Mini Review
Intel Celeron E3300 advantages
![]() |
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 (BGA) advantages
Picture is not available |
E3300 vs T7100 estimated performance
The charts in the table below demonstrate performance of Celeron E3300 and Core 2 Duo T7100 (BGA) processors. Results for Celeron E3300 were determined based on a number of benchmarks. Performance numbers for Core 2 Duo T7100 (BGA) were approximated from test results of other microprocessors with the same core and microarchitecture. It is important to note that the estimate has greater error of margin than results obtained using real-world tests. Also, this is an averaged performance, and the difference in individual benchmarks may be lower or higher than what you see in the charts below. | |
- Intel Celeron E3300 - Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 (BGA) |
E3300 vs T7100 specifications comparison
The graphs below compare the most important characteristics of the Celeron E3300 and T7100 processors. These features, together with an IPC (instructions per cycle) number, determine how well a microprocessor performs. Darker area on the "On-chip cache" graph is for the On-chip L1 cache. Lighter area is for the L2 cache cache. While the L2 cache cache is usually larger than the On-chip L1 cache, it is always slower.
Higher is better |
Higher is better |
||||||||||||||||||
- Intel Celeron E3300 - Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 (BGA) | |||||||||||||||||||
Higher is better |
Lower is better |
Detailed side by side comparison of E3300 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 (BGA) specs can be found in the Specifications section below. Much more detailed comparison of internal features of both CPUs is located in the CPUIDs section.
Pros and Cons summary
Celeron E3300 | Core 2 Duo T7100 (BGA) | |
General recommendations: |
General recommendations: |
|
Drawbacks: |
Drawbacks: |
Similar processors
Celeron E3300 | Core 2 Duo T7100 (BGA) | |
Similar microprocessors use the same socket and architecture as Celeron E3300 and T7100, but their performance and other characteristics are a bit different.