Intel Celeron M 560 vs Core i5-560M (PGA988)

Mini Review

Intel Celeron M 560 advantages



Picture
is not
available
  • Power consumption of this microprocessor is better.

Intel Core i5-560M (PGA988) advantages



Intel Core i5-560M (PGA988)
  • The i5-560M processor is 79% faster in single-threaded programs.
  • Multi-threaded performance of the i5-560M is higher.
  • In memory-intensive tasks, the microprocessor has 224% better performance.
  • The processor provides hardware acceleration of virtualized programs.
  • SSE4.1 and SSE4.2 instructions are enabled on this microprocessor.
  • The Intel i5-560M CPU incorporates Advanced Encryption Standard extension to the instruction set. These instructions provide hardware acceleration of AES encryption and decryption, and are useful if you need to protect your disk or network data.
  • The processor comes with integrated HD (Nehalem) graphics. This GPU can be used for casual gaming and 3D applications.

560 vs i5-560M performance comparison

The charts in the section below show performance of Celeron M 560 and Core i5-560M (PGA988) processors in a few different kinds of applications. To determine displayed numbers we averaged results for several benchmarks for each specific program type. Consequentally, performance in individual benchmarks may be lower or higher than what you see in the charts here. We also averaged the numbers for application type specific benchmarks and all-around performance benchmarks, and presented them in the 'Overall performance' chart.
Single-threaded performance
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1
 
1.79
 
 
Higher is better
Multi-threaded performance
5
4
3
2
1
0
 
 
1
 
3.83
 
 
Higher is better
Memory-intensive applications
4
3.2
2.4
1.6
0.8
0
 
 
1
 
3.24
 
 
Higher is better
Overall performance
3
2.4
1.8
1.2
0.6
0
 
 
1
 
2.66
 
 
Higher is better

  - Intel Celeron M 560       - Intel Core i5-560M (PGA988)

Exhaustive list of benchmarks, that demonstrate performance difference between 560 and Intel Core i5-560M (PGA988) in various types of tests, can be seen in the "Benchmarks" tab.


560 vs i5-560M power consumption comparison

Thermal Design Power
40
32
24
16
8
0
 
 
31W
 
35W
 
 
Lower is better
 

Detailed side by side comparison of Celeron M 560 vs Core i5-560M (PGA988) specs can be found in the "Specifications" tab. Even more detailed comparison of low level features of both microprocessors you will find in the "CPUIDs" tab.


Pros and Cons summary

Celeron M 560 Core i5-560M (PGA988)
General recommendations:
Needs less power
  General recommendations:
Performs much faster in all types of programs,
Supports SSE4.1 / SSE4.2 instructions,
Has on-chip HD (Nehalem) graphics

Drawbacks:

Slow,
Does not support some instructions,
No on-chip GPU
 

Drawbacks:

Requires more power

Similar processors

Celeron M 560 Core i5-560M (PGA988)
 

Similar CPUs use the same socket and architecture as Intel 560 and Core i5-560M (PGA988).

Jump to:
  • Benchmarks
  • CPUIDs
  • Comments
 

Compare Intel Celeron M 560 with...

Other Core i5 Mobile CPU:

Any CPU:


Compare Intel Core i5-560M (PGA988) with...

Other Celeron M CPU:

Any CPU:


Note: To see differences with any CPU, type in any combination of the following into the "Any CPU" field: manufacturer name, full or partial family name, model number, part number, core name, socket name, operating frequency, bus speed (must have FSB suffix), and the last level cache. Here are some valid searches:

  i5-3570K
  Intel Celeron 2 GHz
  Ivy Bridge
  Pentium 4 800FSB
  AMD 3.3GHz 8MB

Specifications

Please visit Intel Celeron M 560 and Intel Core i5-560M (PGA988) pages for more complete specifications of both microprocessors.

 Intel Celeron M 560Intel Core i5-560M (PGA988)
Market segmentMobile
ManufacturerIntel
FamilyCeleron MCore i5 Mobile
Basic details
Model number560i5-560M
CPU part numberLF80537NE0461MCP80617005487AA
Box part numberBX80537560BX80617I5560M
Introduction date September 26, 2010
 
CPU features
Core nameMeromArrandale
Platform nameSanta Rosa; Santa Rosa RefreshCalpella
MicroarchitectureCoreNehalem
Technology (micron)0.0650.032
Data width (bits)64
SocketSocket PSocket G1
Frequency (MHz)21332667
Turbo Frequency (MHz) 3200
Bus speed (MHz)533 
Clock Multiplier1620
L1 cache32 KB (code) / 32 KB (data)64 KB (code) / 64 KB (data)
L2 cache (KB)1024512
L3 cache (KB) 3072
Max temperature (°C)100 
TDP (Watt)27 / 3135
Max power dissipation (Watt)45.31 
Core voltage (V)0.95 - 1.3 
Cores12
Threads14
Multiprocessing1
 
Instruction set extensions
AES / Advanced Encryption Standard-+
AMD64 / EM64T 64-bit technology+
MMX+
SSE+
SSE2+
SSE3+
SSE4.1-+
SSE4.2-+
SSSE3 / Supplemental SSE3+
 
Supported technologies
Hyper-Threading-+
PowerNow! / Enhanced SpeedStep-+
Trusted Execution-+
Turbo Core / Turbo Boost-+
Virtualization-+
Virus Protection / Execute Disable bit+
 
Integrated Graphics
GPU TypeNoneHD (Nehalem)
 
Integrated Memory Controller(s)
The number of controllers01
Notes:

Rows with different specifications or features are highlighted.

For detailed specifications of "Intel Celeron M 560" or "Intel Core i5-560M (PGA988)" parts please click on the links in the table header.

Benchmarks

System setup

Below is a complete set of Intel Celeron M 560 and i5-560M (PGA988) benchmarks from our CPU benchmark database. The former processor was tested on MSI Fuzzy GM965 (MS-9803 V1.0) motherboard with 2GB dual-channel Corsair CM2X1024-6400C4 memory, and Powercolor 24PRO256M DDR2 (ATI Radeon HD2400). The latter processor was tested on Jetway NF98-QM57-LF motherboard, that had 2 GB dual-channel Crucial CT2KIT12864BC1339 DDR3-1333 SODIMM memory, and Integrated on-chip Intel Westmere graphics.

All tests were performed at default frequency and voltage, using manufacturer's stock fan/heatsink. None of the components were overclocked. Motherboard BIOS options were left at default settings.

The results of all benchmarks are broken into four categories: multi-threaded, single-threaded, memory intensive and graphics / gaming.


Celeron M 560 vs i5-560M (PGA988) single-threaded benchmarks

Single-threaded benchmarks run on a single CPU core, and do not depend on such features as the number of cores, or Hyper-Threading technology. Additionally, they do not utilize on-chip caches, dedicated to other cores.


    Intel Celeron M 560           Intel Core i5-560M (PGA988)

3DMark03 CPU score benchmark

Uses DirectX software vertex shader to run Wings of Fury and Trolls' Lair games, and calculates a 3DMark03 CPU score based on averaged number of frames per second, achieved by the CPU/GPU combination.
100%
91.8%

CINEBENCH R10 CPU score (1 core) benchmark

Measures performance of a single-core rendering of a photo-realistic 3D image using CINEMA 4D software engine.
100%
60.7%

PCMark2002 CPU score benchmark

100%
71.2%

Super PI (1M) benchmark

Measures time, required to calculate the first 1 million digits after the decimal point in the number Pi.
100%
50.9%


Celeron M 560 vs i5-560M (PGA988) multi-threaded benchmarks

Multi-threaded benchmarks utilize all CPU cores and other on-chip resources (on-chip caches, internal buffers, etc). Intel's Hyper-Threading feature also helps to improve multi-threading performance.


    Intel Celeron M 560           Intel Core i5-560M (PGA988)

CINEBENCH R10 CPU score benchmark

Measures performance of multi-core rendering of a photo-realistic 3D image using CINEMA 4D software engine.
100%
26.5%

CINEBENCH R10 render time (seconds) benchmark

Measures time taken to render a photo-realistic 3D image using CINEMA 4D software engine.
100%
26.5%

Euler3D benchmark

100%
30.9%

Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) benchmark

Runs Dhrystone test on all cores, and reports estimated integer performance in MIPS (Millions of Instructions Per Second).
100%
33.2%

Sandra MultiMedia Floating Point (it/s) benchmark

100%
20.8%

    Intel Celeron M 560           Intel Core i5-560M (PGA988)

Sandra MultiMedia Integer (it/s) benchmark

100%
36.1%

Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) benchmark

Runs Whetstone test on all cores, and reports estimated floating-point performance in MFLOPS (Millions of Floating-Point Operations Per Second).
100%
20.7%

Sandra Whetstone SSE2 (MFLOPS) benchmark

Runs SSE2-enabled Whetstone test on all cores, and reports estimated floating-point performance in MFLOPS (Millions of Floating-Point Operations Per Second).
100%
19.7%

wPrime v1.55 (32M) benchmark

wPrime benchmark measures time taken to calculate square roots of numbers from 1 to 33554431.
100%
20.9%


Celeron M 560 vs i5-560M (PGA988) graphics benchmarks

Graphics benchmarks depend on the type of integrated or discrete graphics adapter, and to less extent on the processor performance. Because these benchmarks are synthetic, they may not truly represent gaming performance. However, they still can be used to estimate whether one processor will perform faster or slower than another CPU in games and other 3D tasks.

Important! The processors were tested using different types of graphics adapters, that may not be suitable for comparison.

    Intel Celeron M 560           Intel Core i5-560M (PGA988)

3DMark03 game score benchmark

Measures graphics and 3D game performance of discrete and integrated GPUs using 4 different game simulations, that have varying level of DirectX support from version 7 to version 9.
100%
67.6%

3DMark2001 score benchmark

Runs a series of game simulations and feature tests to measure graphics and 3D game performance of discrete and integrated GPUs. It utilizes a single CPU core, and it is compatible with DirectX 8 and later APIs.
100%
86.8%

CINEBENCH R10 OpenGL score benchmark

100%
72.4%


Celeron M 560 vs i5-560M (PGA988) memory performance

Memory-intensive tests or programs move large amounts of data to/from memory, and they depend more on memory throughput and the size of on-chip caches, rather than on CPU integer/FP/SIMD performance.


    Intel Celeron M 560           Intel Core i5-560M (PGA988)

7Zip compressing/decompressing speed (1 thread) benchmark

100%
97.2%

PCMark2002 Memory score benchmark

100%
25.0%

WinRAR compressing/decompressing speed benchmark

100%
30.8%

CPUIDs

The table below compares two random CPUID records for Intel Celeron M 560 and Intel Core i5-560M (PGA988) microprocessors, that were submitted to our CPUID database. Please note that different steppings of Intel processors, identified by S-spec numbers or CPUID, may have slightly different features. For that reason the comparison table below only applies to CPUs with specific S-Spec number / CPUID.

  CPUID 1 CPUID 2
ManufacturerIntel
CPU FamilyCeleron MCore i5
Model / Processor Number560i5-560M
Frequency2128 MHz2659 MHz
CWID version0.30.4
Part numberLF80537NE0461MCP80617005487AA
S-Spec / Stepping CodeSLA2DSLBTS
 
General information
VendorGenuineIntel
Processor name (BIOS)Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 560 @ 2.13GHzIntel(R) Core(TM) i5 CPU M 560 @ 2.67GHz
Cores12
Logical processors14
Processor typeOriginal OEM Processor
CPUID signature1066120655
Family 6 (06h)
Model22 (016h)37 (025h)
Stepping 1 (01h) 5 (05h)
TLB/Cache details64-byte Prefetching
Data TLB: 4-KB Pages, 4-way set associative, 256 entries
Data TLB: 4-MB Pages, 4-way set associative, 32 entries
Instruction TLB: 2-MB pages, 4-way, 8 entries or 4M pages, 4-way, 4 entries
Instruction TLB: 4-KB Pages, 4-way set associative, 128 entries
L1 Data TLB: 4-KB pages, 4-way set associative, 16 entries
L1 Data TLB: 4-MB pages, 4-way set associative, 16 entries
64-byte Prefetching
Data TLB0: 2-MB or 4-MB pages, 4-way set associative, 32 entries
Data TLB: 4-KB Pages, 4-way set associative, 64 entries
Instruction TLB: 2-MB or 4-MB pages, fully associative, 7 entries
Instruction TLB: 4-KB pages, 4-way set associative, 64 entries
Shared 2nd-level TLB: 4 KB pages, 4-way set associative, 512 entries
 
Cache
L1 data: Associativity8-way set associative
L1 data: Comments Direct-mapped
L1 data: Line size64 bytes
L1 data: Size32 KB2 x 32 KB
L1 instruction: Associativity8-way set associative4-way set associative
L1 instruction: Comments Direct-mapped
L1 instruction: Line size64 bytes
L1 instruction: Size32 KB2 x 32 KB
L2: Associativity4-way set associative8-way set associative
L2: Comments Non-inclusive|Direct-mapped
L2: Line size64 bytes
L2: Size1 MB2 x 256 KB
L3: Associativity 12-way set associative
L3: Comments Inclusive|Direct-mapped|Shared between all cores
L3: Line size 64 bytes
L3: Size 3 MB
 
Instruction set extensions
AES-+
MMX+
SSE+
SSE2+
SSE3+
SSE4.1-+
SSE4.2-+
SSSE3+
 
Additional instructions
CLFLUSH+
CMOV+
CMPXCHG16B+
CMPXCHG8B+
FXSAVE/FXRSTORE+
MONITOR/MWAIT+
PCLMULDQ-+
POPCNT-+
RDTSCP-+
SYSENTER/SYSEXIT+
 
Major features
64-bit / Intel 64+
Enhanced SpeedStep-+
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Intel Trusted Execution technology-+
Intel Virtualization-+
NX bit/XD-bit+
On-chip Floating Point Unit+
Turbo Boost-+
 
Other features
36-bit page-size extensions+
64-bit debug store+
Advanced programmable interrupt controller+
CPL qualified debug store+
Debug store+
Debugging extensions+
Digital Thermal Sensor capability+
LAHF / SAHF support in 64-bit mode+
Machine check architecture+
Machine check exception+
Memory-type range registers+
Model-specific registers+
Page attribute table+
Page global extension+
Page-size extensions (4MB pages)+
Pending break enable+
Perfmon and Debug capability+
Physical address extensions+
Process context identifiers-+
Self-snoop+
TSC rate is ensured to be invariant across all states-+
Thermal monitor+
Thermal monitor 2+
Thermal monitor and software controlled clock facilities+
Time stamp counter+
Virtual 8086-mode enhancements+
xTPR Update Control+
+ - feature is supported
- - feature is not supported
Features, not supported by all processors in the table, are not displayed

Comments (0)
Terms and Conditions · Privacy Policy · Contact Us (c) Copyright 2003 - 2010 Gennadiy Shvets