Search CPU-World

Search site contents:

Intel Celeron E3400 vs Core 2 Duo E4500

Mini Review

Intel Celeron E3400 advantages



Intel Celeron E3400
  • In single-threaded programs, this processor has 18% higher performance.
  • The CPU has 16% better performance in multi-threaded applications. The difference in performance depends on specific task. In some of them the Intel Celeron E3400 could be up to 28% faster.
  • The Celeron E3400 microprocessor supports hardware acceleration of virtualized tasks.

Intel Core 2 Duo E4500 advantages



Picture
is not
available
  • Memory performance of the Intel Core 2 Duo E4500 is better.

E3400 vs E4500 performance comparison

The charts in the section below illustrate relative performance of Celeron E3400 and Core 2 Duo E4500 microprocessors in a number of different types of tasks. The results in the charts are based on several benchmarks, that you can find in the "Benchmarks" tab. As such, the displayed results may differ from results, that you may receive in individual tests. We also averaged the numbers for application type specific benchmarks and all-around performance benchmarks, and presented them in the 'Overall performance' chart.
Single-threaded performance
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1.18
 
1
 
 
Higher is better
Multi-threaded performance
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1.16
 
1
 
 
Higher is better
Memory-intensive applications
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1
 
1.05
 
 
Higher is better
Discrete Graphics performance
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1
 
1
 
 
Higher is better
Overall performance
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1.07
 
1
 
 
Higher is better
 

  - Intel Celeron E3400       - Intel Core 2 Duo E4500

Exhaustive list of benchmarks, that demonstrate performance difference between Intel Celeron E3400 and Core 2 Duo E4500 in various types of applications, can be seen in the "Benchmarks" tab.


E3400 vs E4500 power consumption comparison

Thermal Design Power
80
64
48
32
16
0
 
 
65W
 
65W
 
 
Lower is better
 

Detailed side by side comparison of Celeron E3400 vs Intel Core 2 Duo E4500 specs can be found in the "Specifications" tab. Even more detailed comparison of internal features of both processors you will find in the "CPUIDs" tab.


Pros and Cons summary

Celeron E3400 Core 2 Duo E4500
General recommendations:
Performs insignificantly better in all types of programs
  General recommendations:
None

Drawbacks:

None
 

Drawbacks:

Performs a bit worse in all kinds of applications

Similar processors

Celeron E3400 Core 2 Duo E4500
 

Similar CPUs use the same socket and architecture as E3400 and Core 2 Duo E4500.


Where to buy


These processors are no longer manufactured. For this reason the best place to search for them is eBay. Third party vendors at Amazon may also have them for sale.
Jump to:
  • Benchmarks
  • CPUIDs
  • Comments
 

More comparisons

Compare Intel Celeron E3400 with...

Other Core 2 Duo CPU:

Any CPU:


Compare Intel Core 2 Duo E4500 with...

Other Celeron Dual-Core CPU:

Any CPU:


Note: To see differences with any CPU, type in any combination of the following into the "Any CPU" field: manufacturer name, full or partial family name, model number, part number, core name, socket name, operating frequency, bus speed (must have FSB suffix), and the last level cache. Here are some valid searches:

  i5-3570K
  Intel Celeron 2 GHz
  Core
  Pentium 4 800FSB
  AMD 3.3GHz 8MB

Specifications

Please visit Intel Celeron E3400 and Intel Core 2 Duo E4500 pages for more detailed specifications of both microprocessors.

 Intel Celeron E3400Intel Core 2 Duo E4500
Market segmentDesktop
ManufacturerIntel
FamilyCeleron Dual-CoreCore 2 Duo
Basic details
Model numberE3400E4500
CPU part numberAT80571RG0641MLHH80557PG0492M
Box part numberBX80571E3400
BXC80571E3400
BX80557E4500
Introduction dateJanuary 17, 2010 
 
CPU features
Core nameWolfdaleAllendale
MicroarchitectureCore
Technology (micron)0.0450.065
Data width (bits)64
SocketSocket 775
Frequency (MHz)26002200
Bus speed (MHz)800
Clock Multiplier1311
L1 cache64 KB (code) / 64 KB (data)
L2 cache (KB)10242048
Max temperature (°C)74.173.3
TDP (Watt)65
Max power dissipation (Watt) 104.63
Core voltage (V)0.85 - 1.36250.85 - 1.5
Cores2
Threads2
Multiprocessing1
 
Instruction set extensions
AMD64 / EM64T 64-bit technology+
MMX+
SSE+
SSE2+
SSE3+
SSSE3 / Supplemental SSE3+
 
Supported technologies
PowerNow! / Enhanced SpeedStep+
Virtualization+-
Virus Protection / Execute Disable bit+
 
Integrated Graphics
GPU TypeNone
 
Integrated Memory Controller(s)
The number of controllers0
Notes:

Rows with different specifications or features are highlighted.

For detailed specifications of "Intel Celeron E3400" or "Intel Core 2 Duo E4500" parts please click on the links in the table header.

Benchmarks

System setup

Intel Celeron E3400 and Core 2 Duo E4500 processors were tested using different system components, that are identified by MB, RAM and VID columns in the tables below. The numbers in each of these columns correspond to one of motherboards (MB), memory configurations (RAM) or graphics adapters (VID), listed below:

MB - Motherboard(s):
1. ASROCK 4CORE1600TWINS-P35
2. INTEL DP965LT

RAM - Memory:
1. 2 GB DUAL-CHANNEL CORSAIR CM3X1024-1333C9 DDR3
2. 2GB DUAL-CHANNEL CORSAIR CM2X1024-6400C4

VID - Video card(s):
1. POWERCOLOR 24PRO256M DDR2 (ATI RADEON HD2400)

All tests were performed at default frequency and voltage, using manufacturer's stock fan/heatsink. None of the components were overclocked. Motherboard BIOS options were left at default settings.

The results of all benchmarks are broken into four categories: multi-threaded, single-threaded, memory intensive and graphics / gaming.


Celeron E3400 vs Core 2 Duo E4500 single-threaded benchmarks

Single-threaded benchmarks run on a single CPU core, and do not depend on such features as the number of cores, or Hyper-Threading technology. Additionally, they do not utilize on-chip caches, dedicated to other cores.

     

    Intel Celeron E3400           Intel Core 2 Duo E4500

3DMark03 CPU score benchmark

Uses DirectX software vertex shader to run Wings of Fury and Trolls' Lair games, and calculates a 3DMark03 CPU score based on averaged number of frames per second, achieved by the CPU/GPU combination.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
97.5%111

CINEBENCH R10 CPU score (1 core) benchmark

Measures performance of a single-core rendering of a photo-realistic 3D image using CINEMA 4D software engine.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
83.9%111
83.8%221

FLAC encoding - single process benchmark

Reports the number of songs, converted by a single CPU core from WAV to FLAC format using the best possible compression.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
85.3%111

H.264 video encoding - single process benchmark

Measures the number of frames, converted by one CPU thread from MPEG2 format to H.264 format using high quality settings.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
85.8%111

LAME MP3 encoding - single process benchmark

Reports the number of MP3 songs, encoded by one CPU core per one minute.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
82.0%111

    Intel Celeron E3400           Intel Core 2 Duo E4500

PCMark2002 CPU score benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
87.8%111
87.6%221

Super PI (1M) benchmark

Measures time, required to calculate the first 1 million digits after the decimal point in the number Pi.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
88.1%111
86.9%221

XVid video encoding - single process benchmark

Reports how many frames per second can be transcoded by a single CPU core from MPEG2 to XVid (MPEG4) format, utilizing single-pass conversion method.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
85.5%111


Celeron E3400 vs Core 2 Duo E4500 multi-threaded benchmarks

Multi-threaded benchmarks utilize all CPU cores and other on-chip resources (on-chip caches, internal buffers, etc). Intel's Hyper-Threading feature also helps to improve multi-threading performance.

     

    Intel Celeron E3400           Intel Core 2 Duo E4500

Apache web server - dynamic pages benchmark

Shows an average number of dynamic HTML pages served per second by local instance of Apache 1.3.41 web server. The test has much greater error margin than other tests.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
99.6%111

Apache web server - static pages benchmark

Shows an average number of very simple static HTML pages served per second by local Apache 1.3.41 web server. The test has much greater error margin than other tests.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
86.0%111

Blowfish encryption benchmark

Reports encryption speed of pre-defined 32KB text block. The data is encrypted using Blowfish algorithm.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
86.3%111

CINEBENCH R10 CPU score benchmark

Measures performance of multi-core rendering of a photo-realistic 3D image using CINEMA 4D software engine.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
85.1%221
85.0%111

CINEBENCH R10 render time (seconds) benchmark

Measures time taken to render a photo-realistic 3D image using CINEMA 4D software engine.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
85.1%221
85.0%111

    Intel Celeron E3400           Intel Core 2 Duo E4500

CrystalMark ALU benchmark

Runs Fibonacci, Napierian, Eratosthenes and QuickSort integer performance tests on all CPU cores, and reports the sum of results.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
74.9%111

CrystalMark FPU benchmark

Executes MikoFPU, RandMeanSS, FFT and Mandelbrot FPU-dependent tests using all CPU cores, and reports the sum of results.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
87.0%111

Euler3D benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
96.4%221
96.4%111

FLAC encoding - multiple processes benchmark

Reports the number of songs, converted from WAV to FLAC format by all CPU cores using the best possible compression.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
85.6%111

Fritz Chess Benchmark benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
87.0%111

    Intel Celeron E3400           Intel Core 2 Duo E4500

H.264 video encoding - multiple processes benchmark

Measures the number of frames, converted by all logical processors from MPEG2 format to H.264 format using single-pass method and high quality settings.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
87.2%111

H.264 video encoding - multithreaded benchmark

Measures the number of frames, converted by all logical processors from MPEG2 format to H.264 format using multi-threading system calls, dual-pass method and high quality settings.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
88.2%111

LAME MP3 encoding - multiple processes benchmark

Reports the number of MP3 songs, encoded by all CPU cores per one minute.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
82.1%111

MySQL 5.0.27 - selecting data benchmark

Shows the number of SQL requests per second served by MySQL server v5.0.27, running on the same computer. This test does not scale beyond 6 CPU cores.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
88.2%111

Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) benchmark

Runs Dhrystone test on all cores, and reports estimated integer performance in MIPS (Millions of Instructions Per Second).
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
84.4%111
84.2%221

    Intel Celeron E3400           Intel Core 2 Duo E4500

Sandra MultiMedia Floating Point (it/s) benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
84.3%111
84.1%221

Sandra MultiMedia Integer (it/s) benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
84.7%111
84.6%221

Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) benchmark

Runs Whetstone test on all cores, and reports estimated floating-point performance in MFLOPS (Millions of Floating-Point Operations Per Second).
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
78.6%221
78.6%111

Sandra Whetstone SSE2 (MFLOPS) benchmark

Runs SSE2-enabled Whetstone test on all cores, and reports estimated floating-point performance in MFLOPS (Millions of Floating-Point Operations Per Second).
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
75.2%111
75.0%221

XVid video encoding - multiple processes benchmark

Reports how many frames per second can be transcoded by all CPU cores from MPEG2 to XVid (MPEG4) format, utilizing single-pass conversion method.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
86.8%111

    Intel Celeron E3400           Intel Core 2 Duo E4500

wPrime v1.55 (32M) benchmark

wPrime benchmark measures time taken to calculate square roots of numbers from 1 to 33554431.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
78.4%221
78.0%111


Celeron E3400 vs Core 2 Duo E4500 graphics benchmarks

Graphics benchmarks depend on the type of integrated or discrete graphics adapter, and to less extent on the processor performance. Because these benchmarks are synthetic, they may not truly represent gaming performance. However, they still can be used to estimate whether one processor will perform faster or slower than another CPU in games and other 3D tasks.

     

    Intel Celeron E3400           Intel Core 2 Duo E4500

3DMark03 game score benchmark

Measures graphics and 3D game performance of discrete and integrated GPUs using 4 different game simulations, that have varying level of DirectX support from version 7 to version 9.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
100%111

3DMark2001 score benchmark

Runs a series of game simulations and feature tests to measure graphics and 3D game performance of discrete and integrated GPUs. It utilizes a single CPU core, and it is compatible with DirectX 8 and later APIs.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%221
99.9%111
99.9%111

CINEBENCH R10 OpenGL score benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
98.9%111
98.2%221


Celeron E3400 vs Core 2 Duo E4500 memory performance

Memory-intensive tests or programs move large amounts of data to/from memory, and they depend more on memory throughput and the size of on-chip caches, rather than on CPU integer/FP/SIMD performance.

     

    Intel Celeron E3400           Intel Core 2 Duo E4500

7Zip compressing/decompressing speed (1 thread) benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
91.8%221
91.3%111

CrystalMark Memory benchmark

Evaluates Read, Write, Read/Write and Cache memory bandwidth score. The final result is the sum of measured results.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
94.8%111

PCMark2002 Memory score benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
99.0%221
69.3%111

WinRAR compressing/decompressing speed benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%221
97.0%111
93.4%111

CPUIDs

The table below compares two random CPUID records for Intel Celeron E3400 and Intel Core 2 Duo E4500 microprocessors, that were submitted to our CPUID database. Please note that different steppings of Intel processors, identified by S-spec numbers or CPUID, may have slightly different features. For that reason the comparison table below only applies to CPUs with specific S-Spec number / CPUID.

  CPUID 1 CPUID 2
ManufacturerIntel
CPU FamilyCeleron Dual-CoreCore 2 Duo
Model / Processor NumberE3400E4500
Frequency2600 MHz2200 MHz
CWID version0.4
Part numberAT80571RG0641MLHH80557PG0492M
S-Spec / Stepping CodeSLGTZSLA95
 
General information
VendorGenuineIntel
Processor name (BIOS)Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU E3400 @ 2.60GHzIntel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E4500 @ 2.20GHz
Cores2
Logical processors2
Processor typeOriginal OEM Processor
CPUID signature1067A6FD
Family 6 (06h)
Model23 (017h)15 (0Fh)
Stepping10 (0Ah)13 (0Dh)
TLB/Cache details64-byte Prefetching
Data TLB: 4-KB Pages, 4-way set associative, 256 entries
Data TLB: 4-MB Pages, 4-way set associative, 32 entries
Instruction TLB: 2-MB pages, 4-way, 8 entries or 4M pages, 4-way, 4 entries
Instruction TLB: 4-KB Pages, 4-way set associative, 128 entries
L1 Data TLB: 4-KB pages, 4-way set associative, 16 entries
L1 Data TLB: 4-MB pages, 4-way set associative, 16 entries
 
Cache
L1 data: Associativity8-way set associative
L1 data: CommentsDirect-mapped
L1 data: Line size64 bytes
L1 data: Size2 x 32 KB
L1 instruction: Associativity8-way set associative
L1 instruction: CommentsDirect-mapped
L1 instruction: Line size64 bytes
L1 instruction: Size2 x 32 KB
L2: Associativity4-way set associative8-way set associative
L2: CommentsNon-inclusive|Direct-mapped|Shared between all cores
L2: Line size64 bytes
L2: Size1 MB2 MB
 
Instruction set extensions
MMX+
SSE+
SSE2+
SSE3+
SSSE3+
 
Additional instructions
CLFLUSH+
CMOV+
CMPXCHG16B+
CMPXCHG8B+
FXSAVE/FXRSTORE+
MONITOR/MWAIT+
SYSENTER/SYSEXIT+
XSAVE/XRESTORE states+-
 
Major features
64-bit / Intel 64+
Enhanced SpeedStep+
Intel Virtualization+-
On-chip Floating Point Unit+
 
Other features
36-bit page-size extensions+
64-bit debug store+
Advanced programmable interrupt controller+
CPL qualified debug store+
Debug store+
Debugging extensions+
Digital Thermal Sensor capability+
LAHF/SAHF support in 64-bit mode+
Machine check architecture+
Machine check exception+
Memory-type range registers+
Model-specific registers+
Page attribute table+
Page global extension+
Page-size extensions (4MB pages)+
Pending break enable+
Perfmon and Debug capability+
Physical address extensions+
Self-snoop+
Thermal monitor+
Thermal monitor 2+
Thermal monitor and software controlled clock facilities+
Time stamp counter+
Virtual 8086-mode enhancements+
xTPR Update Control+
+ - feature is supported
- - feature is not supported
Features, not supported by all processors in the table, are not displayed

Comments (0)
Terms and Conditions · Privacy Policy · Contact Us (c) Copyright 2003 - 2010 Gennadiy Shvets