AMD FX-8350 vs Intel Core i7-3770K


Mini Review

AMD FX-8350 advantages



Picture
is not
available

  • The AMD FX-8350 processor has FMA4 and XOP instructions enabled. Although these extensions are not broadly used in programs yet, this should improve in future applications.
  • The AMD FX-8350 CPU has FMA3 instructions enabled. This technology is only offered on AMD processors, thus not many software vendors may support it in the future.
  • The FX-8350 microprocessor is priced 41% cheaper than the Intel i7-3770K.
  • The AMD FX-8350 processor has 44% better price/performance ratio.


Intel Core i7-3770K advantages



Intel Core i7-3770K

  • In single-threaded applications, the Core i7-3770K is 49% faster.
  • Multi-threaded performance of the microprocessor is higher.
  • In memory-intensive tasks, the Core i7-3770K has 16% better performance.
  • In graphics applications and games, the CPU has 2% higher performance.
  • Besides 4 CPU cores, the Intel i7-3770K includes HD 4000 Graphics Processing Unit. This Graphics Processing Unit can be used for casual gaming and 3D apps.
  • Power consumption of the CPU is lower.


FX-8350 vs i7-3770K performance comparison

The charts in the table below show performance of FX-8350 and Core i7-3770K CPUs in various kinds of programs. The numbers for 'Single-threaded performance', 'Multi-threaded performance' and 'Discrete Graphics performance' charts are calculated as an average of several related benchmarks, that you can find in the "Benchmarks" tab. Consequentally, performance in individual benchmarks may be lower or higher than what you see in the charts on this page. We also averaged the results for application type specific benchmarks and all-around performance benchmarks, and displayed them in the 'Overall performance' chart. The 'Price-performance ratio' displays how much more performance you will get per dollar spent. This ratio does not take into account the cost of other system components.

Single-threaded performance
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1
 
1.49
 
 
Higher is better
Multi-threaded performance
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1
 
1.1
 
 
Higher is better
Memory-intensive applications
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1
 
1.16
 
 
Higher is better
Discrete Graphics performance
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1
 
1.02
 
 
Higher is better
Overall performance
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1
 
1.18
 
 
Higher is better
Price / performance ratio
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1.44
 
1
 
 
Higher is better

  - AMD FX-8350       - Intel Core i7-3770K

Please see the "Benchmarks" tab for complete list of benchmarks, showing performance difference between FX-8350 and Intel Core i7-3770K in various types of applications.



FX-8350 vs i7-3770K power consumption and price comparison

Thermal Design Power
200
160
120
80
40
0
 
 
125W
 
77W
 
 
Lower is better
Current official price
400
320
240
160
80
0
 
 
$195
 
$332
 
 
Lower is better
 

Detailed side by side comparison of FX-8350 vs i7-3770K specs can be found in the "Specifications" tab. Even more detailed comparison of internal features of both CPUs you will find in the "CPUIDs" tab.



Pros and Cons summary

 
FX-8350Core i7-3770K

General recommendations:
Supports FMA4 / XOP instructions,
Less expensive,
Somewhat better price / performance ratio

General recommendations:
Performs somewhat faster in all program types,
Performs a bit better in graphics tasks,
Integrates HD 4000 GPU,
Somewhat more energy efficient

Drawbacks:
Not as fast in general,
Performs insignificantly worse in graphics programs,
No integrated GPU,
Less energy efficient

Drawbacks:
Does not support some instructions,
Significantly higher official price,
Worse price / performance ratio


Similar processors

 
FX-8350Core i7-3770K

Similar microprocessors use the same socket and architecture as FX-8350 and Core i7-3770K.

Specifications

 AMD FX-8350Intel Core i7-3770K
 Basic details
Market segmentDesktop
ManufacturerAMDIntel
FamilyAMD FX-SeriesIntel Core i7
Model numberFX-8350i7-3770K
CPU part numberFD8350FRW8KHKCM8063701211700
Box part numberFD8350FRHKBOXBX80637I73770K
BXC80637I73770K
Introduction dateOctober 23, 2012April 23, 2012
Current official price$195 (as of Apr 2013)$332 (as of Apr 2013)
 
 CPU features
Core nameVisheraIvy Bridge
Platform nameVolan 
MicroarchitecturePiledriverIvy Bridge
Technology (micron)0.0320.022
Data width (bits)64
SocketSocket AM3+Socket 1155
Frequency (MHz)40003500
Turbo Frequency (MHz)42003900 / 3900 / 3800 / 3700
Bus speed (MHz)2600 (HT/QPI) 
Clock Multiplier 35
L1 cache256 KB (code) / 128 KB (data)128 KB (code) / 128 KB (data)
L2 cache (KB)81921024
L3 cache (KB)8192
TDP (Watt)12577
Cores84
Threads8
Multiprocessing1
 
 Instruction set extensions
AES / Advanced Encryption Standard+
AMD64 / EM64T 64-bit technology+
AVX / Advanced Vector Extensions+
F16C / 16-bit Floating-Point conversion+
FMA3 / 3-operand Fused Multiply-Add+-
FMA4 / 4-operand Fused Multiply-Add+-
MMX+
SSE+
SSE2+
SSE3+
SSE4.1+
SSE4.2+
SSSE3 / Supplemental SSE3+
XOP / eXtended Operations+-
 
 Supported technologies
Hyper-Threading-+
PowerNow! / Enhanced SpeedStep+
Turbo Core / Turbo Boost+
Unlocked multiplier+
Virtualization+
Virus Protection / Execute Disable bit+
 
 Integrated Graphics
GPU TypeNoneHD 4000
 
 Integrated Memory Controller(s)
The number of controllers1
Memory channels2
Supported memoryDDR3-1866DDR3-1333
DDR3-1600

Notes:

Rows with different specifications or features are highlighted.

For detailed specifications of "AMD FX-8350" or "Intel Core i7-3770K" parts please click on the links in the table header.

Benchmarks

System setup

Below is a partial set of AMD FX-8350 and Intel Core i7-3770K benchmarks from our CPU benchmark database. The former processor was tested on ASUS Sabertooth 990FX motherboard with 4GB dual-channel Crucial BallistixPC3-14900 (DDR3-1866) memory, and MSI R6670 1GB GDDR5 (ATI Radeon). The latter processor was tested on ASUS P8P67 motherboard, that had 2 GB dual-channel Corsair TR3X3G1600C9 DDR3 memory, and MSI R6670 1GB GDDR5 (ATI Radeon) graphics. For different system configurations please see tests of FX-8350 and Intel Core i7-3770K CPUs in our benchmark database.

All tests were performed at default frequency and voltage, using manufacturer's stock fan/heatsink. None of the components were overclocked. Motherboard BIOS options were left at default settings.

The results of all benchmarks are broken into four categories: multi-threaded, single-threaded, memory intensive and graphics / gaming.


FX-8350 vs Intel Core i7-3770K single-threaded benchmarks

Single-threaded benchmarks run on a single CPU core, and do not depend on such features as the number of cores, or Hyper-Threading technology. Additionally, they do not utilize on-chip caches, dedicated to other cores.


    AMD FX-8350           Intel Core i7-3770K

3DMark03 CPU score benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
79.0%

CINEBENCH R10 CPU score (1 core) benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
58.8%

FLAC encoding - single process benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
76.2%

H.264 video encoding - single process benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
79.6%

LAME MP3 encoding - single process benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
65.4%

    AMD FX-8350           Intel Core i7-3770K

PCMark2002 CPU score benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
69.5%

Super PI (1M) benchmark

< Shorter is better
100%
42.7%

XVid video encoding - single process benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
80.5%



FX-8350 vs Intel Core i7-3770K multi-threaded benchmarks

Multi-threaded benchmarks utilize all CPU cores and other on-chip resources (on-chip caches, internal buffers, etc). Intel's Hyper-Threading feature also helps to improve multi-threading performance.


    AMD FX-8350           Intel Core i7-3770K

3DMark06 CPU score benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
87.8%

Apache web server - dynamic pages benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
91.7%

Apache web server - static pages benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
50.5%

Blowfish encryption benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
92.7%

CINEBENCH R10 CPU score benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
81.2%

    AMD FX-8350           Intel Core i7-3770K

CINEBENCH R10 render time (seconds) benchmark

< Shorter is better
100%
81.3%

CrystalMark ALU benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
68.6%

CrystalMark FPU benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
64.8%

Euler3D benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
97.6%

FLAC encoding - multiple processes benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
99.4%

    AMD FX-8350           Intel Core i7-3770K

Fritz Chess Benchmark benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
92.8%

H.264 video encoding - multiple processes benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
95.6%

H.264 video encoding - multithreaded benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
99.0%

LAME MP3 encoding - multiple processes benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
83.9%

MySQL 5.0.96 - selecting data benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
80.7%

    AMD FX-8350           Intel Core i7-3770K

PCMark05 CPU score benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
80.3%

PCMark05 score benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
81.4%

Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
90.8%

Sandra MultiMedia Floating Point (it/s) benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
79.9%

Sandra MultiMedia Integer (it/s) benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
70.9%

    AMD FX-8350           Intel Core i7-3770K

Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
52.7%

Sandra Whetstone SSE2 (MFLOPS) benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
66.9%

XVid video encoding - multiple processes benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
94.3%

wPrime v1.55 (32M) benchmark

< Shorter is better
100%
79.1%



FX-8350 vs Intel Core i7-3770K graphics benchmarks

Graphics benchmarks depend on the type of integrated or discrete graphics adapter, and to less extent on the processor performance. Because these benchmarks are synthetic, they may not truly represent gaming performance. However, they still can used to estimate whether one processor will perform faster or slower in games than another CPU.


    AMD FX-8350           Intel Core i7-3770K

3DMark03 game score benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
97.5%

3DMark06 3DMark score benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
98.5%

3DMark2001 score benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
69.4%

CINEBENCH R10 OpenGL score benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
78.2%

PCMark05 Graphics score benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
97.8%



FX-8350 vs Intel Core i7-3770K memory performance

Memory-intensive tests or programs move large amounts of data to/from memory, and they depend more on memory throughput and the size of on-chip caches, rather than on CPU integer/FP/SIMD performance.


    AMD FX-8350           Intel Core i7-3770K

7Zip compressing/decompressing speed benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
94.3%

CrystalMark Memory benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
83.3%

PCMark05 Memory score benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
67.8%

PCMark2002 Memory score benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
62.8%

WinRAR compressing/decompressing speed benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
95.3%


CPUIDs

The table below compares two random CPUID records for AMD FX-8350 and Intel Core i7-3770K microprocessors, that were submitted to our CPUID database. Please note that different steppings of Intel processors, identified by S-spec numbers or CPUID, may have slightly different features. For that reason the comparison table below only applies to CPUs with specific S-Spec number / CPUID.

  CPUID 1 CPUID 2
ManufacturerAMDIntel
CPU FamilyFX-SeriesCore i7
Model / Processor NumberFX-8350i7-3770K
Frequency4013 MHz3491 MHz
CWID version0.4
Part numberFD8350FRW8KHKCM8063701211700
S-Spec / Stepping CodeFA 1236PGNSR0PL
 
General information
VendorAuthenticAMDGenuineIntel
Processor name (BIOS)AMD FX(tm)-8350 Eight-Core Processor Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770K CPU @ 3.50GHz
Cores84
Logical processors48
Processor type8Original OEM Processor
CPUID signatureOriginal OEM Processor306A9
Family600F20 6 (06h)
Model21 (015h)58 (03Ah)
Stepping 2 (02h) 9 (09h)
TLB/Cache details 0 (00h)64-byte Prefetching
Data TLB0: 2-MB or 4-MB pages, 4-way associative, 32 entries
Data TLB: 4-KB Pages, 4-way set associative, 64 entries
Instruction TLB: 4-KB pages, 4-way set associative, 64 entries
L2 TLB: 1-MB, 4-way set associative, 64-byte line size
Shared 2nd-level TLB: 4 KB pages, 4-way set associative, 512 entries
SocketAM3+ 
 
Cache
L1 data: Associativity4-way set associative8-way set associative
L1 data: Comments Direct-mapped
L1 data: Line size64 bytes
L1 data: Lines per tag1 
L1 data: Size8 x 16 KB4 x 32 KB
L1 instruction: Associativity2-way set associative8-way set associative
L1 instruction: Comments1 cache per 2 coresDirect-mapped
L1 instruction: Line size64 bytes
L1 instruction: Lines per tag1 
L1 instruction: Size4 x 64 KB4 x 32 KB
L2: Associativity16-way set associative8-way set associative
L2: Comments1 cache per 2 coresNon-inclusive|Direct-mapped
L2: Line size64 bytes
L2: Lines per tag1 
L2: Size4 x 2 MB4 x 256 KB
L3: Associativity64-way set associative16-way set associative
L3: Comments Inclusive|Shared between all cores
L3: Line size64 bytes
L3: Lines per tag1 
L3: Size8 MB
 
Instruction set extensions
AES+
AMD extensions to MMX+-
AVX+
BMI+-
F16C+
FMA+-
FMA4+-
MMX+
SSE+
SSE2+
SSE3+
SSE4.1+
SSE4.2+
SSE4A+-
SSSE3+
TBM+-
XOP+-
 
Additional instructions
Advanced Bit manipulation+-
CLFLUSH+
CMOV+
CMPXCHG16B+
CMPXCHG8B+
FXSAVE/FXRSTORE+
MONITOR/MWAIT+
PCLMULDQ+
POPCNT+
PREFETCH/PREFETCHW+-
RDRAND-+
RDTSCP+
SKINIT / STGI support+-
SYSCALL/SYSRET+-
SYSENTER/SYSEXIT+
XSAVE / XRESTORE states+
 
Major features
64-bit / Intel 64+
Enhanced SpeedStep-+
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Intel Virtualization-+
NX bit/XD-bit+
On-chip Floating Point Unit+
PowerNow! / Cool'n'Quiet+-
Secure Virtual Machine (Virtualization)+-
Turbo Boost-+
Turbo Core+-
 
Other features
1 GB large page support+-
100MHz multiplier control+-
128-bit SSE instructions+-
36-bit page-size extensions+
64-bit debug store-+
Advanced programmable interrupt controller+
CPL qualified debug store-+
Core multi-processing legacy mode+-
Debug store-+
Debugging extensions+
Digital Thermal Sensor capability-+
Extended APIC space+-
Hardware P-state control+-
Hardware thermal control+-
Instruction based sampling+-
LAHF / SAHF support in 64-bit mode+
LBR virtualization+-
LOCK MOV CR0 means MOV CR8+-
Lightweight profiling support+-
Machine check architecture+
Machine check exception+
Memory-type range registers+
Misaligned SSE mode+-
Model-specific registers+
Nested page tables+-
OS visible workaround+-
Page attribute table+
Page global extension+
Page-size extensions (4MB pages)+
Pending break enable-+
Perfmon and Debug capability-+
Physical address extensions+
Power Limit Notification capability-+
Process context identifiers-+
SVM lock+-
Self-snoop-+
Support for NRIP save+-
THERMTRIP+-
TSC rate is ensured to be invariant across all states+
Temperature sensor+-
Thermal monitor-+
Thermal monitor 2-+
Thermal monitor and software controlled clock facilities-+
Time stamp counter+
Timestamp counter deadline-+
Virtual 8086-mode enhancements+
Watchdog timer support+-
xTPR Update Control-+

+ - feature is supported
- - feature is not supported
Features, not supported by all processors in the table, are not displayed

Compare with ...

Compare AMD FX-8350 with...

Other Core i7 CPU:

Any CPU:


Compare Intel Core i7-3770K with...

Other FX-Series CPU:

Any CPU:


Note: To see differences with any CPU, type in any combination of the following into the "Any CPU" field: manufacturer name, full or partial family name, model number, part number, core name, socket name, operating frequency, bus speed (must have FSB suffix), and the last level cache. Here are some valid searches:

  i5-3570K
  Intel Celeron 2 GHz
  Ivy Bridge
  Pentium 4 800FSB
  AMD 3.3GHz 8MB

Comments (0)

Terms and Conditions · Privacy Policy · Contact Us (c) Copyright 2003 - 2010 Gennadiy Shvets

Search CPU-World

Search site contents:

Identify part

Identify CPU, FPU or MCU:

Jump to CPU / Family

Type in partial CPU manufacturer, family, model and/or number.

Quick Links