AMD FX-4100 vs Intel Core i3-2100T


Mini Review

AMD FX-4100 advantages



AMD FX-4100

  • In multi-threaded programs, this CPU is 19% faster. The difference in performance depends on specific program. In some of them the microprocessor could be up to 37% faster.
  • Memory performance of the FX-4100 is better.
  • The CPU performs 1% faster in graphics applications and games.
  • The CPU features AES extension to the instruction set. This technology accelerates AES encryption and decryption, and is useful if you need to protect your disk or network data.
  • The FX-4100 CPU includes FMA4 and XOP instructions. These extensions are not broadly used by programs yet, but their support should improve in future applications.
  • The AMD FX-4100 has clock multiplier unlocked. The CPU can be freely overclocked on most motherboards to achieve greater performance. Be warned that overclocking can void CPU warranty.


Intel Core i3-2100T advantages



Intel Core i3-2100T

  • Single-threaded performance of the processor is better.
  • Like many modern microprocessors, the Intel i3-2100T incorporates graphics unit. This Graphics Processing Unit can be used for casual gaming and 3D apps.
  • The microprocessor is 63% more energy efficient.


FX-4100 vs i3-2100T performance comparison

The charts in the table below demonstrate relative performance of FX-4100 and Core i3-2100T processors in a few different kinds of tasks. To determine displayed numbers we averaged results for several benchmarks for each specific program type. As such, the shown results may differ from results, that you may receive in individual tests. The 'Overall performance' chart displays an average of all-around performance benchmarks, and benchmarks, specific to each type of task.

Single-threaded performance
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1
 
1.06
 
 
Higher is better
Multi-threaded performance
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1.19
 
1
 
 
Higher is better
Memory-intensive applications
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1.12
 
1
 
 
Higher is better
Discrete Graphics performance
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1.01
 
1
 
 
Higher is better
Overall performance
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1.08
 
1
 
 
Higher is better
 

  - AMD FX-4100       - Intel Core i3-2100T

Complete list of benchmarks, that show performance difference between FX-4100 and Core i3-2100T in various types of applications, can be seen in the "Benchmarks" tab.



FX-4100 vs i3-2100T power consumption comparison

Thermal Design Power
110
88
66
44
22
0
 
 
95W
 
35W
 
 
Lower is better
   

Detailed side by side comparison of AMD FX-4100 vs Core i3-2100T specs can be found in the "Specifications" tab. Even more detailed comparison of internal features of both CPUs is located in the "CPUIDs" tab.



Pros and Cons summary

 
FX-4100Core i3-2100T

General recommendations:
Insignificantly faster overall,
Performs slightly better in graphics programs,
Features FMA4 / XOP instructions,
Allows easy overclocking

General recommendations:
Slightly faster in single-threaded programs,
Has on-chip HD 2000 GPU,
Much lower power consumption

Drawbacks:
A bit slow in single-threaded applications,
Comes without integrated GPU,
Significantly higher power consumption

Drawbacks:
Performs insignificantly worse in all application types,
A bit slower performance in graphics applications,
Does not support some instructions


Similar processors

 
FX-4100Core i3-2100T

Similar microprocessors use the same socket and architecture as AMD FX-4100 and i3-2100T.

Specifications

 AMD FX-4100Intel Core i3-2100T
 Basic details
Market segmentDesktop
ManufacturerAMDIntel
FamilyAMD FX-SeriesIntel Core i3
Model numberFX-4100i3-2100T
CPU part numberFD4100WMW4KGUCM8062301045908
Box part numberFD4100WMGUSBXBX80623I32100T
BXC80623I32100T
Introduction dateOctober 12, 2011February 20, 2011
Current official price$101 (as of Apr 2013) 
 
 CPU features
Core nameZambeziSandy Bridge
Platform nameScorpius 
MicroarchitectureBulldozerSandy Bridge
Technology (micron)0.032
Data width (bits)64
SocketSocket AM3+Socket 1155
Frequency (MHz)36002500
Turbo Frequency (MHz)3800 / 3700 
Bus speed (MHz)2600 (HT/QPI) 
Clock Multiplier 25
L1 cache128 KB (code) / 64 KB (data)64 KB (code) / 64 KB (data)
L2 cache (KB)4096512
L3 cache (KB)81923072
Max temperature (°C)7065
TDP (Watt)9535
Cores42
Threads4
Multiprocessing1
 
 Instruction set extensions
AES / Advanced Encryption Standard+-
AMD64 / EM64T 64-bit technology+
AVX / Advanced Vector Extensions+
FMA4 / 4-operand Fused Multiply-Add+-
MMX+
SSE+
SSE2+
SSE3+
SSE4.1+
SSE4.2+
SSSE3 / Supplemental SSE3+
XOP / eXtended Operations+-
 
 Supported technologies
Hyper-Threading-+
PowerNow! / Enhanced SpeedStep+
Turbo Core / Turbo Boost+-
Unlocked multiplier+-
Virtualization+
Virus Protection / Execute Disable bit+
 
 Integrated Graphics
GPU TypeNoneHD 2000
 
 Integrated Memory Controller(s)
The number of controllers1
Memory channels2
Supported memoryDDR3-1866DDR3-1066
DDR3-1333

Notes:

Rows with different specifications or features are highlighted.

For detailed specifications of "AMD FX-4100" or "Intel Core i3-2100T" parts please click on the links in the table header.

Benchmarks

System setup

Below is a partial set of AMD FX-4100 and Intel Core i3-2100T benchmarks from our CPU benchmark database. The former processor was tested on ASUS Sabertooth 990FX motherboard with 4GB dual-channel Crucial BallistixPC3-14900 (DDR3-1866) memory, and MSI R6670 1GB GDDR5 (ATI Radeon). The latter processor was tested on ASUS P8P67 motherboard, that had 2 GB dual-channel Corsair TR3X3G1600C9 DDR3 memory, and MSI R6670 1GB GDDR5 (ATI Radeon) graphics. For different system configurations please see tests of FX-4100 and Intel Core i3-2100T CPUs in our benchmark database.

All tests were performed at default frequency and voltage, using manufacturer's stock fan/heatsink. None of the components were overclocked. Motherboard BIOS options were left at default settings.

The results of all benchmarks are broken into four categories: multi-threaded, single-threaded, memory intensive and graphics / gaming.


FX-4100 vs Intel Core i3-2100T single-threaded benchmarks

Single-threaded benchmarks run on a single CPU core, and do not depend on such features as the number of cores, or Hyper-Threading technology. Additionally, they do not utilize on-chip caches, dedicated to other cores.


    AMD FX-4100           Intel Core i3-2100T

3DMark03 CPU score benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
93.1%

CINEBENCH R10 CPU score (1 core) benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
82.2%

FLAC encoding - single process benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
94.8%

H.264 video encoding - single process benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
89.0%

LAME MP3 encoding - single process benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
89.1%

    AMD FX-4100           Intel Core i3-2100T

PCMark2002 CPU score benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
95.5%

Super PI (1M) benchmark

< Shorter is better
100%
66.9%

XVid video encoding - single process benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
88.8%



FX-4100 vs Intel Core i3-2100T multi-threaded benchmarks

Multi-threaded benchmarks utilize all CPU cores and other on-chip resources (on-chip caches, internal buffers, etc). Intel's Hyper-Threading feature also helps to improve multi-threading performance.


    AMD FX-4100           Intel Core i3-2100T

3DMark06 CPU score benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
78.7%

Apache web server - dynamic pages benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
95.5%

Apache web server - static pages benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
72.4%

Blowfish encryption benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
87.4%

CINEBENCH R10 CPU score benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
89.2%

    AMD FX-4100           Intel Core i3-2100T

CINEBENCH R10 render time (seconds) benchmark

< Shorter is better
100%
89.2%

CrystalMark ALU benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
88.0%

CrystalMark FPU benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
93.9%

Euler3D benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
97.3%

FLAC encoding - multiple processes benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
75.3%

    AMD FX-4100           Intel Core i3-2100T

Fritz Chess Benchmark benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
76.1%

H.264 video encoding - multiple processes benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
74.6%

H.264 video encoding - multithreaded benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
80.1%

LAME MP3 encoding - multiple processes benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
93.5%

PCMark05 CPU score benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
89.5%

    AMD FX-4100           Intel Core i3-2100T

PCMark05 score benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
88.8%

Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
81.4%

Sandra MultiMedia Floating Point (it/s) benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
91.5%

Sandra MultiMedia Integer (it/s) benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
52.1%

Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
70.9%

    AMD FX-4100           Intel Core i3-2100T

Sandra Whetstone SSE2 (MFLOPS) benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
94.3%

XVid video encoding - multiple processes benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
73.1%

wPrime v1.55 (32M) benchmark

< Shorter is better
100%
90.2%



FX-4100 vs Intel Core i3-2100T graphics benchmarks

Graphics benchmarks depend on the type of integrated or discrete graphics adapter, and to less extent on the processor performance. Because these benchmarks are synthetic, they may not truly represent gaming performance. However, they still can used to estimate whether one processor will perform faster or slower in games than another CPU.


    AMD FX-4100           Intel Core i3-2100T

3DMark03 game score benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
98.7%

3DMark06 3DMark score benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
95.2%

3DMark2001 score benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
91.2%

CINEBENCH R10 OpenGL score benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
91.1%

PCMark05 Graphics score benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
99.7%



FX-4100 vs Intel Core i3-2100T memory performance

Memory-intensive tests or programs move large amounts of data to/from memory, and they depend more on memory throughput and the size of on-chip caches, rather than on CPU integer/FP/SIMD performance.


    AMD FX-4100           Intel Core i3-2100T

7Zip compressing/decompressing speed benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
73.0%

CrystalMark Memory benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
92.3%

PCMark05 Memory score benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
97.5%

PCMark2002 Memory score benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
99.9%

WinRAR compressing/decompressing speed benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
82.8%


CPUIDs

The table below compares two random CPUID records for AMD FX-4100 and Intel Core i3-2100T microprocessors, that were submitted to our CPUID database. Please note that different steppings of Intel processors, identified by S-spec numbers or CPUID, may have slightly different features. For that reason the comparison table below only applies to CPUs with specific S-Spec number / CPUID.

  CPUID 1 CPUID 2
ManufacturerAMDIntel
CPU FamilyFX-SeriesCore i3
Model / Processor NumberFX-4100i3-2100T
Frequency2702 MHz2508 MHz
CWID version0.4
Part numberFD4100WMW4KGUCM8062301045908
S-Spec / Stepping CodeFA 1139CPMSR05Z
 
General information
VendorAuthenticAMDGenuineIntel
Processor name (BIOS)AMD FX(tm)-4100 Quad-Core Processor Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-2100T CPU @ 2.50GHz
Cores42
Logical processors24
Processor type4Original OEM Processor
CPUID signatureOriginal OEM Processor206A7
FamilyOR-B2 6 (06h)
Model600F1242 (02Ah)
Stepping21 (015h) 7 (07h)
TLB/Cache details 1 (01h)64-byte Prefetching
Data TLB0: 2-MB or 4-MB pages, 4-way associative, 32 entries
Data TLB: 4-KB Pages, 4-way set associative, 64 entries
Instruction TLB: 4-KB pages, 4-way set associative, 64 entries
L2 TLB: 1-MB, 4-way set associative, 64-byte line size
Shared 2nd-level TLB: 4 KB pages, 4-way set associative, 512 entries
Stepping 2 (02h) 
SocketAM3+ 
 
Cache
L1 data: Associativity4-way set associative8-way set associative
L1 data: Comments Direct-mapped
L1 data: Line size64 bytes
L1 data: Lines per tag1 
L1 data: Size4 x 16 KB2 x 32 KB
L1 instruction: Associativity2-way set associative8-way set associative
L1 instruction: Comments1 cache per 2 coresDirect-mapped
L1 instruction: Line size64 bytes
L1 instruction: Lines per tag1 
L1 instruction: Size2 x 64 KB2 x 32 KB
L2: Associativity16-way set associative8-way set associative
L2: Comments1 cache per 2 coresNon-inclusive|Direct-mapped
L2: Line size64 bytes
L2: Lines per tag1 
L2: Size2 x 2 MB2 x 256 KB
L3: Associativity64-way set associative12-way set associative
L3: Comments Inclusive|Shared between all cores
L3: Line size64 bytes
L3: Lines per tag1 
L3: Size8 MB3 MB
 
Instruction set extensions
AES+-
AMD extensions to MMX+-
AVX+
FMA4+-
MMX+
SSE+
SSE2+
SSE3+
SSE4.1+
SSE4.2+
SSE4A+-
SSSE3+
XOP+-
 
Additional instructions
Advanced Bit manipulation+-
CLFLUSH+
CMOV+
CMPXCHG16B+
CMPXCHG8B+
FXSAVE/FXRSTORE+
MONITOR/MWAIT+
PCLMULDQ+
POPCNT+
PREFETCH/PREFETCHW+-
RDTSCP+
SKINIT / STGI support+-
SYSCALL/SYSRET+-
SYSENTER/SYSEXIT+
XSAVE / XRESTORE states+
 
Major features
64-bit / Intel 64+
Enhanced SpeedStep-+
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Intel Virtualization-+
NX bit/XD-bit+
On-chip Floating Point Unit+
PowerNow! / Cool'n'Quiet+-
Secure Virtual Machine (Virtualization)+-
Turbo Core+-
 
Other features
1 GB large page support+-
100MHz multiplier control+-
128-bit SSE instructions+-
36-bit page-size extensions+
64-bit debug store-+
Advanced programmable interrupt controller+
CPL qualified debug store-+
Core multi-processing legacy mode+-
Debug store-+
Debugging extensions+
Digital Thermal Sensor capability-+
Extended APIC space+-
Hardware P-state control+-
Hardware thermal control+-
Instruction based sampling+-
LAHF / SAHF support in 64-bit mode+
LBR virtualization+-
LOCK MOV CR0 means MOV CR8+-
Lightweight profiling support+-
Machine check architecture+
Machine check exception+
Memory-type range registers+
Misaligned SSE mode+-
Model-specific registers+
Nested page tables+-
OS visible workaround+-
Page attribute table+
Page global extension+
Page-size extensions (4MB pages)+
Pending break enable-+
Perfmon and Debug capability-+
Physical address extensions+
Power Limit Notification capability-+
Process context identifiers-+
SVM lock+-
Self-snoop-+
Support for NRIP save+-
THERMTRIP+-
TSC rate is ensured to be invariant across all states+
Temperature sensor+-
Thermal monitor-+
Thermal monitor 2-+
Thermal monitor and software controlled clock facilities-+
Time stamp counter+
Timestamp counter deadline-+
Virtual 8086-mode enhancements+
Watchdog timer support+-
xTPR Update Control-+

+ - feature is supported
- - feature is not supported
Features, not supported by all processors in the table, are not displayed

Compare with ...

Compare AMD FX-4100 with...

Other Core i3 CPU:

Any CPU:


Compare Intel Core i3-2100T with...

Other FX-Series CPU:

Any CPU:


Note: To see differences with any CPU, type in any combination of the following into the "Any CPU" field: manufacturer name, full or partial family name, model number, part number, core name, socket name, operating frequency, bus speed (must have FSB suffix), and the last level cache. Here are some valid searches:

  i5-3570K
  Intel Celeron 2 GHz
  Ivy Bridge
  Pentium 4 800FSB
  AMD 3.3GHz 8MB

Comments (0)

Terms and Conditions · Privacy Policy · Contact Us (c) Copyright 2003 - 2010 Gennadiy Shvets

Search CPU-World

Search site contents:

Identify part

Identify CPU, FPU or MCU:

Jump to CPU / Family

Type in partial CPU manufacturer, family, model and/or number.

Quick Links