AMD FX-6300 vs Phenom II X4 965 (140W, BE)

Mini Review

AMD FX-6300 advantages

  • The AMD FX-6300 is 14% faster when running multi-threaded programs.
  • Memory performance of the CPU is better.
  • The FX-6300 has SSSE3, SSE4.1 and SSE4.2 instructions enabled.
  • AES instructions are available on this processor. These instructions accelerate AES encryption and decryption, and are useful if you run applications, that protect your disk or network data.
  • The AMD FX-6300 microprocessor incorporates AVX, F16C, FMA3 and XOP instructions. These extensions are not extensively used in programs yet, however their support should improve in future applications.
  • The FX-6300 includes FMA4 instruction set extension. The FMA4 technology is only offered on AMD microprocessors, therefore not many software vendors may support it in the future.
  • Power consumption of the AMD FX-6300 is lower.

AMD Phenom II X4 965 (140W, BE) advantages

  • Single-threaded performance of the processor is better.
  • The microprocessor has 3DNow! technology enabled. Even though the 3DNow! instructions may boost performance of certain old games, they are now obsolete, and they are not used by modern applications.
  • Based on current official prices, the Phenom II X4 965 processor is 28% cheaper than the AMD FX-6300.
  • The Phenom II X4 965 has 19% better price/performance ratio.

FX-6300 vs 965 performance comparison

The charts illustrate performance of FX-6300 and Phenom II X4 965 (140W, BE) CPUs in a number of different kinds of programs. To calculate displayed numbers we averaged results for a few tests for each specific type of program. As such, the shown results may differ from results, that you may see in individual benchmarks. We also averaged the numbers for application type specific benchmarks and all-around performance benchmarks, and presented them in the 'Overall performance' chart. The 'Price-performance ratio' displays how much more performance you will get per dollar spent. The cost of other system components is not included in the ratio chart.
Single-threaded performance
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1
 
1.11
 
 
Higher is better
Multi-threaded performance
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1.14
 
1
 
 
Higher is better
Memory-intensive applications
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1.46
 
1
 
 
Higher is better
Overall performance
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1.16
 
1
 
 
Higher is better
Price / performance ratio
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1
 
1.19
 
 
Higher is better
 

  - AMD FX-6300       - AMD Phenom II X4 965 (140W, BE)

Complete list of benchmarks, that show performance difference between FX-6300 and AMD Phenom II X4 965 (140W, BE) in various types of programs, can be seen in the "Benchmarks" tab.


FX-6300 vs 965 power consumption and price comparison

Thermal Design Power
200
160
120
80
40
0
 
 
95W
 
140W
 
 
Lower is better
Current official price
200
160
120
80
40
0
 
 
$112
 
$81
 
 
Lower is better

Detailed side by side comparison of FX-6300 vs Phenom II X4 965 (140W, BE) specs can be found in the "Specifications" tab. Even more detailed comparison of low level features of both microprocessors you will find in the "CPUIDs" tab.


Pros and Cons summary

FX-6300 Phenom II X4 965 (140W, BE)
General recommendations:
Faster in all task types,
Features SSE4.1 / SSE4.2 / AVX / F16C / FMA3 / XOP instructions,
Needs less power
  General recommendations:
Faster in single-threaded tasks,
Less expensive,
Somewhat better price / performance ratio

Drawbacks:

Worse performance in single-threaded programs,
Priced higher,
Worse price / performance ratio
 

Drawbacks:

Not as fast in general,
Lacks some instructions,
Requires more power

Similar processors

FX-6300 Phenom II X4 965 (140W, BE)
 

Similar CPUs use the same socket and architecture as FX-6300 and AMD 965, but their performance and other characteristics are slightly different.

Jump to:
  • Benchmarks
  • CPUIDs
  • Comments
 

More comparisons

Compare AMD FX-6300 with...

Other Phenom II X4 CPU:

Any CPU:


Compare AMD Phenom II X4 965 (140W, BE) with...

Other FX-Series CPU:

Any CPU:


Note: To see differences with any CPU, type in any combination of the following into the "Any CPU" field: manufacturer name, full or partial family name, model number, part number, core name, socket name, operating frequency, bus speed (must have FSB suffix), and the last level cache. Here are some valid searches:

  i5-3570K
  Intel Celeron 2 GHz
  Piledriver
  Pentium 4 800FSB
  AMD 3.3GHz 8MB

Specifications

Please visit AMD FX-6300 and AMD Phenom II X4 965 (140W, BE) pages for more complete specifications of both microprocessors.

 AMD FX-6300AMD Phenom II X4 965 (140W, BE)
Market segmentDesktop
ManufacturerAMD
FamilyFX-SeriesPhenom II X4
Basic details
Model numberFX-6300965
CPU part numberFD6300WMW6KHKHDZ965FBK4DGI
Box part numberFD6300WMHKBOXHDZ965FBGIBOX
Introduction dateOctober 23, 2012August 13, 2009
Current official price$112 (as of Mar 2014)$81 (as of Mar 2014)
 
CPU features
Core nameVisheraDeneb
Platform nameVolanDragon
MicroarchitecturePiledriverK10
Technology (micron)0.0320.045
Data width (bits)64
SocketSocket AM3+Socket AM2+ / Socket AM3
Frequency (MHz)35003400
Turbo Frequency (MHz)4100 
Bus speed (MHz)2600 (HT/QPI)2000 (HT/QPI)
Clock Multiplier 17
L1 cache192 KB (code) / 96 KB (data)256 KB (code) / 256 KB (data)
L2 cache (KB)61442048
L3 cache (KB)81926144
Max temperature (°C) 55 - 62
TDP (Watt)95140
Core voltage (V) 0.85 - 1.425
Cores64
Threads64
Multiprocessing1
 
Instruction set extensions
3DNow!-+
AES / Advanced Encryption Standard+-
AMD64 / EM64T 64-bit technology+
AVX / Advanced Vector Extensions+-
BMI1 / Bit Manipulation+-
F16C / 16-bit Floating-Point conversion+-
FMA3 / 3-operand Fused Multiply-Add+-
FMA4 / 4-operand Fused Multiply-Add+-
MMX+
SSE+
SSE2+
SSE3+
SSE4.1+-
SSE4.2+-
SSSE3 / Supplemental SSE3+-
XOP / eXtended Operations+-
 
Supported technologies
PowerNow! / Enhanced SpeedStep+
Turbo Core / Turbo Boost+-
Unlocked multiplier+
Virtualization+
Virus Protection / Execute Disable bit+
 
Integrated Graphics
GPU TypeNone
 
Integrated Memory Controller(s)
The number of controllers1
Memory channels2
Supported memoryDDR3-1866DDR2-1066, DDR3-1333
Notes:

Rows with different specifications or features are highlighted.

For detailed specifications of "AMD FX-6300" or "AMD Phenom II X4 965 (140W, BE)" parts please click on the links in the table header.

Benchmarks

System setup

AMD FX-6300 and 965 (140W, BE) processors were tested using different system components, that are identified by MB, RAM and VID columns in the tables below. The numbers in each of these columns correspond to one of motherboards (MB), memory configurations (RAM) or graphics adapters (VID), listed below:

MB - Motherboard(s):
1. ASUS SABERTOOTH 990FX
2. ASROCK M3A780GXH/128M
3. MSI K9A2 PLATINUM

RAM - Memory:
1. 4GB DUAL-CHANNEL CRUCIAL BALLISTIXPC3-14900 (DDR3-1866)
2. 2 GB DUAL-CHANNEL CORSAIR CM3X1024-1333C9 DDR3
3. 2GB DUAL-CHANNEL CORSAIR CM2X1024-6400C4

VID - Video card(s):
1. MSI R6670 1GB GDDR5 (ATI RADEON)
2. POWERCOLOR 24PRO256M DDR2 (ATI RADEON HD2400)

All tests were performed at default frequency and voltage, using manufacturer's stock fan/heatsink. None of the components were overclocked. Motherboard BIOS options were left at default settings.

The results of all benchmarks are broken into four categories: multi-threaded, single-threaded, memory intensive and graphics / gaming.


FX-6300 vs 965 (140W, BE) single-threaded benchmarks

Single-threaded benchmarks run on a single CPU core, and do not depend on such features as the number of cores, or Hyper-Threading technology. Additionally, they do not utilize on-chip caches, dedicated to other cores.

     

    AMD FX-6300           AMD Phenom II X4 965 (140W, BE)

3DMark03 CPU score benchmark

Uses DirectX software vertex shader to run Wings of Fury and Trolls' Lair games, and calculates a 3DMark03 CPU score based on averaged number of frames per second, achieved by the CPU/GPU combination.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
70.5%222
70.0%332

CINEBENCH R10 CPU score (1 core) benchmark

Measures performance of a single-core rendering of a photo-realistic 3D image using CINEMA 4D software engine.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%332
97.2%222
94.1%111

PCMark2002 CPU score benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%332
99.6%222
87.3%111

Super PI (1M) benchmark

Measures time, required to calculate the first 1 million digits after the decimal point in the number Pi.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%332
100%222
84.8%111


FX-6300 vs 965 (140W, BE) multi-threaded benchmarks

Multi-threaded benchmarks utilize all CPU cores and other on-chip resources (on-chip caches, internal buffers, etc). Intel's Hyper-Threading feature also helps to improve multi-threading performance.

     

    AMD FX-6300           AMD Phenom II X4 965 (140W, BE)

CINEBENCH R10 CPU score benchmark

Measures performance of multi-core rendering of a photo-realistic 3D image using CINEMA 4D software engine.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
94.4%332
93.7%222

CINEBENCH R10 render time (seconds) benchmark

Measures time taken to render a photo-realistic 3D image using CINEMA 4D software engine.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
94.4%332
93.7%222

Euler3D benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
70.1%222
67.7%332

Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) benchmark

Runs Dhrystone test on all cores, and reports estimated integer performance in MIPS (Millions of Instructions Per Second).
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%332
99.8%222
94.0%111

Sandra MultiMedia Floating Point (it/s) benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
82.3%332
82.2%222

    AMD FX-6300           AMD Phenom II X4 965 (140W, BE)

Sandra MultiMedia Integer (it/s) benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
98.2%332
97.8%222

Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) benchmark

Runs Whetstone test on all cores, and reports estimated floating-point performance in MFLOPS (Millions of Floating-Point Operations Per Second).
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%332
99.8%222
64.7%111

Sandra Whetstone SSE2 (MFLOPS) benchmark

Runs SSE2-enabled Whetstone test on all cores, and reports estimated floating-point performance in MFLOPS (Millions of Floating-Point Operations Per Second).
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
92.4%332
92.2%222

wPrime v1.55 (32M) benchmark

wPrime benchmark measures time taken to calculate square roots of numbers from 1 to 33554431.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%332
99.7%222
89.5%111


FX-6300 vs 965 (140W, BE) graphics benchmarks

Graphics benchmarks depend on the type of integrated or discrete graphics adapter, and to less extent on the processor performance. Because these benchmarks are synthetic, they may not truly represent gaming performance. However, they still can be used to estimate whether one processor will perform faster or slower than another CPU in games and other 3D tasks.

Important! The processors were tested using different types of graphics adapters, that may not be suitable for comparison.
     

    AMD FX-6300           AMD Phenom II X4 965 (140W, BE)

3DMark03 game score benchmark

Measures graphics and 3D game performance of discrete and integrated GPUs using 4 different game simulations, that have varying level of DirectX support from version 7 to version 9.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
9.0%332
9.0%222

3DMark2001 score benchmark

Runs a series of game simulations and feature tests to measure graphics and 3D game performance of discrete and integrated GPUs. It utilizes a single CPU core, and it is compatible with DirectX 8 and later APIs.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
27.8%332
27.6%222

CINEBENCH R10 OpenGL score benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
31.0%332
30.7%222


FX-6300 vs 965 (140W, BE) memory performance

Memory-intensive tests or programs move large amounts of data to/from memory, and they depend more on memory throughput and the size of on-chip caches, rather than on CPU integer/FP/SIMD performance.

     

    AMD FX-6300           AMD Phenom II X4 965 (140W, BE)

7Zip compressing/decompressing speed (1 thread) benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%332
99.4%222
83.0%111

PCMark2002 Memory score benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
89.1%332
86.6%222

WinRAR compressing/decompressing speed benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
69.7%222
67.7%332

CPUIDs

The table below compares two random CPUID records for AMD FX-6300 and AMD Phenom II X4 965 (140W, BE) microprocessors, that were submitted to our CPUID database.

  CPUID 1 CPUID 2
ManufacturerAMD
CPU FamilyFX-SeriesPhenom II X4
Model / Processor NumberFX-6300965
Frequency3511 MHz2971 MHz
CWID version0.40.3
Part numberFD6300WMW6KHKHDZ965FBK4DGI
S-Spec / Stepping CodeFA 1234PGNCACYC AC 0927DPMW
 
General information
VendorAuthenticAMD
Processor name (BIOS)AMD FX(tm)-6300 Six-Core Processor AMD Phenom(tm) II X4 965 Processor
Cores64
Compute units3 
Logical processors64
Processor typeOriginal OEM Processor
Core stepping RB-C2
CPUID signature600F20100F42
Family21 (015h)16 (010h)
Model 2 (02h) 4 (04h)
Stepping 0 (00h) 2 (02h)
SocketAM3+ 
 
Cache
L1 data: Associativity4-way set associative2-way set associative
L1 data: Line size64 bytes
L1 data: Lines per tag1
L1 data: Size6 x 16 KB4 x 64 KB
L1 instruction: Associativity2-way set associative
L1 instruction: Comments1 cache per 2 cores 
L1 instruction: Line size64 bytes
L1 instruction: Lines per tag1
L1 instruction: Size3 x 64 KB4 x 64 KB
L2: Associativity16-way set associative
L2: Comments1 cache per 2 cores 
L2: Line size64 bytes
L2: Lines per tag1
L2: Size3 x 2 MB4 x 512 KB
L3: Associativity64-way set associative48-way set associative
L3: Line size64 bytes
L3: Lines per tag1
L3: Size8 MB6 MB
 
Instruction set extensions
3DNow!-+
AES+-
AMD extensions to MMX+
AVX+-
BMI1+-
Extensions to 3DNow!-+
F16C+-
FMA+-
FMA4+-
MMX+
SSE+
SSE2+
SSE3+
SSE4.1+-
SSE4.2+-
SSE4A+
SSSE3+-
TBM+-
XOP+-
 
Additional instructions
Advanced Bit manipulation+
CLFLUSH+
CMOV+
CMPXCHG16B+
CMPXCHG8B+
FXSAVE/FXRSTORE+
MONITOR/MWAIT+
PCLMULDQ+-
POPCNT+
PREFETCH/PREFETCHW+
RDTSCP+
SKINIT / STGI support+
SYSCALL/SYSRET+
SYSENTER/SYSEXIT+
XSAVE / XRESTORE states+-
 
Major features
64-bit / Intel 64+
NX bit/XD-bit+
On-chip Floating Point Unit+
PowerNow! / Cool'n'Quiet+
Secure Virtual Machine (Virtualization)+
Turbo Core+-
 
Other features
1 GB large page support+
100MHz multiplier control+
128-bit SSE instructions+
36-bit page-size extensions+
Advanced programmable interrupt controller+
Core multi-processing legacy mode+
Debugging extensions+
Extended APIC space+
Hardware P-state control+
Hardware thermal control+
Instruction based sampling+
LAHF / SAHF support in 64-bit mode+
LBR virtualization+
LOCK MOV CR0 means MOV CR8+
Lightweight profiling support+-
Machine check architecture+
Machine check exception+
Memory-type range registers+
Misaligned SSE mode+
Model-specific registers+
Nested page tables+
OS visible workaround+
Page attribute table+
Page global extension+
Page-size extensions (4MB pages)+
Physical address extensions+
SVM lock+
Software thermal control-+
Support for NRIP save+
THERMTRIP+
TSC rate is ensured to be invariant across all states+
Temperature sensor+
Time stamp counter+
Virtual 8086-mode enhancements+
Watchdog timer support+
+ - feature is supported
- - feature is not supported
Features, not supported by all processors in the table, are not displayed

Comments (0)
Terms and Conditions · Privacy Policy · Contact Us (c) Copyright 2003 - 2010 Gennadiy Shvets