Search CPU-World

Search site contents:

AMD Sempron 145 vs Intel Celeron E3400

Mini Review

AMD Sempron 145 advantages



AMD Sempron 145
  • The microprocessor has 3DNow! technology enabled. Although the 3DNow! instructions may improve performance of certain old games, they are now obsolete, and they are not utilized by modern applications.
  • This CPU is 31% more energy efficient.

Intel Celeron E3400 advantages



Intel Celeron E3400
  • Single-threaded performance of the E3400 microprocessor is better.
  • The Celeron E3400 processor has 89% higher performance when running multi-threaded programs.
  • The microprocessor is 42% faster in memory-intensive applications.
  • SSSE3 instructions are enabled on this CPU.

145 vs E3400 performance comparison

The charts below demonstrate relative performance of Sempron 145 and Celeron E3400 microprocessors in several different kinds of programs. The numbers for 'Single-threaded performance', 'Multi-threaded performance' and 'Discrete Graphics performance' charts are calculated as an average of several related benchmarks, that you can view in the "Benchmarks" tab. Consequentally, the shown results may differ from results, that you may see in individual tests. We also averaged the numbers for application type specific benchmarks and all-around performance benchmarks, and presented them in the 'Overall performance' chart.
Single-threaded performance
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1
 
1.03
 
 
Higher is better
Multi-threaded performance
3
2.4
1.8
1.2
0.6
0
 
 
1
 
1.89
 
 
Higher is better
Memory-intensive applications
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1
 
1.42
 
 
Higher is better
Discrete Graphics performance
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1
 
1
 
 
Higher is better
Overall performance
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
 
 
1
 
1.25
 
 
Higher is better
 

  - AMD Sempron 145       - Intel Celeron E3400

Exhaustive list of benchmarks, that show difference in performance between 145 and Intel E3400 in various types of applications, can be seen in the "Benchmarks" tab.


145 vs E3400 power consumption comparison

Thermal Design Power
80
64
48
32
16
0
 
 
45W
 
65W
 
 
Lower is better
 

Detailed side by side comparison of Sempron 145 vs Intel Celeron E3400 specs can be found in the "Specifications" tab. Even more detailed comparison of internal features of both CPUs you will find in the "CPUIDs" tab.


Pros and Cons summary

Sempron 145 Celeron E3400
General recommendations:
Needs less power
  General recommendations:
Performs better in all task types

Drawbacks:

Not as fast overall
 

Drawbacks:

Requires more power

Similar processors

Sempron 145 Celeron E3400
 

Similar processors use the same socket and architecture as AMD Sempron 145 and E3400.

Jump to:
  • Benchmarks
  • CPUIDs
  • Comments
 

More comparisons

Compare AMD Sempron 145 with...

Other Celeron Dual-Core CPU:

Any CPU:


Compare Intel Celeron E3400 with...

Other Sempron CPU:

Any CPU:


Note: To see differences with any CPU, type in any combination of the following into the "Any CPU" field: manufacturer name, full or partial family name, model number, part number, core name, socket name, operating frequency, bus speed (must have FSB suffix), and the last level cache. Here are some valid searches:

  i5-3570K
  Intel Celeron 2 GHz
  K10
  Pentium 4 800FSB
  AMD 3.3GHz 8MB

Specifications

Please visit AMD Sempron 145 and Intel Celeron E3400 pages for more detailed specifications of both microprocessors.

 AMD Sempron 145Intel Celeron E3400
Market segmentDesktop
ManufacturerAMDIntel
FamilySempronCeleron Dual-Core
Basic details
Model number145E3400
CPU part numberSDX145HBK13GMAT80571RG0641ML
Box part numberSDX145HBGMBOXBX80571E3400
BXC80571E3400
Introduction dateMay 31, 2010January 17, 2010
 
CPU features
Core nameSargasWolfdale
MicroarchitectureK10Core
Technology (micron)0.045
Data width (bits)64
SocketSocket AM2+ / Socket AM3Socket 775
Frequency (MHz)28002600
Bus speed (MHz)2000 (HT/QPI)800
Clock Multiplier1413
L1 cache64 KB (code) / 64 KB (data)
L2 cache (KB)1024
Max temperature (°C)6374.1
TDP (Watt)4565
Core voltage (V)0.825 - 1.350.85 - 1.3625
Cores12
Threads12
Multiprocessing1
 
Instruction set extensions
3DNow!+-
AMD64 / EM64T 64-bit technology+
MMX+
SSE+
SSE2+
SSE3+
SSSE3 / Supplemental SSE3-+
 
Supported technologies
PowerNow! / Enhanced SpeedStep+
Virtualization+
Virus Protection / Execute Disable bit+
 
Integrated Graphics
GPU TypeNone
Notes:

Rows with different specifications or features are highlighted.

For detailed specifications of "AMD Sempron 145" or "Intel Celeron E3400" parts please click on the links in the table header.

Benchmarks

System setup

Below is a partial set of AMD Sempron 145 and Intel Celeron E3400 benchmarks from our CPU benchmark database. The former processor was tested on ASRock M3A780GXH/128M motherboard with 2 GB dual-channel Corsair CM3X1024-1333C9 DDR3 memory, and Powercolor 24PRO256M DDR2 (ATI Radeon HD2400). The latter processor was tested on ASRock 4Core1600Twins-P35 motherboard, that had 2 GB dual-channel Corsair CM3X1024-1333C9 DDR3 memory, and Powercolor 24PRO256M DDR2 (ATI Radeon HD2400) graphics. For different system configurations please see tests of Sempron 145 and Intel Celeron E3400 CPUs in our benchmark database.

All tests were performed at default frequency and voltage, using manufacturer's stock fan/heatsink. None of the components were overclocked. Motherboard BIOS options were left at default settings.

The results of all benchmarks are broken into four categories: multi-threaded, single-threaded, memory intensive and graphics / gaming.


Sempron 145 vs Intel Celeron E3400 single-threaded benchmarks

Single-threaded benchmarks run on a single CPU core, and do not depend on such features as the number of cores, or Hyper-Threading technology. Additionally, they do not utilize on-chip caches, dedicated to other cores.


    AMD Sempron 145           Intel Celeron E3400

3DMark03 CPU score benchmark

Uses DirectX software vertex shader to run Wings of Fury and Trolls' Lair games, and calculates a 3DMark03 CPU score based on averaged number of frames per second, achieved by the CPU/GPU combination.
100%
86.9%

CINEBENCH R10 CPU score (1 core) benchmark

Measures performance of a single-core rendering of a photo-realistic 3D image using CINEMA 4D software engine.
100%
93.8%

FLAC encoding - single process benchmark

Reports the number of songs, converted by a single CPU core from WAV to FLAC format using the best possible compression.
100%
99.9%

H.264 video encoding - single process benchmark

Measures the number of frames, converted by one CPU thread from MPEG2 format to H.264 format using high quality settings.
100%
95.8%

LAME MP3 encoding - single process benchmark

Reports the number of MP3 songs, encoded by one CPU core per one minute.
100%
91.2%

    AMD Sempron 145           Intel Celeron E3400

PCMark2002 CPU score benchmark

100%
97.8%

Super PI (1M) benchmark

Measures time, required to calculate the first 1 million digits after the decimal point in the number Pi.
100%
81.7%

XVid video encoding - single process benchmark

Reports how many frames per second can be transcoded by a single CPU core from MPEG2 to XVid (MPEG4) format, utilizing single-pass conversion method.
100%
88.4%


Sempron 145 vs Intel Celeron E3400 multi-threaded benchmarks

Multi-threaded benchmarks utilize all CPU cores and other on-chip resources (on-chip caches, internal buffers, etc). Intel's Hyper-Threading feature also helps to improve multi-threading performance.


    AMD Sempron 145           Intel Celeron E3400

Apache web server - dynamic pages benchmark

Shows an average number of dynamic HTML pages served per second by local instance of Apache 1.3.41 web server. The test has much greater error margin than other tests.
100%
64.9%

Apache web server - static pages benchmark

Shows an average number of very simple static HTML pages served per second by local Apache 1.3.41 web server. The test has much greater error margin than other tests.
100%
87.5%

Blowfish encryption benchmark

Reports encryption speed of pre-defined 32KB text block. The data is encrypted using Blowfish algorithm.
100%
53.2%

CINEBENCH R10 CPU score benchmark

Measures performance of multi-core rendering of a photo-realistic 3D image using CINEMA 4D software engine.
100%
49.9%

CINEBENCH R10 render time (seconds) benchmark

Measures time taken to render a photo-realistic 3D image using CINEMA 4D software engine.
100%
49.9%

    AMD Sempron 145           Intel Celeron E3400

CrystalMark ALU benchmark

Runs Fibonacci, Napierian, Eratosthenes and QuickSort integer performance tests on all CPU cores, and reports the sum of results.
100%
43.4%

CrystalMark FPU benchmark

Executes MikoFPU, RandMeanSS, FFT and Mandelbrot FPU-dependent tests using all CPU cores, and reports the sum of results.
100%
49.7%

Euler3D benchmark

100%
59.8%

FLAC encoding - multiple processes benchmark

Reports the number of songs, converted from WAV to FLAC format by all CPU cores using the best possible compression.
100%
50.2%

Fritz Chess Benchmark benchmark

100%
48.0%

    AMD Sempron 145           Intel Celeron E3400

H.264 video encoding - multiple processes benchmark

Measures the number of frames, converted by all logical processors from MPEG2 format to H.264 format using single-pass method and high quality settings.
100%
54.0%

H.264 video encoding - multithreaded benchmark

Measures the number of frames, converted by all logical processors from MPEG2 format to H.264 format using multi-threading system calls, dual-pass method and high quality settings.
100%
70.5%

LAME MP3 encoding - multiple processes benchmark

Reports the number of MP3 songs, encoded by all CPU cores per one minute.
100%
45.8%

MySQL 5.0.27 - selecting data benchmark

Shows the number of SQL requests per second served by MySQL server v5.0.27, running on the same computer. This test does not scale beyond 6 CPU cores.
100%
59.1%

Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) benchmark

Runs Dhrystone test on all cores, and reports estimated integer performance in MIPS (Millions of Instructions Per Second).
100%
43.9%

    AMD Sempron 145           Intel Celeron E3400

Sandra MultiMedia Floating Point (it/s) benchmark

100%
45.0%

Sandra MultiMedia Integer (it/s) benchmark

100%
53.8%

Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) benchmark

Runs Whetstone test on all cores, and reports estimated floating-point performance in MFLOPS (Millions of Floating-Point Operations Per Second).
100%
51.8%

Sandra Whetstone SSE2 (MFLOPS) benchmark

Runs SSE2-enabled Whetstone test on all cores, and reports estimated floating-point performance in MFLOPS (Millions of Floating-Point Operations Per Second).
100%
44.2%

XVid video encoding - multiple processes benchmark

Reports how many frames per second can be transcoded by all CPU cores from MPEG2 to XVid (MPEG4) format, utilizing single-pass conversion method.
100%
58.8%

    AMD Sempron 145           Intel Celeron E3400

wPrime v1.55 (32M) benchmark

wPrime benchmark measures time taken to calculate square roots of numbers from 1 to 33554431.
100%
57.8%


Sempron 145 vs Intel Celeron E3400 graphics benchmarks

Graphics benchmarks depend on the type of integrated or discrete graphics adapter, and to less extent on the processor performance. Because these benchmarks are synthetic, they may not truly represent gaming performance. However, they still can be used to estimate whether one processor will perform faster or slower than another CPU in games and other 3D tasks.


    AMD Sempron 145           Intel Celeron E3400

3DMark03 game score benchmark

Measures graphics and 3D game performance of discrete and integrated GPUs using 4 different game simulations, that have varying level of DirectX support from version 7 to version 9.
100%
99.6%

3DMark2001 score benchmark

Runs a series of game simulations and feature tests to measure graphics and 3D game performance of discrete and integrated GPUs. It utilizes a single CPU core, and it is compatible with DirectX 8 and later APIs.
100%
98.9%

CINEBENCH R10 OpenGL score benchmark

100%
95.7%


Sempron 145 vs Intel Celeron E3400 memory performance

Memory-intensive tests or programs move large amounts of data to/from memory, and they depend more on memory throughput and the size of on-chip caches, rather than on CPU integer/FP/SIMD performance.


    AMD Sempron 145           Intel Celeron E3400

7Zip compressing/decompressing speed (1 thread) benchmark

100%
87.7%

CrystalMark Memory benchmark

Evaluates Read, Write, Read/Write and Cache memory bandwidth score. The final result is the sum of measured results.
100%
99.9%

PCMark2002 Memory score benchmark

100%
59.5%

WinRAR compressing/decompressing speed benchmark

100%
70.2%

CPUIDs

The table below compares two random CPUID records for AMD Sempron 145 and Intel Celeron E3400 microprocessors, that were submitted to our CPUID database. Please note that different steppings of Intel processors, identified by S-spec numbers or CPUID, may have slightly different features. For that reason the comparison table below only applies to CPUs with specific S-Spec number / CPUID.

  CPUID 1 CPUID 2
ManufacturerAMDIntel
CPU FamilySempronCeleron Dual-Core
Model / Processor Number145E3400
Frequency2793 MHz2600 MHz
CWID version0.4
Part numberSDX145HBK13GMAT80571RG0641ML
S-Spec / Stepping CodeAAEGC AE 0945APMWSLGTZ
 
General information
VendorAuthenticAMDGenuineIntel
Processor name (BIOS)AMD Sempron(tm) Processor 145 ProcessorIntel(R) Celeron(R) CPU E3400 @ 2.60GHz
Processor name (CWID)AMD Sempron(tm) 145 Processor 
Cores12
Logical processors12
Processor typeOriginal OEM Processor
Core steppingDA-C3 
CPUID signature100F631067A
Family16 (010h) 6 (06h)
Model 6 (06h)23 (017h)
Stepping 3 (03h)10 (0Ah)
TLB/Cache details 64-byte Prefetching
Data TLB: 4-KB Pages, 4-way set associative, 256 entries
Data TLB: 4-MB Pages, 4-way set associative, 32 entries
Instruction TLB: 2-MB pages, 4-way, 8 entries or 4M pages, 4-way, 4 entries
Instruction TLB: 4-KB Pages, 4-way set associative, 128 entries
L1 Data TLB: 4-KB pages, 4-way set associative, 16 entries
L1 Data TLB: 4-MB pages, 4-way set associative, 16 entries
 
Cache
L1 data: Associativity2-way set associative8-way set associative
L1 data: Comments Direct-mapped
L1 data: Line size64 bytes
L1 data: Lines per tag1 
L1 data: Size64 KB2 x 32 KB
L1 instruction: Associativity2-way set associative8-way set associative
L1 instruction: Comments Direct-mapped
L1 instruction: Line size64 bytes
L1 instruction: Lines per tag1 
L1 instruction: Size64 KB2 x 32 KB
L2: Associativity16-way set associative4-way set associative
L2: Comments Non-inclusive|Direct-mapped|Shared between all cores
L2: Line size64 bytes
L2: Lines per tag1 
L2: Size1 MB
 
Instruction set extensions
3DNow!+-
AMD extensions to MMX+-
Extensions to 3DNow!+-
MMX+
SSE+
SSE2+
SSE3+
SSE4A+-
SSSE3-+
 
Additional instructions
Advanced Bit manipulation+-
CLFLUSH+
CMOV+
CMPXCHG16B+
CMPXCHG8B+
FXSAVE/FXRSTORE+
MONITOR/MWAIT+
POPCNT+-
PREFETCH/PREFETCHW+-
RDTSCP+-
SKINIT/STGI support+-
SYSCALL/SYSRET+-
SYSENTER/SYSEXIT+
XSAVE/XRESTORE states-+
 
Major features
64-bit / Intel 64+
Enhanced SpeedStep-+
Intel Virtualization-+
NX bit/XD-bit+-
On-chip Floating Point Unit+
PowerNow! / Cool'n'Quiet+-
Secure Virtual Machine (Virtualization)+-
 
Other features
1 GB large page support+-
100MHz multiplier control+-
128-bit SSE instructions+-
36-bit page-size extensions+
64-bit debug store-+
Advanced programmable interrupt controller+
CPL qualified debug store-+
Debug store-+
Debugging extensions+
Digital Thermal Sensor capability-+
Extended APIC space+-
FXSAVE/FXRSTOR optimizations+-
Hardware P-state control+-
Hardware thermal control+-
Instruction based sampling+-
LAHF/SAHF support in 64-bit mode+
LBR virtualization+-
LOCK MOV CR0 means MOV CR8+-
Machine check architecture+
Machine check exception+
Memory-type range registers+
Misaligned SSE mode+-
Model-specific registers+
Nested page tables+-
OS visible workaround+-
Page attribute table+
Page global extension+
Page-size extensions (4MB pages)+
Pending break enable-+
Perfmon and Debug capability-+
Physical address extensions+
SVM lock+-
Self-snoop-+
Software thermal control+-
Support for NRIP save+-
THERMTRIP+-
TSC rate is ensured to be invariant across all states+-
Temperature sensor+-
Thermal monitor-+
Thermal monitor 2-+
Thermal monitor and software controlled clock facilities-+
Time stamp counter+
Virtual 8086-mode enhancements+
Watchdog timer support+-
xTPR Update Control-+
+ - feature is supported
- - feature is not supported
Features, not supported by all processors in the table, are not displayed

Comments (0)
Terms and Conditions · Privacy Policy · Contact Us (c) Copyright 2003 - 2010 Gennadiy Shvets