| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| What resolution is your screen set at? |
| 800x600 |
|
2% |
[ 1 ] |
| 1024x768 |
|
2% |
[ 1 ] |
| 1280x1024 |
|
13% |
[ 5 ] |
| 1440x900 |
|
8% |
[ 3 ] |
| 1600x1200 |
|
8% |
[ 3 ] |
| 1920x1080 |
|
19% |
[ 7 ] |
| 1920x1200 |
|
11% |
[ 4 ] |
| Other |
|
33% |
[ 12 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 36 |
|
| Author |
Message |
smithy
Joined: 27 Apr 2008
Posts: 2906
Location: Sydney, Australia
|
 Posted: Thu May 05, 2011 7:22 am Post subject: Resolution of your screen revised!! |
 |
|
OK, let's try again....sorry missed a few key resolutions 
Just working away on my site and trying to gauge what resolution members have their screens set to, so I can optimise the display |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
D.8080
Joined: 03 Apr 2006
Posts: 1474
Location: Italy
|
| Posted: Thu May 05, 2011 7:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
1366*768
 New poll |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Neon
Joined: 04 Feb 2008
Posts: 1512
Location: Dallas, Texas, USA
|
| Posted: Thu May 05, 2011 8:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
1366 x 768 on my notebook
1600 x 1200 on my desktop |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Chiefish
Joined: 23 Sep 2007
Posts: 2153
Location: Northwest N.J. U.S.A
|
| Posted: Thu May 05, 2011 10:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
the counter that I use on my site keeps track of all this as the people visit the site, it also will track the browser and windows version as well as alot of other useful info.
_________________
"The only reason for time is so that everything doesn't happen at once." A.E. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
xhoba
Joined: 20 Apr 2009
Posts: 4596
Location: Picardie, France
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gshv
Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 7898
Location: Fairfax, VA USA
|
| Posted: Thu May 05, 2011 11:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
1280 x 768 here. In my opinion, the site should be optimized for 1024 x 768, because good percentage of visitors (15% according to Wikipedia) still use that resolution, but less than 1% uses 800 x 600. 1280 x 1024 is another popular resolution. It's better not to go higher than that.
Gennadiy |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CPUShack
Joined: 16 Jun 2003
Posts: 34259
Location: State of Jefferson, USA
|
| Posted: Thu May 05, 2011 11:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
| gshv wrote: | 1280 x 768 here. In my opinion, the site should be optimized for 1024 x 768, because good percentage of visitors (15% according to Wikipedia) still use that resolution, but less than 1% uses 800 x 600. 1280 x 1024 is another popular resolution. It's better not to go higher than that.
Gennadiy |
Thats about right
Here is what viewers of CPU Shack use:
However, people who are less 'techy' still use lower resolutions
Here is stats from a finance website I manage:
_________________
New for 2025! The CPU Shack has a co-processor!
Visit The CPU Shack of microprocessor history and information. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
silice
Joined: 03 Mar 2009
Posts: 2178
Location: France
|
| Posted: Thu May 05, 2011 11:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi
1600*900 and for theother one 1920*1200
Pascal |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Chook
Joined: 29 Oct 2008
Posts: 2250
Location: Australia
|
| Posted: Thu May 05, 2011 12:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm one of those that still use 1024x768. Never been a fan of wide screen.
_________________
General failure reading disk in drive A
Who's General Failure and why is he reading my disk? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
D.8080
Joined: 03 Apr 2006
Posts: 1474
Location: Italy
|
| Posted: Thu May 05, 2011 2:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Chook wrote: | | I'm one of those that still use 1024x768. Never been a fan of wide screen. |
Same here, and I hate above all things having my face reflected all the time on the screen... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Marcin
Joined: 02 Jan 2005
Posts: 8519
Location: Poland
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JAC
Joined: 24 Jul 2005
Posts: 3469
|
| Posted: Thu May 05, 2011 4:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Need option for 3840 x 1200 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
smithy
Joined: 27 Apr 2008
Posts: 2906
Location: Sydney, Australia
|
| Posted: Thu May 05, 2011 5:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for all your feedback.
JAC - maybe screen size is inversely proportional to some other size 
Chook & Dume - you guys need to move up with the times! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jrmunro
Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 3149
Location: Vancouver, Canada
|
| Posted: Thu May 05, 2011 6:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| 1280 x 720 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
D.8080
Joined: 03 Apr 2006
Posts: 1474
Location: Italy
|
| Posted: Thu May 05, 2011 6:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| smithy wrote: | Thanks for all your feedback.
JAC - maybe screen size is inversely proportional to some other size
Chook & Dume - you guys need to move up with the times! |
I hate 16:9/10... but I can live with it.
But all that glossy stuff they put on them to make colors more vivid just end up having a mirror and needing to dim light like Deckard testing Rachel.......
Resolution is important, house pc has a big 22" full hd, and I love it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
![[ Hidden ]](https://cdn.cpu-world.com/forum/templates/CPUWorld/images/lang_english/icon_email.gif "[ Hidden ]"){kind=icon}
