Search CPU-World

Search site contents:

Intel Core 2 Duo E6550 vs Core i3-530

Mini Review

Intel Core 2 Duo E6550 advantages

  • The microprocessor is 11% more energy efficient than the Core i3-530 CPU.

Intel Core i3-530 advantages

  • The Intel i3-530 performs 44% faster when running single-threaded tasks.
  • Multi-threaded performance of this microprocessor is higher.
  • In memory-intensive programs, the Intel i3-530 is 48% faster.
  • The CPU has SSE4.1 and SSE4.2 instructions enabled.
  • The Intel Core i3-530 features integrated HD (Nehalem) GPU. This Graphics Processing Unit is not a substitute for high-end graphics cards, but it can be used for 3D apps and casual games.

E6550 vs i3-530 performance comparison

The charts show performance of Core 2 Duo E6550 and Core i3-530 CPUs in a few different types of programs. The numbers in the charts are calculated from several benchmarks, that you can see in the "Benchmarks" tab. As such, performance in individual benchmarks may be higher or lower than what you see in the charts here. The 'Overall performance' chart displays an average of all-around performance benchmarks, and benchmarks, specific to each application type.
Single-threaded performance
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1
 
1.44
 
 
Higher is better
Multi-threaded performance
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1
 
1.73
 
 
Higher is better
Memory-intensive applications
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1
 
1.48
 
 
Higher is better
Overall performance
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1
 
1.54
 
 
Higher is better

  - Intel Core 2 Duo E6550       - Intel Core i3-530

Complete list of benchmarks, that demonstrate difference in performance between Intel Core 2 Duo E6550 and Core i3-530 in various types of tests, can be found in the "Benchmarks" tab.


E6550 vs i3-530 power consumption comparison

Thermal Design Power
90
72
54
36
18
0
 
 
65W
 
73W
 
 
Lower is better
 

Detailed side by side comparison of Intel Core 2 Duo E6550 vs i3-530 specs can be found in the "Specifications" tab.


Pros and Cons summary

Core 2 Duo E6550 Core i3-530
General recommendations:
Needs less power
  General recommendations:
Considerably better performance in all kinds of tasks,
Supports SSE4.1 / SSE4.2 instructions,
Includes HD (Nehalem) GPU

Drawbacks:

Poor overall performance,
Does not support some instructions,
No on-chip graphics
 

Drawbacks:

Requires somewhat more power

Similar processors

Core 2 Duo E6550 Core i3-530
 

Similar processors use the same socket and architecture as Core 2 Duo E6550 and Intel Core i3-530, however their performance and other characteristics are a bit different.


Where to buy


The microprocessors are obsolete. For this reason the best place to find them is eBay. They may also be available from third party vendors at Amazon.
Jump to:
  • Benchmarks
  • Comments

More comparisons

Compare Intel Core 2 Duo E6550 with...

Other Core i3 CPU:

Any CPU:


Compare Intel Core i3-530 with...

Other Core 2 Duo CPU:

Any CPU:


Note: To see differences with any CPU, type in any combination of the following into the "Any CPU" field: manufacturer name, full or partial family name, model number, part number, core name, socket name, operating frequency, bus speed (must have FSB suffix), and the last level cache. Here are some valid searches:

  i5-3570K
  Intel Celeron 2 GHz
  Core
  Pentium 4 800FSB
  AMD 3.3GHz 8MB

Specifications

Please visit Intel Core 2 Duo E6550 and Intel Core i3-530 pages for more complete specifications of both microprocessors.

 Intel Core 2 Duo E6550Intel Core i3-530
Market segmentDesktop
ManufacturerIntel
FamilyCore 2 DuoCore i3
Basic details
Model numberE6550i3-530
CPU part numberHH80557PJ0534MGCM80616003180AG
Box part numberBX80557E6550
BX80557E6550R
BX80616I3530
BXC80616I3530
Introduction dateJuly 16, 2007January 7, 2010
 
CPU features
Core nameConroeClarkdale
MicroarchitectureCoreNehalem
Technology (micron)0.0650.032
Data width (bits)64
SocketSocket 775Socket 1156
Frequency (MHz)23332933
Bus speed (MHz)1333 
Clock Multiplier7 
L1 cache64 KB (code) / 64 KB (data)
L2 cache (KB)4096512
L3 cache (KB) 4096
Max temperature (°C)7272.6
TDP (Watt)6573
Max power dissipation (Watt)105.15170.83
Core voltage (V)0.85 - 1.50.65 - 1.4
Cores2
Threads24
Multiprocessing1
 
Instruction set extensions
AMD64 / EM64T 64-bit technology+
MMX+
SSE+
SSE2+
SSE3+
SSE4.1-+
SSE4.2-+
SSSE3 / Supplemental SSE3+
 
Supported technologies
Hyper-Threading-+
PowerNow! / Enhanced SpeedStep+
Trusted Execution+-
Virtualization+
Virus Protection / Execute Disable bit+
 
Integrated Graphics
GPU TypeNoneHD (Nehalem)
 
Integrated Memory Controller(s)
The number of controllers01
Notes:

Rows with different specifications or features are highlighted.

For detailed specifications of "Intel Core 2 Duo E6550" or "Intel Core i3-530" parts please click on the links in the table header.

Benchmarks

System setup

Below is a complete set of Intel Core 2 Duo E6550 and Core i3-530 benchmarks from our CPU benchmark database. The former processor was tested on ASRock 4Core1600Twins-P35 motherboard with 2 GB dual-channel Corsair CM3X1024-1333C9 DDR3 memory, and Powercolor 24PRO256M DDR2 (ATI Radeon HD2400). The latter processor was tested on ASUS P7P55D motherboard, that had 2 GB dual-channel Corsair TR3X3G1600C9 DDR3 memory, and Powercolor 24PRO256M DDR2 (ATI Radeon HD2400) graphics.

All tests were performed at default frequency and voltage, using manufacturer's stock fan/heatsink. None of the components were overclocked. Motherboard BIOS options were left at default settings.

The results of all benchmarks are broken into four categories: multi-threaded, single-threaded, memory intensive and graphics / gaming.


Core 2 Duo E6550 vs Core i3-530 single-threaded benchmarks

Single-threaded benchmarks run on a single CPU core, and do not depend on such features as the number of cores, or Hyper-Threading technology. Additionally, they do not utilize on-chip caches, dedicated to other cores.


    Intel Core 2 Duo E6550           Intel Core i3-530

CINEBENCH R10 CPU score (1 core) benchmark

Measures performance of a single-core rendering of a photo-realistic 3D image using CINEMA 4D software engine.
100%
72.8%

PCMark2002 CPU score benchmark

100%
83.7%

Super PI (1M) benchmark

Measures time, required to calculate the first 1 million digits after the decimal point in the number Pi.
100%
65.9%


Core 2 Duo E6550 vs Core i3-530 multi-threaded benchmarks

Multi-threaded benchmarks utilize all CPU cores and other on-chip resources (on-chip caches, internal buffers, etc). Intel's Hyper-Threading feature also helps to improve multi-threading performance.


    Intel Core 2 Duo E6550           Intel Core i3-530

CINEBENCH R10 CPU score benchmark

Measures performance of multi-core rendering of a photo-realistic 3D image using CINEMA 4D software engine.
100%
60.1%

CINEBENCH R10 render time (seconds) benchmark

Measures time taken to render a photo-realistic 3D image using CINEMA 4D software engine.
100%
60.2%

Euler3D benchmark

100%
67.4%

Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) benchmark

Runs Dhrystone test on all cores, and reports estimated integer performance in MIPS (Millions of Instructions Per Second).
100%
72.3%

Sandra MultiMedia Floating Point (it/s) benchmark

100%
45.5%

    Intel Core 2 Duo E6550           Intel Core i3-530

Sandra MultiMedia Integer (it/s) benchmark

100%
79.6%

Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) benchmark

Runs Whetstone test on all cores, and reports estimated floating-point performance in MFLOPS (Millions of Floating-Point Operations Per Second).
100%
47.7%

Sandra Whetstone SSE2 (MFLOPS) benchmark

Runs SSE2-enabled Whetstone test on all cores, and reports estimated floating-point performance in MFLOPS (Millions of Floating-Point Operations Per Second).
100%
46.2%

wPrime v1.55 (32M) benchmark

wPrime benchmark measures time taken to calculate square roots of numbers from 1 to 33554431.
100%
45.8%


Core 2 Duo E6550 vs Core i3-530 graphics benchmarks

Graphics benchmarks depend on the type of integrated or discrete graphics adapter, and to less extent on the processor performance. Because these benchmarks are synthetic, they may not truly represent gaming performance. However, they still can be used to estimate whether one processor will perform faster or slower than another CPU in games and other 3D tasks.


    Intel Core 2 Duo E6550           Intel Core i3-530

3DMark2001 score benchmark

Runs a series of game simulations and feature tests to measure graphics and 3D game performance of discrete and integrated GPUs. It utilizes a single CPU core, and it is compatible with DirectX 8 and later APIs.
100%
98.9%

CINEBENCH R10 OpenGL score benchmark

100%
93.2%


Core 2 Duo E6550 vs Core i3-530 memory performance

Memory-intensive tests or programs move large amounts of data to/from memory, and they depend more on memory throughput and the size of on-chip caches, rather than on CPU integer/FP/SIMD performance.


    Intel Core 2 Duo E6550           Intel Core i3-530

7Zip compressing/decompressing speed (1 thread) benchmark

100%
86.8%

PCMark2002 Memory score benchmark

100%
73.5%

WinRAR compressing/decompressing speed benchmark

100%
67.6%

Comments (0)
Terms and Conditions · Privacy Policy · Contact Us (c) Copyright 2003 - 2010 Gennadiy Shvets