|
AMD FX-6100 vs Phenom II X6 1055T (125W)
Mini Review
AMD FX-6100 advantages
 |
- In memory-intensive tasks, this processor has 7% higher performance.
- SSSE3, SSE4.1 and SSE4.2 instructions are enabled on this microprocessor.
- The AMD FX-6100 features AES, or Advanced Encryption Standard, technology. This extension accelerates AES encryption and decryption, and is useful if you need to protect your disk or network data.
- The AMD FX-6100 supports AVX, FMA4 and XOP instructions. These extensions are not widely used in programs yet, but their support should improve in future apps.
- The AMD FX-6100 is unlocked. The processor can be effortlessly overclocked on most motherboards to get better performance.
- Power consumption of the microprocessor is lower.
- Based on current official prices, the processor is 27% cheaper.
- The AMD FX-6100 CPU has 24% better price/performance ratio.
|
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (125W) advantages
Picture is not available |
- Single-threaded performance of the Phenom II X6 1055T CPU is higher.
- The 1055T performs 21% faster in multi-threaded applications, or when running multiple single-threaded processes.
- 3DNow! technology is enabled on this CPU. This technology can increase performance of certain old games and software. The 3DNow! set was depreciated, and not used by modern programs.
|
FX-6100 vs 1055T performance comparison
The charts illustrate performance of FX-6100 and Phenom II X6 1055T (125W) CPUs in different kinds of applications. The numbers for 'Single-threaded performance' and 'Multi-threaded performance' charts are calculated as an average of several related benchmarks, that you can find in the "Benchmarks" tab. Consequentally, the displayed results may differ from results, that you may see in individual tests. The 'Overall performance' chart shows an average of all-around performance benchmarks, and benchmarks, specific to each type of program. The 'Price-performance ratio' calculates how much more performance you will get per dollar spent. This ratio does not include the cost of other system components. |
Single-threaded performance Higher is better |
Multi-threaded performance Higher is better |
Memory-intensive applications Higher is better |
Overall performance Higher is better |
Price / performance ratio Higher is better |
|
- AMD FX-6100 - AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (125W)
Exhaustive list of benchmarks, that demonstrate performance difference between AMD FX-6100 and 1055T in various types of applications, can be found in the "Benchmarks" tab.
FX-6100 vs 1055T power consumption and price comparison
Thermal Design Power Lower is better |
Current official price Lower is better |
|
Detailed side by side comparison of AMD FX-6100 vs AMD 1055T specs can be found in the "Specifications" tab. Much more detailed comparison of low level features of both microprocessors you will find in the "CPUIDs" tab.
Pros and Cons summary
| |
| FX-6100 | Phenom II X6 1055T (125W) |
General recommendations: Features SSE4.1 / SSE4.2 / AVX / FMA4 / XOP instructions, Allows effortless overclocking, More energy efficient, Somewhat lower official price, Somewhat better price / performance ratio
|
General recommendations: Faster in all types of tasks
|
Drawbacks: Rather slow
|
Drawbacks: Does not support some instructions, Less energy efficient, More expensive, Somewhat worse price / performance ratio
|
Similar processors
| |
| FX-6100 | Phenom II X6 1055T (125W) |
|
|
|
Similar CPUs use the same socket and architecture as AMD FX-6100 and AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (125W), however their performance and other characteristics are a bit different.
Specifications
| | AMD FX-6100 | AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (125W) |
| | Basic details |
| Market segment | Desktop |
| Manufacturer | AMD |
| Family | AMD FX-Series | AMD Phenom II X6 |
| Model number | FX-6100 | 1055T |
| CPU part number | FD6100WMW6KGU | HDT55TFBK6DGR |
| Box part number | FD6100WMGUSBX | HDT55TFBGRBOX |
| Introduction date | October 12, 2011 | April 27, 2010 |
| Current official price | $112 (as of Apr 2013) | $153 (as of Jan 2013) |
| |
| | CPU features |
| Core name | Zambezi | Thuban |
| Platform name | Scorpius | Leo |
| Microarchitecture | Bulldozer | K10 |
| Technology (micron) | 0.032 | 0.045 |
| Data width (bits) | 64 |
| Socket | Socket AM3+ | Socket AM3 |
| Frequency (MHz) | 3300 | 2800 |
| Turbo Frequency (MHz) | 3900 / 3600 | 3300 / 3300 / 3300 / - / - / - |
| Bus speed (MHz) | 2600 (HT/QPI) | 2000 (HT/QPI) |
| Clock Multiplier | | 14 |
| L1 cache | 192 KB (code) / 96 KB (data) | 384 KB (code) / 384 KB (data) |
| L2 cache (KB) | 6144 | 3072 |
| L3 cache (KB) | 8192 | 6144 |
| Max temperature (°C) | 70 | 55 - 62 |
| TDP (Watt) | 95 | 125 |
| Core voltage (V) | | 1.15 - 1.475 |
| Cores | 6 |
| Threads | 6 |
| Multiprocessing | 1 |
| |
| | Instruction set extensions |
| 3DNow! | - | + |
| AES / Advanced Encryption Standard | + | - |
| AMD64 / EM64T 64-bit technology | + |
| AVX / Advanced Vector Extensions | + | - |
| FMA4 / 4-operand Fused Multiply-Add | + | - |
| MMX | + |
| SSE | + |
| SSE2 | + |
| SSE3 | + |
| SSE4.1 | + | - |
| SSE4.2 | + | - |
| SSSE3 / Supplemental SSE3 | + | - |
| XOP / eXtended Operations | + | - |
| |
| | Supported technologies |
| PowerNow! / Enhanced SpeedStep | + |
| Turbo Core / Turbo Boost | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
| Virtualization | + |
| Virus Protection / Execute Disable bit | + |
| |
| | Integrated Graphics |
| GPU Type | None |
Notes:
Rows with different specifications or features are highlighted.
For detailed specifications of "AMD FX-6100" or "AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (125W)" parts please click on the links in the table header.
Benchmarks
System setup
Below is a complete set of AMD FX-6100 and 1055T (125W) benchmarks from our CPU benchmark database.
The former processor was tested on ASUS Sabertooth 990FX motherboard with 4GB dual-channel Crucial BallistixPC3-14900 (DDR3-1866) memory, and MSI R6670 1GB GDDR5 (ATI Radeon).
The latter processor was tested on ASRock M3A780GXH/128M motherboard, that had 2 GB dual-channel Corsair CM3X1024-1333C9 DDR3 memory, and Powercolor 24PRO256M DDR2 (ATI Radeon HD2400) graphics.
All tests were performed at default frequency and voltage, using manufacturer's stock fan/heatsink. None of the components were overclocked. Motherboard BIOS options were left at default settings.
The results of all benchmarks are broken into four categories: multi-threaded, single-threaded, memory intensive and graphics / gaming.
FX-6100 vs 1055T (125W) single-threaded benchmarks
Single-threaded benchmarks run on a single CPU core, and do not depend
on such features as the number of cores, or Hyper-Threading
technology. Additionally, they do not utilize on-chip caches,
dedicated to other cores.
AMD FX-6100
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (125W)
|
CINEBENCH R10 CPU score (1 core) benchmark
|
Longer is better  |
| 100% |
| 75.4% |
FLAC encoding - single process benchmark
|
Longer is better  |
| 100% |
| 80.9% |
H.264 video encoding - single process benchmark
|
Longer is better  |
| 100% |
| 95.1% |
LAME MP3 encoding - single process benchmark
|
Longer is better  |
| 100% |
| 79.6% |
Super PI (1M) benchmark
|
Shorter is better |
| 100% |
| 80.6% |
AMD FX-6100
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (125W)
|
XVid video encoding - single process benchmark
|
Longer is better  |
| 100% |
| 90.9% |
FX-6100 vs 1055T (125W) multi-threaded benchmarks
Multi-threaded benchmarks utilize all CPU cores and other on-chip
resources (on-chip caches, internal buffers, etc). Intel's
Hyper-Threading feature also helps to improve multi-threading
performance.
AMD FX-6100
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (125W)
|
Apache web server - dynamic pages benchmark
|
Longer is better  |
| 100% |
| 98.3% |
Apache web server - static pages benchmark
|
Longer is better  |
| 100% |
| 72.3% |
Blowfish encryption benchmark
|
Longer is better  |
| 100% |
| 67.3% |
CINEBENCH R10 CPU score benchmark
|
Longer is better  |
| 100% |
| 81.5% |
CINEBENCH R10 render time (seconds) benchmark
|
Shorter is better |
| 100% |
| 81.5% |
AMD FX-6100
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (125W)
|
CrystalMark ALU benchmark
|
Longer is better  |
| 100% |
| 93.5% |
CrystalMark FPU benchmark
|
Longer is better  |
| 100% |
| 81.9% |
Euler3D benchmark
|
Longer is better  |
| 100% |
| 92.1% |
FLAC encoding - multiple processes benchmark
|
Longer is better  |
| 100% |
| 78.8% |
Fritz Chess Benchmark benchmark
|
Longer is better  |
| 100% |
| 85.8% |
AMD FX-6100
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (125W)
|
H.264 video encoding - multiple processes benchmark
|
Longer is better  |
| 100% |
| 94.4% |
H.264 video encoding - multithreaded benchmark
|
Longer is better  |
| 100% |
| 99.6% |
LAME MP3 encoding - multiple processes benchmark
|
Longer is better  |
| 100% |
| 83.0% |
MySQL 5.0.27 - selecting data benchmark
|
Longer is better  |
| 100% |
| 55.3% |
Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) benchmark
|
Longer is better  |
| 100% |
| 74.2% |
AMD FX-6100
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (125W)
|
Sandra MultiMedia Floating Point (it/s) benchmark
|
Longer is better  |
| 100% |
| 89.0% |
Sandra MultiMedia Integer (it/s) benchmark
|
Longer is better  |
| 100% |
| 76.2% |
Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) benchmark
|
Longer is better  |
| 100% |
| 48.0% |
Sandra Whetstone SSE2 (MFLOPS) benchmark
|
Longer is better  |
| 100% |
| 83.3% |
XVid video encoding - multiple processes benchmark
|
Longer is better  |
| 100% |
| 92.7% |
AMD FX-6100
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (125W)
|
wPrime v1.55 (32M) benchmark
|
Shorter is better |
| 100% |
| 67.0% |
FX-6100 vs 1055T (125W) graphics benchmarks
Graphics benchmarks depend on the type of integrated or discrete
graphics adapter, and to less extent on the processor performance.
Because these benchmarks are synthetic, they may not truly represent
gaming performance. However, they still can used to estimate whether
one processor will perform faster or slower in games than another CPU.
Important! The processors were tested using different types of graphics adapters, that may not be suitable for comparison.
AMD FX-6100
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (125W)
|
3DMark2001 score benchmark
|
Longer is better  |
| 100% |
| 35.5% |
CINEBENCH R10 OpenGL score benchmark
|
Longer is better  |
| 100% |
| 39.3% |
FX-6100 vs 1055T (125W) memory performance
Memory-intensive tests or programs move large amounts of data to/from
memory, and they depend more on memory throughput and the size of
on-chip caches, rather than on CPU integer/FP/SIMD performance.
AMD FX-6100
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (125W)
|
7Zip compressing/decompressing speed benchmark
|
Longer is better  |
| 100% |
| 86.9% |
CrystalMark Memory benchmark
|
Longer is better  |
| 100% |
| 74.4% |
WinRAR compressing/decompressing speed benchmark
|
Longer is better  |
| 100% |
| 93.4% |
CPUIDs
The table below compares two random CPUID records for AMD FX-6100 and AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (125W)
microprocessors, that were submitted to our CPUID database.
| |
CPUID 1 |
CPUID 2 |
| Manufacturer | AMD |
| CPU Family | FX-Series | Phenom II X6 |
| Model / Processor Number | FX-6100 | 1055T |
| Frequency | 3311 MHz | 2793 MHz |
| CWID version | 0.4 |
| Part number | FD6100WMW6KGU | HDT55TFBK6DGR |
| S-Spec / Stepping Code | FA 1137GPM | CCBBE CB 1013CPCW |
| |
| General information |
| Vendor | AuthenticAMD |
| Processor name (BIOS) | AMD FX(tm)-6100 Six-Core Processor | AMD Phenom(tm) II X6 1055T Processor |
| Processor name (CWID) | 6 | Phenom II(tm) X6 1055T |
| Cores | 3 | 6 |
| Logical processors | 6 |
| Processor type | Original OEM Processor |
| Core stepping | OR-B2 | PH-E0 |
| CPUID signature | 600F12 | 100FA0 |
| Family | 21 (015h) | 16 (010h) |
| Model | 1 (01h) | 10 (0Ah) |
| Stepping | 2 (02h) | 0 (00h) |
| Socket | AM3+ | |
| |
| Cache |
| L1 data: Associativity | 4-way set associative | 2-way set associative |
| L1 data: Line size | 64 bytes |
| L1 data: Lines per tag | 1 |
| L1 data: Size | 6 x 16 KB | 6 x 64 KB |
| L1 instruction: Associativity | 2-way set associative |
| L1 instruction: Comments | 1 cache per 2 cores | |
| L1 instruction: Line size | 64 bytes |
| L1 instruction: Lines per tag | 1 |
| L1 instruction: Size | 3 x 64 KB | 6 x 64 KB |
| L2: Associativity | 16-way set associative |
| L2: Comments | 1 cache per 2 cores | |
| L2: Line size | 64 bytes |
| L2: Lines per tag | 1 |
| L2: Size | 3 x 2 MB | 6 x 512 KB |
| L3: Associativity | 64-way set associative | 48-way set associative |
| L3: Line size | 64 bytes |
| L3: Lines per tag | 1 |
| L3: Size | 8 MB | 6 MB |
| |
| Instruction set extensions |
| 3DNow! | - | + |
| AES | + | - |
| AMD extensions to MMX | + |
| AVX | + | - |
| Extensions to 3DNow! | - | + |
| FMA4 | + | - |
| MMX | + |
| SSE | + |
| SSE2 | + |
| SSE3 | + |
| SSE4.1 | + | - |
| SSE4.2 | + | - |
| SSE4A | + |
| SSSE3 | + | - |
| XOP | + | - |
| |
| Additional instructions |
| Advanced Bit manipulation | + |
| CLFLUSH | + |
| CMOV | + |
| CMPXCHG16B | + |
| CMPXCHG8B | + |
| FXSAVE/FXRSTORE | + |
| MONITOR/MWAIT | + |
| PCLMULDQ | + | - |
| POPCNT | + |
| PREFETCH/PREFETCHW | + |
| RDTSCP | + |
| SKINIT / STGI support | + |
| SYSCALL/SYSRET | + |
| SYSENTER/SYSEXIT | + |
| XSAVE / XRESTORE states | + | - |
| |
| Major features |
| 64-bit / Intel 64 | + |
| NX bit/XD-bit | + |
| On-chip Floating Point Unit | + |
| PowerNow! / Cool'n'Quiet | + |
| Secure Virtual Machine (Virtualization) | + |
| Turbo Core | + |
| |
| Other features |
| 1 GB large page support | + |
| 100MHz multiplier control | + |
| 128-bit SSE instructions | + |
| 36-bit page-size extensions | + |
| Advanced programmable interrupt controller | + |
| Core multi-processing legacy mode | + |
| Debugging extensions | + |
| Extended APIC space | + |
| Hardware P-state control | + |
| Hardware thermal control | + |
| Instruction based sampling | + |
| LAHF / SAHF support in 64-bit mode | + |
| LBR virtualization | + |
| LOCK MOV CR0 means MOV CR8 | + |
| Lightweight profiling support | + | - |
| Machine check architecture | + |
| Machine check exception | + |
| Memory-type range registers | + |
| Misaligned SSE mode | + |
| Model-specific registers | + |
| Nested page tables | + |
| OS visible workaround | + |
| Page attribute table | + |
| Page global extension | + |
| Page-size extensions (4MB pages) | + |
| Physical address extensions | + |
| SVM lock | + |
| Software thermal control | - | + |
| Support for NRIP save | + |
| THERMTRIP | + |
| TSC rate is ensured to be invariant across all states | + |
| Temperature sensor | + |
| Time stamp counter | + |
| Virtual 8086-mode enhancements | + |
| Watchdog timer support | + |
+ - feature is supported
- - feature is not supported
Features, not supported by all processors in the table, are not displayed
Compare with ...
Compare AMD FX-6100 with...
Compare AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (125W) with...
Note: To see differences with any CPU, type in
any combination of the following into the "Any CPU" field: manufacturer name,
full or partial family name, model number, part number, core name,
socket name, operating frequency, bus speed (must have FSB suffix),
and the last level cache. Here are some valid searches:
i5-3570K
Intel Celeron 2 GHz
Ivy Bridge
Pentium 4 800FSB
AMD 3.3GHz 8MB
|
|