AMD FX-6200 vs Phenom II X4 965 (140W, BE)
Mini Review
AMD FX-6200 advantages
 |
|
AMD Phenom II X4 965 (140W, BE) advantages
Picture is not available |
|
FX-6200 vs 965 performance comparison
The charts in the table below illustrate performance of FX-6200 and Phenom II X4 965 (140W, BE) microprocessors in several different types of programs. The results in the charts are calculated from a few benchmarks, that you can find in the "Benchmarks" tab. As such, performance in individual benchmarks may be lower or higher than what you see in the charts on this page. We also averaged the numbers for task type specific benchmarks and all-around performance benchmarks, and presented them in the 'Overall performance' chart. The 'Price-performance ratio' chart shows how much more performance you will get per dollar spent. The cost of other system components is not included in this ratio. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Higher is better |
Higher is better |
Higher is better |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Higher is better |
Higher is better |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Complete list of benchmarks, that show performance difference between AMD FX-6200 and Phenom II X4 965 (140W, BE) in various types of applications, can be found in the "Benchmarks" tab.
FX-6200 vs 965 power consumption and price comparison
Lower is better |
Lower is better |
Detailed side by side comparison of AMD FX-6200 vs AMD 965 specs can be found in the "Specifications" tab. Even more detailed comparison of internal features of both CPUs is located in the "CPUIDs" tab.
Pros and Cons summary
| FX-6200 | Phenom II X4 965 (140W, BE) |
|
General recommendations: Faster in general,
Supports SSE4.1 / SSE4.2 / AVX / FMA4 / XOP instructions, Somewhat more energy efficient |
General recommendations: A bit faster in single-threaded tasks,
Lower official price, Somewhat better price / performance ratio |
|
Drawbacks: Performs a bit worse in single-threaded programs,
Priced significantly higher, Somewhat worse price / performance ratio |
Drawbacks: Not as fast overall,
Does not support some instructions, Less energy efficient |
Similar processors
| FX-6200 | Phenom II X4 965 (140W, BE) |
Similar processors use the same socket and architecture as FX-6200 and AMD 965.
Specifications
| AMD FX-6200 | AMD Phenom II X4 965 (140W, BE) | |
| Basic details | ||
| Market segment | Desktop | |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | |
| Family | AMD FX-Series | AMD Phenom II X4 |
| Model number | FX-6200 | 965 |
| CPU part number | FD6200FRW6KGU | HDZ965FBK4DGI |
| Box part number | FD6200FRGUBOX | HDZ965FBGIBOX |
| Introduction date | February 27, 2012 | August 13, 2009 |
| Current official price | $132 (as of Apr 2013) | $81 (as of Apr 2013) |
| CPU features | ||
| Core name | Zambezi | Deneb |
| Platform name | Scorpius | Dragon |
| Microarchitecture | Bulldozer | K10 |
| Technology (micron) | 0.032 | 0.045 |
| Data width (bits) | 64 | |
| Socket | Socket AM3+ | Socket AM2+ / Socket AM3 |
| Frequency (MHz) | 3800 | 3400 |
| Turbo Frequency (MHz) | 4100 | |
| Bus speed (MHz) | 2000 (HT/QPI) | |
| Clock Multiplier | 17 | |
| L1 cache | 192 KB (code) / 96 KB (data) | 256 KB (code) / 256 KB (data) |
| L2 cache (KB) | 6144 | 2048 |
| L3 cache (KB) | 8192 | 6144 |
| Max temperature (°C) | 55 - 62 | |
| TDP (Watt) | 125 | 140 |
| Core voltage (V) | 0.85 - 1.425 | |
| Cores | 6 | 4 |
| Threads | 6 | 4 |
| Multiprocessing | 1 | |
| Instruction set extensions | ||
| 3DNow! | - | + |
| AES / Advanced Encryption Standard | + | - |
| AMD64 / EM64T 64-bit technology | + | |
| AVX / Advanced Vector Extensions | + | - |
| FMA4 / 4-operand Fused Multiply-Add | + | - |
| MMX | + | |
| SSE | + | |
| SSE2 | + | |
| SSE3 | + | |
| SSE4.1 | + | - |
| SSE4.2 | + | - |
| SSSE3 / Supplemental SSE3 | + | - |
| XOP / eXtended Operations | + | - |
| Supported technologies | ||
| PowerNow! / Enhanced SpeedStep | + | |
| Turbo Core / Turbo Boost | + | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | |
| Virtualization | + | |
| Virus Protection / Execute Disable bit | + | |
| Integrated Graphics | ||
| GPU Type | None | |
Rows with different specifications or features are highlighted.
For detailed specifications of "AMD FX-6200" or "AMD Phenom II X4 965 (140W, BE)" parts please click on the links in the table header.
Benchmarks
System setup
AMD FX-6200 and 965 (140W, BE) processors were tested using different system components, that are identified by MB, RAM and VID columns in the tables below. The numbers in each of these columns correspond to one of motherboards (MB), memory configurations (RAM) or graphics adapters (VID), listed below:
MB - Motherboard(s):
1. ASUS SABERTOOTH 990FX
2. ASROCK M3A780GXH/128M
3. MSI K9A2 PLATINUM
RAM - Memory:
1. 4GB DUAL-CHANNEL CRUCIAL BALLISTIXPC3-14900 (DDR3-1866)
2. 2 GB DUAL-CHANNEL CORSAIR CM3X1024-1333C9 DDR3
3. 2GB DUAL-CHANNEL CORSAIR CM2X1024-6400C4
VID - Video card(s):
1. MSI R6670 1GB GDDR5 (ATI RADEON)
2. POWERCOLOR 24PRO256M DDR2 (ATI RADEON HD2400)
All tests were performed at default frequency and voltage, using manufacturer's stock fan/heatsink. None of the components were overclocked. Motherboard BIOS options were left at default settings.
The results of all benchmarks are broken into four categories: multi-threaded, single-threaded, memory intensive and graphics / gaming.
FX-6200 vs 965 (140W, BE) single-threaded benchmarks
Single-threaded benchmarks run on a single CPU core, and do not depend on such features as the number of cores, or Hyper-Threading technology. Additionally, they do not utilize on-chip caches, dedicated to other cores.
AMD FX-6200 AMD Phenom II X4 965 (140W, BE) | |||||
3DMark03 CPU score benchmark | |||||
Longer is better  | MB | RAM | VID | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100% | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
| 73.0% | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||
| 72.4% | 3 | 3 | 2 | ||
CINEBENCH R10 CPU score (1 core) benchmark | |||||
| Longer is better | MB | RAM | VID | ||
| 100% | 3 | 3 | 2 | ||
| 97.2% | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||
| 91.3% | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
PCMark2002 CPU score benchmark | |||||
| Longer is better | MB | RAM | VID | ||
| 100% | 3 | 3 | 2 | ||
| 99.6% | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||
| 85.1% | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
Super PI (1M) benchmark | |||||
 Shorter is better | MB | RAM | VID | ||
| 100% | 3 | 3 | 2 | ||
| 100% | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||
| 90.2% | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
FX-6200 vs 965 (140W, BE) multi-threaded benchmarks
Multi-threaded benchmarks utilize all CPU cores and other on-chip resources (on-chip caches, internal buffers, etc). Intel's Hyper-Threading feature also helps to improve multi-threading performance.
AMD FX-6200 AMD Phenom II X4 965 (140W, BE) | |||||
CINEBENCH R10 CPU score benchmark | |||||
| Longer is better | MB | RAM | VID | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100% | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
| 92.1% | 3 | 3 | 2 | ||
| 91.5% | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||
CINEBENCH R10 render time (seconds) benchmark | |||||
| Shorter is better | MB | RAM | VID | ||
| 100% | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
| 92.1% | 3 | 3 | 2 | ||
| 91.4% | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||
Euler3D benchmark | |||||
| Longer is better | MB | RAM | VID | ||
| 100% | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
| 76.8% | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||
| 74.3% | 3 | 3 | 2 | ||
Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) benchmark | |||||
| Longer is better | MB | RAM | VID | ||
| 100% | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
| 95.2% | 3 | 3 | 2 | ||
| 95.0% | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||
Sandra MultiMedia Floating Point (it/s) benchmark | |||||
| Longer is better | MB | RAM | VID | ||
| 100% | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
| 80.0% | 3 | 3 | 2 | ||
| 79.9% | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||
AMD FX-6200 AMD Phenom II X4 965 (140W, BE) | |||||
Sandra MultiMedia Integer (it/s) benchmark | |||||
| Longer is better | MB | RAM | VID | ||
| 100% | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
| 92.3% | 3 | 3 | 2 | ||
| 91.9% | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||
Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) benchmark | |||||
| Longer is better | MB | RAM | VID | ||
| 100% | 3 | 3 | 2 | ||
| 99.8% | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||
| 66.4% | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
Sandra Whetstone SSE2 (MFLOPS) benchmark | |||||
| Longer is better | MB | RAM | VID | ||
| 100% | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
| 85.2% | 3 | 3 | 2 | ||
| 85.1% | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||
wPrime v1.55 (32M) benchmark | |||||
| Shorter is better | MB | RAM | VID | ||
| 100% | 3 | 3 | 2 | ||
| 99.7% | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||
| 93.9% | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
FX-6200 vs 965 (140W, BE) graphics benchmarks
Graphics benchmarks depend on the type of integrated or discrete graphics adapter, and to less extent on the processor performance. Because these benchmarks are synthetic, they may not truly represent gaming performance. However, they still can used to estimate whether one processor will perform faster or slower in games than another CPU.
AMD FX-6200 AMD Phenom II X4 965 (140W, BE) | |||||
3DMark03 game score benchmark | |||||
| Longer is better | MB | RAM | VID | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100% | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
| 9.2% | 3 | 3 | 2 | ||
| 9.2% | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||
3DMark2001 score benchmark | |||||
| Longer is better | MB | RAM | VID | ||
| 100% | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
| 29.7% | 3 | 3 | 2 | ||
| 29.5% | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||
CINEBENCH R10 OpenGL score benchmark | |||||
| Longer is better | MB | RAM | VID | ||
| 100% | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
| 32.6% | 3 | 3 | 2 | ||
| 32.3% | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||
FX-6200 vs 965 (140W, BE) memory performance
Memory-intensive tests or programs move large amounts of data to/from memory, and they depend more on memory throughput and the size of on-chip caches, rather than on CPU integer/FP/SIMD performance.
AMD FX-6200 AMD Phenom II X4 965 (140W, BE) | |||||
7Zip compressing/decompressing speed benchmark | |||||
| Longer is better | MB | RAM | VID | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100% | 3 | 3 | 2 | ||
| 99.4% | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||
| 82.6% | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
PCMark2002 Memory score benchmark | |||||
| Longer is better | MB | RAM | VID | ||
| 100% | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
| 86.0% | 3 | 3 | 2 | ||
| 83.6% | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||
WinRAR compressing/decompressing speed benchmark | |||||
| Longer is better | MB | RAM | VID | ||
| 100% | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
| 74.4% | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||
| 72.4% | 3 | 3 | 2 | ||
CPUIDs
The table below compares two random CPUID records for AMD FX-6200 and AMD Phenom II X4 965 (140W, BE) microprocessors, that were submitted to our CPUID database.
| CPUID 1 | CPUID 2 | |
| Manufacturer | AMD | |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Family | FX-Series | Phenom II X4 |
| Model / Processor Number | FX-6200 | 965 |
| Frequency | 3812 MHz | 2971 MHz |
| CWID version | 0.5 | 0.3 |
| Part number | FD6200FRW6KGU | HDZ965FBK4DGI |
| S-Spec / Stepping Code | FA 1216PGT | CACYC AC 0927DPMW |
| General information | ||
| Vendor | AuthenticAMD | |
| Processor name (BIOS) | AMD FX(tm)-6200 Six-Core Processor | AMD Phenom(tm) II X4 965 Processor |
| Cores | 6 | 4 |
| Logical processors | 3 | 4 |
| Processor type | 6 | Original OEM Processor |
| Core stepping | Original OEM Processor | RB-C2 |
| CPUID signature | OR-B2 | 100F42 |
| Family | 600F12 | 16 (010h) |
| Model | 21 (015h) | 4 (04h) |
| Stepping | 1 (01h) | 2 (02h) |
| Stepping | 2 (02h) | |
| Socket | AM3+ | |
| Cache | ||
| L1 data: Associativity | 4-way set associative | 2-way set associative |
| L1 data: Comments | Direct-mapped | |
| L1 data: Line size | 64 bytes | |
| L1 data: Lines per tag | 1 | |
| L1 data: Size | 6 x 16 KB | 4 x 64 KB |
| L1 instruction: Associativity | 2-way set associative | |
| L1 instruction: Comments | Direct-mapped|1 cache per 2 cores | |
| L1 instruction: Line size | 64 bytes | |
| L1 instruction: Lines per tag | 1 | |
| L1 instruction: Size | 3 x 64 KB | 4 x 64 KB |
| L2: Associativity | 16-way set associative | |
| L2: Comments | Non-inclusive|Direct-mapped|1 cache per 2 cores | |
| L2: Line size | 64 bytes | |
| L2: Lines per tag | 1 | |
| L2: Size | 3 x 2 MB | 4 x 512 KB |
| L3: Associativity | 64-way set associative | 48-way set associative |
| L3: Comments | Non-inclusive|Direct-mapped|Shared between all cores | |
| L3: Line size | 64 bytes | |
| L3: Lines per tag | 1 | |
| L3: Size | 8 MB | 6 MB |
| Instruction set extensions | ||
| 3DNow! | - | + |
| AES | + | - |
| AMD extensions to MMX | + | |
| AVX | + | - |
| Extensions to 3DNow! | - | + |
| FMA4 | + | - |
| MMX | + | |
| SSE | + | |
| SSE2 | + | |
| SSE3 | + | |
| SSE4.1 | + | - |
| SSE4.2 | + | - |
| SSE4A | + | |
| SSSE3 | + | - |
| XOP | + | - |
| Additional instructions | ||
| Advanced Bit manipulation | + | |
| CLFLUSH | + | |
| CMOV | + | |
| CMPXCHG16B | + | |
| CMPXCHG8B | + | |
| FXSAVE/FXRSTORE | + | |
| MONITOR/MWAIT | + | |
| PCLMULDQ | + | - |
| POPCNT | + | |
| PREFETCH/PREFETCHW | + | |
| RDTSCP | + | |
| SKINIT / STGI support | + | |
| SYSCALL/SYSRET | + | |
| SYSENTER/SYSEXIT | + | |
| XSAVE / XRESTORE states | + | - |
| Major features | ||
| 64-bit / Intel 64 | + | |
| NX bit/XD-bit | + | |
| On-chip Floating Point Unit | + | |
| PowerNow! / Cool'n'Quiet | + | |
| Secure Virtual Machine (Virtualization) | + | |
| Turbo Core | + | - |
| Other features | ||
| 1 GB large page support | + | |
| 100MHz multiplier control | + | |
| 128-bit SSE instructions | + | |
| 36-bit page-size extensions | + | |
| Advanced programmable interrupt controller | + | |
| Core multi-processing legacy mode | + | |
| Debugging extensions | + | |
| Extended APIC space | + | |
| Hardware P-state control | + | |
| Hardware thermal control | + | |
| Instruction based sampling | + | |
| LAHF / SAHF support in 64-bit mode | + | |
| LBR virtualization | + | |
| LOCK MOV CR0 means MOV CR8 | + | |
| Lightweight profiling support | + | - |
| Machine check architecture | + | |
| Machine check exception | + | |
| Memory-type range registers | + | |
| Misaligned SSE mode | + | |
| Model-specific registers | + | |
| Nested page tables | + | |
| OS visible workaround | + | |
| Page attribute table | + | |
| Page global extension | + | |
| Page-size extensions (4MB pages) | + | |
| Physical address extensions | + | |
| SVM lock | + | |
| Software thermal control | - | + |
| Support for NRIP save | + | |
| THERMTRIP | + | |
| TSC rate is ensured to be invariant across all states | + | |
| Temperature sensor | + | |
| Time stamp counter | + | |
| Virtual 8086-mode enhancements | + | |
| Watchdog timer support | + | |
- - feature is not supported
Features, not supported by all processors in the table, are not displayed
Compare with ...
i5-3570K
Intel Celeron 2 GHz
Ivy Bridge
Pentium 4 800FSB
AMD 3.3GHz 8MB
| Terms and Conditions · Privacy Policy · Contact Us | (c) Copyright 2003 - 2010 Gennadiy Shvets |