Search CPU-World

Search site contents:

Intel Core i3-3220 vs i5-650

Mini Review

Intel Core i3-3220 advantages

  • In single-threaded tasks, the Intel Core i3-3220 is 14% faster.
  • Multi-threaded performance of the Core i3-3220 is higher. The difference in performance is task specific. In some of them the Intel Core i3-3220 processor could be up to 30% faster.
  • Memory performance of the CPU is better.
  • AVX and F16C instructions are enabled on this microprocessor. While these extensions are not widely used by applications yet, their support should improve in future programs.
  • Power consumption of the Core i3-3220 is lower.

Intel Core i5-650 advantages

  • The CPU has AES extension to the instruction set enabled. These instructions accelerate AES encryption and decryption, and are valuable if you run applications, that protect your disk or network data.

i3-3220 vs i5-650 performance comparison

The charts in the section below show relative performance of Core i3-3220 and Core i5-650 microprocessors in various types of programs. The numbers in the charts are calculated from a number of benchmarks, that you can find in the "Benchmarks" tab. Consequentally, the shown results may differ from results, that you may receive in individual tests. The 'Overall performance' chart displays an average of all-around performance benchmarks, and benchmarks, specific to each type of application.
Single-threaded performance
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1.14
 
1
 
 
Higher is better
Multi-threaded performance
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1.17
 
1
 
 
Higher is better
Memory-intensive applications
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1.27
 
1
 
 
Higher is better
Overall performance
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1.19
 
1
 
 
Higher is better

  - Intel Core i3-3220       - Intel Core i5-650

Please see the "Benchmarks" tab for exhaustive list of benchmarks, showing performance difference between Core i3-3220 and Intel i5-650 in various types of applications.


i3-3220 vs i5-650 power consumption comparison

Thermal Design Power
90
72
54
36
18
0
 
 
55W
 
73W
 
 
Lower is better
 

Detailed side by side comparison of Intel i3-3220 vs Core i5-650 specs can be found in the "Specifications" tab. More detailed comparison of low level features of both CPUs you will find in the "CPUIDs" tab.


Pros and Cons summary

Core i3-3220 Core i5-650
General recommendations:
Somewhat faster in all kinds of tasks,
Features AVX / F16C instructions,
Needs less power
  General recommendations:
None

Drawbacks:

None
 

Drawbacks:

Not as fast in general,
Does not support some instructions,
Somewhat higher power consumption,
The socket is obsolete

Similar processors

Core i3-3220 Core i5-650
 

Similar processors use the same socket and architecture as Intel Core i3-3220 and Intel i5-650, but their performance and other characteristics are a bit different.

Jump to:
  • Benchmarks
  • CPUIDs
  • Comments
 

More comparisons

Compare Intel Core i3-3220 with...

Other Core i5 CPU:

Any CPU:


Compare Intel Core i5-650 with...

Other Core i3 CPU:

Any CPU:


Note: To see differences with any CPU, type in any combination of the following into the "Any CPU" field: manufacturer name, full or partial family name, model number, part number, core name, socket name, operating frequency, bus speed (must have FSB suffix), and the last level cache. Here are some valid searches:

  i5-3570K
  Intel Celeron 2 GHz
  Ivy Bridge
  Pentium 4 800FSB
  AMD 3.3GHz 8MB

Specifications

Please visit Intel Core i3-3220 and Intel Core i5-650 pages for more detailed specifications of both microprocessors.

 Intel Core i3-3220Intel Core i5-650
Market segmentDesktop
ManufacturerIntel
FamilyCore i3Core i5
Basic details
Model numberi3-3220i5-650
CPU part numberCM8063701137502
CM8063701246900
CM8063701247200
CM80616003174AH
Box part numberBX80637I33220
BXC80637I33220
BX80616I5650
BXC80616I5650
Introduction dateSeptember 2, 2012January 7, 2010
Current official price$117 (as of Jun 2014) 
 
CPU features
Core nameIvy BridgeClarkdale
MicroarchitectureIvy BridgeNehalem
Technology (micron)0.0220.032
Data width (bits)64
SocketSocket 1155Socket 1156
Frequency (MHz)33003200
Turbo Frequency (MHz) 3467 / 3333
Clock Multiplier33 
L1 cache64 KB (code) / 64 KB (data)
L2 cache (KB)512
L3 cache (KB)30724096
Max temperature (°C)65.372.6
TDP (Watt)5573
Max power dissipation (Watt) 170.83
Core voltage (V) 0.65 - 1.4
Cores2
Threads4
Multiprocessing1
 
Instruction set extensions
AES / Advanced Encryption Standard-+
AMD64 / EM64T 64-bit technology+
AVX / Advanced Vector Extensions+-
F16C / 16-bit Floating-Point conversion+-
MMX+
SSE+
SSE2+
SSE3+
SSE4.1+
SSE4.2+
SSSE3 / Supplemental SSE3+
 
Supported technologies
Hyper-Threading+
PowerNow! / Enhanced SpeedStep+
Trusted Execution-+
Turbo Core / Turbo Boost-+
Virtualization+
Virus Protection / Execute Disable bit+
 
Integrated Graphics
GPU TypeHD 2500HD (Nehalem)
Base frequency (MHz)650733
The number of supported displays32
 
Integrated Memory Controller(s)
The number of controllers1
Memory channels2
Supported memoryDDR3-1333, DDR3-1600DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333
Maximum memory bandwidth (GB/s)25.621.3
Notes:

Rows with different specifications or features are highlighted.

For detailed specifications of "Intel Core i3-3220" or "Intel Core i5-650" parts please click on the links in the table header.

Benchmarks

System setup

Below is a complete set of Intel Core i3-3220 and i5-650 benchmarks from our CPU benchmark database. The former processor was tested on ASUS P8H61-M motherboard with 2 GB dual-channel Corsair CM3X1024-1333C9 DDR3 memory, and Integrated on-chip Intel Sandy Bridge graphics. The latter processor was tested on ASUS P7P55D motherboard, that had 2 GB dual-channel Corsair TR3X3G1600C9 DDR3 memory, and Powercolor 24PRO256M DDR2 (ATI Radeon HD2400) graphics.

All tests were performed at default frequency and voltage, using manufacturer's stock fan/heatsink. None of the components were overclocked. Motherboard BIOS options were left at default settings.

The results of all benchmarks are broken into four categories: multi-threaded, single-threaded, memory intensive and graphics / gaming.


Core i3-3220 vs i5-650 single-threaded benchmarks

Single-threaded benchmarks run on a single CPU core, and do not depend on such features as the number of cores, or Hyper-Threading technology. Additionally, they do not utilize on-chip caches, dedicated to other cores.


    Intel Core i3-3220           Intel Core i5-650

3DMark03 CPU score benchmark

Uses DirectX software vertex shader to run Wings of Fury and Trolls' Lair games, and calculates a 3DMark03 CPU score based on averaged number of frames per second, achieved by the CPU/GPU combination.
100%
78.2%

CINEBENCH R10 CPU score (1 core) benchmark

Measures performance of a single-core rendering of a photo-realistic 3D image using CINEMA 4D software engine.
100%
79.0%

FLAC encoding - single process benchmark

Reports the number of songs, converted by a single CPU core from WAV to FLAC format using the best possible compression.
100%
88.9%

H.264 video encoding - single process benchmark

Measures the number of frames, converted by one CPU thread from MPEG2 format to H.264 format using high quality settings.
100%
85.5%

LAME MP3 encoding - single process benchmark

Reports the number of MP3 songs, encoded by one CPU core per one minute.
100%
90.2%

    Intel Core i3-3220           Intel Core i5-650

PCMark2002 CPU score benchmark

100%
92.9%

Super PI (1M) benchmark

Measures time, required to calculate the first 1 million digits after the decimal point in the number Pi.
100%
96.7%

XVid video encoding - single process benchmark

Reports how many frames per second can be transcoded by a single CPU core from MPEG2 to XVid (MPEG4) format, utilizing single-pass conversion method.
100%
86.7%


Core i3-3220 vs i5-650 multi-threaded benchmarks

Multi-threaded benchmarks utilize all CPU cores and other on-chip resources (on-chip caches, internal buffers, etc). Intel's Hyper-Threading feature also helps to improve multi-threading performance.


    Intel Core i3-3220           Intel Core i5-650

Apache web server - dynamic pages benchmark

Shows an average number of dynamic HTML pages served per second by local instance of Apache 1.3.41 web server. The test has much greater error margin than other tests.
100%
99.4%

Apache web server - static pages benchmark

Shows an average number of very simple static HTML pages served per second by local Apache 1.3.41 web server. The test has much greater error margin than other tests.
100%
99.9%

Blowfish encryption benchmark

Reports encryption speed of pre-defined 32KB text block. The data is encrypted using Blowfish algorithm.
100%
83.1%

CINEBENCH R10 CPU score benchmark

Measures performance of multi-core rendering of a photo-realistic 3D image using CINEMA 4D software engine.
100%
84.7%

CINEBENCH R10 render time (seconds) benchmark

Measures time taken to render a photo-realistic 3D image using CINEMA 4D software engine.
100%
84.8%

    Intel Core i3-3220           Intel Core i5-650

CrystalMark ALU benchmark

Runs Fibonacci, Napierian, Eratosthenes and QuickSort integer performance tests on all CPU cores, and reports the sum of results.
100%
77.1%

CrystalMark FPU benchmark

Executes MikoFPU, RandMeanSS, FFT and Mandelbrot FPU-dependent tests using all CPU cores, and reports the sum of results.
100%
83.3%

Euler3D benchmark

100%
76.8%

FLAC encoding - multiple processes benchmark

Reports the number of songs, converted from WAV to FLAC format by all CPU cores using the best possible compression.
100%
82.5%

Fritz Chess Benchmark benchmark

100%
96.3%

    Intel Core i3-3220           Intel Core i5-650

H.264 video encoding - multiple processes benchmark

Measures the number of frames, converted by all logical processors from MPEG2 format to H.264 format using single-pass method and high quality settings.
100%
84.6%

H.264 video encoding - multithreaded benchmark

Measures the number of frames, converted by all logical processors from MPEG2 format to H.264 format using multi-threading system calls, dual-pass method and high quality settings.
100%
83.9%

LAME MP3 encoding - multiple processes benchmark

Reports the number of MP3 songs, encoded by all CPU cores per one minute.
100%
86.9%

Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) benchmark

Runs Dhrystone test on all cores, and reports estimated integer performance in MIPS (Millions of Instructions Per Second).
100%
95.6%

Sandra MultiMedia Floating Point (it/s) benchmark

100%
99.3%

    Intel Core i3-3220           Intel Core i5-650

Sandra MultiMedia Integer (it/s) benchmark

100%
99.8%

Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) benchmark

Runs Whetstone test on all cores, and reports estimated floating-point performance in MFLOPS (Millions of Floating-Point Operations Per Second).
100%
97.4%

Sandra Whetstone SSE2 (MFLOPS) benchmark

Runs SSE2-enabled Whetstone test on all cores, and reports estimated floating-point performance in MFLOPS (Millions of Floating-Point Operations Per Second).
100%
84.5%

XVid video encoding - multiple processes benchmark

Reports how many frames per second can be transcoded by all CPU cores from MPEG2 to XVid (MPEG4) format, utilizing single-pass conversion method.
100%
82.4%

wPrime v1.55 (32M) benchmark

wPrime benchmark measures time taken to calculate square roots of numbers from 1 to 33554431.
100%
95.5%


Core i3-3220 vs i5-650 graphics benchmarks

Graphics benchmarks depend on the type of integrated or discrete graphics adapter, and to less extent on the processor performance. Because these benchmarks are synthetic, they may not truly represent gaming performance. However, they still can be used to estimate whether one processor will perform faster or slower than another CPU in games and other 3D tasks.

Important! The processors were tested using different types of graphics adapters, that may not be suitable for comparison.

    Intel Core i3-3220           Intel Core i5-650

3DMark03 game score benchmark

Measures graphics and 3D game performance of discrete and integrated GPUs using 4 different game simulations, that have varying level of DirectX support from version 7 to version 9.
100%
38.7%

3DMark2001 score benchmark

Runs a series of game simulations and feature tests to measure graphics and 3D game performance of discrete and integrated GPUs. It utilizes a single CPU core, and it is compatible with DirectX 8 and later APIs.
100%
65.0%

CINEBENCH R10 OpenGL score benchmark

100%
94.4%


Core i3-3220 vs i5-650 memory performance

Memory-intensive tests or programs move large amounts of data to/from memory, and they depend more on memory throughput and the size of on-chip caches, rather than on CPU integer/FP/SIMD performance.


    Intel Core i3-3220           Intel Core i5-650

7Zip compressing/decompressing speed (1 thread) benchmark

100%
93.0%

CrystalMark Memory benchmark

Evaluates Read, Write, Read/Write and Cache memory bandwidth score. The final result is the sum of measured results.
100%
79.5%

PCMark2002 Memory score benchmark

100%
91.0%

WinRAR compressing/decompressing speed benchmark

100%
79.0%

CPUIDs

The table below compares two random CPUID records for Intel Core i3-3220 and Intel Core i5-650 microprocessors, that were submitted to our CPUID database. Please note that different steppings of Intel processors, identified by S-spec numbers or CPUID, may have slightly different features. For that reason the comparison table below only applies to CPUs with specific S-Spec number / CPUID.

  CPUID 1 CPUID 2
ManufacturerIntel
CPU FamilyCore i3Core i5
Model / Processor Numberi3-3220i5-650
Frequency3291 MHz4018 MHz
CWID version0.50.4
Part numberCM8063701137502CM80616003174AH
S-Spec / Stepping CodeSR0RGSLBLK
 
General information
VendorGenuineIntel
Processor name (BIOS) Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-3220 CPU @ 3.30GHzIntel(R) Core(TM) i5 CPU 650 @ 3.20GHz
Cores2
Logical processors4
Processor typeOriginal OEM Processor
CPUID signature306A920652
Family 6 (06h)
Model58 (03Ah)37 (025h)
Stepping 9 (09h) 2 (02h)
TLB/Cache details64-byte Prefetching
Data TLB0: 2-MB or 4-MB pages, 4-way set associative, 32 entries
Data TLB: 4-KB Pages, 4-way set associative, 64 entries
Instruction TLB: 4-KB pages, 4-way set associative, 64 entries
L2 TLB: 1-MB, 4-way set associative, 64-byte line size
Shared 2nd-level TLB: 4 KB pages, 4-way set associative, 512 entries
64-byte Prefetching
Data TLB0: 2-MB or 4-MB pages, 4-way set associative, 32 entries
Data TLB: 4-KB Pages, 4-way set associative, 64 entries
Instruction TLB: 2-MB or 4-MB pages, fully associative, 7 entries
Instruction TLB: 4-KB pages, 4-way set associative, 64 entries
Shared 2nd-level TLB: 4 KB pages, 4-way set associative, 512 entries
 
Cache
L1 data: Associativity8-way set associative
L1 data: CommentsDirect-mapped
L1 data: Line size64 bytes
L1 data: Size2 x 32 KB
L1 instruction: Associativity8-way set associative4-way set associative
L1 instruction: CommentsDirect-mapped
L1 instruction: Line size64 bytes
L1 instruction: Size2 x 32 KB
L2: Associativity8-way set associative
L2: CommentsNon-inclusive|Direct-mapped
L2: Line size64 bytes
L2: Size2 x 256 KB
L3: Associativity12-way set associative16-way set associative
L3: CommentsInclusive|Shared between all coresInclusive|Direct-mapped|Shared between all cores
L3: Line size64 bytes
L3: Size3 MB4 MB
 
Instruction set extensions
AES-+
AVX+-
F16C+-
MMX+
SSE+
SSE2+
SSE3+
SSE4.1+
SSE4.2+
SSSE3+
 
Additional instructions
CLFLUSH+
CMOV+
CMPXCHG16B+
CMPXCHG8B+
Enhanced REP MOVSB/STOSB+-
FXSAVE/FXRSTORE+
MONITOR/MWAIT+
PCLMULDQ+
POPCNT+
RD/WR FSGSBASE instructions+-
RDTSCP+
SYSENTER/SYSEXIT+
XSAVE/XRESTORE states+-
 
Major features
64-bit / Intel 64+
Enhanced SpeedStep+
Hyper-Threading Technology+
Intel Trusted Execution technology-+
Intel Virtualization+
NX bit/XD-bit+
On-chip Floating Point Unit+
Turbo Boost-+
 
Other features
36-bit page-size extensions+
64-bit debug store+
Advanced programmable interrupt controller+
CPL qualified debug store+
Debug store+
Debugging extensions+
Digital Thermal Sensor capability+
LAHF/SAHF support in 64-bit mode+
Machine check architecture+
Machine check exception+
Memory-type range registers+
Model-specific registers+
Page attribute table+
Page global extension+
Page-size extensions (4MB pages)+
Pending break enable+
Perfmon and Debug capability+
Physical address extensions+
Power Limit Notification capability+-
Process context identifiers+-
Self-snoop+
Supervisor Mode Execution Protection+-
TSC rate is ensured to be invariant across all states+
Thermal monitor+
Thermal monitor 2+
Thermal monitor and software controlled clock facilities+
Time stamp counter+
Timestamp counter deadline+-
Virtual 8086-mode enhancements+
xTPR Update Control+
+ - feature is supported
- - feature is not supported
Features, not supported by all processors in the table, are not displayed

Comments (0)
Terms and Conditions · Privacy Policy · Contact Us (c) Copyright 2003 - 2010 Gennadiy Shvets