmarks
Single-threaded benchmarks run on a single CPU core, and do not depend on such features as the number of cores, or Hyper-Threading technology. Additionally, they do not utilize on-chip caches, dedicated to other cores.
Intel Celeron B800 Intel Celeron P4600 | ||
3DMark03 CPU score benchmark | ||
Longer is better  | ||
|---|---|---|
| 100% | ||
| 94.3% | ||
CINEBENCH R10 CPU score (1 core) benchmark | ||
| Longer is better | ||
| 100% | ||
| 88.0% | ||
FLAC encoding - single process benchmark | ||
| Longer is better | ||
| 100% | ||
| 85.7% | ||
H.264 video encoding - single process benchmark | ||
| Longer is better | ||
| 100% | ||
| 89.9% | ||
LAME MP3 encoding - single process benchmark | ||
| Longer is better | ||
| 100% | ||
| 84.7% | ||
Intel Celeron B800 Intel Celeron P4600 | ||
PCMark2002 CPU score benchmark | ||
| Longer is better | ||
| 100% | ||
| 77.6% | ||
Super PI (1M) benchmark | ||
 Shorter is better | ||
| 100% | ||
| 85.4% | ||
XVid video encoding - single process benchmark | ||
| Longer is better | ||
| 100% | ||
| 88.7% | ||
Celeron B800 vs P4600 multi-threaded benchmarks
Multi-threaded benchmarks utilize all CPU cores and other on-chip resources (on-chip caches, internal buffers, etc). Intel's Hyper-Threading feature also helps to improve multi-threading performance.
Intel Celeron B800 Intel Celeron P4600 | ||
3DMark06 CPU score benchmark | ||
| Longer is better | ||
|---|---|---|
| 100% | ||
| 85.1% | ||
Apache web server - dynamic pages benchmark | ||
| Longer is better | ||
| 100% | ||
| 83.2% | ||
Apache web server - static pages benchmark | ||
| Longer is better | ||
| 100% | ||
| 83.5% | ||
Blowfish encryption benchmark | ||
| Longer is better | ||
| 100% | ||
| 78.3% | ||
CINEBENCH R10 CPU score benchmark | ||
| Longer is better | ||
| 100% | ||
| 88.7% | ||
Intel Celeron B800 Intel Celeron P4600 | ||
CINEBENCH R10 render time (seconds) benchmark | ||
| Shorter is better | ||
| 100% | ||
| 88.7% | ||
CrystalMark ALU benchmark | ||
| Longer is better | ||
| 100% | ||
| 88.1% | ||
CrystalMark FPU benchmark | ||
| Longer is better | ||
| 100% | ||
| 72.8% | ||
Euler3D benchmark | ||
| Longer is better | ||
| 100% | ||
| 91.1% | ||
FLAC encoding - multiple processes benchmark | ||
| Longer is better | ||
| 100% | ||
| 85.7% | ||
Intel Celeron B800 Intel Celeron P4600 | ||
Fritz Chess Benchmark benchmark | ||
| Longer is better | ||
| 100% | ||
| 80.8% | ||
H.264 video encoding - multiple processes benchmark | ||
| Longer is better | ||
| 100% | ||
| 90.1% | ||
H.264 video encoding - multithreaded benchmark | ||
| Longer is better | ||
| 100% | ||
| 89.1% | ||
LAME MP3 encoding - multiple processes benchmark | ||
| Longer is better | ||
| 100% | ||
| 84.8% | ||
MySQL 5.0.96 - selecting data benchmark | ||
| Longer is better | ||
| 100% | ||
| 75.8% | ||
Intel Celeron B800 Intel Celeron P4600 | ||
PCMark05 CPU score benchmark | ||
| Longer is better | ||
| 100% | ||
| 80.8% | ||
PCMark05 score benchmark | ||
| Longer is better | ||
| 100% | ||
| 91.7% | ||
Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) benchmark | ||
| Longer is better | ||
| 100% | ||
| 75.8% | ||
Sandra MultiMedia Floating Point (it/s) benchmark | ||
| Longer is better | ||
| 100% | ||
| 72.1% | ||
Sandra MultiMedia Integer (it/s) benchmark | ||
| Longer is better | ||
| 100% | ||
| 71.3% | ||
Intel Celeron B800 Intel Celeron P4600 | ||
Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) benchmark | ||
| Longer is better | ||
| 100% | ||
| 71.0% | ||
Sandra Whetstone SSE2 (MFLOPS) benchmark | ||
| Longer is better | ||
| 100% | ||
| 74.8% | ||
XVid video encoding - multiple processes benchmark | ||
| Longer is better | ||
| 100% | ||
| 90.0% | ||
wPrime v1.55 (32M) benchmark | ||
| Shorter is better | ||
| 100% | ||
| 77.3% | ||
Celeron B800 vs P4600 graphics benchmarks
Graphics benchmarks depend on the type of integrated or discrete graphics adapter, and to less extent on the processor performance. Because these benchmarks are synthetic, they may not truly represent gaming performance. However, they still can used to estimate whether one processor will perform faster or slower in games than another CPU.
Intel Celeron B800 Intel Celeron P4600 | ||
3DMark03 game score benchmark | ||
| Longer is better | ||
|---|---|---|
| 100% | ||
| 66.3% | ||
3DMark06 3DMark score benchmark | ||
| Longer is better | ||
| 100% | ||
| 69.7% | ||
3DMark2001 score benchmark | ||
| Longer is better | ||
| 100% | ||
| 95.9% | ||
CINEBENCH R10 OpenGL score benchmark | ||
| Longer is better | ||
| 100% | ||
| 83.8% | ||
PCMark05 Graphics score benchmark | ||
| Longer is better | ||
| 100% | ||
| 99.0% | ||
Celeron B800 vs P4600 memory performance
Memory-intensive tests or programs move large amounts of data to/from memory, and they depend more on memory throughput and the size of on-chip caches, rather than on CPU integer/FP/SIMD performance.
Intel Celeron B800 Intel Celeron P4600 | ||
7Zip compressing/decompressing speed benchmark | ||
| Longer is better | ||
|---|---|---|
| 100% | ||
| 84.9% | ||
CrystalMark Memory benchmark | ||
| Longer is better | ||
| 100% | ||
| 78.7% | ||
PCMark05 Memory score benchmark | ||
| Longer is better | ||
| 100% | ||
| 91.0% | ||
PCMark2002 Memory score benchmark | ||
| Longer is better | ||
| 100% | ||
| 96.3% | ||
WinRAR compressing/decompressing speed benchmark | ||
| Longer is better | ||
| 100% | ||
| 82.8% | ||
CPUIDs
The table below compares two random CPUID records for Intel Celeron B800 and Intel Celeron P4600 microprocessors, that were submitted to our CPUID database. Please note that different steppings of Intel processors, identified by S-spec numbers or CPUID, may have slightly different features. For that reason the comparison table below only applies to CPUs with specific S-Spec number / CPUID.
| CPUID 1 | CPUID 2 | |
| Manufacturer | Intel | |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Family | Celeron Dual-Core / Core i3 / Core i3 Mobile / Core i5 / Core i5 Mobile / Core i7 / Core i7 Mobile / Mobile Celeron Dual-Core / | Mobile Celeron Dual-Core |
| Model / Processor Number | 1.50 GHz | P4600 |
| Frequency | 1500 MHz | 1994 MHz |
| CWID version | 0.4 | |
| Part number | FF8062701142600 | CP80617005307AB |
| S-Spec / Stepping Code | SR0EW | SLBZY |
| General information | ||
| Vendor | GenuineIntel | |
| Processor name (BIOS) | Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU B800 @ 1.50GHz | Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU P4600 @ 2.00GHz |
| Cores | 2 | |
| Logical processors | 2 | |
| Processor type | Original OEM Processor | |
| CPUID signature | 206A7 | 20655 |
| Family | 6 (06h) | |
| Model | 42 (02Ah) | 37 (025h) |
| Stepping | 7 (07h) | 5 (05h) |
| TLB/Cache details | 64-byte Prefetching Data TLB0: 2-MB or 4-MB pages, 4-way associative, 32 entries Data TLB: 4-KB Pages, 4-way set associative, 64 entries Instruction TLB: 4-KB Pages, 4-way set associative, 128 entries L2 TLB: 1-MB, 4-way set associative, 64-byte line size Shared 2nd-level TLB: 4 KB pages, 4-way set associative, 512 entries | 64-byte Prefetching Data TLB0: 2-MB or 4-MB pages, 4-way associative, 32 entries Data TLB: 4-KB Pages, 4-way set associative, 64 entries Instruction TLB: 2-MB or 4-MB pages, fully associative, 7 entries Instruction TLB: 4-KB Pages, 4-way set associative, 128 entries Shared 2nd-level TLB: 4 KB pages, 4-way set associative, 512 entries |
| Cache | ||
| L1 data: Associativity | 8-way set associative | |
| L1 data: Comments | Direct-mapped | |
| L1 data: Line size | 64 bytes | |
| L1 data: Size | 2 x 32 KB | |
| L1 instruction: Associativity | 8-way set associative | 4-way set associative |
| L1 instruction: Comments | Direct-mapped | |
| L1 instruction: Line size | 64 bytes | |
| L1 instruction: Size | 2 x 32 KB | |
| L2: Associativity | 8-way set associative | |
| L2: Comments | Non-inclusive|Direct-mapped | |
| L2: Line size | 64 bytes | |
| L2: Size | 2 x 256 KB | |
| L3: Associativity | 8-way set associative | |
| L3: Comments | Inclusive|Shared between all cores | Inclusive|Direct-mapped|Shared between all cores |
| L3: Line size | 64 bytes | |
| L3: Size | 2 MB | |
| Instruction set extensions | ||
| MMX | + | |
| SSE | + | |
| SSE2 | + | |
| SSE3 | + | |
| SSE4.1 | + | - |
| SSE4.2 | + | - |
| SSSE3 | + | |
| Additional instructions | ||
| CLFLUSH | + | |
| CMOV | + | |
| CMPXCHG16B | + | |
| CMPXCHG8B | + | |
| FXSAVE/FXRSTORE | + | |
| MONITOR/MWAIT | + | |
| PCLMULDQ | + | - |
| POPCNT | + | |
| RDTSCP | + | |
| SYSENTER/SYSEXIT | + | |
| XSAVE / XRESTORE states | + | - |
| Major features | ||
| 64-bit / Intel 64 | + | |
| Enhanced SpeedStep | + | |
| Intel Virtualization | + | |
| NX bit/XD-bit | + | |
| On-chip Floating Point Unit | + | |
| Other features | ||
| 36-bit page-size extensions | + | |
| 64-bit debug store | + | |
| Advanced programmable interrupt controller | + | |
| CPL qualified debug store | + | |
| Debug store | + | |
| Debugging extensions | + | |
| Digital Thermal Sensor capability | + | |
| Extended xAPIC support | + | - |
| LAHF / SAHF support in 64-bit mode | + | |
| Machine check architecture | + | |
| Machine check exception | + | |
| Memory-type range registers | + | |
| Model-specific registers | + | |
| Page attribute table | + | |
| Page global extension | + | |
| Page-size extensions (4MB pages) | + | |
| Pending break enable | + | |
| Perfmon and Debug capability | + | |
| Physical address extensions | + | |
| Power Limit Notification capability | + | - |
| Process context identifiers | + | |
| Self-snoop | + | |
| TSC rate is ensured to be invariant across all states | + | |
| Thermal monitor | + | |
| Thermal monitor 2 | + | |
| Thermal monitor and software controlled clock facilities | + | |
| Time stamp counter | + | |
| Timestamp counter deadline | + | - |
| Virtual 8086-mode enhancements | + | |
| xTPR Update Control | + | |
- - feature is not supported
Features, not supported by all processors in the table, are not displayed
Compare with ...
i5-3570K
Intel Celeron 2 GHz
Ivy Bridge
Pentium 4 800FSB
AMD 3.3GHz 8MB
| Terms and Conditions · Privacy Policy · Contact Us | (c) Copyright 2003 - 2010 Gennadiy Shvets |