AMD FX-6100 vs Phenom II X6 1055T (125W)


Mini Review

AMD FX-6100 advantages



AMD FX-6100

  • In memory-intensive tasks, this processor has 7% higher performance.
  • SSSE3, SSE4.1 and SSE4.2 instructions are enabled on this microprocessor.
  • The AMD FX-6100 features AES, or Advanced Encryption Standard, technology. This extension accelerates AES encryption and decryption, and is useful if you need to protect your disk or network data.
  • The AMD FX-6100 supports AVX, FMA4 and XOP instructions. These extensions are not widely used in programs yet, but their support should improve in future apps.
  • The AMD FX-6100 is unlocked. The processor can be effortlessly overclocked on most motherboards to get better performance.
  • Power consumption of the microprocessor is lower.
  • Based on current official prices, the processor is 27% cheaper.
  • The AMD FX-6100 CPU has 24% better price/performance ratio.


AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (125W) advantages



Picture
is not
available

  • Single-threaded performance of the Phenom II X6 1055T CPU is higher.
  • The 1055T performs 21% faster in multi-threaded applications, or when running multiple single-threaded processes.
  • 3DNow! technology is enabled on this CPU. This technology can increase performance of certain old games and software. The 3DNow! set was depreciated, and not used by modern programs.


FX-6100 vs 1055T performance comparison

The charts illustrate performance of FX-6100 and Phenom II X6 1055T (125W) CPUs in different kinds of applications. The numbers for 'Single-threaded performance' and 'Multi-threaded performance' charts are calculated as an average of several related benchmarks, that you can find in the "Benchmarks" tab. Consequentally, the displayed results may differ from results, that you may see in individual tests. The 'Overall performance' chart shows an average of all-around performance benchmarks, and benchmarks, specific to each type of program. The 'Price-performance ratio' calculates how much more performance you will get per dollar spent. This ratio does not include the cost of other system components.

Single-threaded performance
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1
 
1.19
 
 
Higher is better
Multi-threaded performance
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1
 
1.21
 
 
Higher is better
Memory-intensive applications
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1.07
 
1
 
 
Higher is better
Overall performance
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1
 
1.1
 
 
Higher is better
Price / performance ratio
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1.24
 
1
 
 
Higher is better
 

  - AMD FX-6100       - AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (125W)

Exhaustive list of benchmarks, that demonstrate performance difference between AMD FX-6100 and 1055T in various types of applications, can be found in the "Benchmarks" tab.



FX-6100 vs 1055T power consumption and price comparison

Thermal Design Power
200
160
120
80
40
0
 
 
95W
 
125W
 
 
Lower is better
Current official price
200
160
120
80
40
0
 
 
$112
 
$153
 
 
Lower is better
 

Detailed side by side comparison of AMD FX-6100 vs AMD 1055T specs can be found in the "Specifications" tab. Much more detailed comparison of low level features of both microprocessors you will find in the "CPUIDs" tab.



Pros and Cons summary

 
FX-6100Phenom II X6 1055T (125W)

General recommendations:
Features SSE4.1 / SSE4.2 / AVX / FMA4 / XOP instructions,
Allows effortless overclocking,
More energy efficient,
Somewhat lower official price,
Somewhat better price / performance ratio

General recommendations:
Faster in all types of tasks

Drawbacks:
Rather slow

Drawbacks:
Does not support some instructions,
Less energy efficient,
More expensive,
Somewhat worse price / performance ratio


Similar processors

 
FX-6100Phenom II X6 1055T (125W)

Similar CPUs use the same socket and architecture as AMD FX-6100 and AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (125W), however their performance and other characteristics are a bit different.

Specifications

 AMD FX-6100AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (125W)
 Basic details
Market segmentDesktop
ManufacturerAMD
FamilyAMD FX-SeriesAMD Phenom II X6
Model numberFX-61001055T
CPU part numberFD6100WMW6KGUHDT55TFBK6DGR
Box part numberFD6100WMGUSBXHDT55TFBGRBOX
Introduction dateOctober 12, 2011April 27, 2010
Current official price$112 (as of Apr 2013)$153 (as of Jan 2013)
 
 CPU features
Core nameZambeziThuban
Platform nameScorpiusLeo
MicroarchitectureBulldozerK10
Technology (micron)0.0320.045
Data width (bits)64
SocketSocket AM3+Socket AM3
Frequency (MHz)33002800
Turbo Frequency (MHz)3900 / 36003300 / 3300 / 3300 / - / - / -
Bus speed (MHz)2600 (HT/QPI)2000 (HT/QPI)
Clock Multiplier 14
L1 cache192 KB (code) / 96 KB (data)384 KB (code) / 384 KB (data)
L2 cache (KB)61443072
L3 cache (KB)81926144
Max temperature (°C)7055 - 62
TDP (Watt)95125
Core voltage (V) 1.15 - 1.475
Cores6
Threads6
Multiprocessing1
 
 Instruction set extensions
3DNow!-+
AES / Advanced Encryption Standard+-
AMD64 / EM64T 64-bit technology+
AVX / Advanced Vector Extensions+-
FMA4 / 4-operand Fused Multiply-Add+-
MMX+
SSE+
SSE2+
SSE3+
SSE4.1+-
SSE4.2+-
SSSE3 / Supplemental SSE3+-
XOP / eXtended Operations+-
 
 Supported technologies
PowerNow! / Enhanced SpeedStep+
Turbo Core / Turbo Boost+
Unlocked multiplier+-
Virtualization+
Virus Protection / Execute Disable bit+
 
 Integrated Graphics
GPU TypeNone

Notes:

Rows with different specifications or features are highlighted.

For detailed specifications of "AMD FX-6100" or "AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (125W)" parts please click on the links in the table header.

Benchmarks

System setup

Below is a complete set of AMD FX-6100 and 1055T (125W) benchmarks from our CPU benchmark database. The former processor was tested on ASUS Sabertooth 990FX motherboard with 4GB dual-channel Crucial BallistixPC3-14900 (DDR3-1866) memory, and MSI R6670 1GB GDDR5 (ATI Radeon). The latter processor was tested on ASRock M3A780GXH/128M motherboard, that had 2 GB dual-channel Corsair CM3X1024-1333C9 DDR3 memory, and Powercolor 24PRO256M DDR2 (ATI Radeon HD2400) graphics.

All tests were performed at default frequency and voltage, using manufacturer's stock fan/heatsink. None of the components were overclocked. Motherboard BIOS options were left at default settings.

The results of all benchmarks are broken into four categories: multi-threaded, single-threaded, memory intensive and graphics / gaming.


FX-6100 vs 1055T (125W) single-threaded benchmarks

Single-threaded benchmarks run on a single CPU core, and do not depend on such features as the number of cores, or Hyper-Threading technology. Additionally, they do not utilize on-chip caches, dedicated to other cores.


    AMD FX-6100           AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (125W)

CINEBENCH R10 CPU score (1 core) benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
75.4%

FLAC encoding - single process benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
80.9%

H.264 video encoding - single process benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
95.1%

LAME MP3 encoding - single process benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
79.6%

Super PI (1M) benchmark

< Shorter is better
100%
80.6%

    AMD FX-6100           AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (125W)

XVid video encoding - single process benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
90.9%



FX-6100 vs 1055T (125W) multi-threaded benchmarks

Multi-threaded benchmarks utilize all CPU cores and other on-chip resources (on-chip caches, internal buffers, etc). Intel's Hyper-Threading feature also helps to improve multi-threading performance.


    AMD FX-6100           AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (125W)

Apache web server - dynamic pages benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
98.3%

Apache web server - static pages benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
72.3%

Blowfish encryption benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
67.3%

CINEBENCH R10 CPU score benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
81.5%

CINEBENCH R10 render time (seconds) benchmark

< Shorter is better
100%
81.5%

    AMD FX-6100           AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (125W)

CrystalMark ALU benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
93.5%

CrystalMark FPU benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
81.9%

Euler3D benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
92.1%

FLAC encoding - multiple processes benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
78.8%

Fritz Chess Benchmark benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
85.8%

    AMD FX-6100           AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (125W)

H.264 video encoding - multiple processes benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
94.4%

H.264 video encoding - multithreaded benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
99.6%

LAME MP3 encoding - multiple processes benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
83.0%

MySQL 5.0.27 - selecting data benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
55.3%

Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
74.2%

    AMD FX-6100           AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (125W)

Sandra MultiMedia Floating Point (it/s) benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
89.0%

Sandra MultiMedia Integer (it/s) benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
76.2%

Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
48.0%

Sandra Whetstone SSE2 (MFLOPS) benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
83.3%

XVid video encoding - multiple processes benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
92.7%

    AMD FX-6100           AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (125W)

wPrime v1.55 (32M) benchmark

< Shorter is better
100%
67.0%



FX-6100 vs 1055T (125W) graphics benchmarks

Graphics benchmarks depend on the type of integrated or discrete graphics adapter, and to less extent on the processor performance. Because these benchmarks are synthetic, they may not truly represent gaming performance. However, they still can used to estimate whether one processor will perform faster or slower in games than another CPU.

Important! The processors were tested using different types of graphics adapters, that may not be suitable for comparison.


    AMD FX-6100           AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (125W)

3DMark2001 score benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
35.5%

CINEBENCH R10 OpenGL score benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
39.3%



FX-6100 vs 1055T (125W) memory performance

Memory-intensive tests or programs move large amounts of data to/from memory, and they depend more on memory throughput and the size of on-chip caches, rather than on CPU integer/FP/SIMD performance.


    AMD FX-6100           AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (125W)

7Zip compressing/decompressing speed benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
86.9%

CrystalMark Memory benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
74.4%

WinRAR compressing/decompressing speed benchmark

Longer is better <
100%
93.4%


CPUIDs

The table below compares two random CPUID records for AMD FX-6100 and AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (125W) microprocessors, that were submitted to our CPUID database.

  CPUID 1 CPUID 2
ManufacturerAMD
CPU FamilyFX-SeriesPhenom II X6
Model / Processor NumberFX-61001055T
Frequency3311 MHz2793 MHz
CWID version0.4
Part numberFD6100WMW6KGUHDT55TFBK6DGR
S-Spec / Stepping CodeFA 1137GPMCCBBE CB 1013CPCW
 
General information
VendorAuthenticAMD
Processor name (BIOS)AMD FX(tm)-6100 Six-Core Processor AMD Phenom(tm) II X6 1055T Processor
Processor name (CWID)6Phenom II(tm) X6 1055T
Cores36
Logical processors6
Processor typeOriginal OEM Processor
Core steppingOR-B2PH-E0
CPUID signature600F12100FA0
Family21 (015h)16 (010h)
Model 1 (01h)10 (0Ah)
Stepping 2 (02h) 0 (00h)
SocketAM3+ 
 
Cache
L1 data: Associativity4-way set associative2-way set associative
L1 data: Line size64 bytes
L1 data: Lines per tag1
L1 data: Size6 x 16 KB6 x 64 KB
L1 instruction: Associativity2-way set associative
L1 instruction: Comments1 cache per 2 cores 
L1 instruction: Line size64 bytes
L1 instruction: Lines per tag1
L1 instruction: Size3 x 64 KB6 x 64 KB
L2: Associativity16-way set associative
L2: Comments1 cache per 2 cores 
L2: Line size64 bytes
L2: Lines per tag1
L2: Size3 x 2 MB6 x 512 KB
L3: Associativity64-way set associative48-way set associative
L3: Line size64 bytes
L3: Lines per tag1
L3: Size8 MB6 MB
 
Instruction set extensions
3DNow!-+
AES+-
AMD extensions to MMX+
AVX+-
Extensions to 3DNow!-+
FMA4+-
MMX+
SSE+
SSE2+
SSE3+
SSE4.1+-
SSE4.2+-
SSE4A+
SSSE3+-
XOP+-
 
Additional instructions
Advanced Bit manipulation+
CLFLUSH+
CMOV+
CMPXCHG16B+
CMPXCHG8B+
FXSAVE/FXRSTORE+
MONITOR/MWAIT+
PCLMULDQ+-
POPCNT+
PREFETCH/PREFETCHW+
RDTSCP+
SKINIT / STGI support+
SYSCALL/SYSRET+
SYSENTER/SYSEXIT+
XSAVE / XRESTORE states+-
 
Major features
64-bit / Intel 64+
NX bit/XD-bit+
On-chip Floating Point Unit+
PowerNow! / Cool'n'Quiet+
Secure Virtual Machine (Virtualization)+
Turbo Core+
 
Other features
1 GB large page support+
100MHz multiplier control+
128-bit SSE instructions+
36-bit page-size extensions+
Advanced programmable interrupt controller+
Core multi-processing legacy mode+
Debugging extensions+
Extended APIC space+
Hardware P-state control+
Hardware thermal control+
Instruction based sampling+
LAHF / SAHF support in 64-bit mode+
LBR virtualization+
LOCK MOV CR0 means MOV CR8+
Lightweight profiling support+-
Machine check architecture+
Machine check exception+
Memory-type range registers+
Misaligned SSE mode+
Model-specific registers+
Nested page tables+
OS visible workaround+
Page attribute table+
Page global extension+
Page-size extensions (4MB pages)+
Physical address extensions+
SVM lock+
Software thermal control-+
Support for NRIP save+
THERMTRIP+
TSC rate is ensured to be invariant across all states+
Temperature sensor+
Time stamp counter+
Virtual 8086-mode enhancements+
Watchdog timer support+

+ - feature is supported
- - feature is not supported
Features, not supported by all processors in the table, are not displayed

Compare with ...

Compare AMD FX-6100 with...

Other Phenom II X6 CPU:

Any CPU:


Compare AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (125W) with...

Other FX-Series CPU:

Any CPU:


Note: To see differences with any CPU, type in any combination of the following into the "Any CPU" field: manufacturer name, full or partial family name, model number, part number, core name, socket name, operating frequency, bus speed (must have FSB suffix), and the last level cache. Here are some valid searches:

  i5-3570K
  Intel Celeron 2 GHz
  Ivy Bridge
  Pentium 4 800FSB
  AMD 3.3GHz 8MB

Comments (0)

Terms and Conditions · Privacy Policy · Contact Us (c) Copyright 2003 - 2010 Gennadiy Shvets

Search CPU-World

Search site contents:

Identify part

Identify CPU, FPU or MCU:

Jump to CPU / Family

Type in partial CPU manufacturer, family, model and/or number.

Quick Links