Search CPU-World

Search site contents:

Intel Core 2 Duo E7400 vs Core i5-3570

Mini Review

Intel Core 2 Duo E7400 advantages

  • Power consumption of the Core 2 Duo E7400 is lower.

Intel Core i5-3570 advantages

  • In single-threaded applications, this processor has 137% better performance.
  • Multi-threaded performance of the microprocessor is higher.
  • The i5-3570 CPU performs 154% faster when running memory-intensive programs.
  • SSE4.2 instructions are enabled on this microprocessor.
  • The Intel i5-3570 incorporates Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) instructions, that provide AES encryption acceleration. The instructions are beneficial if you need to protect your disk or network data.
  • The Intel Core i5-3570 processor includes AVX and F16C instructions. Although these extensions are not widely supported by applications yet, their support should improve in future programs.
  • The Intel Core i5-3570 microprocessor features on-chip HD 2500 GPU. This Graphics Processing Unit is not a replacement for high-end graphics cards, but it can be used for casual games and 3D apps.

E7400 vs i5-3570 performance comparison

The charts below demonstrate performance of Core 2 Duo E7400 and Core i5-3570 microprocessors in a number of different application types. The numbers for 'Single-threaded performance' and 'Multi-threaded performance' charts are calculated as an average of several related benchmarks, that you can see in the "Benchmarks" tab. As such, performance in individual benchmarks may be higher or lower than what you see in the charts on this page. The 'Overall performance' displays an average of all-around performance benchmarks, and benchmarks, specific to each program type.
Single-threaded performance
3
2.4
1.8
1.2
0.6
0
 
 
1
 
2.37
 
 
Higher is better
Multi-threaded performance
5
4
3
2
1
0
 
 
1
 
3.98
 
 
Higher is better
Memory-intensive applications
3
2.4
1.8
1.2
0.6
0
 
 
1
 
2.54
 
 
Higher is better
Overall performance
4
3.2
2.4
1.6
0.8
0
 
 
1
 
2.81
 
 
Higher is better

  - Intel Core 2 Duo E7400       - Intel Core i5-3570

Complete list of benchmarks, that show difference in performance between Intel E7400 and i5-3570 in various types of applications, can be seen in the "Benchmarks" tab.


E7400 vs i5-3570 power consumption comparison

Thermal Design Power
90
72
54
36
18
0
 
 
65W
 
77W
 
 
Lower is better
 

Detailed side by side comparison of Intel Core 2 Duo E7400 vs Intel i5-3570 specs can be found in the "Specifications" tab. Much more detailed comparison of internal features of both CPUs you will find in the "CPUIDs" tab.


Pros and Cons summary

Core 2 Duo E7400 Core i5-3570
General recommendations:
Needs less power
  General recommendations:
Significantly better overall performance,
Supports SSE4.2 / AVX / F16C instructions,
Integrates HD 2500 GPU

Drawbacks:

Poor overall performance,
Does not support some instructions,
Lacks integrated graphics,
The socket is obsolete
 

Drawbacks:

Requires more power

Similar processors

Core 2 Duo E7400 Core i5-3570
 

Similar microprocessors use the same socket and architecture as Core 2 Duo E7400 and Intel i5-3570, however their performance and other characteristics are a bit different.

Jump to:
  • Benchmarks
  • CPUIDs
  • Comments
 

More comparisons

Compare Intel Core 2 Duo E7400 with...

Other Core i5 CPU:

Any CPU:


Compare Intel Core i5-3570 with...

Other Core 2 Duo CPU:

Any CPU:


Note: To see differences with any CPU, type in any combination of the following into the "Any CPU" field: manufacturer name, full or partial family name, model number, part number, core name, socket name, operating frequency, bus speed (must have FSB suffix), and the last level cache. Here are some valid searches:

  i5-3570K
  Intel Celeron 2 GHz
  Core
  Pentium 4 800FSB
  AMD 3.3GHz 8MB

Specifications

Please visit Intel Core 2 Duo E7400 and Intel Core i5-3570 pages for more complete specifications of both microprocessors.

 Intel Core 2 Duo E7400Intel Core i5-3570
Market segmentDesktop
ManufacturerIntel
FamilyCore 2 DuoCore i5
Basic details
Model numberE7400i5-3570
CPU part numberAT80571PH0723M
AT80571PH0723ML
CM8063701093103
Box part numberBX80571E7400
BXC80571E7400
BX80637I53570
BXC80637I53570
Introduction dateOctober 19, 2008June 3, 2012
Current official price $205 (as of Apr 2014)
 
CPU features
Core nameWolfdaleIvy Bridge
MicroarchitectureCoreIvy Bridge
Technology (micron)0.0450.022
Data width (bits)64
SocketSocket 775Socket 1155
Frequency (MHz)28003400
Turbo Frequency (MHz) 3800 / 3800 / 3700 / 3600
Bus speed (MHz)1066 
Clock Multiplier10.534
L1 cache64 KB (code) / 64 KB (data)128 KB (code) / 128 KB (data)
L2 cache (KB)30721024
L3 cache (KB) 6144
Max temperature (°C)74.1 
TDP (Watt)6577
Max power dissipation (Watt)98.89 
Core voltage (V)0.85 - 1.3625 
Cores24
Threads24
Multiprocessing1
 
Instruction set extensions
AES / Advanced Encryption Standard-+
AMD64 / EM64T 64-bit technology+
AVX / Advanced Vector Extensions-+
F16C / 16-bit Floating-Point conversion-+
MMX+
SSE+
SSE2+
SSE3+
SSE4.1+
SSE4.2-+
SSSE3 / Supplemental SSE3+
 
Supported technologies
PowerNow! / Enhanced SpeedStep+
Trusted Execution-+
Turbo Core / Turbo Boost-+
Virtualization+
Virus Protection / Execute Disable bit+
 
Integrated Graphics
GPU TypeNoneHD 2500
 
Integrated Memory Controller(s)
The number of controllers01
Notes:

Rows with different specifications or features are highlighted.

For detailed specifications of "Intel Core 2 Duo E7400" or "Intel Core i5-3570" parts please click on the links in the table header.

Benchmarks

System setup

Intel Core 2 Duo E7400 and Core i5-3570 processors were tested using different system components, that are identified by MB, RAM and VID columns in the tables below. The numbers in each of these columns correspond to one of motherboards (MB), memory configurations (RAM) or graphics adapters (VID), listed below:

MB - Motherboard(s):
1. ASUS P8P67
2. ASROCK 4CORE1600TWINS-P35
3. INTEL DP965LT

RAM - Memory:
1. 2 GB DUAL-CHANNEL CORSAIR TR3X3G1600C9 DDR3
2. 2 GB DUAL-CHANNEL CORSAIR CM3X1024-1333C9 DDR3
3. 2GB DUAL-CHANNEL CORSAIR CM2X1024-6400C4

VID - Video card(s):
1. MSI R6670 1GB GDDR5 (ATI RADEON)
2. POWERCOLOR 24PRO256M DDR2 (ATI RADEON HD2400)

All tests were performed at default frequency and voltage, using manufacturer's stock fan/heatsink. None of the components were overclocked. Motherboard BIOS options were left at default settings.

The results of all benchmarks are broken into four categories: multi-threaded, single-threaded, memory intensive and graphics / gaming.


Core 2 Duo E7400 vs Core i5-3570 single-threaded benchmarks

Single-threaded benchmarks run on a single CPU core, and do not depend on such features as the number of cores, or Hyper-Threading technology. Additionally, they do not utilize on-chip caches, dedicated to other cores.

     

    Intel Core 2 Duo E7400           Intel Core i5-3570

3DMark03 CPU score benchmark

Uses DirectX software vertex shader to run Wings of Fury and Trolls' Lair games, and calculates a 3DMark03 CPU score based on averaged number of frames per second, achieved by the CPU/GPU combination.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
41.3%222
28.9%332

CINEBENCH R10 CPU score (1 core) benchmark

Measures performance of a single-core rendering of a photo-realistic 3D image using CINEMA 4D software engine.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
56.4%222
32.6%332

PCMark2002 CPU score benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
68.4%222
39.3%332

Super PI (1M) benchmark

Measures time, required to calculate the first 1 million digits after the decimal point in the number Pi.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
52.4%222
32.3%332


Core 2 Duo E7400 vs Core i5-3570 multi-threaded benchmarks

Multi-threaded benchmarks utilize all CPU cores and other on-chip resources (on-chip caches, internal buffers, etc). Intel's Hyper-Threading feature also helps to improve multi-threading performance.

     

    Intel Core 2 Duo E7400           Intel Core i5-3570

CINEBENCH R10 CPU score benchmark

Measures performance of multi-core rendering of a photo-realistic 3D image using CINEMA 4D software engine.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
31.4%222
18.2%332

CINEBENCH R10 render time (seconds) benchmark

Measures time taken to render a photo-realistic 3D image using CINEMA 4D software engine.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
31.4%222
18.2%332

Euler3D benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
33.0%222
25.1%332

Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) benchmark

Runs Dhrystone test on all cores, and reports estimated integer performance in MIPS (Millions of Instructions Per Second).
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
35.2%222
20.1%332

Sandra MultiMedia Floating Point (it/s) benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
36.0%222
20.5%332

    Intel Core 2 Duo E7400           Intel Core i5-3570

Sandra MultiMedia Integer (it/s) benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
45.3%222
25.8%332

Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) benchmark

Runs Whetstone test on all cores, and reports estimated floating-point performance in MFLOPS (Millions of Floating-Point Operations Per Second).
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
41.8%222
23.9%332

Sandra Whetstone SSE2 (MFLOPS) benchmark

Runs SSE2-enabled Whetstone test on all cores, and reports estimated floating-point performance in MFLOPS (Millions of Floating-Point Operations Per Second).
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
37.5%222
21.4%332

wPrime v1.55 (32M) benchmark

wPrime benchmark measures time taken to calculate square roots of numbers from 1 to 33554431.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
29.5%222
16.9%332


Core 2 Duo E7400 vs Core i5-3570 graphics benchmarks

Graphics benchmarks depend on the type of integrated or discrete graphics adapter, and to less extent on the processor performance. Because these benchmarks are synthetic, they may not truly represent gaming performance. However, they still can be used to estimate whether one processor will perform faster or slower than another CPU in games and other 3D tasks.

Important! The processors were tested using different types of graphics adapters, that may not be suitable for comparison.
     

    Intel Core 2 Duo E7400           Intel Core i5-3570

3DMark03 game score benchmark

Measures graphics and 3D game performance of discrete and integrated GPUs using 4 different game simulations, that have varying level of DirectX support from version 7 to version 9.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
8.7%222
8.7%332

3DMark2001 score benchmark

Runs a series of game simulations and feature tests to measure graphics and 3D game performance of discrete and integrated GPUs. It utilizes a single CPU core, and it is compatible with DirectX 8 and later APIs.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
18.1%222
17.1%332

CINEBENCH R10 OpenGL score benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
22.7%222
19.6%332


Core 2 Duo E7400 vs Core i5-3570 memory performance

Memory-intensive tests or programs move large amounts of data to/from memory, and they depend more on memory throughput and the size of on-chip caches, rather than on CPU integer/FP/SIMD performance.

     

    Intel Core 2 Duo E7400           Intel Core i5-3570

7Zip compressing/decompressing speed (1 thread) benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
70.1%222
42.9%332

PCMark2002 Memory score benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
53.0%222
30.7%332

WinRAR compressing/decompressing speed benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
42.2%222
36.4%332

CPUIDs

The table below compares two random CPUID records for Intel Core 2 Duo E7400 and Intel Core i5-3570 microprocessors, that were submitted to our CPUID database. Please note that different steppings of Intel processors, identified by S-spec numbers or CPUID, may have slightly different features. For that reason the comparison table below only applies to CPUs with specific S-Spec number / CPUID.

  CPUID 1 CPUID 2
ManufacturerIntel
CPU FamilyCore 2 DuoCore i5
Model / Processor NumberE7400i5-3570
Frequency2800 MHz3840 MHz
CWID version0.30.5
Part numberAT80571PH0723MCM8063701093103
S-Spec / Stepping CodeSLB9YSR0T7
 
General information
VendorGenuineIntel
Processor name (BIOS)Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E7400 @ 2.80GHz Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3570 CPU @ 3.40GHz
Cores24
Logical processors24
Processor typeOriginal OEM Processor
CPUID signature1067A306A9
Family 6 (06h)
Model23 (017h)58 (03Ah)
Stepping10 (0Ah) 9 (09h)
TLB/Cache details64-byte Prefetching
Data TLB: 4-KB Pages, 4-way set associative, 256 entries
Data TLB: 4-MB Pages, 4-way set associative, 32 entries
Instruction TLB: 2-MB pages, 4-way, 8 entries or 4M pages, 4-way, 4 entries
Instruction TLB: 4-KB Pages, 4-way set associative, 128 entries
L1 Data TLB: 4-KB pages, 4-way set associative, 16 entries
L1 Data TLB: 4-MB pages, 4-way set associative, 16 entries
64-byte Prefetching
Data TLB0: 2-MB or 4-MB pages, 4-way set associative, 32 entries
Data TLB: 4-KB Pages, 4-way set associative, 64 entries
Instruction TLB: 4-KB Pages, 4-way set associative, 128 entries
L2 TLB: 1-MB, 4-way set associative, 64-byte line size
Shared 2nd-level TLB: 4 KB pages, 4-way set associative, 512 entries
 
Cache
L1 data: Associativity8-way set associative
L1 data: Comments Direct-mapped
L1 data: Line size64 bytes
L1 data: Size32 KB4 x 32 KB
L1 instruction: Associativity8-way set associative
L1 instruction: Comments Direct-mapped
L1 instruction: Line size64 bytes
L1 instruction: Size32 KB4 x 32 KB
L2: Associativity8-way set associative
L2: Commentsunified on-dieNon-inclusive|Direct-mapped
L2: Line size64 bytes
L2: Size3 MB4 x 256 KB
L3: Associativity 12-way set associative
L3: Comments Inclusive|Shared between all cores
L3: Line size 64 bytes
L3: Size 6 MB
 
Instruction set extensions
AES-+
AVX-+
F16C-+
MMX+
SSE+
SSE2+
SSE3+
SSE4.1+
SSE4.2-+
SSSE3+
 
Additional instructions
CLFLUSH+
CMOV+
CMPXCHG16B+
CMPXCHG8B+
Enhanced REP MOVSB/STOSB-+
FXSAVE/FXRSTORE+
MONITOR/MWAIT+
PCLMULDQ-+
POPCNT-+
RD/WR FSGSBASE instructions-+
RDRAND-+
RDTSCP-+
SYSENTER/SYSEXIT+
XSAVE / XRESTORE states+
 
Major features
64-bit / Intel 64+
Enhanced SpeedStep+
Intel Trusted Execution technology-+
Intel Virtualization-+
NX bit/XD-bit-+
On-chip Floating Point Unit+
Turbo Boost-+
 
Other features
36-bit page-size extensions+
64-bit debug store+
Advanced programmable interrupt controller+
CPL qualified debug store+
Debug store+
Debugging extensions+
Digital Thermal Sensor capability+
Extended xAPIC support-+
LAHF / SAHF support in 64-bit mode+
Machine check architecture+
Machine check exception+
Memory-type range registers+
Model-specific registers+
Page attribute table+
Page global extension+
Page-size extensions (4MB pages)+
Pending break enable+
Perfmon and Debug capability+
Physical address extensions+
Power Limit Notification capability-+
Process context identifiers-+
Self-snoop+
Supervisor Mode Execution Protection-+
TSC rate is ensured to be invariant across all states-+
Thermal monitor+
Thermal monitor 2+
Thermal monitor and software controlled clock facilities+
Time stamp counter+
Timestamp counter deadline-+
Virtual 8086-mode enhancements+
xTPR Update Control+
+ - feature is supported
- - feature is not supported
Features, not supported by all processors in the table, are not displayed

Comments (0)
Terms and Conditions · Privacy Policy · Contact Us (c) Copyright 2003 - 2010 Gennadiy Shvets