Details of Intel Haswell microarchitecture leakedSome preliminary information about about Intel's "Shark Bay" platform and "Haswell" processor core, the next generation after Ivy Bridge, surfaced on the net. Where Ivy Bridge will have 2 platforms, Chief River for the mobile platform and Maho Bay for the desktop platform, Haswell has Shark Bay for both. As you might expect, it also offers a performance boost, although it uses the same 22nm trigate technology. Haswell is expected to offer a 20% per core performance boost over Ivy Bridge, as well as greater integration and reduced power consumption. According to VR-Zone "the performance improvements are expected to be limited to increased instruction per cycle parallelism with new execution ports and better prefetching and branch handling for per-thread performance improvement, as well as AVX2 improvements like fused multiply add (which doesn't always speed up things) with doubled cache bandwidth to feed all that". Haswell has, of course, got it's own chipset, called "Lynx Point". The mobile and Desktop platforms will have this on a separate chip, as with previous platforms, but the Ultra Low Power chips (ultrabook) will have the chipset integrated into the processor. The ultrabook chips will have only 2 cores, while the mobile processors will have 4 and the desktop processors will have 2 or 4 cores. The processors will support Hyperthreading, but it's unclear at this time which parts it will be enabled for.
The improvements with integration include having the VRMs fully integrated into the CPU, a great help to the power design, as well as overclockers. Additionally, the display ports will be on the CPU die, removing the need for external I/O hubs. This will simply the manufacture of motherboards and systems, as there is no longer a need for VRMs on the board, and HDMI/DisplayPort connectors being fed directly from the CPU. Only VGA will be handled by the Lynx Point chipset. This leaves more room on the chipset for implementing interfaces such as USB, SATA3 and LAN. The IGP will come in 3 performance oriented versions, GT1-GT3. The desktop version will have versions up to GT2, but the mobile and ultrabook versions will have versions up to GT3. It is beyond me why desktop processors have the slowest graphics options. Haswell also indicated a return to Dual-Channel DDR3. The ultrabook processors support DDR3-L (1.35V) and LPDDR3 (1.2V). Mobile processors support DDR3-L, and desktop processors support DDR3 and DDR3-L. All processors look like they support 1600MHz memory. The idle power consumption is significantly reduced, something which will benefit untold numbers of consumers who leave their computer idle, as well as benefitting users of low power, portable devices. TDP for the ultrabook processors is 15W. For the mobiles it's 37/47/57W, and the desktop has TDP of 35/45/65/95W. All these changes mean we also have a new pinout. Haswell processors on the desktop will come in an LGA 1150 scket (socket H3). The ultrabook processors will be in a BGA package, and the mobiles will be BGA or rPGA-947 (socket G3). Related News (newer articles):
Aug 31, 2012: Basic features of Haswell Core, Pentium and Celeron CPUs
Aug 23, 2012: New video and graphics features of Haswell CPUs Aug 21, 2012: Package options of desktop and mobile Haswell processors Jul 10, 2012: Launch schedule of Intel Haswell processors Jun 21, 2012: First details of Haswell-EP processors emerge Feb 10, 2012: Haswell to launch in March - June 2013
|
Search CPU-WorldIdentify part | ||||||
It's great news. Looking forward to incoming cpu
im waiting for haswell
TDP Not reduced!! Ugh disgusting
37w, 47w and 57w for Mobile chips? Ugh! We had 55w TDP quad core mobile chips with the 45nm first generation 2GHZ core i7 mobile chips that were released back in 2009! I would expect at least a 2.6GHZ constantly clocked quad core Haswell chip at 37 watts. Maybe 57w is reserved for just the extreme chips?
I am also highly disappointed in no quad core options in the mobile sector.
AMD Piledriver here I come.
Err, I mean I am highly disappointed of no 6-core processors in the mobile sector with Haswell
Re:
Is hexa core even needed? most games can't even handle quadcore. I grid so I would use all threads there are but not the average user.
Don't forget that haswell is all about energy efficient cpu (14nm one).
I hope we can get hexa and octa core cpu