Search CPU-World

Search site contents:

AMD FX-6300 vs Intel Core i5-3570K

Mini Review

AMD FX-6300 advantages



Picture
is not
available
  • The FX-6300 CPU includes FMA3 and XOP instructions, introduced in the recent past. These extensions are not widely used by programs yet, however this should improve in future applications.
  • The processor has FMA4 instruction set extension. The FMA4 technology is only offered on AMD CPUs, thus it probably will not get broad support from software vendors.
  • The microprocessor is priced about 50% lower.
  • The FX-6300 CPU has 64% better price/performance ratio.

Intel Core i5-3570K advantages



Intel Core i5-3570K
  • In single-threaded applications, the Core i5-3570K is about 62% faster.
  • Multi-threaded performance of the microprocessor is better.
  • In memory-intensive tasks, the processor has 3% higher performance.
  • The CPU has 3% better performance when running graphics applications and games.
  • Like many modern microprocessors, the i5-3570K embeds Graphics Processing Unit. While this GPU is not fast enough to run latest games with all settings on, it can be used for casual gaming and 3D apps.
  • Power consumption of the processor is lower.

FX-6300 vs i5-3570K performance comparison

The charts in the table below show relative performance of FX-6300 and Core i5-3570K CPUs in different kinds of applications. To determine displayed numbers we averaged results for several tests for each specific type of application. As such, the shown results may differ from results, that you may see in individual benchmarks. We also averaged the numbers for task type specific benchmarks and all-around performance benchmarks, and presented them in the 'Overall performance' chart. The 'Price-performance ratio' chart shows how much more performance you will get per dollar spent. This ratio does not take into account the cost of other system components.
Single-threaded performance
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1
 
1.62
 
 
Higher is better
Multi-threaded performance
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1
 
1.32
 
 
Higher is better
Memory-intensive applications
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1
 
1.03
 
 
Higher is better
Discrete Graphics performance
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1
 
1.03
 
 
Higher is better
Overall performance
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1
 
1.22
 
 
Higher is better
Price / performance ratio
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1.64
 
1
 
 
Higher is better

  - AMD FX-6300       - Intel Core i5-3570K

Complete list of benchmarks, that demonstrate performance difference between AMD FX-6300 and Intel Core i5-3570K in various types of programs, can be seen in the "Benchmarks" tab.


FX-6300 vs i5-3570K power consumption and price comparison

Thermal Design Power
110
88
66
44
22
0
 
 
95W
 
77W
 
 
Lower is better
Current official price
300
240
180
120
60
0
 
 
$112
 
$225
 
 
Lower is better

Detailed side by side comparison of FX-6300 vs Intel Core i5-3570K specs can be found in the "Specifications" tab. Even more detailed comparison of internal features of both processors is located in the "CPUIDs" tab.


Pros and Cons summary

FX-6300 Core i5-3570K
General recommendations:
Features FMA3 / XOP instructions,
Less expensive,
Considerably better price / performance ratio
  General recommendations:
Faster overall,
Performs slightly better in graphics programs,
Integrates HD 4000 GPU,
Needs less power

Drawbacks:

Rather slow,
Performs insignificantly worse in graphics tasks,
No on-chip GPU,
Higher power
 

Drawbacks:

Does not support some instructions,
Much more expensive,
Considerably worse price / performance ratio

Similar processors

FX-6300 Core i5-3570K
 

Similar CPUs use the same socket and architecture as AMD FX-6300 and Intel i5-3570K, but their performance and other characteristics are a bit different.

Jump to:
  • Benchmarks
  • CPUIDs
  • Comments
 

More comparisons

Compare AMD FX-6300 with...

Other Core i5 CPU:

Any CPU:


Compare Intel Core i5-3570K with...

Other FX-Series CPU:

Any CPU:


Note: To see differences with any CPU, type in any combination of the following into the "Any CPU" field: manufacturer name, full or partial family name, model number, part number, core name, socket name, operating frequency, bus speed (must have FSB suffix), and the last level cache. Here are some valid searches:

  i5-3570K
  Intel Celeron 2 GHz
  Piledriver
  Pentium 4 800FSB
  AMD 3.3GHz 8MB

Specifications

Please visit AMD FX-6300 and Intel Core i5-3570K pages for more complete specifications of both microprocessors.

 AMD FX-6300Intel Core i5-3570K
Market segmentDesktop
ManufacturerAMDIntel
FamilyFX-SeriesCore i5
Basic details
Model numberFX-6300i5-3570K
CPU part numberFD6300WMW6KHKCM8063701211800
CM8063701211801
Box part numberFD6300WMHKBOXBX80637I53570K
BXC80637I53570K
Introduction dateOctober 23, 2012April 23, 2012
Current official price$112 (as of Mar 2014)$225 (as of Mar 2014)
 
CPU features
Core nameVisheraIvy Bridge
Platform nameVolan 
MicroarchitecturePiledriverIvy Bridge
Technology (micron)0.0320.022
Data width (bits)64
SocketSocket AM3+Socket 1155
Frequency (MHz)35003400
Turbo Frequency (MHz)41003800 / 3800 / 3700 / 3600
Bus speed (MHz)2600 (HT/QPI) 
Clock Multiplier 34
L1 cache192 KB (code) / 96 KB (data)128 KB (code) / 128 KB (data)
L2 cache (KB)61441024
L3 cache (KB)81926144
TDP (Watt)9577
Cores64
Threads64
Multiprocessing1
 
Instruction set extensions
AES / Advanced Encryption Standard+
AMD64 / EM64T 64-bit technology+
AVX / Advanced Vector Extensions+
BMI1 / Bit Manipulation+-
F16C / 16-bit Floating-Point conversion+
FMA3 / 3-operand Fused Multiply-Add+-
FMA4 / 4-operand Fused Multiply-Add+-
MMX+
SSE+
SSE2+
SSE3+
SSE4.1+
SSE4.2+
SSSE3 / Supplemental SSE3+
XOP / eXtended Operations+-
 
Supported technologies
PowerNow! / Enhanced SpeedStep+
Turbo Core / Turbo Boost+
Unlocked multiplier+
Virtualization+
Virus Protection / Execute Disable bit+
 
Integrated Graphics
GPU TypeNoneHD 4000
 
Integrated Memory Controller(s)
The number of controllers1
Memory channels2
Supported memoryDDR3-1866DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600
Notes:

Rows with different specifications or features are highlighted.

For detailed specifications of "AMD FX-6300" or "Intel Core i5-3570K" parts please click on the links in the table header.

Benchmarks

System setup

Below is a partial set of AMD FX-6300 and Intel Core i5-3570K benchmarks from our CPU benchmark database. The former processor was tested on ASUS Sabertooth 990FX motherboard with 4GB dual-channel Crucial BallistixPC3-14900 (DDR3-1866) memory, and MSI R6670 1GB GDDR5 (ATI Radeon). The latter processor was tested on ASUS P8P67 motherboard, that had 2 GB dual-channel Corsair TR3X3G1600C9 DDR3 memory, and MSI R6670 1GB GDDR5 (ATI Radeon) graphics. For different system configurations please see tests of FX-6300 and Intel Core i5-3570K CPUs in our benchmark database.

All tests were performed at default frequency and voltage, using manufacturer's stock fan/heatsink. None of the components were overclocked. Motherboard BIOS options were left at default settings.

The results of all benchmarks are broken into four categories: multi-threaded, single-threaded, memory intensive and graphics / gaming.


FX-6300 vs Intel Core i5-3570K single-threaded benchmarks

Single-threaded benchmarks run on a single CPU core, and do not depend on such features as the number of cores, or Hyper-Threading technology. Additionally, they do not utilize on-chip caches, dedicated to other cores.


    AMD FX-6300           Intel Core i5-3570K

3DMark03 CPU score benchmark

Uses DirectX software vertex shader to run Wings of Fury and Trolls' Lair games, and calculates a 3DMark03 CPU score based on averaged number of frames per second, achieved by the CPU/GPU combination.
100%
68.9%

CINEBENCH R10 CPU score (1 core) benchmark

Measures performance of a single-core rendering of a photo-realistic 3D image using CINEMA 4D software engine.
100%
54.0%

FLAC encoding - single process benchmark

Reports the number of songs, converted by a single CPU core from WAV to FLAC format using the best possible compression.
100%
69.3%

H.264 video encoding - single process benchmark

Measures the number of frames, converted by one CPU thread from MPEG2 format to H.264 format using high quality settings.
100%
72.5%

LAME MP3 encoding - single process benchmark

Reports the number of MP3 songs, encoded by one CPU core per one minute.
100%
59.8%

    AMD FX-6300           Intel Core i5-3570K

PCMark2002 CPU score benchmark

100%
64.8%

Super PI (1M) benchmark

Measures time, required to calculate the first 1 million digits after the decimal point in the number Pi.
100%
40.1%

XVid video encoding - single process benchmark

Reports how many frames per second can be transcoded by a single CPU core from MPEG2 to XVid (MPEG4) format, utilizing single-pass conversion method.
100%
74.3%


FX-6300 vs Intel Core i5-3570K multi-threaded benchmarks

Multi-threaded benchmarks utilize all CPU cores and other on-chip resources (on-chip caches, internal buffers, etc). Intel's Hyper-Threading feature also helps to improve multi-threading performance.


    AMD FX-6300           Intel Core i5-3570K

3DMark06 CPU score benchmark

Estimates processor performance based on how fast it runs such CPU-intensive code as game logic, physics and pathfinding AI. The test requires DirectX 9.0.
100%
79.9%

Apache web server - dynamic pages benchmark

Shows an average number of dynamic HTML pages served per second by local instance of Apache 1.3.41 web server. The test has much greater error margin than other tests.
100%
58.7%

Apache web server - static pages benchmark

Shows an average number of very simple static HTML pages served per second by local Apache 1.3.41 web server. The test has much greater error margin than other tests.
100%
44.5%

Blowfish encryption benchmark

Reports encryption speed of pre-defined 32KB text block. The data is encrypted using Blowfish algorithm.
100%
67.9%

CINEBENCH R10 CPU score benchmark

Measures performance of multi-core rendering of a photo-realistic 3D image using CINEMA 4D software engine.
100%
63.3%

    AMD FX-6300           Intel Core i5-3570K

CINEBENCH R10 render time (seconds) benchmark

Measures time taken to render a photo-realistic 3D image using CINEMA 4D software engine.
100%
63.4%

CrystalMark ALU benchmark

100%
61.3%

CrystalMark FPU benchmark

100%
57.9%

Euler3D benchmark

100%
79.9%

FLAC encoding - multiple processes benchmark

Reports the number of songs, converted from WAV to FLAC format by all CPU cores using the best possible compression.
100%
79.6%

    AMD FX-6300           Intel Core i5-3570K

Fritz Chess Benchmark benchmark

100%
82.9%

H.264 video encoding - multiple processes benchmark

Measures the number of frames, converted by all logical processors from MPEG2 format to H.264 format using single-pass method and high quality settings.
100%
87.2%

H.264 video encoding - multithreaded benchmark

Measures the number of frames, converted by all logical processors from MPEG2 format to H.264 format using multi-threading system calls, dual-pass method and high quality settings.
100%
97.1%

LAME MP3 encoding - multiple processes benchmark

Reports the number of MP3 songs, encoded by all CPU cores per one minute.
100%
73.2%

MySQL 5.0.96 - selecting data benchmark

Shows sustained number of SQL requests per second served by local instance of MySQL server v5.0.96. This test scales well with the number of CPU cores.
100%
71.6%

    AMD FX-6300           Intel Core i5-3570K

PCMark05 CPU score benchmark

100%
65.3%

PCMark05 score benchmark

100%
78.3%

Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) benchmark

Runs Dhrystone test on all cores, and reports estimated integer performance in MIPS (Millions of Instructions Per Second).
100%
65.8%

Sandra MultiMedia Floating Point (it/s) benchmark

100%
88.7%

Sandra MultiMedia Integer (it/s) benchmark

100%
88.4%

    AMD FX-6300           Intel Core i5-3570K

Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) benchmark

Runs Whetstone test on all cores, and reports estimated floating-point performance in MFLOPS (Millions of Floating-Point Operations Per Second).
100%
63.3%

Sandra Whetstone SSE2 (MFLOPS) benchmark

Runs SSE2-enabled Whetstone test on all cores, and reports estimated floating-point performance in MFLOPS (Millions of Floating-Point Operations Per Second).
100%
81.3%

XVid video encoding - multiple processes benchmark

Reports how many frames per second can be transcoded by all CPU cores from MPEG2 to XVid (MPEG4) format, utilizing single-pass conversion method.
100%
91.0%

wPrime v1.55 (32M) benchmark

wPrime benchmark measures time taken to calculate square roots of numbers from 1 to 33554431.
100%
69.9%


FX-6300 vs Intel Core i5-3570K graphics benchmarks

Graphics benchmarks depend on the type of integrated or discrete graphics adapter, and to less extent on the processor performance. Because these benchmarks are synthetic, they may not truly represent gaming performance. However, they still can be used to estimate whether one processor will perform faster or slower than another CPU in games and other 3D tasks.


    AMD FX-6300           Intel Core i5-3570K

3DMark03 game score benchmark

Measures graphics and 3D game performance of discrete and integrated GPUs using 4 different game simulations, that have varying level of DirectX support from version 7 to version 9.
100%
96.6%

3DMark06 3DMark score benchmark

Measures 3D graphics and game performance of CPU/GPU combination by running 4 game simulations, that make extensive use of DirectX 9.0/9.0C capabilities.
100%
97.0%

3DMark2001 score benchmark

Runs a series of game simulations and feature tests to measure graphics and 3D game performance of discrete and integrated GPUs. It utilizes a single CPU core, and it is compatible with DirectX 8 and later APIs.
100%
65.3%

CINEBENCH R10 OpenGL score benchmark

100%
76.2%

PCMark05 Graphics score benchmark

100%
96.8%


FX-6300 vs Intel Core i5-3570K memory performance

Memory-intensive tests or programs move large amounts of data to/from memory, and they depend more on memory throughput and the size of on-chip caches, rather than on CPU integer/FP/SIMD performance.


    AMD FX-6300           Intel Core i5-3570K

7Zip compressing/decompressing speed (1 thread) benchmark

100%
69.6%

CrystalMark Memory benchmark

100%
79.9%

PCMark05 Memory score benchmark

100%
67.8%

PCMark2002 Memory score benchmark

100%
59.3%

WinRAR compressing/decompressing speed benchmark

100%
79.6%

CPUIDs

The table below compares two random CPUID records for AMD FX-6300 and Intel Core i5-3570K microprocessors, that were submitted to our CPUID database. Please note that different steppings of Intel processors, identified by S-spec numbers or CPUID, may have slightly different features. For that reason the comparison table below only applies to CPUs with specific S-Spec number / CPUID.

  CPUID 1 CPUID 2
ManufacturerAMDIntel
CPU FamilyFX-SeriesCore i5
Model / Processor NumberFX-6300i5-3570K
Frequency3511 MHz3391 MHz
CWID version0.4
Part numberFD6300WMW6KHKCM8063701211800
S-Spec / Stepping CodeFA 1234PGNSR0PM
 
General information
VendorAuthenticAMDGenuineIntel
Processor name (BIOS)AMD FX(tm)-6300 Six-Core Processor Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3570K CPU @ 3.40GHz
Cores64
Compute units3 
Logical processors64
Processor typeOriginal OEM Processor
CPUID signature600F20306A9
Family21 (015h) 6 (06h)
Model 2 (02h)58 (03Ah)
Stepping 0 (00h) 9 (09h)
SocketAM3+ 
TLB/Cache details 64-byte Prefetching
Data TLB0: 2-MB or 4-MB pages, 4-way set associative, 32 entries
Data TLB: 4-KB Pages, 4-way set associative, 64 entries
Instruction TLB: 4-KB Pages, 4-way set associative, 128 entries
L2 TLB: 1-MB, 4-way set associative, 64-byte line size
Shared 2nd-level TLB: 4 KB pages, 4-way set associative, 512 entries
 
Cache
L1 data: Associativity4-way set associative8-way set associative
L1 data: Comments Direct-mapped
L1 data: Line size64 bytes
L1 data: Lines per tag1 
L1 data: Size6 x 16 KB4 x 32 KB
L1 instruction: Associativity2-way set associative8-way set associative
L1 instruction: Comments1 cache per 2 coresDirect-mapped
L1 instruction: Line size64 bytes
L1 instruction: Lines per tag1 
L1 instruction: Size3 x 64 KB4 x 32 KB
L2: Associativity16-way set associative8-way set associative
L2: Comments1 cache per 2 coresNon-inclusive|Direct-mapped
L2: Line size64 bytes
L2: Lines per tag1 
L2: Size3 x 2 MB4 x 256 KB
L3: Associativity64-way set associative12-way set associative
L3: Comments Inclusive|Shared between all cores
L3: Line size64 bytes
L3: Lines per tag1 
L3: Size8 MB6 MB
 
Instruction set extensions
AES+
AMD extensions to MMX+-
AVX+
BMI1+-
F16C+
FMA+-
FMA4+-
MMX+
SSE+
SSE2+
SSE3+
SSE4.1+
SSE4.2+
SSE4A+-
SSSE3+
TBM+-
XOP+-
 
Additional instructions
Advanced Bit manipulation+-
CLFLUSH+
CMOV+
CMPXCHG16B+
CMPXCHG8B+
Enhanced REP MOVSB/STOSB-+
FXSAVE/FXRSTORE+
MONITOR/MWAIT+
PCLMULDQ+
POPCNT+
PREFETCH/PREFETCHW+-
RD/WR FSGSBASE instructions-+
RDRAND-+
RDTSCP+
SKINIT / STGI support+-
SYSCALL/SYSRET+-
SYSENTER/SYSEXIT+
XSAVE / XRESTORE states+
 
Major features
64-bit / Intel 64+
Enhanced SpeedStep-+
Intel Virtualization-+
NX bit/XD-bit+
On-chip Floating Point Unit+
PowerNow! / Cool'n'Quiet+-
Secure Virtual Machine (Virtualization)+-
Turbo Boost-+
Turbo Core+-
 
Other features
1 GB large page support+-
100MHz multiplier control+-
128-bit SSE instructions+-
36-bit page-size extensions+
64-bit debug store-+
Advanced programmable interrupt controller+
CPL qualified debug store-+
Core multi-processing legacy mode+-
Debug store-+
Debugging extensions+
Digital Thermal Sensor capability-+
Extended APIC space+-
Hardware P-state control+-
Hardware thermal control+-
Instruction based sampling+-
LAHF / SAHF support in 64-bit mode+
LBR virtualization+-
LOCK MOV CR0 means MOV CR8+-
Lightweight profiling support+-
Machine check architecture+
Machine check exception+
Memory-type range registers+
Misaligned SSE mode+-
Model-specific registers+
Nested page tables+-
OS visible workaround+-
Page attribute table+
Page global extension+
Page-size extensions (4MB pages)+
Pending break enable-+
Perfmon and Debug capability-+
Physical address extensions+
Power Limit Notification capability-+
Process context identifiers-+
SVM lock+-
Self-snoop-+
Supervisor Mode Execution Protection-+
Support for NRIP save+-
THERMTRIP+-
TSC rate is ensured to be invariant across all states+
Temperature sensor+-
Thermal monitor-+
Thermal monitor 2-+
Thermal monitor and software controlled clock facilities-+
Time stamp counter+
Timestamp counter deadline-+
Virtual 8086-mode enhancements+
Watchdog timer support+-
xTPR Update Control-+
+ - feature is supported
- - feature is not supported
Features, not supported by all processors in the table, are not displayed

Comments (2)

THIS IS BS

2013-04-26 23:20:49
Posted by: commissar

the 6300 does perform worse single-threaded, but 62%?!?!?! COME ON! that is obvious bull.

Response: The 3570K performs 62% better, that means that the FX-6300 is about 39% slower. The FX-8350 is a bit faster than the i5-3570K in mutli-threaded tasks, i.e. 2 AMD cores = 1 Intel core with HT. You can estimate single core performance from here.

Power comsuption is wrong

2014-02-23 03:55:42
Posted by: Pablo

In realic test AMD fx 6300 need max operating 77.19W (AMD said max 95W is ok), Intel Core i5 3570K needs 107.5W (Intel said max 77W). AMD is better than intel core i5 for power consuption. Look this page

Response: The link was removed because we do not allow links in comments. Besides, the site you referenced does not test processors. They scrap benchmark results from all over the net.
Terms and Conditions · Privacy Policy · Contact Us (c) Copyright 2003 - 2010 Gennadiy Shvets