AMD Athlon II X4 640 vs Phenom II X6 1055T (125W)


Mini Review

AMD Athlon II X4 640 advantages



AMD Athlon II X4 640

  • Power consumption of this microprocessor is better.
  • The CPU is priced 56% cheaper.
  • The AMD Athlon II X4 640 has 72% better price/performance ratio than the AMD Phenom II X6 1055T.


AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (125W) advantages



Picture
is not
available

  • In single-threaded tasks, the 1055T CPU has 15% higher performance.
  • In multi-threaded programs, the AMD Phenom II X6 1055T CPU has 43% better performance.
  • The AMD Phenom II X6 1055T has 45% higher performance in memory-intensive tasks.


640 vs 1055T performance comparison

The charts in the table below illustrate performance of Athlon II X4 640 and Phenom II X6 1055T (125W) microprocessors in different types of tasks. The numbers in the charts are based on a number of benchmarks, that you can find in the "Benchmarks" tab. As such, the displayed results may differ from results, that you may see in individual tests. The 'Overall performance' calculates an average of all-around performance benchmarks, and benchmarks, specific to each type of application. The 'Price-performance ratio' chart displays how much more performance you will get per dollar spent. This ratio does not take into account the cost of other system parts.

Single-threaded performance
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1
 
1.15
 
 
Higher is better
Multi-threaded performance
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1
 
1.43
 
 
Higher is better
Memory-intensive applications
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1
 
1.45
 
 
Higher is better
Overall performance
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1
 
1.33
 
 
Higher is better
Price / performance ratio
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1.72
 
1
 
 
Higher is better
 

  - AMD Athlon II X4 640       - AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (125W)

Complete list of benchmarks, that demonstrate difference in performance between AMD Athlon II X4 640 and AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (125W) in various types of programs, can be seen in the "Benchmarks" tab.



640 vs 1055T power consumption and price comparison

Thermal Design Power
200
160
120
80
40
0
 
 
95W
 
125W
 
 
Lower is better
Current official price
200
160
120
80
40
0
 
 
$67
 
$153
 
 
Lower is better
 

Detailed side by side comparison of Athlon II X4 640 vs AMD 1055T specs can be found in the "Specifications" tab. Much more detailed comparison of low level features of both CPUs is located in the "CPUIDs" tab.



Pros and Cons summary

 
Athlon II X4 640Phenom II X6 1055T (125W)

General recommendations:
Somewhat more energy efficient,
Considerably lower official price,
Significantly better price / performance ratio

General recommendations:
Faster in all kinds of applications

Drawbacks:
Performs somewhat worse in all program types

Drawbacks:
Less energy efficient,
Much more expensive,
Significantly worse price / performance ratio


Similar processors

 
Athlon II X4 640Phenom II X6 1055T (125W)

Similar CPUs use the same socket and architecture as AMD Athlon II X4 640 and 1055T.



Where to buy


The CPUs are obsolete. Hence, the best place to look for them is eBay. Third party sellers at Amazon may also have them for sale.

Specifications

 AMD Athlon II X4 640AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (125W)
 Basic details
Market segmentDesktop
ManufacturerAMD
FamilyAMD Athlon II X4AMD Phenom II X6
Model number6401055T
CPU part numberADX640WFK42GMHDT55TFBK6DGR
Box part numberADX640WFGMBOXHDT55TFBGRBOX
Introduction dateMay 10, 2010April 27, 2010
Current official price$67 (as of Apr 2013)$153 (as of Jan 2013)
 
 CPU features
Core namePropusThuban
Platform name Leo
MicroarchitectureK10
Technology (micron)0.045
Data width (bits)64
SocketSocket AM2+ / Socket AM3Socket AM3
Frequency (MHz)30002800
Turbo Frequency (MHz) 3300 / 3300 / 3300 / - / - / -
Bus speed (MHz)2000 (HT/QPI)
Clock Multiplier1514
L1 cache256 KB (code) / 256 KB (data)384 KB (code) / 384 KB (data)
L2 cache (KB)20483072
L3 cache (KB) 6144
Max temperature (°C)55 - 7155 - 62
TDP (Watt)95125
Core voltage (V)1.1 - 1.41.15 - 1.475
Cores46
Threads46
Multiprocessing1
 
 Instruction set extensions
3DNow!+
AMD64 / EM64T 64-bit technology+
MMX+
SSE+
SSE2+
SSE3+
 
 Supported technologies
PowerNow! / Enhanced SpeedStep+
Turbo Core / Turbo Boost-+
Virtualization+
Virus Protection / Execute Disable bit+
 
 Integrated Graphics
GPU TypeNone

Notes:

Rows with different specifications or features are highlighted.

For detailed specifications of "AMD Athlon II X4 640" or "AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (125W)" parts please click on the links in the table header.

Benchmarks

System setup

Below is a complete set of AMD Athlon II X4 640 and 1055T (125W) benchmarks from our CPU benchmark database. Both microprocessors were tested on ASRock M3A780GXH/128M motherboard with 2 GB dual-channel Corsair CM3X1024-1333C9 DDR3 memory, and Powercolor 24PRO256M DDR2 (ATI Radeon HD2400) graphics.

All tests were performed at default frequency and voltage, using manufacturer's stock fan/heatsink. None of the components were overclocked. Motherboard BIOS options were left at default settings.

The results of all benchmarks are broken into four categories: multi-threaded, single-threaded, memory intensive and graphics / gaming.


Athlon II X4 640 vs 1055T (125W) single-threaded benchmarks

Single-threaded benchmarks run on a single CPU core, and do not depend on such features as the number of cores, or Hyper-Threading technology. Additionally, they do not utilize on-chip caches, dedicated to other cores.


    AMD Athlon II X4 640           AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (125W)

CINEBENCH R10 CPU score (1 core) benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
86.3%

FLAC encoding - single process benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
91.3%

H.264 video encoding - single process benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
88.8%

LAME MP3 encoding - single process benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
91.3%

Super PI (1M) benchmark

< Shorter is better
100%
78.6%

    AMD Athlon II X4 640           AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (125W)

XVid video encoding - single process benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
86.6%



Athlon II X4 640 vs 1055T (125W) multi-threaded benchmarks

Multi-threaded benchmarks utilize all CPU cores and other on-chip resources (on-chip caches, internal buffers, etc). Intel's Hyper-Threading feature also helps to improve multi-threading performance.


    AMD Athlon II X4 640           AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (125W)

Apache web server - dynamic pages benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
89.6%

Apache web server - static pages benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
83.2%

Blowfish encryption benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
69.4%

CINEBENCH R10 CPU score benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
71.1%

CINEBENCH R10 render time (seconds) benchmark

< Shorter is better
100%
71.0%

    AMD Athlon II X4 640           AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (125W)

CrystalMark ALU benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
93.1%

CrystalMark FPU benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
93.6%

Euler3D benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
64.0%

FLAC encoding - multiple processes benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
71.4%

Fritz Chess Benchmark benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
71.8%

    AMD Athlon II X4 640           AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (125W)

H.264 video encoding - multiple processes benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
70.3%

H.264 video encoding - multithreaded benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
67.8%

LAME MP3 encoding - multiple processes benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
71.4%

MySQL 5.0.27 - selecting data benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
75.2%

Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
71.5%

    AMD Athlon II X4 640           AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (125W)

Sandra MultiMedia Floating Point (it/s) benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
71.4%

Sandra MultiMedia Integer (it/s) benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
71.1%

Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
71.5%

Sandra Whetstone SSE2 (MFLOPS) benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
71.4%

XVid video encoding - multiple processes benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
70.1%

    AMD Athlon II X4 640           AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (125W)

wPrime v1.55 (32M) benchmark

< Shorter is better
100%
71.8%



Athlon II X4 640 vs 1055T (125W) graphics benchmarks

Graphics benchmarks depend on the type of integrated or discrete graphics adapter, and to less extent on the processor performance. Because these benchmarks are synthetic, they may not truly represent gaming performance. However, they still can used to estimate whether one processor will perform faster or slower in games than another CPU.


    AMD Athlon II X4 640           AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (125W)

3DMark2001 score benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
98.6%

CINEBENCH R10 OpenGL score benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
95.2%



Athlon II X4 640 vs 1055T (125W) memory performance

Memory-intensive tests or programs move large amounts of data to/from memory, and they depend more on memory throughput and the size of on-chip caches, rather than on CPU integer/FP/SIMD performance.


    AMD Athlon II X4 640           AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (125W)

7Zip compressing/decompressing speed benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
99.4%

CrystalMark Memory benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
99.2%

WinRAR compressing/decompressing speed benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
69.0%


CPUIDs

The table below compares two random CPUID records for AMD Athlon II X4 640 and AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (125W) microprocessors, that were submitted to our CPUID database.

  CPUID 1 CPUID 2
ManufacturerAMD
CPU FamilyAthlon II X4Phenom II X6
Model / Processor Number6401055T
Frequency2993 MHz2793 MHz
CWID version0.4
Part numberADX640WFK42GMHDT55TFBK6DGR
S-Spec / Stepping CodeCADHC AD 1007DPCWCCBBE CB 1013CPCW
 
General information
VendorAuthenticAMD
Processor name (BIOS)AMD Athlon(tm) II X4 640 ProcessorAMD Phenom(tm) II X6 1055T Processor
Processor name (CWID)4Phenom II(tm) X6 1055T
Cores46
Logical processorsOriginal OEM Processor6
Processor typeBL-C3Original OEM Processor
Core stepping100F53PH-E0
CPUID signature16 (010h)100FA0
Family 5 (05h)16 (010h)
Model 3 (03h)10 (0Ah)
Stepping  0 (00h)
 
Cache
L1 data: Associativity2-way set associative
L1 data: Line size64 bytes
L1 data: Lines per tag1
L1 data: Size4 x 64 KB6 x 64 KB
L1 instruction: Associativity2-way set associative
L1 instruction: Line size64 bytes
L1 instruction: Lines per tag1
L1 instruction: Size4 x 64 KB6 x 64 KB
L2: Associativity16-way set associative
L2: Line size64 bytes
L2: Lines per tag1
L2: Size4 x 512 KB6 x 512 KB
L3: Associativity 48-way set associative
L3: Line size 64 bytes
L3: Lines per tag 1
L3: Size 6 MB
 
Instruction set extensions
3DNow!+
AMD extensions to MMX+
Extensions to 3DNow!+
MMX+
SSE+
SSE2+
SSE3+
SSE4A+
 
Additional instructions
Advanced Bit manipulation+
CLFLUSH+
CMOV+
CMPXCHG16B+
CMPXCHG8B+
FXSAVE/FXRSTORE+
MONITOR/MWAIT+
POPCNT+
PREFETCH/PREFETCHW+
RDTSCP+
SKINIT / STGI support+
SYSCALL/SYSRET+
SYSENTER/SYSEXIT+
 
Major features
64-bit / Intel 64+
NX bit/XD-bit+
On-chip Floating Point Unit+
PowerNow! / Cool'n'Quiet+
Secure Virtual Machine (Virtualization)+
Turbo Core-+
 
Other features
1 GB large page support+
100MHz multiplier control+
128-bit SSE instructions+
36-bit page-size extensions+
Advanced programmable interrupt controller+
Core multi-processing legacy mode+
Debugging extensions+
Extended APIC space+
Hardware P-state control+
Hardware thermal control+
Instruction based sampling+
LAHF / SAHF support in 64-bit mode+
LBR virtualization+
LOCK MOV CR0 means MOV CR8+
Machine check architecture+
Machine check exception+
Memory-type range registers+
Misaligned SSE mode+
Model-specific registers+
Nested page tables+
OS visible workaround+
Page attribute table+
Page global extension+
Page-size extensions (4MB pages)+
Physical address extensions+
SVM lock+
Software thermal control+
Support for NRIP save+
THERMTRIP+
TSC rate is ensured to be invariant across all states+
Temperature sensor+
Time stamp counter+
Virtual 8086-mode enhancements+
Watchdog timer support+

+ - feature is supported
- - feature is not supported
Features, not supported by all processors in the table, are not displayed

Compare with ...

Compare AMD Athlon II X4 640 with...

Other Phenom II X6 CPU:

Any CPU:


Compare AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (125W) with...

Other Athlon II X4 CPU:

Any CPU:


Note: To see differences with any CPU, type in any combination of the following into the "Any CPU" field: manufacturer name, full or partial family name, model number, part number, core name, socket name, operating frequency, bus speed (must have FSB suffix), and the last level cache. Here are some valid searches:

  i5-3570K
  Intel Celeron 2 GHz
  Ivy Bridge
  Pentium 4 800FSB
  AMD 3.3GHz 8MB

Comments (0)

Terms and Conditions · Privacy Policy · Contact Us (c) Copyright 2003 - 2010 Gennadiy Shvets

Search CPU-World

Search site contents:

Identify part

Identify CPU, FPU or MCU:

Jump to CPU / Family

Type in partial CPU manufacturer, family, model and/or number.

Quick Links