| Author |
Message |
| hugo929 |
Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2007 1:26 pm Post subject: |
|
hi, JAC, why? can you explain more? thanks!
Datacode discrepancies? |
|
 |
| JAC |
Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2007 12:18 pm Post subject: |
|
The printing does not look good.
Here is another fake 486, notice the same back.
 |
|
 |
| hugo929 |
Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2007 11:48 am Post subject: |
|
| and this SX953 is fake too? |
|
 |
| hugo929 |
Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2007 11:46 am Post subject: |
|
| picture is here:-) |
|
 |
| hugo929 |
Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2007 6:27 pm Post subject: |
|
| JAC wrote: | | Do you have a picture of the back Hugo? |
sorry,jac, no at this moment, will post later.
hugo |
|
 |
| JAC |
Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2007 2:34 pm Post subject: |
|
| Do you have a picture of the back Hugo? |
|
 |
| FDIV |
Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:56 pm Post subject: |
|
| looks pretty fake to me. I have seen worse fakes but this one is a very nice example. |
|
 |
| el_gecko |
Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2007 7:22 am Post subject: |
|
| Others seems genuine. |
|
 |
| hugo929 |
Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2007 5:01 am Post subject: |
|
No more ????  |
|
 |
| Cpuswe |
|
 |
| hugo929 |
|
 |
| CPUShack |
Posted: Wed Dec 26, 2007 6:10 pm Post subject: |
|
| wow thats a bad fake |
|
 |
| JAC |
Posted: Wed Dec 26, 2007 5:58 pm Post subject: |
|
| Can you post a picture of the back please Hugo? |
|
 |
| hugo929 |
Posted: Wed Dec 26, 2007 5:55 pm Post subject: |
|
 |
|
 |
| el_gecko |
Posted: Wed Dec 26, 2007 5:41 pm Post subject: |
|
| 200% faked. |
|
 |