| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
gshv
Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 7065
Location: Fairfax, VA USA
|
 Posted: Thu Mar 02, 2006 11:29 pm Post subject: Intel X8008 |
 |
|
I was looking for 8008-related stuff on the net, and found a picture of Intel X8008 on some site that mirrors wikipedia pages. I was quite surprised that they used a picture of X8008. Here is a link to wikipedia site:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_8008
Gennadiy |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CPUShack
Joined: 16 Jun 2003
Posts: 12986
Location: State of Jefferson, USA
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 02, 2006 11:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
wow very nice, again it looks like the 'X' was an afterthought in printing.
_________________
***I Aim to Misbehave.***
Some where out there . There's a bullet with your name on it .....
Trick is, to die of old age before it finds you.
Visit The CPU Shack of microprocessor history and information. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
slava
Joined: 24 Jul 2005
Posts: 377
Location: Dnipropetrovs'k, Ukraine
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 03, 2006 4:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
How much is this chip worth?
_________________
United Processors (former site).
Introducing the 1010, a one-bit processor.
INSTRUCTION SET
Code | Mnemonic | What
0 | NOP | No Operation
1 | JMP | Jump (address specified by next 2 bits)
Now Available for only 12 1/2 cents! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
chiptalk
Joined: 17 Jun 2003
Posts: 1837
Location: USA
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 03, 2006 8:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
| CPUShack wrote: | | wow very nice, again it looks like the 'X' was an afterthought in printing. |
Steady hand and a good sharpie marker.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
southsails
Joined: 10 Jan 2006
Posts: 16
Location: Pittsburgh, PA USA
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 03, 2006 11:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Isn't there one too many numerals on the datecode below? Makes me extra suspicious. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
![[ Hidden ]](http://cdn.cpu-world.com/forum/templates/CPUWorld/images/lang_english/icon_email.gif "[ Hidden ]"){kind=icon}
