| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Should there be an increase in upload size for pix? |
| Yes |
|
30% |
[ 3 ] |
| No |
|
70% |
[ 7 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 10 |
|
| Author |
Message |
jd
Joined: 01 Jan 2006
Posts: 1565
Location: Canada
|
 Posted: Tue Apr 25, 2006 9:14 am Post subject: Increasing file upload size limitations. |
 |
|
Ok, really need to increase the Picture upload size ! I mean really ,comme on now ! Does anyone not agree with this?
Let's make a POLL on it shall we !
Make it at least 1mb or something...
Glin 
Last edited by jd on Tue Apr 25, 2006 9:17 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JAC
Joined: 24 Jul 2005
Posts: 3430
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 25, 2006 9:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
| aww.. I like the bubble cam.. has it gone? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
slava
Joined: 24 Jul 2005
Posts: 377
Location: Dnipropetrovs'k, Ukraine
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 25, 2006 11:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Did you think about Genna?
Use imageshack.us, it gives a meg per image.
_________________
United Processors (former site).
Introducing the 1010, a one-bit processor.
INSTRUCTION SET
Code | Mnemonic | What
0 | NOP | No Operation
1 | JMP | Jump (address specified by next 2 bits)
Now Available for only 12 1/2 cents! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
debs3759
Joined: 18 Jan 2006
Posts: 5132
Location: In the computer room
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 25, 2006 11:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
I don't think 1M per image is reasonable. People would then want more total storage space per registered account (5M wouldn't hold much if you upload images of 1M). I have sometimes thought it would be useful to be able to upload 200K or maybe 250K, but I have yet to find an image that can't be split or reduced in size with Photoshop without losing viewable image quality. Only time I want to upload images over 150k is when I ahve multiple chips in one scan, and they can always be either reduced in size (pixels or quality) while still seeing any detail....
_________________
OMG, I finally found out what's wrong with my brain:
On the left side, there's nothing right, and on the right side there's nothing left!
Debs |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Hippo
Joined: 01 Feb 2006
Posts: 378
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 25, 2006 12:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| If it's a big image or file host it on your own webserver and link to it. Simple as tbh. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
sammyc
Joined: 09 Dec 2005
Posts: 1667
Location: LANCASHIRE
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 25, 2006 12:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I can easily get a 1600x1200 image on here glin glin. no need to make file sizes any bigger. rememebr it takes some people a good few minutes to download a mb
_________________
4000+ chips.
4004-P4. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jd
Joined: 01 Jan 2006
Posts: 1565
Location: Canada
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 25, 2006 1:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ok ,no problem , just poling a vote!
I'm gonna make another interesting poll in a few....
Glin |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jd
Joined: 01 Jan 2006
Posts: 1565
Location: Canada
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 25, 2006 1:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| slava wrote: | Did you think about Genna?
Use imageshack.us, it gives a meg per image. |
Not sure what your implying with that?  yes?
But anyways, yes I had thought about Genna, as a matter of fact I know this site probly cost to run, and any changes could mean an increase in $ to do so.
I have another Poll I'm gonna do here in a minute, you might want to vue that differently.
Glin |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
chiptalk
Joined: 17 Jun 2003
Posts: 1837
Location: USA
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 25, 2006 2:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Why not use photobucket etc? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
