Search CPU-World

Search site contents:

Intel Core 2 Duo E7500 vs Core i5-4670

Mini Review

Intel Core 2 Duo E7500 advantages



Picture
is not
available
  • Power consumption of this processor is lower.

Intel Core i5-4670 advantages



Intel Core i5-4670
  • The microprocessor performs 81% faster in single-threaded programs.
  • Multi-threaded performance of the Core i5-4670 is better.
  • In memory-intensive applications, the Intel i5-4670 CPU is 131% faster.
  • The Core i5-4670 features SSE4.2 instructions.
  • The i5-4670 supports AES, or Advanced Encryption Standard, technology. This extension accelerates AES encryption and decryption, and is useful if you need to secure your disk or network data.
  • The microprocessor includes AVX, AVX2, F16C and FMA3 instructions, that were introduced in modern microprocessors not too far ago. While these extensions are not widely supported by programs yet, their support should improve in future apps.
  • The CPU has on-chip HD 4600 graphics unit. This graphics is not powerful enough to play latest games with all settings on, however it can be used for casual gaming and 3D applications.
  • The Socket 1150, used by the processor, is still actively supported by Intel. The company is going to introduce new products for the socket in the future.

E7500 vs i5-4670 performance comparison

The charts in the section below illustrate relative performance of Core 2 Duo E7500 and Core i5-4670 CPUs in different application types. The results in the charts are calculated from several benchmarks, that you can find in the "Benchmarks" tab. As a result, performance in individual benchmarks may be worse or better than what you see in the charts on this page. We also averaged the numbers for task type specific benchmarks and all-around performance benchmarks, and presented them in the 'Overall performance' chart.
Single-threaded performance
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1
 
1.81
 
 
Higher is better
Multi-threaded performance
4
3.2
2.4
1.6
0.8
0
 
 
1
 
3.19
 
 
Higher is better
Memory-intensive applications
3
2.4
1.8
1.2
0.6
0
 
 
1
 
2.31
 
 
Higher is better
Overall performance
3
2.4
1.8
1.2
0.6
0
 
 
1
 
2.31
 
 
Higher is better

  - Intel Core 2 Duo E7500       - Intel Core i5-4670

Please see the "Benchmarks" tab for complete list of benchmarks, showing performance difference between Intel Core 2 Duo E7500 and Intel i5-4670 in various types of tests.


E7500 vs i5-4670 power consumption comparison

Thermal Design Power
100
80
60
40
20
0
 
 
65W
 
84W
 
 
Lower is better
 

Detailed side by side comparison of Intel Core 2 Duo E7500 vs Intel Core i5-4670 specs can be found in the "Specifications" tab. More detailed comparison of low level features of both microprocessors you will find in the "CPUIDs" tab.


Pros and Cons summary

Core 2 Duo E7500 Core i5-4670
General recommendations:
Needs less power
  General recommendations:
Significantly faster overall,
Features SSE4.2 / AVX / AVX2 / F16C / FMA3 instructions,
Integrates HD 4600 GPU,
Non-obsolete socket

Drawbacks:

Slow,
Lacks some instructions,
Comes without integrated GPU,
The socket is obsolete
 

Drawbacks:

Somewhat higher power

Similar processors

Core 2 Duo E7500 Core i5-4670
 

Similar processors use the same socket and architecture as Intel E7500 and i5-4670.

Jump to:
  • Benchmarks
  • CPUIDs
  • Comments
 

More comparisons

Compare Intel Core 2 Duo E7500 with...

Other Core i5 CPU:

Any CPU:


Compare Intel Core i5-4670 with...

Other Core 2 Duo CPU:

Any CPU:


Note: To see differences with any CPU, type in any combination of the following into the "Any CPU" field: manufacturer name, full or partial family name, model number, part number, core name, socket name, operating frequency, bus speed (must have FSB suffix), and the last level cache. Here are some valid searches:

  i5-3570K
  Intel Celeron 2 GHz
  Core
  Pentium 4 800FSB
  AMD 3.3GHz 8MB

Specifications

Please visit Intel Core 2 Duo E7500 and Intel Core i5-4670 pages for more detailed specifications of both microprocessors.

 Intel Core 2 Duo E7500Intel Core i5-4670
Market segmentDesktop
ManufacturerIntel
FamilyCore 2 DuoCore i5
Basic details
Model numberE7500i5-4670
CPU part numberAT80571PH0773M
AT80571PH0773ML
CM8064601464706
Box part numberBX80571E7500
BXC80571E7500
BX80646I54670
BXC80646I54670
Introduction dateJanuary 18, 2009June 2, 2013
Current official price $213 (as of Jun 2014)
 
CPU features
Core nameWolfdaleHaswell
MicroarchitectureCoreHaswell
Technology (micron)0.0450.022
Data width (bits)64
SocketSocket 775Socket 1150
Frequency (MHz)29333400
Turbo Frequency (MHz) 3800
Bus speed (MHz)1066 
Clock Multiplier1134
L1 cache64 KB (code) / 64 KB (data)128 KB (code) / 128 KB (data)
L2 cache (KB)30721024
L3 cache (KB) 6144
Max temperature (°C)74.172.72
TDP (Watt)6584
Max power dissipation (Watt)98.89 
Core voltage (V)0.85 - 1.3625 
Cores24
Threads24
Multiprocessing1
 
Instruction set extensions
AES / Advanced Encryption Standard-+
AMD64 / EM64T 64-bit technology+
AVX / Advanced Vector Extensions-+
AVX2 / Advanced Vector Extensions 2-+
F16C / 16-bit Floating-Point conversion-+
FMA3 / 3-operand Fused Multiply-Add-+
MMX+
SSE+
SSE2+
SSE3+
SSE4.1+
SSE4.2-+
SSSE3 / Supplemental SSE3+
TSX / Transactional Synchronization Extensions-+
 
Supported technologies
PowerNow! / Enhanced SpeedStep+
Trusted Execution-+
Turbo Core / Turbo Boost-+
Virtualization+
Virus Protection / Execute Disable bit+
 
Integrated Graphics
GPU TypeNoneHD 4600
 
Integrated Memory Controller(s)
The number of controllers01
Notes:

Rows with different specifications or features are highlighted.

For detailed specifications of "Intel Core 2 Duo E7500" or "Intel Core i5-4670" parts please click on the links in the table header.

Benchmarks

System setup

Below is a complete set of Intel Core 2 Duo E7500 and Core i5-4670 benchmarks from our CPU benchmark database. The former processor was tested on ASRock 4Core1600Twins-P35 motherboard with 2 GB dual-channel Corsair CM3X1024-1333C9 DDR3 memory, and Powercolor 24PRO256M DDR2 (ATI Radeon HD2400). The latter processor was tested on Intel DH87RL motherboard, that had 2 GB dual-channel Corsair TR3X3G1600C9 DDR3 memory, and MSI R6670 1GB GDDR5 (ATI Radeon) graphics.

All tests were performed at default frequency and voltage, using manufacturer's stock fan/heatsink. None of the components were overclocked. Motherboard BIOS options were left at default settings.

The results of all benchmarks are broken into four categories: multi-threaded, single-threaded, memory intensive and graphics / gaming.


Core 2 Duo E7500 vs Core i5-4670 single-threaded benchmarks

Single-threaded benchmarks run on a single CPU core, and do not depend on such features as the number of cores, or Hyper-Threading technology. Additionally, they do not utilize on-chip caches, dedicated to other cores.


    Intel Core 2 Duo E7500           Intel Core i5-4670

3DMark03 CPU score benchmark

Uses DirectX software vertex shader to run Wings of Fury and Trolls' Lair games, and calculates a 3DMark03 CPU score based on averaged number of frames per second, achieved by the CPU/GPU combination.
100%
37.8%

CINEBENCH R10 CPU score (1 core) benchmark

Measures performance of a single-core rendering of a photo-realistic 3D image using CINEMA 4D software engine.
100%
56.1%

PCMark2002 CPU score benchmark

100%
68.1%

Super PI (1M) benchmark

Measures time, required to calculate the first 1 million digits after the decimal point in the number Pi.
100%
54.1%


Core 2 Duo E7500 vs Core i5-4670 multi-threaded benchmarks

Multi-threaded benchmarks utilize all CPU cores and other on-chip resources (on-chip caches, internal buffers, etc). Intel's Hyper-Threading feature also helps to improve multi-threading performance.


    Intel Core 2 Duo E7500           Intel Core i5-4670

CINEBENCH R10 CPU score benchmark

Measures performance of multi-core rendering of a photo-realistic 3D image using CINEMA 4D software engine.
100%
31.1%

CINEBENCH R10 render time (seconds) benchmark

Measures time taken to render a photo-realistic 3D image using CINEMA 4D software engine.
100%
31.1%

Euler3D benchmark

100%
32.7%

Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) benchmark

Runs Dhrystone test on all cores, and reports estimated integer performance in MIPS (Millions of Instructions Per Second).
100%
30.3%

Sandra MultiMedia Floating Point (it/s) benchmark

100%
37.9%

    Intel Core 2 Duo E7500           Intel Core i5-4670

Sandra MultiMedia Integer (it/s) benchmark

100%
51.9%

Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) benchmark

Runs Whetstone test on all cores, and reports estimated floating-point performance in MFLOPS (Millions of Floating-Point Operations Per Second).
100%
44.3%

Sandra Whetstone SSE2 (MFLOPS) benchmark

Runs SSE2-enabled Whetstone test on all cores, and reports estimated floating-point performance in MFLOPS (Millions of Floating-Point Operations Per Second).
100%
39.3%

wPrime v1.55 (32M) benchmark

wPrime benchmark measures time taken to calculate square roots of numbers from 1 to 33554431.
100%
30.2%


Core 2 Duo E7500 vs Core i5-4670 graphics benchmarks

Graphics benchmarks depend on the type of integrated or discrete graphics adapter, and to less extent on the processor performance. Because these benchmarks are synthetic, they may not truly represent gaming performance. However, they still can be used to estimate whether one processor will perform faster or slower than another CPU in games and other 3D tasks.

Important! The processors were tested using different types of graphics adapters, that may not be suitable for comparison.

    Intel Core 2 Duo E7500           Intel Core i5-4670

3DMark03 game score benchmark

Measures graphics and 3D game performance of discrete and integrated GPUs using 4 different game simulations, that have varying level of DirectX support from version 7 to version 9.
100%
8.7%

3DMark2001 score benchmark

Runs a series of game simulations and feature tests to measure graphics and 3D game performance of discrete and integrated GPUs. It utilizes a single CPU core, and it is compatible with DirectX 8 and later APIs.
100%
16.1%

CINEBENCH R10 OpenGL score benchmark

100%
19.9%


Core 2 Duo E7500 vs Core i5-4670 memory performance

Memory-intensive tests or programs move large amounts of data to/from memory, and they depend more on memory throughput and the size of on-chip caches, rather than on CPU integer/FP/SIMD performance.


    Intel Core 2 Duo E7500           Intel Core i5-4670

7Zip compressing/decompressing speed (1 thread) benchmark

100%
71.7%

PCMark2002 Memory score benchmark

100%
50.0%

WinRAR compressing/decompressing speed benchmark

100%
43.3%

CPUIDs

The table below compares two random CPUID records for Intel Core 2 Duo E7500 and Intel Core i5-4670 microprocessors, that were submitted to our CPUID database. Please note that different steppings of Intel processors, identified by S-spec numbers or CPUID, may have slightly different features. For that reason the comparison table below only applies to CPUs with specific S-Spec number / CPUID.

  CPUID 1 CPUID 2
ManufacturerIntel
CPU FamilyCore 2 DuoCore i5
Model / Processor NumberE7500i5-4670
Frequency2139 MHz2964 MHz
CWID version0.30.5
Part numberAT80571PH0773MCM8064601464706
S-Spec / Stepping CodeSLB9ZSR14D
 
General information
VendorGenuineIntel
Processor name (BIOS)Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E7500 @ 2.93GHzIntel(R) Core(TM) i5-4670 CPU @ 3.40GHz
Cores24
Logical processors24
Processor typeOriginal OEM Processor
CPUID signature1067A306C3
Family 6 (06h)
Model23 (017h)60 (03Ch)
Stepping10 (0Ah) 3 (03h)
TLB/Cache details64-byte Prefetching
Data TLB: 4-KB Pages, 4-way set associative, 256 entries
Data TLB: 4-MB Pages, 4-way set associative, 32 entries
Instruction TLB: 2-MB pages, 4-way, 8 entries or 4M pages, 4-way, 4 entries
Instruction TLB: 4-KB Pages, 4-way set associative, 128 entries
L1 Data TLB: 4-KB pages, 4-way set associative, 16 entries
L1 Data TLB: 4-MB pages, 4-way set associative, 16 entries
64-byte Prefetching
Data TLB: 1-GB pages, 4-way set associative, 4 entries
Data TLB: 4-KB Pages, 4-way set associative, 64 entries
L2 TLB: 1-MB, 4-way set associative, 64-byte line size
 
Cache
L1 data: Associativity8-way set associative
L1 data: Comments Direct-mapped
L1 data: Line size64 bytes
L1 data: Size32 KB4 x 32 KB
L1 instruction: Associativity8-way set associative
L1 instruction: Comments Direct-mapped
L1 instruction: Line size64 bytes
L1 instruction: Size32 KB4 x 32 KB
L2: Associativity8-way set associative
L2: Commentsunified on-dieNon-inclusive|Direct-mapped
L2: Line size64 bytes
L2: Size3 MB4 x 256 KB
L3: Associativity 12-way set associative
L3: Comments Inclusive|Shared between all cores
L3: Line size 64 bytes
L3: Size 6 MB
 
Instruction set extensions
AES-+
AVX-+
AVX2-+
BMI1-+
BMI2-+
F16C-+
FMA-+
MMX+
SSE+
SSE2+
SSE3+
SSE4.1+
SSE4.2-+
SSSE3+
TSX (HLE interface)-+
TSX (RTM interface)-+
 
Additional instructions
Advanced Bit manipulation-+
CLFLUSH+
CMOV+
CMPXCHG16B+
CMPXCHG8B+
Enhanced REP MOVSB/STOSB-+
FXSAVE/FXRSTORE+
INVPCID-+
MONITOR/MWAIT+
MOVBE-+
PCLMULDQ-+
POPCNT-+
RD/WR FSGSBASE instructions-+
RDRAND-+
RDTSCP-+
SYSENTER/SYSEXIT+
XSAVE/XRESTORE states+
 
Major features
64-bit / Intel 64+
Enhanced SpeedStep+
Intel Trusted Execution technology-+
Intel Virtualization-+
NX bit/XD-bit-+
On-chip Floating Point Unit+
Turbo Boost-+
 
Other features
1 GB large page support-+
36-bit page-size extensions+
64-bit debug store+
Advanced programmable interrupt controller+
CPL qualified debug store+
Debug store+
Debugging extensions+
Digital Thermal Sensor capability+
Extended xAPIC support-+
LAHF/SAHF support in 64-bit mode+
Machine check architecture+
Machine check exception+
Memory-type range registers+
Model-specific registers+
Page attribute table+
Page global extension+
Page-size extensions (4MB pages)+
Pending break enable+
Perfmon and Debug capability+
Physical address extensions+
Power Limit Notification capability-+
Process context identifiers-+
Self-snoop+
Supervisor Mode Execution Protection-+
TSC rate is ensured to be invariant across all states-+
Thermal monitor+
Thermal monitor 2+
Thermal monitor and software controlled clock facilities+
Time stamp counter+
Timestamp counter deadline-+
Virtual 8086-mode enhancements+
xTPR Update Control+
+ - feature is supported
- - feature is not supported
Features, not supported by all processors in the table, are not displayed

Comments (0)
Terms and Conditions · Privacy Policy · Contact Us (c) Copyright 2003 - 2010 Gennadiy Shvets