Mini Review
AMD Athlon 64 4000+ (rev. CG) advantages
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 (Socket P) advantages
4000+ vs T7250 specifications comparison
The graphs below compare the most important T7250 and AMD 4000+ characteristics. These features, together with an IPC (instructions per cycle) number, determine how well a CPU performs. Darker area on the "On-chip cache" graph is for the On-chip L1 cache. Lighter area is for the L2 cache cache. While the L2 cache cache is usually larger than the On-chip L1 cache, it is always slower.
Higher is better |
Higher is better |
||||||||||||||||||
- AMD Athlon 64 4000+ (rev. CG) - Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 (Socket P) | |||||||||||||||||||
Higher is better |
Lower is better |
Detailed side by side comparison of AMD Athlon 64 4000+ (rev. CG) vs Core 2 Duo T7250 (Socket P) specs can be found in the Specifications section below. Even more detailed comparison of low level features of both CPUs is located in the CPUIDs section.
Pros and Cons summary
Athlon 64 4000+ (rev. CG) | Core 2 Duo T7250 (Socket P) | |
General recommendations: |
General recommendations: |
|
Drawbacks: |
Drawbacks: |
Similar processors
Athlon 64 4000+ (rev. CG) | Core 2 Duo T7250 (Socket P) | |
Similar microprocessors use the same socket and architecture as 4000+ and Core 2 Duo T7250 (Socket P), but their performance and other characteristics are a bit different.