Intel Core 2 Duo E7200 vs Pentium G3220

Mini Review

Intel Core 2 Duo E7200 advantages

  • None

Intel Pentium G3220 advantages

  • The microprocessor is 64% faster in single-threaded programs.
  • Multi-threaded performance of the CPU is better.
  • In memory-intensive applications, the microprocessor is 37% faster.
  • The Intel Pentium G3220 supports hardware acceleration of virtualized programs.
  • This processor has SSE4.2 instructions.
  • Like many modern microprocessors, the CPU incorporates graphics unit. This GPU can be used for casual gaming and 3D apps.
  • Power consumption of the processor is lower.
  • The Socket 1150, used by the CPU, is still actively supported by Intel. The company has plans to release new products for the socket in the future.

E7200 vs G3220 performance comparison

The charts in the table below show relative performance of Core 2 Duo E7200 and Pentium G3220 processors in various kinds of applications. The numbers for 'Single-threaded performance' and 'Multi-threaded performance' charts are calculated as an average of several related benchmarks, that you can view in the "Benchmarks" tab. As such, the displayed results may differ from results, that you may receive in individual tests. The 'Overall performance' displays an average of all-around performance benchmarks, and benchmarks, specific to each type of application.
Single-threaded performance
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1
 
1.64
 
 
Higher is better
Multi-threaded performance
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1
 
1.73
 
 
Higher is better
Memory-intensive applications
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1
 
1.37
 
 
Higher is better
Overall performance
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1
 
1.57
 
 
Higher is better

  - Intel Core 2 Duo E7200       - Intel Pentium G3220

Exhaustive list of benchmarks, that demonstrate performance difference between Intel Core 2 Duo E7200 and Intel G3220 in various types of applications, can be found in the "Benchmarks" tab.


E7200 vs G3220 power consumption comparison

Thermal Design Power
80
64
48
32
16
0
 
 
65W
 
53W
 
 
Lower is better
 

Detailed side by side comparison of Core 2 Duo E7200 vs Intel G3220 specs can be found in the "Specifications" tab.


Pros and Cons summary

Core 2 Duo E7200 Pentium G3220
General recommendations:
None
  General recommendations:
Much higher overall performance,
Features SSE4.2 instructions,
Comes with HD (Haswell) graphics,
Needs less power,
The socket is not obsolete

Drawbacks:

Performs much worse in all task types,
Lacks some instructions,
Comes without integrated graphics,
Somewhat higher power consumption,
The socket is obsolete
 

Drawbacks:

None

Similar processors

Core 2 Duo E7200 Pentium G3220
 

Similar microprocessors use the same socket and architecture as Intel E7200 and G3220, however their performance and other characteristics are a bit different.

Jump to:
  • Benchmarks
  • Comments

More comparisons

Compare Intel Core 2 Duo E7200 with...

Other Pentium Dual-Core CPU:

Any CPU:


Compare Intel Pentium G3220 with...

Other Core 2 Duo CPU:

Any CPU:


Note: To see differences with any CPU, type in any combination of the following into the "Any CPU" field: manufacturer name, full or partial family name, model number, part number, core name, socket name, operating frequency, bus speed (must have FSB suffix), and the last level cache. Here are some valid searches:

  i5-3570K
  Intel Celeron 2 GHz
  Core
  Pentium 4 800FSB
  AMD 3.3GHz 8MB

Specifications

Please visit Intel Core 2 Duo E7200 and Intel Pentium G3220 pages for more complete specifications of both microprocessors.

 Intel Core 2 Duo E7200Intel Pentium G3220
Market segmentDesktop
ManufacturerIntel
FamilyCore 2 DuoPentium Dual-Core
Basic details
Model numberE7200G3220
CPU part numberEU80571PH0613MCM8064601482519
CM8064601562017
Box part numberBX80571E7200
BXC80571E7200
BX80646G3220
BXC80646G3220
Introduction dateApril 20, 2008September 1, 2013
Current official price $64 (as of Mar 2014)
 
CPU features
Core nameWolfdaleHaswell
MicroarchitectureCoreHaswell
Technology (micron)0.0450.022
Data width (bits)64
SocketSocket 775Socket 1150
Frequency (MHz)25333000
Bus speed (MHz)1066 
Clock Multiplier9.530
L1 cache64 KB (code) / 64 KB (data)
L2 cache (KB)3072512
L3 cache (KB) 3072
Max temperature (°C)74.172
TDP (Watt)6553
Max power dissipation (Watt)98.89 
Core voltage (V)0.85 - 1.3625 
Cores2
Threads2
Multiprocessing1
 
Instruction set extensions
AMD64 / EM64T 64-bit technology+
MMX+
SSE+
SSE2+
SSE3+
SSE4.1+
SSE4.2-+
SSSE3 / Supplemental SSE3+
 
Supported technologies
PowerNow! / Enhanced SpeedStep+
Virtualization-+
Virus Protection / Execute Disable bit+
 
Integrated Graphics
GPU TypeNoneHD (Haswell)
 
Integrated Memory Controller(s)
The number of controllers01
Notes:

Rows with different specifications or features are highlighted.

For detailed specifications of "Intel Core 2 Duo E7200" or "Intel Pentium G3220" parts please click on the links in the table header.

Benchmarks

System setup

Intel Core 2 Duo E7200 and Pentium G3220 processors were tested using different system components, that are identified by MB, RAM and VID columns in the tables below. The numbers in each of these columns correspond to one of motherboards (MB), memory configurations (RAM) or graphics adapters (VID), listed below:

MB - Motherboard(s):
1. INTEL DH87RL
2. ASROCK 4CORE1600TWINS-P35
3. INTEL DP965LT

RAM - Memory:
1. 2 GB DUAL-CHANNEL CORSAIR TR3X3G1600C9 DDR3
2. 2 GB DUAL-CHANNEL CORSAIR CM3X1024-1333C9 DDR3
3. 2GB DUAL-CHANNEL CORSAIR CM2X1024-6400C4

VID - Video card(s):
1. MSI R6670 1GB GDDR5 (ATI RADEON)
2. POWERCOLOR 24PRO256M DDR2 (ATI RADEON HD2400)

All tests were performed at default frequency and voltage, using manufacturer's stock fan/heatsink. None of the components were overclocked. Motherboard BIOS options were left at default settings.

The results of all benchmarks are broken into four categories: multi-threaded, single-threaded, memory intensive and graphics / gaming.


Core 2 Duo E7200 vs Pentium G3220 single-threaded benchmarks

Single-threaded benchmarks run on a single CPU core, and do not depend on such features as the number of cores, or Hyper-Threading technology. Additionally, they do not utilize on-chip caches, dedicated to other cores.

     

    Intel Core 2 Duo E7200           Intel Pentium G3220

CINEBENCH R10 CPU score (1 core) benchmark

Measures performance of a single-core rendering of a photo-realistic 3D image using CINEMA 4D software engine.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
61.2%222
58.6%332

PCMark2002 CPU score benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
70.8%332

Super PI (1M) benchmark

Measures time, required to calculate the first 1 million digits after the decimal point in the number Pi.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
62.8%222
61.2%332


Core 2 Duo E7200 vs Pentium G3220 multi-threaded benchmarks

Multi-threaded benchmarks utilize all CPU cores and other on-chip resources (on-chip caches, internal buffers, etc). Intel's Hyper-Threading feature also helps to improve multi-threading performance.

     

    Intel Core 2 Duo E7200           Intel Pentium G3220

CINEBENCH R10 CPU score benchmark

Measures performance of multi-core rendering of a photo-realistic 3D image using CINEMA 4D software engine.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
61.0%222
58.5%332

CINEBENCH R10 render time (seconds) benchmark

Measures time taken to render a photo-realistic 3D image using CINEMA 4D software engine.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
61.0%222
58.5%332

Euler3D benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
54.4%222
53.6%332

Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) benchmark

Runs Dhrystone test on all cores, and reports estimated integer performance in MIPS (Millions of Instructions Per Second).
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
61.9%222
58.5%332

Sandra MultiMedia Floating Point (it/s) benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
78.9%222
74.7%332

    Intel Core 2 Duo E7200           Intel Pentium G3220

Sandra MultiMedia Integer (it/s) benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%222
94.6%332
93.0%111

Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) benchmark

Runs Whetstone test on all cores, and reports estimated floating-point performance in MFLOPS (Millions of Floating-Point Operations Per Second).
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
90.4%222
85.9%332

Sandra Whetstone SSE2 (MFLOPS) benchmark

Runs SSE2-enabled Whetstone test on all cores, and reports estimated floating-point performance in MFLOPS (Millions of Floating-Point Operations Per Second).
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
81.2%222
77.2%332

wPrime v1.55 (32M) benchmark

wPrime benchmark measures time taken to calculate square roots of numbers from 1 to 33554431.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
61.2%222
58.2%332


Core 2 Duo E7200 vs Pentium G3220 graphics benchmarks

Graphics benchmarks depend on the type of integrated or discrete graphics adapter, and to less extent on the processor performance. Because these benchmarks are synthetic, they may not truly represent gaming performance. However, they still can be used to estimate whether one processor will perform faster or slower than another CPU in games and other 3D tasks.

Important! The processors were tested using different types of graphics adapters, that may not be suitable for comparison.
     

    Intel Core 2 Duo E7200           Intel Pentium G3220

3DMark2001 score benchmark

Runs a series of game simulations and feature tests to measure graphics and 3D game performance of discrete and integrated GPUs. It utilizes a single CPU core, and it is compatible with DirectX 8 and later APIs.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
20.1%222
20.1%332

CINEBENCH R10 OpenGL score benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
26.4%222
26.3%332


Core 2 Duo E7200 vs Pentium G3220 memory performance

Memory-intensive tests or programs move large amounts of data to/from memory, and they depend more on memory throughput and the size of on-chip caches, rather than on CPU integer/FP/SIMD performance.

     

    Intel Core 2 Duo E7200           Intel Pentium G3220

7Zip compressing/decompressing speed (1 thread) benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
71.9%222
69.1%332

PCMark2002 Memory score benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
55.8%332

WinRAR compressing/decompressing speed benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
74.4%332
71.4%222

Comments (0)
Terms and Conditions · Privacy Policy · Contact Us (c) Copyright 2003 - 2010 Gennadiy Shvets