Search CPU-World

Search site contents:

Intel Celeron D 336 vs Core 2 Duo E6700

Mini Review

Intel Celeron D 336 advantages

  • None

Intel Core 2 Duo E6700 advantages

  • Single-threaded performance of the Intel E6700 is better.
  • The CPU performs 305% faster when running multi-threaded programs.
  • Memory performance of this processor is better.
  • The microprocessor provides hardware acceleration of virtualized applications.
  • The Intel Core 2 Duo E6700 has SSSE3 instructions.
  • Power consumption of the CPU is lower.

336 vs E6700 performance comparison

The charts in the section below illustrate performance of Celeron D 336 and Core 2 Duo E6700 microprocessors in several different kinds of programs. The numbers for 'Single-threaded performance' and 'Multi-threaded performance' charts are calculated as an average of several related benchmarks, that you can see in the "Benchmarks" tab. As a result, the displayed results may differ from results, that you may receive in individual tests. The 'Overall performance' chart calculates an average of all-around performance benchmarks, and benchmarks, specific to each type of application.
Single-threaded performance
3
2.4
1.8
1.2
0.6
0
 
 
1
 
2.49
 
 
Higher is better
Multi-threaded performance
5
4
3
2
1
0
 
 
1
 
4.05
 
 
Higher is better
Memory-intensive applications
4
3.2
2.4
1.6
0.8
0
 
 
1
 
3.42
 
 
Higher is better
Overall performance
4
3.2
2.4
1.6
0.8
0
 
 
1
 
3.19
 
 
Higher is better

  - Intel Celeron D 336       - Intel Core 2 Duo E6700

Full list of benchmarks, that demonstrate performance difference between Intel 336 and Intel E6700 in various types of applications, can be seen in the "Benchmarks" tab.


336 vs E6700 power consumption comparison

Thermal Design Power
100
80
60
40
20
0
 
 
84W
 
65W
 
 
Lower is better
 

Detailed side by side comparison of Intel Celeron D 336 vs E6700 specs can be found in the "Specifications" tab.


Pros and Cons summary

Celeron D 336 Core 2 Duo E6700
General recommendations:
None
  General recommendations:
Performs considerably faster in all program types,
Needs less power

Drawbacks:

Slow,
Somewhat higher power consumption
 

Drawbacks:

None

Similar processors

Celeron D 336 Core 2 Duo E6700
 

Similar processors use the same socket and architecture as Celeron D 336 and Core 2 Duo E6700.

Jump to:
  • Benchmarks
  • Comments

Popular comparisons:

More comparisons

Compare Intel Celeron D 336 with...

Other Core 2 Duo CPU:

Any CPU:


Compare Intel Core 2 Duo E6700 with...

Other Celeron D CPU:

Any CPU:


Note: To see differences with any CPU, type in any combination of the following into the "Any CPU" field: manufacturer name, full or partial family name, model number, part number, core name, socket name, operating frequency, bus speed (must have FSB suffix), and the last level cache. Here are some valid searches:

  i5-3570K
  Intel Celeron 2 GHz
  Netburst
  Pentium 4 800FSB
  AMD 3.3GHz 8MB

Specifications

Please visit Intel Celeron D 336 and Intel Core 2 Duo E6700 pages for more complete specifications of both microprocessors.

 Intel Celeron D 336Intel Core 2 Duo E6700
Market segmentDesktop
ManufacturerIntel
FamilyCeleron DCore 2 Duo
Basic details
Model number336E6700
CPU part numberJM80547RE072CN
HH80547RE072CN
HH80557PH0674M
Box part numberBX80547RE2800CNBX80557E6700
Introduction dateJune 27, 2005July 27, 2006
 
CPU features
Core namePrescottConroe
MicroarchitectureNetburstCore
Technology (micron)0.090.065
Data width (bits)64
SocketSocket 775
Frequency (MHz)28002667
Bus speed (MHz)5331066
Clock Multiplier2110
L1 cache16 KB (data)64 KB (code) / 64 KB (data)
L2 cache (KB)2564096
Max temperature (°C)67.760.1
TDP (Watt)8465
Max power dissipation (Watt)98.83105.15
Core voltage (V)1.25 - 1.40.85 - 1.5
Cores12
Threads12
Multiprocessing 1
 
Instruction set extensions
AMD64 / EM64T 64-bit technology+
MMX+
SSE+
SSE2+
SSE3+
SSSE3 / Supplemental SSE3-+
 
Supported technologies
PowerNow! / Enhanced SpeedStep-+
Virtualization-+
Virus Protection / Execute Disable bit+
 
Integrated Graphics
GPU TypeNone
 
Integrated Memory Controller(s)
The number of controllers0
Notes:

Rows with different specifications or features are highlighted.

For detailed specifications of "Intel Celeron D 336" or "Intel Core 2 Duo E6700" parts please click on the links in the table header.

Benchmarks

System setup

Below is a complete set of Intel Celeron D 336 and Core 2 Duo E6700 benchmarks from our CPU benchmark database. The former processor was tested on Intel DP965LT motherboard with 2GB dual-channel Corsair CM2X1024-6400C4 memory, and Powercolor 24PRO256M DDR2 (ATI Radeon HD2400). The latter processor was tested on ASRock 4Core1600Twins-P35 motherboard, that had 2 GB dual-channel Corsair CM3X1024-1333C9 DDR3 memory, and Powercolor 24PRO256M DDR2 (ATI Radeon HD2400) graphics.

All tests were performed at default frequency and voltage, using manufacturer's stock fan/heatsink. None of the components were overclocked. Motherboard BIOS options were left at default settings.

The results of all benchmarks are broken into four categories: multi-threaded, single-threaded, memory intensive and graphics / gaming.


Celeron D 336 vs Core 2 Duo E6700 single-threaded benchmarks

Single-threaded benchmarks run on a single CPU core, and do not depend on such features as the number of cores, or Hyper-Threading technology. Additionally, they do not utilize on-chip caches, dedicated to other cores.


    Intel Celeron D 336           Intel Core 2 Duo E6700

CINEBENCH R10 CPU score (1 core) benchmark

Measures performance of a single-core rendering of a photo-realistic 3D image using CINEMA 4D software engine.
100%
45.7%

PCMark2002 CPU score benchmark

100%
55.6%

Super PI (1M) benchmark

Measures time, required to calculate the first 1 million digits after the decimal point in the number Pi.
100%
34.6%


Celeron D 336 vs Core 2 Duo E6700 multi-threaded benchmarks

Multi-threaded benchmarks utilize all CPU cores and other on-chip resources (on-chip caches, internal buffers, etc). Intel's Hyper-Threading feature also helps to improve multi-threading performance.


    Intel Celeron D 336           Intel Core 2 Duo E6700

CINEBENCH R10 CPU score benchmark

Measures performance of multi-core rendering of a photo-realistic 3D image using CINEMA 4D software engine.
100%
23.9%

CINEBENCH R10 render time (seconds) benchmark

Measures time taken to render a photo-realistic 3D image using CINEMA 4D software engine.
100%
23.9%

Euler3D benchmark

100%
23.1%

Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) benchmark

Runs Dhrystone test on all cores, and reports estimated integer performance in MIPS (Millions of Instructions Per Second).
100%
23.5%

Sandra MultiMedia Floating Point (it/s) benchmark

100%
23.5%

    Intel Celeron D 336           Intel Core 2 Duo E6700

Sandra MultiMedia Integer (it/s) benchmark

100%
22.3%

Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) benchmark

Runs Whetstone test on all cores, and reports estimated floating-point performance in MFLOPS (Millions of Floating-Point Operations Per Second).
100%
25.0%

Sandra Whetstone SSE2 (MFLOPS) benchmark

Runs SSE2-enabled Whetstone test on all cores, and reports estimated floating-point performance in MFLOPS (Millions of Floating-Point Operations Per Second).
100%
29.0%

wPrime v1.55 (32M) benchmark

wPrime benchmark measures time taken to calculate square roots of numbers from 1 to 33554431.
100%
27.0%


Celeron D 336 vs Core 2 Duo E6700 graphics benchmarks

Graphics benchmarks depend on the type of integrated or discrete graphics adapter, and to less extent on the processor performance. Because these benchmarks are synthetic, they may not truly represent gaming performance. However, they still can be used to estimate whether one processor will perform faster or slower than another CPU in games and other 3D tasks.


    Intel Celeron D 336           Intel Core 2 Duo E6700

3DMark2001 score benchmark

Runs a series of game simulations and feature tests to measure graphics and 3D game performance of discrete and integrated GPUs. It utilizes a single CPU core, and it is compatible with DirectX 8 and later APIs.
100%
77.5%

CINEBENCH R10 OpenGL score benchmark

100%
68.6%


Celeron D 336 vs Core 2 Duo E6700 memory performance

Memory-intensive tests or programs move large amounts of data to/from memory, and they depend more on memory throughput and the size of on-chip caches, rather than on CPU integer/FP/SIMD performance.


    Intel Celeron D 336           Intel Core 2 Duo E6700

7Zip compressing/decompressing speed (1 thread) benchmark

100%
42.2%

PCMark2002 Memory score benchmark

100%
23.9%

WinRAR compressing/decompressing speed benchmark

100%
29.2%

Comments (0)
Terms and Conditions · Privacy Policy · Contact Us (c) Copyright 2003 - 2010 Gennadiy Shvets