CPU-World logo News · Chips · Information · Forum · Links · About
BSP · CPU · FPU · MCU · SoC · Other ICs · Curiosities

Intel Celeron E3400 vs Intel Core 2 Duo E4500


Mini Review

Intel Celeron E3400 advantages



Intel Celeron E3400

  • In single-threaded programs, this processor has 18% higher performance.
  • The CPU is 16% faster when running multi-threaded tasks.
  • The microprocessor provides hardware acceleration of virtualized programs.


Intel Core 2 Duo E4500 advantages



Picture
is not
available

  • In memory-intensive tasks, the CPU has 5% higher performance.


E3400 vs E4500 performance comparison

The charts illustrate performance of Celeron E3400 and Core 2 Duo E4500 processors in various kinds of tasks. To calculate displayed numbers we averaged results for several tests for each specific application type. Consequentally, the shown results may differ from results, that you may receive in individual benchmarks. We also averaged the numbers for task type specific benchmarks and all-around performance benchmarks, and presented them in the 'Overall performance' chart.

Single-threaded performance
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0		  
 
1.18
  
1
  
 
Higher is better
Multi-threaded performance
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0		  
 
1.16
  
1
  
 
Higher is better
Memory-intensive applications
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0		  
 
1
  
1.05
  
 
Higher is better
Discrete Graphics performance
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0		  
 
1
  
1
  
 
Higher is better
Overall performance
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0		  
 
1.07
  
1
  
 
Higher is better
  

  - Intel Celeron E3400       - Intel Core 2 Duo E4500

Please see the "Benchmarks" tab for exhaustive list of benchmarks, demonstrating performance difference between Intel E3400 and Intel Core 2 Duo E4500 in various types of programs.



E3400 vs E4500 power consumption comparison

Thermal Design Power
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0		  
 
1
  
1
  
 
Lower is better
    

Detailed side by side comparison of Celeron E3400 vs Intel Core 2 Duo E4500 specs can be found in the "Specifications" tab. Much more detailed comparison of internal features of both CPUs you will find in the "CPUIDs" tab.



Pros and Cons summary

 
Celeron E3400Core 2 Duo E4500

General recommendations:
Insignificantly better overall performance
General recommendations:
None

Drawbacks:
None
Drawbacks:
Performs slightly worse in all types of programs


Similar processors

 
Celeron E3400Core 2 Duo E4500

Similar CPUs use the same socket and architecture as Intel E3400 and E4500.



Where to buy


These microprocessors are obsolete. For this reason the best place to search for them is eBay. Third party vendors at Amazon may also carry them.

Specifications

 Intel Celeron E3400Intel Core 2 Duo E4500
 Basic details
Market segmentDesktop
ManufacturerIntel
FamilyIntel Celeron Dual-CoreIntel Core 2 Duo
Model numberE3400E4500
CPU part numberAT80571RG0641MLHH80557PG0492M
Box part numberBX80571E3400
BXC80571E3400		BX80557E4500
Introduction dateJanuary 17, 2010 
 
 CPU features
Core nameWolfdaleAllendale
MicroarchitectureCore
Technology (micron)0.0450.065
Data width (bits)64
SocketSocket 775
Frequency (MHz)26002200
Bus speed (MHz)800
Clock Multiplier1311
L1 cache64 KB (code) / 64 KB (data)
L2 cache (KB)10242048
Max temperature (°C)74.173.3
TDP (Watt)65
Max power dissipation (Watt) 104.63
Core voltage (V)0.85 - 1.36250.85 - 1.5
Cores2
Threads2
Multiprocessing1
 
 Instruction set extensions
AMD64 / EM64T 64-bit technology+
MMX+
SSE+
SSE2+
SSE3+
SSSE3 / Supplemental SSE3+
 
 Supported technologies
PowerNow! / Enhanced SpeedStep+
Virtualization+-
Virus Protection / Execute Disable bit+
 
 Integrated Graphics
GPU TypeNone
 
 Integrated Memory Controller(s)
The number of controllers0

Notes:

Rows with different specifications or features are highlighted.

For detailed specifications of "Intel Celeron E3400" or "Intel Core 2 Duo E4500" parts please click on the links in the table header.

Benchmarks

MB, RAM and VID fields in the tables below identify components used to benchmark processors: MB - motherboard, RAM - memory, VID - video card. Explanation of numbers for these components is provided below all benchmark graphs. Processors in the benchmark tables are assigned the following colors:
     

    Intel Celeron E3400

    Intel Core 2 Duo E4500


3DMark03 CPU score benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
97.5%111

3DMark03 game score benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
100%111

3DMark2001 score benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%221
99.9%111
99.9%111

7Zip compressing/decompressing speed benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
91.8%221
91.3%111

Apache web server - dynamic pages benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
99.6%111

Apache web server - static pages benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
86.0%111

Blowfish encryption benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
86.3%111

CINEBENCH R10 CPU score benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
85.1%221
85.0%111

CINEBENCH R10 CPU score (1 core) benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
83.9%111
83.8%221

CINEBENCH R10 OpenGL score benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
98.9%111
98.2%221

CINEBENCH R10 render time (seconds) benchmark

< Shorter is betterMBRAMVID
100%111
85.1%221
85.0%111

CrystalMark ALU benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
74.9%111

    Intel Celeron E3400

    Intel Core 2 Duo E4500


CrystalMark FPU benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
87.0%111

CrystalMark Memory benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
94.8%111

Euler3D benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
96.4%221
96.4%111

FLAC encoding - multiple processes benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
85.6%111

FLAC encoding - single process benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
85.3%111

Fritz Chess Benchmark benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
87.0%111

H.264 video encoding - multiple processes benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
87.2%111

H.264 video encoding - multithreaded benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
88.2%111

H.264 video encoding - single process benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
85.8%111

LAME MP3 encoding - multiple processes benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
82.1%111

LAME MP3 encoding - single process benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
82.0%111

MySQL 5.0.27 - selecting data benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
88.2%111

    Intel Celeron E3400

    Intel Core 2 Duo E4500


PCMark2002 CPU score benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
87.8%111
87.6%221

PCMark2002 Memory score benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
99.0%221
69.3%111

Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
84.4%111
84.2%221

Sandra MultiMedia Floating Point (it/s) benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
84.3%111
84.1%221

Sandra MultiMedia Integer (it/s) benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
84.7%111
84.6%221

Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
78.6%221
78.6%111

Sandra Whetstone SSE2 (MFLOPS) benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
75.2%111
75.0%221

Super PI (1M) benchmark

< Shorter is betterMBRAMVID
100%111
88.1%111
86.9%221

WinRAR compressing/decompressing speed benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%221
97.0%111
93.4%111

XVid video encoding - multiple processes benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
86.8%111

XVid video encoding - single process benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
85.5%111

wPrime v1.55 (32M) benchmark

< Shorter is betterMBRAMVID
100%111
78.4%221
78.0%111

MB - Motherboard(s):
1. ASROCK ASROCK 4CORE1600TWINS-P35
2. INTEL INTEL DP965LT

RAM - Memory:
1. 2 GB DUAL-CHANNEL CORSAIR CM3X1024-1333C9 DDR3
2. 2GB DUAL-CHANNEL CORSAIR CM2X1024-6400C4

VID - Video card(s):
1. POWERCOLOR 24PRO256M DDR2 (ATI RADEON HD2400)

CPUIDs

The table below compares two random CPUID records for Intel Celeron E3400 and Intel Core 2 Duo E4500 microprocessors, that were submitted to our CPUID database. Please note that different steppings of Intel processors, identified by S-spec numbers or CPUID, may have slightly different features. For that reason the comparison table below only applies to CPUs with specific S-Spec number / CPUID.

  CPUID 1 CPUID 2
ManufacturerIntel
CPU FamilyCeleron Dual-CoreCore 2 Duo
Model / Processor NumberE3400E4500
Frequency2600 MHz2200 MHz
CWID version0.4
Part numberAT80571RG0641MLHH80557PG0492M
S-Spec / Stepping CodeSLGTZSLA95
 
General information
VendorGenuineIntel
Processor name (BIOS)Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU E3400 @ 2.60GHzIntel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E4500 @ 2.20GHz
Cores2
Logical processors2
Processor typeOriginal OEM Processor
CPUID signature1067A6FD
Family 6 (06h)
Model23 (017h)15 (0Fh)
Stepping10 (0Ah)13 (0Dh)
TLB/Cache details64-byte Prefetching
Data TLB: 4-KB Pages, 4-way set associative, 256 entries
Data TLB: 4-MB Pages, 4-way set associative, 32 entries
Instruction TLB: 2-MB pages, 4-way, 8 entries or 4M pages, 4-way, 4 entries
Instruction TLB: 4-KB Pages, 4-way set associative, 128 entries
L1 Data TLB: 4-KB pages, 4-way set associative, 16 entries
L1 Data TLB: 4-MB pages, 4-way set associative, 16 entries
 
Cache
L1 data: Associativity8-way set associative
L1 data: CommentsDirect-mapped
L1 data: Line size64 bytes
L1 data: Size2 x 32 KB
L1 instruction: Associativity8-way set associative
L1 instruction: CommentsDirect-mapped
L1 instruction: Line size64 bytes
L1 instruction: Size2 x 32 KB
L2: Associativity4-way set associative8-way set associative
L2: CommentsNon-inclusive|Direct-mapped|Shared between all cores
L2: Line size64 bytes
L2: Size1 MB2 MB
 
Instruction set extensions
MMX+
SSE+
SSE2+
SSE3+
SSSE3+
 
Additional instructions
CLFLUSH+
CMOV+
CMPXCHG16B+
CMPXCHG8B+
FXSAVE/FXRSTORE+
MONITOR/MWAIT+
SYSENTER/SYSEXIT+
XSAVE / XRESTORE states+-
 
Major features
64-bit / Intel 64+
Enhanced SpeedStep+
Intel Virtualization+-
On-chip Floating Point Unit+
 
Other features
36-bit page-size extensions+
64-bit debug store+
Advanced programmable interrupt controller+
CPL qualified debug store+
Debug store+
Debugging extensions+
Digital Thermal Sensor capability+
LAHF / SAHF support in 64-bit mode+
Machine check architecture+
Machine check exception+
Memory-type range registers+
Model-specific registers+
Page attribute table+
Page global extension+
Page-size extensions (4MB pages)+
Pending break enable+
Perfmon and Debug capability+
Physical address extensions+
Self-snoop+
Thermal monitor+
Thermal monitor 2+
Thermal monitor and software controlled clock facilities+
Time stamp counter+
Virtual 8086-mode enhancements+
xTPR Update Control+

+ - feature is supported
- - feature is not supported
Features, not supported by all processors in the table, are not displayed

Compare with ...

Compare Intel Celeron E3400 with...

Other Core 2 Duo CPU:

Any CPU:


Compare Intel Core 2 Duo E4500 with...

Other Celeron Dual-Core CPU:

Any CPU:


Note: To see differences with any CPU, type in any combination of the following into the "Any CPU" field: manufacturer name, full or partial family name, model number, part number, core name, socket name, operating frequency, bus speed (must have FSB suffix), and the last level cache. Here are some valid searches:

  i5-3570K
  Intel Celeron 2 GHz
  Ivy Bridge
  Pentium 4 800FSB
  AMD 3.3GHz 8MB

Comments (0)

Last modified: 25 Apr 2013
Terms and Conditions · Privacy Policy · Contact Us (c) Copyright 2003 - 2010 Gennadiy Shvets

Search CPU-World

Search site contents:

Identify part

Identify CPU, FPU or MCU:

Jump to CPU / Family

Type in partial CPU manufacturer, family, model and/or number.

Quick Links