Mini Review
AMD A6-3600 advantages
Picture is not available |
AMD FX-8300 advantages
![]() |
A6-3600 vs FX-8300 estimated performance
The charts in the section below demonstrate relative performance of A6-3600 and FX-8300 CPUs. Results for FX-8300 were determined based on a variety of tests. Performance numbers for A6-3600 were approximated from benchmark results of other microprocessors with the same core and microarchitecture. It is important to note that the estimate has greater error of margin than results obtained using real-world benchmarks. Additionally, this is an averaged performance, and the displayed results may differ from results, that you may see in individual tests. | |
- AMD A6-3600 - AMD FX-8300 |
A6-3600 vs FX-8300 specifications comparison
The graphs below show the difference between AMD A6-3600 and FX-8300 most important characteristics. These features, along with an IPC (instructions per cycle) number, determine how well a processor performs. The "Operating frequency" graph uses dark color to represent base frequency, while lighter area is for extra frequency, provided by Turbo feature. Darker area on the "On-chip cache" graph is for the On-chip L2 cache. Lighter area is for the L3 cache cache. Although the L3 cache cache is usually larger than the On-chip L2 cache, it is always slower.
Higher is better |
Higher is better |
||||||||||||||||||
- AMD A6-3600 - AMD FX-8300 | |||||||||||||||||||
Higher is better |
Lower is better |
Detailed side by side comparison of A6-3600 vs FX-8300 specs can be found in the Specifications section below. Much more detailed comparison of low level features of both processors is located in the CPUIDs section.
Pros and Cons summary
A6-3600 | FX-8300 | |
General recommendations: |
General recommendations: |
|
Drawbacks: |
Drawbacks: |
Similar processors
A6-3600 | FX-8300 | |
Similar microprocessors are based on the same core and fit the same socket as A6-3600 and AMD FX-8300.