| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
D.8080

Joined: 03 Apr 2006 Posts: 1474 Location: Italy
|
Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 1:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You didn't get one.
Why have I quoted your two sentences? What have I quoted?
We don't need to be buddies, as long as this site is up.
Different views. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CPUShack

Joined: 16 Jun 2003 Posts: 34259 Location: State of Jefferson, USA
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cpuswe

Joined: 15 Mar 2005 Posts: 2214 Location: Karlskrona, Sweden
|
Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 2:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| dume wrote: | You didn't get one.
Why have I quoted your two sentences? What have I quoted?
We don't need to be buddies, as long as this site is up.
Different views. |
Sorry did not get that. Thought you meant my first and second post. My mistake.
But to answer your quote then. I have trouble to express what i meant in english since its not my native language. It was not meant as an insult but if you took it that way im sorry. I just meant that i dont think anyone saw anyone making a fool out of anybody other than you. _________________ My collection: http://www.cpucollection.se :::::: http://www.chipdb.org Photos of chips you never knew existed. Now over 6000 different chips in the database. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chiefish

Joined: 23 Sep 2007 Posts: 2153 Location: Northwest N.J. U.S.A
|
Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 2:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hey We are ALL fools at one time or another  _________________ "The only reason for time is so that everything doesn't happen at once." A.E. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
D.8080

Joined: 03 Apr 2006 Posts: 1474 Location: Italy
|
Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 4:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
"If you read out "fool" of this perhaps its your perception you have to check. "
Language error on a whole sentence? I'm still skeptic on this.
But what can I say?
For the rest I give up.
------------------------- |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
doccybrown

Joined: 03 Oct 2005 Posts: 1736 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 7:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
What the heck is going on here?
Let`s agree on this: We are all fools
but a good fool _tries_ to be no fool
I try to be very objective this time!
It seems there is no ultimate truth about the
health hazard of cell phones (not yet).
Scientists on both sides have been arguing
for years (and still do) without finding the
decisive factors for being hazardous or not.
But, and that`s axiomatic, there are interactions
between somatic cells and electromagnetic- and
electric alternating fields. The questions is
do they harm us in any way. The hormone melatonin
is affected (proven). The hormone is believed
to help the somatic cells to kill cancer cells....
Let`s agree on this: Excessive usage of mobile phones
is a bit hazardous.
So, if I only can reduce my personal
cancer risc by 0,1% I will do
anything that is necassary to achieve this.
If you think thats negligible or actually ridiculous
then hey, it`s your choice! But I would feel
bad if I don`t have warned you.
And maybe there are people out there
who didn`t know that cell phones
possibly bear a health risk at all!
You are all responsible for your own life.
If you need and like buy yourself ten mobile phones.
My opinion is that cell phones are as good
as useless and a health risk. Basta.
On food it is really hard to find out what
is most conducive. All fruits I know of that they
are excessivly treated with pesticides I do not buy.
On many fruits you have to junk the rind anyway.
I think eating a bit of anything won`t hurt.
Drinking much water gives the body a good
chance to decontaminate I guess.
For hi-power transmitters I can say that concrete
is shielding electric fields very well. The RFs
are outside, I`m mostly inside my WLAN/bluetoth/DECT/
cellphone-free house.
Other point is that those transmitters are constructed
that way that they spread the waves. Which means
close to it you won`t get blasted away. And it`s a
spatial thing: doubled distance from the tower means
fourfold weaker field strengh. Fourfold distance means
sixteenfold weaker field strengh. At my region I
need very big antennas for receiving any of that
terristical pollution. I`m using (ultra low power) sat for TV.
Switch off the rest and I won`t notice.
/Doccy _________________ Ordem e Progresso |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JAC

Joined: 24 Jul 2005 Posts: 3469
|
Posted: Thu Oct 08, 2009 8:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Cellphones have saved lives, and the odds are one will probably save mine oneday. We are all gonna die oneday, so live and enjoy now sensibly.. sitting in a old age home when I am 99 years old dribbling out of my mouth, looking out the window through my clouded bad vision, pissing my pants and shitting myself is not my idea of life. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
doccybrown

Joined: 03 Oct 2005 Posts: 1736 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Thu Oct 08, 2009 1:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes I must confess that they are very helpful in
emergency situations. I really tought about it
to buy me a cheap one to lay into my
car (with battery pack removed of course)
So you guys just remove the battery packs or switch off -
then you`re save and still proud cell phone owners!
Hmmm, wasn`t it a small isle near Japan were the people
become 100-125 years old, drinking a lot of coral
water and eating their own agricultured, unpolluted food?
And I`m sure I read that most of them are both physically
and mental in the best of health at ages higher than 100.
Cell phones? Hahahahaha!
We are all fools of a materialistic society! Me too, but
for stupid cell phones they won`t get me! _________________ Ordem e Progresso |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wepwawet

Joined: 18 Mar 2004 Posts: 3019 Location: Seligenstadt - Germany
|
Posted: Thu Oct 08, 2009 1:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
wow, some DO think they are followed though they know they think they should not be followed as they think they are followed.
fantastic maniac topic overall:-)
sorry for being a little destructive but I am mad as I realized I missed a big chance to get a bunch of MIL STD 1750 modules for cheap money. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
doccybrown

Joined: 03 Oct 2005 Posts: 1736 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Thu Oct 08, 2009 3:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You`re right wepwa, there you have me!
It`s the pure fear for useless consumption
in a world of mind bending ads
I`m aiming for the highest fun-factor for my
money and not for something people want to
tell me that is fun. Collecting CPUs for example
is not so funny but veeeery thrilling (for me). _________________ Ordem e Progresso |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
doccybrown

Joined: 03 Oct 2005 Posts: 1736 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Thu Oct 08, 2009 3:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
1750 Mil-Std`s?
What went wrong?  _________________ Ordem e Progresso |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wepwawet

Joined: 18 Mar 2004 Posts: 3019 Location: Seligenstadt - Germany
|
Posted: Thu Oct 08, 2009 3:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
those from demotronic.info.
I never zoomed into the pics.
they are all gone.
maybe since years? _________________ You may use the photos I have posted here under CC BY-NC-SA license. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
doccybrown

Joined: 03 Oct 2005 Posts: 1736 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Thu Oct 08, 2009 3:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dang  _________________ Ordem e Progresso |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wepwawet

Joined: 18 Mar 2004 Posts: 3019 Location: Seligenstadt - Germany
|
Posted: Thu Oct 08, 2009 3:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| doccybrown wrote: | ... and not for something people want to
tell me that is fun. |
you are absolutely right there.
And the risk of that gets even gigher after the actual German election.
Just remember wordings like "Lohnnebenkosten" instead of "Sozialbeiträge".
Workers are stupid enough to be happy about a reduction and do not realize they pay double (sometimes even more as insurances get their fee too) for their personal compensation (see Riester-Rente or health-insurance's extra-options).
But you are told all that is a "Sachzwang", a simple matter of case.
When today somebody tells you about obvious knowledge you should know he lies.
"No serious scientist would ever deny that ... AND NOW COMES tHE LIE"
OK, I admit I am a maniac too;-)
To throw in my favourite lie of recent mankind:
I am absolute sure we have a change of climate actually, at least a big rumour (just remember in the 70ies we were told about an upcoming ice age from the same guys, lol).
But I am also sure that has nothing to do with mankind.
Maybe I did a miscalculation but when I calculate the whole weight of the atmosphere, then the weight of 0,03 (roundabout) CO/2 and human production, then cows farths, ants (yes, ants - esp. termites) breath then I know mankind is too small, too unimportant for the actual behavior of our nature. - ratio 1: 1.000.000 - we need about 1000 years to double.
Just as an example, the second interregent time in ancient egypt was caused by a twohundred year period of dry and cold. This is also prooved by arctic ice analytics. Who drove cars at that time?
Why do we consider ourself so important that we KNOW after twenty years WE are responsible for what happens?
We had ice ages where many friends here live at places that were under a thick layer of glaciers for thousands of years.
Conclusion: Do not trade pollution rights, build dykes!
It happens, no matter how many bazillion Euros we spend for pollution right trades. - btw, I am just missing those rights be traded in hedge fonds.
aaaah, enough, good night:-) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
doccybrown

Joined: 03 Oct 2005 Posts: 1736 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Thu Oct 08, 2009 4:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
HAHA, yeah let`s see what will happen.
I am very skeptic we will have more
money in our pockets effectively after
they have turned the wheels.
CO2:
Hmmm but I would not say that Al Gore is a liar.
At least I see no reason why he should lie in his
campaign. ATTENTION! INCOMING CONSPIRACY
THEORY!
Except he would be "sponsored" by some
guys from the "Green Energy" pool.
Even if so, I would have no problem with that.
I like nature. In this case I don`t mind if they
are cheating me. Although many green energy
concepts are not nearly as green as advertised (sure thing).
Ok, but he says that the CO2 emission increases
exponentially and was never as high as today.
Strange, isn`t it? And I believe him.
Or isn`t it a fact how much MEGATONNES of
coal, oil and gas is burned?
Maybe some millions of trees could compensate it
but who cares about the stupid athmosphere?
No, instead of planting trees we continue to decimate
them to have even more happy cows farting.
Ahh, for oil it`s approx. 35000000000000 litres/year.
Just ignoring this fact and have a happy life?
Great idea.... _________________ Ordem e Progresso |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|