Intel Core 2 Duo E6750 vs Pentium E5500

Mini Review

Intel Core 2 Duo E6750 advantages

  • The Core 2 Duo E6750 microprocessor performs 14% faster in memory-intensive applications.

Intel Pentium E5500 advantages

  • In single-threaded programs, the Pentium E5500 has 3% higher performance.
  • The CPU is 5% faster in multi-threaded tasks.

E6750 vs E5500 performance comparison

The charts in the table below demonstrate performance of Core 2 Duo E6750 and Pentium E5500 microprocessors in several different kinds of programs. The numbers for 'Single-threaded performance' and 'Multi-threaded performance' charts are calculated as an average of several related benchmarks, that you can see in the "Benchmarks" tab. Consequentally, performance in individual benchmarks may be lower or higher than what you see in the charts on this page. We also averaged the results for application type specific benchmarks and all-around performance benchmarks, and displayed them in the 'Overall performance' chart.
Single-threaded performance
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1
 
1.03
 
 
Higher is better
Multi-threaded performance
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1
 
1.05
 
 
Higher is better
Memory-intensive applications
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1.14
 
1
 
 
Higher is better
Overall performance
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1.02
 
1
 
 
Higher is better

  - Intel Core 2 Duo E6750       - Intel Pentium E5500

Complete list of benchmarks, that show performance difference between E6750 and Pentium E5500 in various types of tests, can be found in the "Benchmarks" tab.


E6750 vs E5500 power consumption comparison

Thermal Design Power
80
64
48
32
16
0
 
 
65W
 
65W
 
 
Lower is better
 

Detailed side by side comparison of Intel E6750 vs Intel Pentium E5500 specs can be found in the "Specifications" tab.


Pros and Cons summary

Core 2 Duo E6750 Pentium E5500
General recommendations:
A bit better performance in all kinds of tasks
  General recommendations:
Slightly better single- and multi-threaded performance

Drawbacks:

None
 

Drawbacks:

Performs insignificantly worse in all task types

Similar processors

Core 2 Duo E6750 Pentium E5500
 

Similar CPUs use the same socket and architecture as Intel E6750 and E5500, but their performance and other characteristics are a bit different.


Where to buy


These microprocessors are obsolete. If you need one of them, the best place to search are online auction sites, like eBay. Marketplace vendors at Amazon may also carry them.
Jump to:
  • Benchmarks
  • Comments

More comparisons

Compare Intel Core 2 Duo E6750 with...

Other Pentium Dual-Core CPU:

Any CPU:


Compare Intel Pentium E5500 with...

Other Core 2 Duo CPU:

Any CPU:


Note: To see differences with any CPU, type in any combination of the following into the "Any CPU" field: manufacturer name, full or partial family name, model number, part number, core name, socket name, operating frequency, bus speed (must have FSB suffix), and the last level cache. Here are some valid searches:

  i5-3570K
  Intel Celeron 2 GHz
  Core
  Pentium 4 800FSB
  AMD 3.3GHz 8MB

Specifications

Please visit Intel Core 2 Duo E6750 and Intel Pentium E5500 pages for more complete specifications of both microprocessors.

 Intel Core 2 Duo E6750Intel Pentium E5500
Market segmentDesktop
ManufacturerIntel
FamilyCore 2 DuoPentium Dual-Core
Basic details
Model numberE6750E5500
CPU part numberHH80557PJ0674MGAT80571PG0722ML
Box part numberBX80557E6750BX80571E5500
BXC80571E5500
Introduction dateJuly 16, 2007April 18, 2010
 
CPU features
Core nameConroeWolfdale
MicroarchitectureCore
Technology (micron)0.0650.045
Data width (bits)64
SocketSocket 775
Frequency (MHz)26672800
Bus speed (MHz)1333800
Clock Multiplier814
L1 cache64 KB (code) / 64 KB (data)
L2 cache (KB)40962048
Max temperature (°C)7274.1
TDP (Watt)65
Max power dissipation (Watt)105.15 
Core voltage (V)0.85 - 1.50.85 - 1.3625
Cores2
Threads2
Multiprocessing1
 
Instruction set extensions
AMD64 / EM64T 64-bit technology+
MMX+
SSE+
SSE2+
SSE3+
SSSE3 / Supplemental SSE3+
 
Supported technologies
PowerNow! / Enhanced SpeedStep+
Trusted Execution+-
Virtualization+
Virus Protection / Execute Disable bit+
 
Integrated Graphics
GPU TypeNone
 
Integrated Memory Controller(s)
The number of controllers0
Notes:

Rows with different specifications or features are highlighted.

For detailed specifications of "Intel Core 2 Duo E6750" or "Intel Pentium E5500" parts please click on the links in the table header.

Benchmarks

System setup

Below is a complete set of Intel Core 2 Duo E6750 and Pentium E5500 benchmarks from our CPU benchmark database. Both microprocessors were tested on ASRock 4Core1600Twins-P35 motherboard with 2 GB dual-channel Corsair CM3X1024-1333C9 DDR3 memory, and Powercolor 24PRO256M DDR2 (ATI Radeon HD2400) graphics.

All tests were performed at default frequency and voltage, using manufacturer's stock fan/heatsink. None of the components were overclocked. Motherboard BIOS options were left at default settings.

The results of all benchmarks are broken into four categories: multi-threaded, single-threaded, memory intensive and graphics / gaming.


Core 2 Duo E6750 vs Pentium E5500 single-threaded benchmarks

Single-threaded benchmarks run on a single CPU core, and do not depend on such features as the number of cores, or Hyper-Threading technology. Additionally, they do not utilize on-chip caches, dedicated to other cores.


    Intel Core 2 Duo E6750           Intel Pentium E5500

CINEBENCH R10 CPU score (1 core) benchmark

Measures performance of a single-core rendering of a photo-realistic 3D image using CINEMA 4D software engine.
100%
91.1%

Super PI (1M) benchmark

Measures time, required to calculate the first 1 million digits after the decimal point in the number Pi.
100%
97.0%


Core 2 Duo E6750 vs Pentium E5500 multi-threaded benchmarks

Multi-threaded benchmarks utilize all CPU cores and other on-chip resources (on-chip caches, internal buffers, etc). Intel's Hyper-Threading feature also helps to improve multi-threading performance.


    Intel Core 2 Duo E6750           Intel Pentium E5500

CINEBENCH R10 CPU score benchmark

Measures performance of multi-core rendering of a photo-realistic 3D image using CINEMA 4D software engine.
100%
91.2%

CINEBENCH R10 render time (seconds) benchmark

Measures time taken to render a photo-realistic 3D image using CINEMA 4D software engine.
100%
91.2%

Euler3D benchmark

100%
92.7%

Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) benchmark

Runs Dhrystone test on all cores, and reports estimated integer performance in MIPS (Millions of Instructions Per Second).
100%
94.8%

Sandra MultiMedia Floating Point (it/s) benchmark

100%
94.9%

    Intel Core 2 Duo E6750           Intel Pentium E5500

Sandra MultiMedia Integer (it/s) benchmark

100%
95.4%

Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) benchmark

Runs Whetstone test on all cores, and reports estimated floating-point performance in MFLOPS (Millions of Floating-Point Operations Per Second).
100%
88.3%

Sandra Whetstone SSE2 (MFLOPS) benchmark

Runs SSE2-enabled Whetstone test on all cores, and reports estimated floating-point performance in MFLOPS (Millions of Floating-Point Operations Per Second).
100%
84.7%

wPrime v1.55 (32M) benchmark

wPrime benchmark measures time taken to calculate square roots of numbers from 1 to 33554431.
100%
87.8%


Core 2 Duo E6750 vs Pentium E5500 graphics benchmarks

Graphics benchmarks depend on the type of integrated or discrete graphics adapter, and to less extent on the processor performance. Because these benchmarks are synthetic, they may not truly represent gaming performance. However, they still can be used to estimate whether one processor will perform faster or slower than another CPU in games and other 3D tasks.


    Intel Core 2 Duo E6750           Intel Pentium E5500

3DMark2001 score benchmark

Runs a series of game simulations and feature tests to measure graphics and 3D game performance of discrete and integrated GPUs. It utilizes a single CPU core, and it is compatible with DirectX 8 and later APIs.
100%
99.7%

CINEBENCH R10 OpenGL score benchmark

100%
98.4%


Core 2 Duo E6750 vs Pentium E5500 memory performance

Memory-intensive tests or programs move large amounts of data to/from memory, and they depend more on memory throughput and the size of on-chip caches, rather than on CPU integer/FP/SIMD performance.


    Intel Core 2 Duo E6750           Intel Pentium E5500

7Zip compressing/decompressing speed (1 thread) benchmark

100%
98.5%

WinRAR compressing/decompressing speed benchmark

100%
87.6%

Comments (0)
Terms and Conditions · Privacy Policy · Contact Us (c) Copyright 2003 - 2010 Gennadiy Shvets