AMD FX-8350 vs Intel Core i7-3770


Mini Review

AMD FX-8350 advantages



Picture
is not
available

  • The AMD FX-8350 supports FMA4 and XOP instructions, introduced in the recent past. These extensions are not extensively supported by applications yet, but their support should improve in future programs.
  • The FX-8350 includes FMA3 instruction set extension. This technology is only offered on AMD CPUs, for that reason it probably will not get broad support from software vendors.
  • The CPU is unlocked. The CPU can be freely overclocked on most motherboards to achieve higher performance.
  • The CPU is priced about 34% cheaper.
  • The CPU has 27% better price/performance ratio than the Intel Core i7-3770 CPU.


Intel Core i7-3770 advantages



Intel Core i7-3770

  • The microprocessor is 49% faster in single-threaded programs.
  • The Intel Core i7-3770 processor has 10% higher performance when running multi-threaded applications.
  • The Intel i7-3770 is 15% faster in memory-intensive programs.
  • Graphics performance of the Core i7-3770 is better.
  • Like many modern microprocessors, the Intel i7-3770 integrates Graphics Processing Unit. This GPU can be used for casual gaming and 3D apps.
  • Power consumption of the microprocessor is lower.


FX-8350 vs i7-3770 performance comparison

The charts in the table below demonstrate relative performance of FX-8350 and Core i7-3770 CPUs in several different kinds of programs. The numbers for 'Single-threaded performance', 'Multi-threaded performance' and 'Discrete Graphics performance' charts are calculated as an average of several related benchmarks, that you can view in the "Benchmarks" tab. As such, performance in individual benchmarks may be lower or higher than what you see in the charts on this page. We also averaged the results for task type specific benchmarks and all-around performance benchmarks, and displayed them in the 'Overall performance' chart. The 'Price-performance ratio' displays how much more performance you will get per dollar spent. This ratio does not include the cost of other system components.

Single-threaded performance
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1
 
1.49
 
 
Higher is better
Multi-threaded performance
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1
 
1.1
 
 
Higher is better
Memory-intensive applications
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1
 
1.15
 
 
Higher is better
Discrete Graphics performance
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1
 
1.02
 
 
Higher is better
Overall performance
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1
 
1.18
 
 
Higher is better
Price / performance ratio
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1.27
 
1
 
 
Higher is better

  - AMD FX-8350       - Intel Core i7-3770

Exhaustive list of benchmarks, that show performance difference between FX-8350 and Intel Core i7-3770 in various types of applications, can be seen in the "Benchmarks" tab.



FX-8350 vs i7-3770 power consumption and price comparison

Thermal Design Power
200
160
120
80
40
0
 
 
125W
 
77W
 
 
Lower is better
Current official price
400
320
240
160
80
0
 
 
$195
 
$294
 
 
Lower is better
 

Detailed side by side comparison of AMD FX-8350 vs i7-3770 specs can be found in the "Specifications" tab. Even more detailed comparison of low level features of both processors is located in the "CPUIDs" tab.



Pros and Cons summary

 
FX-8350Core i7-3770

General recommendations:
Features FMA4 / XOP instructions,
Can be effortlessly overclocked,
Lower official price,
Somewhat better price / performance ratio

General recommendations:
Performs somewhat faster in all application types,
Performs insignificantly better in graphics applications,
Integrates HD 4000 GPU,
Somewhat more energy efficient

Drawbacks:
Performs worse in all kinds of tasks,
Slightly slow in graphics applications,
Comes without integrated GPU,
Less energy efficient

Drawbacks:
Lacks some instructions,
Significantly higher official price,
Worse price / performance ratio


Similar processors

Specifications

 AMD FX-8350Intel Core i7-3770
 Basic details
Market segmentDesktop
ManufacturerAMDIntel
FamilyAMD FX-SeriesIntel Core i7
Model numberFX-8350i7-3770
CPU part numberFD8350FRW8KHKCM8063701211600
Box part numberFD8350FRHKBOXBX80637I73770
BXC80637I73770
Introduction dateOctober 23, 2012April 23, 2012
Current official price$195 (as of Apr 2013)$294 (as of Apr 2013)
 
 CPU features
Core nameVisheraIvy Bridge
Platform nameVolan 
MicroarchitecturePiledriverIvy Bridge
Technology (micron)0.0320.022
Data width (bits)64
SocketSocket AM3+Socket 1155
Frequency (MHz)40003400
Turbo Frequency (MHz)42003900 / 3900 / 3800 / 3700
Bus speed (MHz)2600 (HT/QPI) 
Clock Multiplier 34
L1 cache256 KB (code) / 128 KB (data)128 KB (code) / 128 KB (data)
L2 cache (KB)81921024
L3 cache (KB)8192
TDP (Watt)12577
Cores84
Threads8
Multiprocessing1
 
 Instruction set extensions
AES / Advanced Encryption Standard+
AMD64 / EM64T 64-bit technology+
AVX / Advanced Vector Extensions+
F16C / 16-bit Floating-Point conversion+
FMA3 / 3-operand Fused Multiply-Add+-
FMA4 / 4-operand Fused Multiply-Add+-
MMX+
SSE+
SSE2+
SSE3+
SSE4.1+
SSE4.2+
SSSE3 / Supplemental SSE3+
XOP / eXtended Operations+-
 
 Supported technologies
Hyper-Threading-+
PowerNow! / Enhanced SpeedStep+
Trusted Execution-+
Turbo Core / Turbo Boost+
Unlocked multiplier+-
Virtualization+
Virus Protection / Execute Disable bit+
 
 Integrated Graphics
GPU TypeNoneHD 4000
 
 Integrated Memory Controller(s)
The number of controllers1
Memory channels2
Supported memoryDDR3-1866DDR3-1333
DDR3-1600

Notes:

Rows with different specifications or features are highlighted.

For detailed specifications of "AMD FX-8350" or "Intel Core i7-3770" parts please click on the links in the table header.

Benchmarks

System setup

Below is a partial set of AMD FX-8350 and Intel Core i7-3770 benchmarks from our CPU benchmark database. The former processor was tested on ASUS Sabertooth 990FX motherboard with 4GB dual-channel Crucial BallistixPC3-14900 (DDR3-1866) memory, and MSI R6670 1GB GDDR5 (ATI Radeon). The latter processor was tested on ASUS P8P67 motherboard, that had 2 GB dual-channel Corsair TR3X3G1600C9 DDR3 memory, and MSI R6670 1GB GDDR5 (ATI Radeon) graphics. For different system configurations please see tests of FX-8350 and Intel Core i7-3770 CPUs in our benchmark database.

All tests were performed at default frequency and voltage, using manufacturer's stock fan/heatsink. None of the components were overclocked. Motherboard BIOS options were left at default settings.

The results of all benchmarks are broken into four categories: multi-threaded, single-threaded, memory intensive and graphics / gaming.


FX-8350 vs Intel Core i7-3770 single-threaded benchmarks

Single-threaded benchmarks run on a single CPU core, and do not depend on such features as the number of cores, or Hyper-Threading technology. Additionally, they do not utilize on-chip caches, dedicated to other cores.


    AMD FX-8350           Intel Core i7-3770

3DMark03 CPU score benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
77.9%

CINEBENCH R10 CPU score (1 core) benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
58.6%

FLAC encoding - single process benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
76.2%

H.264 video encoding - single process benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
79.6%

LAME MP3 encoding - single process benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
65.4%

    AMD FX-8350           Intel Core i7-3770

PCMark2002 CPU score benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
69.3%

Super PI (1M) benchmark

< Shorter is better
100%
42.8%

XVid video encoding - single process benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
80.5%



FX-8350 vs Intel Core i7-3770 multi-threaded benchmarks

Multi-threaded benchmarks utilize all CPU cores and other on-chip resources (on-chip caches, internal buffers, etc). Intel's Hyper-Threading feature also helps to improve multi-threading performance.


    AMD FX-8350           Intel Core i7-3770

3DMark06 CPU score benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
88.2%

Apache web server - dynamic pages benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
90.6%

Apache web server - static pages benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
51.3%

Blowfish encryption benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
92.8%

CINEBENCH R10 CPU score benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
80.0%

    AMD FX-8350           Intel Core i7-3770

CINEBENCH R10 render time (seconds) benchmark

< Shorter is better
100%
80.0%

CrystalMark ALU benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
67.9%

CrystalMark FPU benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
65.7%

Euler3D benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
97.9%

FLAC encoding - multiple processes benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
99.4%

    AMD FX-8350           Intel Core i7-3770

Fritz Chess Benchmark benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
92.7%

H.264 video encoding - multiple processes benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
95.6%

H.264 video encoding - multithreaded benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
98.2%

LAME MP3 encoding - multiple processes benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
83.9%

MySQL 5.0.96 - selecting data benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
80.7%

    AMD FX-8350           Intel Core i7-3770

PCMark05 CPU score benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
77.5%

PCMark05 score benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
79.8%

Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
91.2%

Sandra MultiMedia Floating Point (it/s) benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
79.6%

Sandra MultiMedia Integer (it/s) benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
71.1%

    AMD FX-8350           Intel Core i7-3770

Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
52.9%

Sandra Whetstone SSE2 (MFLOPS) benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
66.8%

XVid video encoding - multiple processes benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
94.2%

wPrime v1.55 (32M) benchmark

< Shorter is better
100%
79.1%



FX-8350 vs Intel Core i7-3770 graphics benchmarks

Graphics benchmarks depend on the type of integrated or discrete graphics adapter, and to less extent on the processor performance. Because these benchmarks are synthetic, they may not truly represent gaming performance. However, they still can used to estimate whether one processor will perform faster or slower in games than another CPU.


    AMD FX-8350           Intel Core i7-3770

3DMark03 game score benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
97.7%

3DMark06 3DMark score benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
98.4%

3DMark2001 score benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
70.7%

CINEBENCH R10 OpenGL score benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
77.2%

PCMark05 Graphics score benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
97.5%



FX-8350 vs Intel Core i7-3770 memory performance

Memory-intensive tests or programs move large amounts of data to/from memory, and they depend more on memory throughput and the size of on-chip caches, rather than on CPU integer/FP/SIMD performance.


    AMD FX-8350           Intel Core i7-3770

7Zip compressing/decompressing speed benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
95.0%

CrystalMark Memory benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
80.9%

PCMark05 Memory score benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
67.1%

PCMark2002 Memory score benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
62.7%

WinRAR compressing/decompressing speed benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
94.0%


CPUIDs

The table below compares two random CPUID records for AMD FX-8350 and Intel Core i7-3770 microprocessors, that were submitted to our CPUID database. Please note that different steppings of Intel processors, identified by S-spec numbers or CPUID, may have slightly different features. For that reason the comparison table below only applies to CPUs with specific S-Spec number / CPUID.

  CPUID 1 CPUID 2
ManufacturerAMDIntel
CPU FamilyFX-SeriesCore i7
Model / Processor NumberFX-8350i7-3770
Frequency4013 MHz3391 MHz
CWID version0.4
Part numberFD8350FRW8KHKCM8063701211600
S-Spec / Stepping CodeFA 1236PGNSR0PK
 
General information
VendorAuthenticAMDGenuineIntel
Processor name (BIOS)AMD FX(tm)-8350 Eight-Core Processor Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz
Cores84
Logical processors48
Processor type8Original OEM Processor
CPUID signatureOriginal OEM Processor306A9
Family600F20 6 (06h)
Model21 (015h)58 (03Ah)
Stepping 2 (02h) 9 (09h)
TLB/Cache details 0 (00h)64-byte Prefetching
Data TLB0: 2-MB or 4-MB pages, 4-way associative, 32 entries
Data TLB: 4-KB Pages, 4-way set associative, 64 entries
Instruction TLB: 4-KB pages, 4-way set associative, 64 entries
L2 TLB: 1-MB, 4-way set associative, 64-byte line size
Shared 2nd-level TLB: 4 KB pages, 4-way set associative, 512 entries
SocketAM3+ 
 
Cache
L1 data: Associativity4-way set associative8-way set associative
L1 data: Comments Direct-mapped
L1 data: Line size64 bytes
L1 data: Lines per tag1 
L1 data: Size8 x 16 KB4 x 32 KB
L1 instruction: Associativity2-way set associative8-way set associative
L1 instruction: Comments1 cache per 2 coresDirect-mapped
L1 instruction: Line size64 bytes
L1 instruction: Lines per tag1 
L1 instruction: Size4 x 64 KB4 x 32 KB
L2: Associativity16-way set associative8-way set associative
L2: Comments1 cache per 2 coresNon-inclusive|Direct-mapped
L2: Line size64 bytes
L2: Lines per tag1 
L2: Size4 x 2 MB4 x 256 KB
L3: Associativity64-way set associative16-way set associative
L3: Comments Inclusive|Shared between all cores
L3: Line size64 bytes
L3: Lines per tag1 
L3: Size8 MB
 
Instruction set extensions
AES+
AMD extensions to MMX+-
AVX+
BMI+-
F16C+
FMA+-
FMA4+-
MMX+
SSE+
SSE2+
SSE3+
SSE4.1+
SSE4.2+
SSE4A+-
SSSE3+
TBM+-
XOP+-
 
Additional instructions
Advanced Bit manipulation+-
CLFLUSH+
CMOV+
CMPXCHG16B+
CMPXCHG8B+
FXSAVE/FXRSTORE+
MONITOR/MWAIT+
PCLMULDQ+
POPCNT+
PREFETCH/PREFETCHW+-
RDRAND-+
RDTSCP+
SKINIT / STGI support+-
SYSCALL/SYSRET+-
SYSENTER/SYSEXIT+
XSAVE / XRESTORE states+
 
Major features
64-bit / Intel 64+
Enhanced SpeedStep-+
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Intel Trusted Execution technology-+
Intel Virtualization-+
NX bit/XD-bit+
On-chip Floating Point Unit+
PowerNow! / Cool'n'Quiet+-
Secure Virtual Machine (Virtualization)+-
Turbo Boost-+
Turbo Core+-
 
Other features
1 GB large page support+-
100MHz multiplier control+-
128-bit SSE instructions+-
36-bit page-size extensions+
64-bit debug store-+
Advanced programmable interrupt controller+
CPL qualified debug store-+
Core multi-processing legacy mode+-
Debug store-+
Debugging extensions+
Digital Thermal Sensor capability-+
Extended APIC space+-
Extended xAPIC support-+
Hardware P-state control+-
Hardware thermal control+-
Instruction based sampling+-
LAHF / SAHF support in 64-bit mode+
LBR virtualization+-
LOCK MOV CR0 means MOV CR8+-
Lightweight profiling support+-
Machine check architecture+
Machine check exception+
Memory-type range registers+
Misaligned SSE mode+-
Model-specific registers+
Nested page tables+-
OS visible workaround+-
Page attribute table+
Page global extension+
Page-size extensions (4MB pages)+
Pending break enable-+
Perfmon and Debug capability-+
Physical address extensions+
Power Limit Notification capability-+
Process context identifiers-+
SVM lock+-
Self-snoop-+
Support for NRIP save+-
THERMTRIP+-
TSC rate is ensured to be invariant across all states+
Temperature sensor+-
Thermal monitor-+
Thermal monitor 2-+
Thermal monitor and software controlled clock facilities-+
Time stamp counter+
Timestamp counter deadline-+
Virtual 8086-mode enhancements+
Watchdog timer support+-
xTPR Update Control-+

+ - feature is supported
- - feature is not supported
Features, not supported by all processors in the table, are not displayed

Compare with ...

Compare AMD FX-8350 with...

Other Core i7 CPU:

Any CPU:


Compare Intel Core i7-3770 with...

Other FX-Series CPU:

Any CPU:


Note: To see differences with any CPU, type in any combination of the following into the "Any CPU" field: manufacturer name, full or partial family name, model number, part number, core name, socket name, operating frequency, bus speed (must have FSB suffix), and the last level cache. Here are some valid searches:

  i5-3570K
  Intel Celeron 2 GHz
  Ivy Bridge
  Pentium 4 800FSB
  AMD 3.3GHz 8MB

Comments (0)

Terms and Conditions · Privacy Policy · Contact Us (c) Copyright 2003 - 2010 Gennadiy Shvets

Search CPU-World

Search site contents:

Identify part

Identify CPU, FPU or MCU:

Jump to CPU / Family

Type in partial CPU manufacturer, family, model and/or number.

Quick Links