| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Chiefish
Joined: 23 Sep 2007
Posts: 2108
Location: Northwest N.J. U.S.A
|
 Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2009 3:27 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
Ok But i am sure i have more non x86 than i do of the x86 cpus. Thanks for the answers 
Most of my x86 cpus are common ones as well so ill see if theres anything i can even add to the database.
_________________
"The only reason for time is so that everything doesn't happen at once." A.E.
Check out my collection at http://www.chiefish.com/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Neon_WA
Joined: 08 Nov 2008
Posts: 6468
Location: Perth, West Australia
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 09, 2009 1:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
started adding in my collection
been great so far, only one small hiccup where it attached the same pic to two different cpus.
i ended up manually changing the file name and then it was happy
at this rate it will probably take me at least a month to add my whole collection 
thx a lot Mixeur
_________________
There are 10 types of people in this world:
those who understand binary and those who don't. ~Author Unknown
http://neon-wa.x86-guide.com/en/collection.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CPUShack
Joined: 16 Jun 2003
Posts: 12840
Location: State of Jefferson, USA
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 09, 2009 2:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
be cool if it supported 2 pics per CPU, then you could have front and back pics.
When researching various CPU's not having the markings from the back is very frustrating
_________________
***I Aim to Misbehave.***
Some where out there . There's a bullet with your name on it .....
Trick is, to die of old age before it finds you.
Visit The CPU Shack of microprocessor history and information. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Neon_WA
Joined: 08 Nov 2008
Posts: 6468
Location: Perth, West Australia
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 09, 2009 2:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
| CPUShack wrote: | be cool if it supported 2 pics per CPU, then you could have front and back pics.
When researching various CPU's not having the markings from the back is very frustrating |
it does support two pics
but i have decided for most, just to do the one only for now
mainly to save bandwidth, but i am going to add in the comments section, the text on the bottom
_________________
There are 10 types of people in this world:
those who understand binary and those who don't. ~Author Unknown
http://neon-wa.x86-guide.com/en/collection.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CPUShack
Joined: 16 Jun 2003
Posts: 12840
Location: State of Jefferson, USA
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 09, 2009 2:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
ok coolness (I havent used it since I have my own site)
_________________
***I Aim to Misbehave.***
Some where out there . There's a bullet with your name on it .....
Trick is, to die of old age before it finds you.
Visit The CPU Shack of microprocessor history and information. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mixeur
Joined: 06 Jan 2005
Posts: 2271
Location: Sochaux, France
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 09, 2009 3:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Neon_WA wrote: |
been great so far, only one small hiccup where it attached the same pic to two different cpus.
i ended up manually changing the file name and then it was happy
|
Strange. What was the name of the pic ? and the cpus ?
Thanks.
PS : I will change the collection page to avoid showing "No picture" image on back photo when there is only top image uploaded. It will look nicer for your collection, I think.
_________________
Register on x86-guide.com to manage and share your collection on-line !
Need to find a x86 ? Go to http://www.x86-guide.com ! Over 5000 chips listed ! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
johnorun
Joined: 04 Apr 2008
Posts: 2681
Location: Chicago, IL- US
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 09, 2009 6:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Mixeur wrote: | Firefox rulez   |
Agreed!
Is there a way to migrate Excel data to my collection list?
This would save countless hours of re-entering chip data, if it's possible! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Neon_WA
Joined: 08 Nov 2008
Posts: 6468
Location: Perth, West Australia
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 09, 2009 7:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
In Pentiums, my collection is also made up of variations in markings.
So i might have a multiple of the same part number. Like iComp and iComp2 or i75 & iPP on the die cap or A80502-100 & A80502100 in the same sSpec.
It isnt obvious in the main listing, but i note it in the comments section along with the base markings.
| Mixeur wrote: | Strange. What was the name of the pic ? and the cpus ?
Thanks. |
added SL22M icomp >> bp120_sl22m.jpg
then SL22M iComp2 >> bp120_i2_sl22m.jpg
when i added the second pic it had attached also to the first SL22M
i deleted the pic on the first and it deleted also the second
manually added correct file name for first and it relinked automatically.
then had to uploaded a new second pic, thinking the file name was the prob, i changed the second pic to bp120i2_sl22m.jpg
this isnt a problem as the correct information is updated >> when i edit one in the database it tells me that i have successfully updated a different cpu filename.
for example i edited box 75 gold cap and it tells i have successfully updated the AMD 486-66 in the database
| Mixeur wrote: | | PS : I will change the collection page to avoid showing "No picture" image on back photo when there is only top image uploaded. It will look nicer for your collection, I think. |
Yes that would be great, thanks
Can you change Irland to Ireland in the database, please
it would be nice if a short comments section showed up under "Functional State' section, where i a comment like BP80502-100/BP80502100 or iComp/iComp2/No iComp or (TM)/(R) would show to make it obvious the difference without going into the individual cpu page.
_________________
There are 10 types of people in this world:
those who understand binary and those who don't. ~Author Unknown
http://neon-wa.x86-guide.com/en/collection.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mixeur
Joined: 06 Jan 2005
Posts: 2271
Location: Sochaux, France
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 10, 2009 1:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Neon_WA wrote: |
added SL22M icomp >> bp120_sl22m.jpg
then SL22M iComp2 >> bp120_i2_sl22m.jpg
when i added the second pic it had attached also to the first SL22M
i deleted the pic on the first and it deleted also the second
manually added correct file name for first and it relinked automatically.
then had to uploaded a new second pic, thinking the file name was the prob, i changed the second pic to bp120i2_sl22m.jpg
|
I will work on that to find out where was the problem next week
| Neon_WA wrote: |
this isnt a problem as the correct information is updated >> when i edit one in the database it tells me that i have successfully updated a different cpu filename.
for example i edited box 75 gold cap and it tells i have successfully updated the AMD 486-66 in the database
|
I know that issue. I will correct it tonight. It will be easy because I already corrected same issue for first cpu entering.
| Neon_WA wrote: |
Can you change Irland to Ireland in the database, please
|
Done ! Thanks !
| Neon_WA wrote: |
it would be nice if a short comments section showed up under "Functional State' section, where i a comment like BP80502-100/BP80502100 or iComp/iComp2/No iComp or (TM)/(R) would show to make it obvious the difference without going into the individual cpu page. |
Yes I was thinking about that. I have to try to see if the design can support many lines like there could be in the comment.
_________________
Register on x86-guide.com to manage and share your collection on-line !
Need to find a x86 ? Go to http://www.x86-guide.com ! Over 5000 chips listed ! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mixeur
Joined: 06 Jan 2005
Posts: 2271
Location: Sochaux, France
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 10, 2009 1:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
| johnorun wrote: | | Mixeur wrote: | | Firefox rulez |
Agreed!
Is there a way to migrate Excel data to my collection list?
This would save countless hours of re-entering chip data, if it's possible! |
It is possible depending on your excel file columns and content. I already made that for entering huge amount of sspec and partnumbers.
Send me your file by e-mail and I will see what is possible to be done.
_________________
Register on x86-guide.com to manage and share your collection on-line !
Need to find a x86 ? Go to http://www.x86-guide.com ! Over 5000 chips listed ! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Neon_WA
Joined: 08 Nov 2008
Posts: 6468
Location: Perth, West Australia
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 10, 2009 1:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Mixeur wrote: | | Neon_WA wrote: |
it would be nice if a short comments section showed up under "Functional State' section, where i a comment like BP80502-100/BP80502100 or iComp/iComp2/No iComp or (TM)/(R) would show to make it obvious the difference without going into the individual cpu page. |
Yes I was thinking about that. I have to try to see if the design can support many lines like there could be in the comment. |
be nice even if it had to be a seperate input box.. up to 30-50 characters long
_________________
There are 10 types of people in this world:
those who understand binary and those who don't. ~Author Unknown
http://neon-wa.x86-guide.com/en/collection.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Leevmeister
Joined: 16 Apr 2008
Posts: 409
Location: Rotterdam, The Netherlands
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 10, 2009 7:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
I started translating the site into my language
Dutch language that is  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mixeur
Joined: 06 Jan 2005
Posts: 2271
Location: Sochaux, France
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Neon_WA
Joined: 08 Nov 2008
Posts: 6468
Location: Perth, West Australia
|
| Posted: Sat Apr 11, 2009 5:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Mixeur wrote: | | PS : I will change the collection page to avoid showing "No picture" image on back photo when there is only top image uploaded. It will look nicer for your collection, I think. |
Thanks, yes it looks a lot better
i didnt like the pics i had already done so just replacing them with new ones, before i start adding more to the collection
_________________
There are 10 types of people in this world:
those who understand binary and those who don't. ~Author Unknown
http://neon-wa.x86-guide.com/en/collection.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Leevmeister
Joined: 16 Apr 2008
Posts: 409
Location: Rotterdam, The Netherlands
|
| Posted: Sat Apr 11, 2009 11:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
| i'm on page 12 from 20 with translating, site really starts to look like it's a real dutch site |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
![[ Hidden ]](http://cdn.cpu-world.com/forum/templates/CPUWorld/images/lang_english/icon_email.gif "[ Hidden ]"){kind=icon}
