| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
My_B
Joined: 30 May 2017 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Tue May 30, 2017 6:05 am Post subject: More cores for faster multi-tab browsing...? |
|
|
| The main thing slowing down the performance of my laptop is when I have multiple internet browser tabs open simultaneously. I know there are better ways to manage this. But aside from those, would it help to get a laptop with more cores, like a quad-core i7? What about a lower-lever quad-core AMD? What else helps for this - larger cache, RAM, hyperthreading, clockspeed? Thanks. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
adamajer

Joined: 23 Oct 2018 Posts: 403 Location: United Kingdom
|
Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2018 4:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
| SSD and more memory is the one I'd concentrate on. Any quad core modern-ish cpu above 2Ghz should do for everyday multitasking. SSD Drive makes a huge difference and Also the amount of installed memory(at least 8Gb) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Parallel
Joined: 05 Aug 2018 Posts: 42 Location: Southwest Quadrant of Michigan
|
Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2018 9:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Agree with Adam. You'd be amazed at how fast tabs eat memory. Memory would be the first place to look. I don't think I've come across CPU as a bottleneck in any setup I have encountered with regard to tabbed browsing unless I was looking at a system that was 6-7 generations old (and even then, it would have to be a weak processor from that generation) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cuttingedgecs
Joined: 08 Oct 2017 Posts: 1764 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2018 3:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I would suggest that when you experience slowness, you use Task Manager to work out if your CPU load is high, or you have run out of memory etc. I agree with the others that it is usually a memory issue, but there are some sites that are poorly scripted, or use your CPU to mine cryptocurrency etc that can significantly bump up CPU usage. Rather than guess it's always best to use available tools to check. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CPUShack

Joined: 16 Jun 2003 Posts: 34259 Location: State of Jefferson, USA
|
Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2018 4:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Parallel wrote: | | Agree with Adam. You'd be amazed at how fast tabs eat memory. Memory would be the first place to look. I don't think I've come across CPU as a bottleneck in any setup I have encountered with regard to tabbed browsing unless I was looking at a system that was 6-7 generations old (and even then, it would have to be a weak processor from that generation) |
Yup I still run a first gen i7 (I think I have faster CPUs in my collection!) Modern browsers are horrid with memory, 8GB on my machine and Chrome is nearly unusable with multiple tabs open. Runs decent with 12GB though _________________ New for 2025! The CPU Shack has a co-processor!
Visit The CPU Shack of microprocessor history and information. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|