Search CPU-World

Search site contents:

AMD A10-5700 vs A10-6800K

Mini Review

AMD A10-5700 advantages



AMD A10-5700
  • Power consumption of this CPU is better.
  • The AMD A10-5700 microprocessor is priced about 14% cheaper than the A10-6800K.
  • The A10-5700 has 5% better price/performance ratio.

AMD A10-6800K advantages



AMD A10-6800K
  • The CPU performs 10% faster in single-threaded tasks.
  • Multi-threaded performance of the A10-6800K microprocessor is higher.
  • The CPU performs 6% better when running memory-intensive applications.
  • The clock multiplier on the A10-6800K is not locked. The processor can be effortlessly overclocked on most motherboards to achieve higher performance. Be aware that overclocking can void your warranty.

A10-5700 vs A10-6800K performance comparison

The charts in the section below show performance of A10-5700 and A10-6800K CPUs in various program types. To determine displayed numbers we averaged results for several tests for each specific type of task. As such, the shown results may differ from results, that you may see in individual benchmarks. We also averaged the numbers for application type specific benchmarks and all-around performance benchmarks, and presented them in the 'Overall performance' chart. The 'Price-performance ratio' chart calculates how much more performance you will get per dollar spent. The cost of other system components is not included in the ratio chart.
Single-threaded performance
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1
 
1.1
 
 
Higher is better
Multi-threaded performance
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1
 
1.16
 
 
Higher is better
Memory-intensive applications
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1
 
1.06
 
 
Higher is better
Overall performance
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1
 
1.1
 
 
Higher is better
Price / performance ratio
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1.05
 
1
 
 
Higher is better
 

  - AMD A10-5700       - AMD A10-6800K

Complete list of benchmarks, that demonstrate difference in performance between A10-5700 and A10-6800K in various types of applications, can be seen in the "Benchmarks" tab.


A10-5700 vs A10-6800K power consumption and price comparison

Thermal Design Power
200
160
120
80
40
0
 
 
65W
 
100W
 
 
Lower is better
Current official price
200
160
120
80
40
0
 
 
$122
 
$142
 
 
Lower is better

Detailed side by side comparison of AMD A10-5700 vs A10-6800K specs can be found in the "Specifications" tab. Much more detailed comparison of internal features of both microprocessors is located in the "CPUIDs" tab.


Pros and Cons summary

A10-5700 A10-6800K
General recommendations:
Needs less power,
Cheaper,
A bit better price / performance ratio
  General recommendations:
Somewhat faster in general,
Effortless overclocking for better performance

Drawbacks:

Not as fast overall
 

Drawbacks:

Requires considerably more power,
Priced somewhat higher,
Insignificantly worse price / performance ratio

Similar processors

A10-5700 A10-6800K
 

Similar CPUs use the same socket and architecture as AMD A10-5700 and AMD A10-6800K.

Jump to:
  • Benchmarks
  • CPUIDs
  • Comments
 

More comparisons

Compare AMD A10-5700 with...

Other A10-Series CPU:

Any CPU:


Compare AMD A10-6800K with...

Other A10-Series CPU:

Any CPU:


Note: To see differences with any CPU, type in any combination of the following into the "Any CPU" field: manufacturer name, full or partial family name, model number, part number, core name, socket name, operating frequency, bus speed (must have FSB suffix), and the last level cache. Here are some valid searches:

  i5-3570K
  Intel Celeron 2 GHz
  Piledriver
  Pentium 4 800FSB
  AMD 3.3GHz 8MB

Specifications

Please visit AMD A10-5700 and AMD A10-6800K pages for more complete specifications of both microprocessors.

 AMD A10-5700AMD A10-6800K
Market segmentDesktop
ManufacturerAMD
FamilyA10-Series
Basic details
Model numberA10-5700A10-6800K
CPU part numberAD5700OKA44HJAD680KWOA44HL
Box part numberAD5700OKHJBOXAD680KWOHLBOX
Introduction dateJuly 31, 2012June 4, 2013
Current official price$122 (as of Apr 2014)$142 (as of Apr 2014)
 
CPU features
Core nameTrinityRichland
Platform nameVirgo 
MicroarchitecturePiledriver
Technology (micron)0.032
Data width (bits)64
SocketSocket FM2
Frequency (MHz)34004100
Turbo Frequency (MHz)40004400
L1 cache128 KB (code) / 64 KB (data)
L2 cache (KB)4096
Max temperature (°C)71.374
TDP (Watt)65100
Core voltage (V)0.825 - 1.475 
Cores4
Threads4
Multiprocessing1
 
Instruction set extensions
AES / Advanced Encryption Standard+
AMD64 / EM64T 64-bit technology+
AVX / Advanced Vector Extensions+
BMI1 / Bit Manipulation+
F16C / 16-bit Floating-Point conversion+
FMA3 / 3-operand Fused Multiply-Add+
FMA4 / 4-operand Fused Multiply-Add+
MMX+
SSE+
SSE2+
SSE3+
SSE4.1+
SSE4.2+
SSSE3 / Supplemental SSE3+
XOP / eXtended Operations+
 
Supported technologies
PowerNow! / Enhanced SpeedStep+
Turbo Core / Turbo Boost+
Unlocked multiplier-+
Virtualization+
Virus Protection / Execute Disable bit+
 
Integrated Graphics
GPU TypeRadeon HD 7660DRadeon HD 8670D
Shader cores384
Base frequency (MHz)760844
 
Integrated Memory Controller(s)
The number of controllers1
Memory channels2
Supported memoryDDR3-1866DDR3-2133
Notes:

Rows with different specifications or features are highlighted.

For detailed specifications of "AMD A10-5700" or "AMD A10-6800K" parts please click on the links in the table header.

Benchmarks

System setup

Below is a complete set of AMD A10-5700 and A10-6800K benchmarks from our CPU benchmark database. The former processor was tested on ASRock FM2A75 Pro4-M motherboard with 4GB dual-channel Crucial BallistixPC3-14900 (DDR3-1866) memory, and Integrated on-chip ATI Radeon 7000-series graphics. The latter processor was tested on ASRock FM2A75 Pro4-M motherboard, that had 4GB dual-channel Crucial BallistixPC3-14900 (DDR3-1866) memory, and MSI R6670 1GB GDDR5 (ATI Radeon) graphics.

All tests were performed at default frequency and voltage, using manufacturer's stock fan/heatsink. None of the components were overclocked. Motherboard BIOS options were left at default settings.

The results of all benchmarks are broken into four categories: multi-threaded, single-threaded, memory intensive and graphics / gaming.


A10-5700 vs A10-6800K single-threaded benchmarks

Single-threaded benchmarks run on a single CPU core, and do not depend on such features as the number of cores, or Hyper-Threading technology. Additionally, they do not utilize on-chip caches, dedicated to other cores.


    AMD A10-5700           AMD A10-6800K

3DMark03 CPU score benchmark

Uses DirectX software vertex shader to run Wings of Fury and Trolls' Lair games, and calculates a 3DMark03 CPU score based on averaged number of frames per second, achieved by the CPU/GPU combination.
100%
86.7%

CINEBENCH R10 CPU score (1 core) benchmark

Measures performance of a single-core rendering of a photo-realistic 3D image using CINEMA 4D software engine.
100%
90.2%

FLAC encoding - single process benchmark

Reports the number of songs, converted by a single CPU core from WAV to FLAC format using the best possible compression.
100%
90.3%

H.264 video encoding - single process benchmark

Measures the number of frames, converted by one CPU thread from MPEG2 format to H.264 format using high quality settings.
100%
89.9%

LAME MP3 encoding - single process benchmark

Reports the number of MP3 songs, encoded by one CPU core per one minute.
100%
90.8%

    AMD A10-5700           AMD A10-6800K

PCMark2002 CPU score benchmark

100%
90.7%

Super PI (1M) benchmark

Measures time, required to calculate the first 1 million digits after the decimal point in the number Pi.
100%
91.6%

XVid video encoding - single process benchmark

Reports how many frames per second can be transcoded by a single CPU core from MPEG2 to XVid (MPEG4) format, utilizing single-pass conversion method.
100%
90.7%


A10-5700 vs A10-6800K multi-threaded benchmarks

Multi-threaded benchmarks utilize all CPU cores and other on-chip resources (on-chip caches, internal buffers, etc). Intel's Hyper-Threading feature also helps to improve multi-threading performance.


    AMD A10-5700           AMD A10-6800K

3DMark06 CPU score benchmark

Estimates processor performance based on how fast it runs such CPU-intensive code as game logic, physics and pathfinding AI. The test requires DirectX 9.0.
100%
84.4%

Apache web server - dynamic pages benchmark

Shows an average number of dynamic HTML pages served per second by local instance of Apache 1.3.41 web server. The test has much greater error margin than other tests.
100%
94.0%

Apache web server - static pages benchmark

Shows an average number of very simple static HTML pages served per second by local Apache 1.3.41 web server. The test has much greater error margin than other tests.
100%
93.7%

Blowfish encryption benchmark

Reports encryption speed of pre-defined 32KB text block. The data is encrypted using Blowfish algorithm.
100%
85.6%

CINEBENCH R10 CPU score benchmark

Measures performance of multi-core rendering of a photo-realistic 3D image using CINEMA 4D software engine.
100%
84.9%

    AMD A10-5700           AMD A10-6800K

CINEBENCH R10 render time (seconds) benchmark

Measures time taken to render a photo-realistic 3D image using CINEMA 4D software engine.
100%
84.8%

CrystalMark ALU benchmark

100%
86.5%

CrystalMark FPU benchmark

100%
85.6%

Euler3D benchmark

100%
89.3%

FLAC encoding - multiple processes benchmark

Reports the number of songs, converted from WAV to FLAC format by all CPU cores using the best possible compression.
100%
85.2%

    AMD A10-5700           AMD A10-6800K

Fritz Chess Benchmark benchmark

100%
85.6%

H.264 video encoding - multiple processes benchmark

Measures the number of frames, converted by all logical processors from MPEG2 format to H.264 format using single-pass method and high quality settings.
100%
85.7%

H.264 video encoding - multithreaded benchmark

Measures the number of frames, converted by all logical processors from MPEG2 format to H.264 format using multi-threading system calls, dual-pass method and high quality settings.
100%
87.1%

LAME MP3 encoding - multiple processes benchmark

Reports the number of MP3 songs, encoded by all CPU cores per one minute.
100%
85.1%

MySQL 5.0.96 - selecting data benchmark

Shows sustained number of SQL requests per second served by local instance of MySQL server v5.0.96. This test scales well with the number of CPU cores.
100%
87.9%

    AMD A10-5700           AMD A10-6800K

PCMark05 CPU score benchmark

100%
87.9%

PCMark05 score benchmark

100%
91.0%

Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) benchmark

Runs Dhrystone test on all cores, and reports estimated integer performance in MIPS (Millions of Instructions Per Second).
100%
86.2%

Sandra MultiMedia Floating Point (it/s) benchmark

100%
85.0%

Sandra MultiMedia Integer (it/s) benchmark

100%
85.0%

    AMD A10-5700           AMD A10-6800K

Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) benchmark

Runs Whetstone test on all cores, and reports estimated floating-point performance in MFLOPS (Millions of Floating-Point Operations Per Second).
100%
86.0%

Sandra Whetstone SSE2 (MFLOPS) benchmark

Runs SSE2-enabled Whetstone test on all cores, and reports estimated floating-point performance in MFLOPS (Millions of Floating-Point Operations Per Second).
100%
86.1%

XVid video encoding - multiple processes benchmark

Reports how many frames per second can be transcoded by all CPU cores from MPEG2 to XVid (MPEG4) format, utilizing single-pass conversion method.
100%
86.1%

wPrime v1.55 (32M) benchmark

wPrime benchmark measures time taken to calculate square roots of numbers from 1 to 33554431.
100%
86.3%


A10-5700 vs A10-6800K graphics benchmarks

Graphics benchmarks depend on the type of integrated or discrete graphics adapter, and to less extent on the processor performance. Because these benchmarks are synthetic, they may not truly represent gaming performance. However, they still can be used to estimate whether one processor will perform faster or slower than another CPU in games and other 3D tasks.

Important! The processors were tested using different types of graphics adapters, that may not be suitable for comparison.

    AMD A10-5700           AMD A10-6800K

3DMark03 game score benchmark

Measures graphics and 3D game performance of discrete and integrated GPUs using 4 different game simulations, that have varying level of DirectX support from version 7 to version 9.
100%
77.7%

3DMark06 3DMark score benchmark

Measures 3D graphics and game performance of CPU/GPU combination by running 4 game simulations, that make extensive use of DirectX 9.0/9.0C capabilities.
100%
76.3%

3DMark2001 score benchmark

Runs a series of game simulations and feature tests to measure graphics and 3D game performance of discrete and integrated GPUs. It utilizes a single CPU core, and it is compatible with DirectX 8 and later APIs.
100%
78.2%

CINEBENCH R10 OpenGL score benchmark

100%
92.2%

PCMark05 Graphics score benchmark

100%
84.4%


A10-5700 vs A10-6800K memory performance

Memory-intensive tests or programs move large amounts of data to/from memory, and they depend more on memory throughput and the size of on-chip caches, rather than on CPU integer/FP/SIMD performance.


    AMD A10-5700           AMD A10-6800K

7Zip compressing/decompressing speed (1 thread) benchmark

100%
87.6%

CrystalMark Memory benchmark

100%
96.1%

PCMark05 Memory score benchmark

100%
94.3%

PCMark2002 Memory score benchmark

100%
93.4%

WinRAR compressing/decompressing speed benchmark

100%
94.4%

CPUIDs

The table below compares two random CPUID records for AMD A10-5700 and AMD A10-6800K microprocessors, that were submitted to our CPUID database.

  CPUID 1 CPUID 2
ManufacturerAMD
CPU FamilyA10-Series
Model / Processor NumberA10-5700A10-6800K
Frequency2966 MHz4092 MHz
CWID version0.40.5
Part numberAD5700OKA44HJAD680KWOA44HL
S-Spec / Stepping CodeGA 1236SUTGA 1303SUS
 
General information
VendorAuthenticAMD
Processor name (BIOS)AMD A10-5700 APU with Radeon(tm) HD Graphics AMD A10-6800K APU with Radeon(tm) HD Graphics
Cores4
Compute units2
Logical processors4
Processor typeOriginal OEM Processor
Core steppingTN-A1RL-A1
CPUID signature610F01610F31
Family21 (015h)
Model16 (010h)19 (013h)
Stepping 1 (01h)
SocketFM2
 
Cache
L1 data: Associativity4-way set associative
L1 data: Comments Direct-mapped
L1 data: Line size64 bytes
L1 data: Lines per tag1 
L1 data: Size4 x 16 KB
L1 instruction: Associativity2-way set associative
L1 instruction: Comments1 cache per 2 coresDirect-mapped|1 cache per 2 cores
L1 instruction: Line size64 bytes
L1 instruction: Lines per tag1 
L1 instruction: Size2 x 64 KB
L2: Associativity16-way set associative
L2: Comments1 cache per 2 coresNon-inclusive|Direct-mapped|1 cache per 2 cores
L2: Line size64 bytes
L2: Lines per tag1 
L2: Size2 x 2 MB
 
Instruction set extensions
AES+
AMD extensions to MMX+
AVX+
BMI1+
F16C+
FMA+
FMA4+
MMX+
SSE+
SSE2+
SSE3+
SSE4.1+
SSE4.2+
SSE4A+
SSSE3+
TBM+
XOP+
 
Additional instructions
Advanced Bit manipulation+
CLFLUSH+
CMOV+
CMPXCHG16B+
CMPXCHG8B+
FXSAVE/FXRSTORE+
MONITOR/MWAIT+
PCLMULDQ+
POPCNT+
PREFETCH/PREFETCHW+
RDTSCP+
SKINIT / STGI support+
SYSCALL/SYSRET+
SYSENTER/SYSEXIT+
XSAVE / XRESTORE states+
 
Major features
64-bit / Intel 64+
NX bit/XD-bit+
On-chip Floating Point Unit+
PowerNow! / Cool'n'Quiet+
Secure Virtual Machine (Virtualization)+
Turbo Core+
 
Other features
1 GB large page support+
100MHz multiplier control+
128-bit SSE instructions+
36-bit page-size extensions+
Advanced programmable interrupt controller+
Core multi-processing legacy mode+
Debugging extensions+
Extended APIC space+
Hardware P-state control+
Hardware thermal control+
Instruction based sampling+
LAHF / SAHF support in 64-bit mode+
LBR virtualization+
LOCK MOV CR0 means MOV CR8+
Lightweight profiling support+
Machine check architecture+
Machine check exception+
Memory-type range registers+
Misaligned SSE mode+
Model-specific registers+
Nested page tables+
OS visible workaround+
Page attribute table+
Page global extension+
Page-size extensions (4MB pages)+
Physical address extensions+
SVM lock+
Support for NRIP save+
THERMTRIP+
TSC rate is ensured to be invariant across all states+
Temperature sensor+
Time stamp counter+
Virtual 8086-mode enhancements+
Watchdog timer support+
+ - feature is supported
- - feature is not supported
Features, not supported by all processors in the table, are not displayed

Comments (0)
Terms and Conditions · Privacy Policy · Contact Us (c) Copyright 2003 - 2010 Gennadiy Shvets