| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
hugo929

Joined: 27 Oct 2006 Posts: 6163 Location: China
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Windmiller

Joined: 24 Jun 2005 Posts: 1716 Location: Chapel Hill, NC
|
Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2008 7:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Cpuswe wrote: | | gshv wrote: | | Cpuswe wrote: | My list consist of a dump i made a year or so ago from gennas database and have 179 s-specs (well 178 now that SY126 is a fake) I have 103 of those 178 sspecs. This equals to 75 s-specs left.
This is the list im collecting after.
S106J
...
SZ978 |
This list contains 178 S-spec numbers, so I guess it's a full list of Pentium S-specs, and not a list of "wanted" s-specs.
Gennadiy |
Yupp, sorry for bad english. The list above is a list of all known s-specs to have in a collection. The list im using to know what s-specs to have. Out of those 178 in the list i have 103.
The list in the first post in this thread are s-specs that i have never seen (or documented in chipdb.org) |
Ahhhh, I see. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hugo929

Joined: 27 Oct 2006 Posts: 6163 Location: China
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cpuswe

Joined: 15 Mar 2005 Posts: 2214 Location: Karlskrona, Sweden
|
Posted: Wed Jul 16, 2008 8:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
The list of s-specs is taken from cpu-world.com and it seems like this is (now?) listed as a fake. Removed from wanted list.
To all, this thread has been "away" for a while so its time to bump it. Check if you got any of the chips in the list in the first post. _________________ My collection: http://www.cpucollection.se :::::: http://www.chipdb.org Photos of chips you never knew existed. Now over 6000 different chips in the database. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hugo929

Joined: 27 Oct 2006 Posts: 6163 Location: China
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cpuswe

Joined: 15 Mar 2005 Posts: 2214 Location: Karlskrona, Sweden
|
Posted: Wed Jul 16, 2008 9:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Nice! List updated! _________________ My collection: http://www.cpucollection.se :::::: http://www.chipdb.org Photos of chips you never knew existed. Now over 6000 different chips in the database. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lither
Joined: 04 Dec 2005 Posts: 1362 Location: Taiwan
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
thomsonicus

Joined: 11 Dec 2007 Posts: 226 Location: Poland
|
Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 8:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
does the laser print on the fron lower left corner always indicate the speed? 'coz I never seen anything like this on a non-box one _________________ Power without the price. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cpuswe

Joined: 15 Mar 2005 Posts: 2214 Location: Karlskrona, Sweden
|
Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 9:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
Interesting! I have no idea but, that would indicate that the SL26Q is a fake if Gennas data is correct. Since we in fact are the ones building the reference for this i would have to say that we class the SL26Q as a fake and add yours as the real thing. Will update the database in the coming weeks _________________ My collection: http://www.cpucollection.se :::::: http://www.chipdb.org Photos of chips you never knew existed. Now over 6000 different chips in the database. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gshv

Joined: 01 Feb 2003 Posts: 7898 Location: Fairfax, VA USA
|
Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 4:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The font on the SL26Q CPGA looks very suspicious. And, if I'm not mistaken, Intel used computer-style zero (slashed zero) to mark speed on boxed processors.
Gennadiy |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JAC

Joined: 24 Jul 2005 Posts: 3469
|
Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 5:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| gshv wrote: | The font on the SL26Q CPGA looks very suspicious. And, if I'm not mistaken, Intel used computer-style zero (slashed zero) to mark speed on boxed processors.
Gennadiy |
Interesting. I agree most Intel chips appear to have slashed zero on the top engraving and not slashed zero on the bottom printing.
However, I found this one in my collection online:
Fake? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JAC

Joined: 24 Jul 2005 Posts: 3469
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cpuswe

Joined: 15 Mar 2005 Posts: 2214 Location: Karlskrona, Sweden
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tekxpert
Joined: 27 Mar 2009 Posts: 10 Location: Tasmania
|
Posted: Fri Mar 27, 2009 2:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Whats the reason why some S-spec chips are not found on Intel website?
I had a look for Pentium S-spec I have, but it reports from the Processor Spec Finder that it does'nt exist?
Thanks.  _________________ CPU = One of the most ingenious inventions humans have ever configured and assembled. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cpuswe

Joined: 15 Mar 2005 Posts: 2214 Location: Karlskrona, Sweden
|
Posted: Fri Mar 27, 2009 3:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
Im not sure why but yes there seems to be many chips missing. The further back you get, the more gaps.
Pure speculation... Its just that the s-spec finder was made long after the first Pentiums came out and they do not have detailed documentation easily available. They would need to go dig in the archives to get the info. Or just visit cpu-world.com  _________________ My collection: http://www.cpucollection.se :::::: http://www.chipdb.org Photos of chips you never knew existed. Now over 6000 different chips in the database. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|