Search CPU-World

Search site contents:

AMD Sempron 145 vs Intel Celeron E1500

Mini Review

AMD Sempron 145 advantages



AMD Sempron 145
  • Single-threaded performance of the CPU is higher.
  • The AMD Sempron 145 processor provides hardware acceleration of virtualized tasks.
  • 3DNow! technology is supported by this CPU. The 3DNow! instruction set helps the processor to perform certain floating-point operations faster, and thus enhance performance in games, that support the instructions. This technology is obsolete now, and only some old games and software used them.
  • The microprocessor is 31% more energy efficient.

Intel Celeron E1500 advantages



Intel Celeron E1500
  • The E1500 CPU is 36% faster when running multi-threaded applications.
  • Memory performance of the E1500 microprocessor is better.
  • The Celeron E1500 has SSSE3 instructions enabled.

145 vs E1500 performance comparison

The charts in the table below illustrate relative performance of Sempron 145 and Celeron E1500 processors in several different kinds of programs. To calculate displayed numbers we averaged results for a number of tests for each specific task type. As a result, the shown results may differ from results, that you may receive in individual benchmarks. We also averaged the numbers for application type specific benchmarks and all-around performance benchmarks, and presented them in the 'Overall performance' chart.
Single-threaded performance
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1.19
 
1
 
 
Higher is better
Multi-threaded performance
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1
 
1.36
 
 
Higher is better
Memory-intensive applications
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1
 
1.26
 
 
Higher is better
Discrete Graphics performance
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1.01
 
1
 
 
Higher is better
Overall performance
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1
 
1.07
 
 
Higher is better
 

  - AMD Sempron 145       - Intel Celeron E1500

Complete list of benchmarks, that demonstrate difference in performance between Sempron 145 and Intel Celeron E1500 in various types of applications, can be seen in the "Benchmarks" tab.


145 vs E1500 power consumption comparison

Thermal Design Power
80
64
48
32
16
0
 
 
45W
 
65W
 
 
Lower is better
 

Detailed side by side comparison of Sempron 145 vs E1500 specs can be found in the "Specifications" tab. Even more detailed comparison of internal features of both microprocessors you will find in the "CPUIDs" tab.


Pros and Cons summary

Sempron 145 Celeron E1500
General recommendations:
Performs somewhat better in single-threaded programs,
Somewhat lower power
  General recommendations:
Insignificantly faster overall

Drawbacks:

Slightly worse performance in all application types
 

Drawbacks:

Performs worse in single-threaded tasks,
Requires more power

Similar processors

Sempron 145 Celeron E1500
 

Similar CPUs utilize the same core and fit the same socket as AMD 145 and Celeron E1500.

Jump to:
  • Benchmarks
  • CPUIDs
  • Comments
 

Popular comparisons:

Celeron E1500:

More comparisons

Compare AMD Sempron 145 with...

Other Celeron Dual-Core CPU:

Any CPU:


Compare Intel Celeron E1500 with...

Other Sempron CPU:

Any CPU:


Note: To see differences with any CPU, type in any combination of the following into the "Any CPU" field: manufacturer name, full or partial family name, model number, part number, core name, socket name, operating frequency, bus speed (must have FSB suffix), and the last level cache. Here are some valid searches:

  i5-3570K
  Intel Celeron 2 GHz
  K10
  Pentium 4 800FSB
  AMD 3.3GHz 8MB

Specifications

Please visit AMD Sempron 145 and Intel Celeron E1500 pages for more detailed specifications of both microprocessors.

 AMD Sempron 145Intel Celeron E1500
Market segmentDesktop
ManufacturerAMDIntel
FamilySempronCeleron Dual-Core
Basic details
Model number145E1500
CPU part numberSDX145HBK13GMHH80557PG049D
Box part numberSDX145HBGMBOXBX80557E1500
BXC80557E1500
Introduction dateMay 31, 2010November 30, 2008
 
CPU features
Core nameSargasAllendale
MicroarchitectureK10Core
Technology (micron)0.0450.065
Data width (bits)64
SocketSocket AM2+ / Socket AM3Socket 775
Frequency (MHz)28002200
Bus speed (MHz)2000 (HT/QPI)800
Clock Multiplier1411
L1 cache64 KB (code) / 64 KB (data)
L2 cache (KB)1024512
Max temperature (°C)6373.3
TDP (Watt)4565
Max power dissipation (Watt) 111.15
Core voltage (V)0.825 - 1.350.85 - 1.5
Cores12
Threads12
Multiprocessing1
 
Instruction set extensions
3DNow!+-
AMD64 / EM64T 64-bit technology+
MMX+
SSE+
SSE2+
SSE3+
SSSE3 / Supplemental SSE3-+
 
Supported technologies
PowerNow! / Enhanced SpeedStep+
Virtualization+-
Virus Protection / Execute Disable bit+
 
Integrated Graphics
GPU TypeNone
Notes:

Rows with different specifications or features are highlighted.

For detailed specifications of "AMD Sempron 145" or "Intel Celeron E1500" parts please click on the links in the table header.

Benchmarks

System setup

AMD Sempron 145 and Intel Celeron E1500 processors were tested using different system components, that are identified by MB, RAM and VID columns in the tables below. The numbers in each of these columns correspond to one of motherboards (MB), memory configurations (RAM) or graphics adapters (VID), listed below:

MB - Motherboard(s):
1. ASROCK M3A780GXH/128M
2. ASROCK 4CORE1600TWINS-P35
3. INTEL DP965LT

RAM - Memory:
1. 2 GB DUAL-CHANNEL CORSAIR CM3X1024-1333C9 DDR3
2. 2GB DUAL-CHANNEL CORSAIR CM2X1024-6400C4

VID - Video card(s):
1. POWERCOLOR 24PRO256M DDR2 (ATI RADEON HD2400)

All tests were performed at default frequency and voltage, using manufacturer's stock fan/heatsink. None of the components were overclocked. Motherboard BIOS options were left at default settings.

The results of all benchmarks are broken into four categories: multi-threaded, single-threaded, memory intensive and graphics / gaming.


Sempron 145 vs Intel Celeron E1500 single-threaded benchmarks

Single-threaded benchmarks run on a single CPU core, and do not depend on such features as the number of cores, or Hyper-Threading technology. Additionally, they do not utilize on-chip caches, dedicated to other cores.

     

    AMD Sempron 145           Intel Celeron E1500

3DMark03 CPU score benchmark

Uses DirectX software vertex shader to run Wings of Fury and Trolls' Lair games, and calculates a 3DMark03 CPU score based on averaged number of frames per second, achieved by the CPU/GPU combination.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
73.2%211
72.4%321

CINEBENCH R10 CPU score (1 core) benchmark

Measures performance of a single-core rendering of a photo-realistic 3D image using CINEMA 4D software engine.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
78.9%321
78.7%211

PCMark2002 CPU score benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
88.7%211
88.3%321

Super PI (1M) benchmark

Measures time, required to calculate the first 1 million digits after the decimal point in the number Pi.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
90.9%211
88.4%321


Sempron 145 vs Intel Celeron E1500 multi-threaded benchmarks

Multi-threaded benchmarks utilize all CPU cores and other on-chip resources (on-chip caches, internal buffers, etc). Intel's Hyper-Threading feature also helps to improve multi-threading performance.

     

    AMD Sempron 145           Intel Celeron E1500

CINEBENCH R10 CPU score benchmark

Measures performance of multi-core rendering of a photo-realistic 3D image using CINEMA 4D software engine.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%211
99.2%321
68.8%111

CINEBENCH R10 render time (seconds) benchmark

Measures time taken to render a photo-realistic 3D image using CINEMA 4D software engine.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%211
99.2%321
68.8%111

Euler3D benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%211
96.6%321
76.1%111

Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) benchmark

Runs Dhrystone test on all cores, and reports estimated integer performance in MIPS (Millions of Instructions Per Second).
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%211
99.9%321
52.1%111

Sandra MultiMedia Floating Point (it/s) benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%211
99.7%321
53.4%111

    AMD Sempron 145           Intel Celeron E1500

Sandra MultiMedia Integer (it/s) benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%211
99.8%321
63.5%111

Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) benchmark

Runs Whetstone test on all cores, and reports estimated floating-point performance in MFLOPS (Millions of Floating-Point Operations Per Second).
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%211
99.9%321
65.7%111

Sandra Whetstone SSE2 (MFLOPS) benchmark

Runs SSE2-enabled Whetstone test on all cores, and reports estimated floating-point performance in MFLOPS (Millions of Floating-Point Operations Per Second).
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%211
99.8%321
58.8%111

wPrime v1.55 (32M) benchmark

wPrime benchmark measures time taken to calculate square roots of numbers from 1 to 33554431.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%321
99.9%211
74.1%111


Sempron 145 vs Intel Celeron E1500 graphics benchmarks

Graphics benchmarks depend on the type of integrated or discrete graphics adapter, and to less extent on the processor performance. Because these benchmarks are synthetic, they may not truly represent gaming performance. However, they still can be used to estimate whether one processor will perform faster or slower than another CPU in games and other 3D tasks.

     

    AMD Sempron 145           Intel Celeron E1500

3DMark03 game score benchmark

Measures graphics and 3D game performance of discrete and integrated GPUs using 4 different game simulations, that have varying level of DirectX support from version 7 to version 9.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
99.5%211
99.3%321

3DMark2001 score benchmark

Runs a series of game simulations and feature tests to measure graphics and 3D game performance of discrete and integrated GPUs. It utilizes a single CPU core, and it is compatible with DirectX 8 and later APIs.
Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
95.6%321
95.4%211

CINEBENCH R10 OpenGL score benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
86.0%321
85.4%211


Sempron 145 vs Intel Celeron E1500 memory performance

Memory-intensive tests or programs move large amounts of data to/from memory, and they depend more on memory throughput and the size of on-chip caches, rather than on CPU integer/FP/SIMD performance.

     

    AMD Sempron 145           Intel Celeron E1500

7Zip compressing/decompressing speed (1 thread) benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
72.3%211
72.1%321

PCMark2002 Memory score benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%111
53.3%211
52.7%321

WinRAR compressing/decompressing speed benchmark

Longer is better <MBRAMVID
100%321
99.6%211
79.2%111

CPUIDs

The table below compares two random CPUID records for AMD Sempron 145 and Intel Celeron E1500 microprocessors, that were submitted to our CPUID database. Please note that different steppings of Intel processors, identified by S-spec numbers or CPUID, may have slightly different features. For that reason the comparison table below only applies to CPUs with specific S-Spec number / CPUID.

  CPUID 1 CPUID 2
ManufacturerAMDIntel
CPU FamilySempronCeleron Dual-Core
Model / Processor Number145E1500
Frequency2793 MHz2200 MHz
CWID version0.40.3
Part numberSDX145HBK13GMHH80557PG049D
S-Spec / Stepping CodeAAEGC AE 0945APMWSLAQZ
 
General information
VendorAuthenticAMDGenuineIntel
Processor name (BIOS)AMD Sempron(tm) Processor 145 ProcessorIntel(R) Celeron(R) CPU E1500 @ 2.20GHz
Processor name (CWID)AMD Sempron(tm) 145 Processor 
Cores12
Logical processors12
Processor typeOriginal OEM Processor
Core steppingDA-C3 
CPUID signature100F636FD
Family16 (010h) 6 (06h)
Model 6 (06h)15 (0Fh)
Stepping 3 (03h)13 (0Dh)
TLB/Cache details 64-byte Prefetching
Data TLB: 4-KB Pages, 4-way set associative, 256 entries
Data TLB: 4-MB Pages, 4-way set associative, 32 entries
Instruction TLB: 2-MB pages, 4-way, 8 entries or 4M pages, 4-way, 4 entries
Instruction TLB: 4-KB Pages, 4-way set associative, 128 entries
L1 Data TLB: 4-KB pages, 4-way set associative, 16 entries
L1 Data TLB: 4-MB pages, 4-way set associative, 16 entries
 
Cache
L1 data: Associativity2-way set associative8-way set associative
L1 data: Line size64 bytes
L1 data: Lines per tag1 
L1 data: Size64 KB32 KB
L1 instruction: Associativity2-way set associative8-way set associative
L1 instruction: Line size64 bytes
L1 instruction: Lines per tag1 
L1 instruction: Size64 KB32 KB
L2: Associativity16-way set associative2-way set associative
L2: Line size64 bytes
L2: Lines per tag1 
L2: Size1 MB512 KB
 
Instruction set extensions
3DNow!+-
AMD extensions to MMX+-
Extensions to 3DNow!+-
MMX+
SSE+
SSE2+
SSE3+
SSE4A+-
SSSE3-+
 
Additional instructions
Advanced Bit manipulation+-
CLFLUSH+
CMOV+
CMPXCHG16B+
CMPXCHG8B+
FXSAVE/FXRSTORE+
MONITOR/MWAIT+
POPCNT+-
PREFETCH/PREFETCHW+-
RDTSCP+-
SKINIT/STGI support+-
SYSCALL/SYSRET+-
SYSENTER/SYSEXIT+
 
Major features
64-bit / Intel 64+
Enhanced SpeedStep-+
NX bit/XD-bit+-
On-chip Floating Point Unit+
PowerNow! / Cool'n'Quiet+-
Secure Virtual Machine (Virtualization)+-
 
Other features
1 GB large page support+-
100MHz multiplier control+-
128-bit SSE instructions+-
36-bit page-size extensions+
64-bit debug store-+
Advanced programmable interrupt controller+
CPL qualified debug store-+
Debug store-+
Debugging extensions+
Digital Thermal Sensor capability-+
Extended APIC space+-
FXSAVE/FXRSTOR optimizations+-
Hardware P-state control+-
Hardware thermal control+-
Instruction based sampling+-
LAHF/SAHF support in 64-bit mode+
LBR virtualization+-
LOCK MOV CR0 means MOV CR8+-
Machine check architecture+
Machine check exception+
Memory-type range registers+
Misaligned SSE mode+-
Model-specific registers+
Nested page tables+-
OS visible workaround+-
Page attribute table+
Page global extension+
Page-size extensions (4MB pages)+
Pending break enable-+
Perfmon and Debug capability-+
Physical address extensions+
SVM lock+-
Self-snoop-+
Software thermal control+-
Support for NRIP save+-
THERMTRIP+-
TSC rate is ensured to be invariant across all states+-
Temperature sensor+-
Thermal monitor-+
Thermal monitor 2-+
Thermal monitor and software controlled clock facilities-+
Time stamp counter+
Virtual 8086-mode enhancements+
Watchdog timer support+-
xTPR Update Control-+
+ - feature is supported
- - feature is not supported
Features, not supported by all processors in the table, are not displayed

Comments (0)
Terms and Conditions · Privacy Policy · Contact Us (c) Copyright 2003 - 2010 Gennadiy Shvets