| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
tlccomp
Joined: 11 May 2006
Posts: 1212
Location: Southeast Wisconsin, USA
|
 Posted: Fri Aug 11, 2006 5:42 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
There should be a law against chip abuse  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jd
Joined: 01 Jan 2006
Posts: 1562
Location: Canada
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 11, 2006 5:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| tlccomp wrote: | | There should be a law against chip abuse |
Ya I know, but I guess when you have to feed the curious, there has to be someone to do it  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CPUShack
Joined: 16 Jun 2003
Posts: 34259
Location: State of Jefferson, USA
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jd
Joined: 01 Jan 2006
Posts: 1562
Location: Canada
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2006 10:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
 ..so sorry...but I had to do-it to silence the "ones" who needed to know the truth about the chips authenticity !
Well, it's ok, next time I say it's what it is, they'll believe me !
JD  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
debs3759
Joined: 18 Jan 2006
Posts: 9477
Location: Northampton, Divided Kingdom
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2006 7:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
I don't think anyone was doubting the authenticity of the chip, people were merely making suggestions you might have overlooked to help you find if there were markings someone else may ahve covered up in the past.
Nice chip anyway, prior to being massacred I also would have bought it just out of curiosity, it was obviously a UV-EPROM and unusual because of the lack of visible markings. I would have done a very high resolution (10000dpi or higher) scan of the core to try and determine if there was any manufacturer specific data written anywhere on the core...)
_________________
My graphics card database can be found at http://www.gpuzoo.com.
I can resist anything except temptation.
Debs |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jd
Joined: 01 Jan 2006
Posts: 1562
Location: Canada
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2006 8:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ya...I could still try that you know (resolution scan)
I'll get on it soon and give results here if I find anything.
Oh and guys/gals, thanx for the considerate offers, but I wouldn't have sold it anyways (since I didn't own one).
Later !
JD |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JAC
Joined: 24 Jul 2005
Posts: 3469
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2006 8:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I would have paid $1000 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gshv
Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 7898
Location: Fairfax, VA USA
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2006 9:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
| CPUShack wrote: | | ah man I would have given ya $10 for that |
You may still buy it for $10 bill cut in half
Gennadiy |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
slava
Joined: 24 Jul 2005
Posts: 379
Location: Dnipro, Ukraine
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 12:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| JD wrote: | No , I didn't try removing the PAINT that covers it , because I must be to busy painting the other ones  wtf ?
...like I got nothing else better to do then waste my time painting worthless eproms ! Thanx Slava ! That's what you think of Canadian's or something... ! |
I never meant to abuse you, man. It was just the unclear picture, that I thought the chip to be white painted.
P.S. I lke Canadians very much I've been to Canada three times.
_________________
Collecting soviet and western CPUs once again -- highfive to old-timers o/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
![[ Hidden ]](https://cdn.cpu-world.com/forum/templates/CPUWorld/images/lang_english/icon_email.gif "[ Hidden ]"){kind=icon}
