| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
sammyc

Joined: 09 Dec 2005 Posts: 1668 Location: Scottish Borders
|
Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 7:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i disagree:
see pic.... _________________ 4000+ chips.
4004-P4. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
skold

Joined: 30 Nov 2003 Posts: 960 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 7:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| wait, you're saying thats more organized and easy to work with than something like this: |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
chipcollector

Joined: 28 Sep 2004 Posts: 1681 Location: New England
|
Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 7:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Skold, you better come up with something quick you're losing the arguement.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
skold

Joined: 30 Nov 2003 Posts: 960 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 7:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| chipcollector wrote: | Skold, you better come up with something quick you're losing the arguement.  |
??
are you people insane or something?
i could walk up to that cd rack, scan the edges of the cases, find the one labelled 'intel 486 dx - SX668 SX729 SX810 SX829', pull it out, and show it to someone or scan it or do whatever i want with it. plus the whole thing takes up like 4 square feet of space in a room.
orrrrrrrrrrr
i could have a dozen blue trays stacked on top of eachother, and when i want that sx810, i have to lift three trays off the top and then scan through ~20 cpus to find the right one....
and if you store them like sammy does, they take up an entire room
no thanks, you crazy people can have your blue trays, ill keep my beautifully organized jewel cases. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CPUShack

Joined: 16 Jun 2003 Posts: 34259 Location: State of Jefferson, USA
|
Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 8:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ROTFLMAO, ok lets keep this at least civil guy.
The table full of CPU's DOES have a certain sex appeal, everything out in the open to see. Skolds looks very sharp though too, its more urban I think.
This is really a nice way to display chips
 _________________ New for 2025! The CPU Shack has a co-processor!
Visit The CPU Shack of microprocessor history and information. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
skold

Joined: 30 Nov 2003 Posts: 960 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 8:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
if yours were mounted on walls, theyd be all kinds of awesome.
presentation is one thing.. if you want to have them all out for the world to see, then cpushack's way is the best.. a lockable, but visible case..
if you just want to store them though like i do, cd cases are by far the best  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
debs3759

Joined: 18 Jan 2006 Posts: 9477 Location: Northampton, Divided Kingdom
|
Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 9:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| skold wrote: | | wait, you're saying thats more organized and easy to work with than something like this: |
Looks like a good way to store them. I'll have to look at where I can get static free CD cases locally until I get some trays - then I can figure out which I find most practical  _________________ My graphics card database can be found at http://www.gpuzoo.com.
I can resist anything except temptation.
Debs |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
chipcollector

Joined: 28 Sep 2004 Posts: 1681 Location: New England
|
Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 9:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Wow this is how I see it
SCORE BOARD
SammyC- 200 Points
Skold - 0 Points
You're losing the battle!!! HURRRY!!!!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
skold

Joined: 30 Nov 2003 Posts: 960 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 10:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
id love to hear how youre tallying this score, because i believe its fundamentally flawed
is i bet theres a 100 point 'sucking up to a moderator' score, and a 100 point 'geeky dirty basement' score
i kid because i love  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gmanbc

Joined: 27 Dec 2004 Posts: 513 Location: Korea
|
Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 11:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hey Skold,
How long have you been using CD cases? I put all my 386 and higher chips in them but keep them stored flat so they don't move around. I was just curious if you got the idea from me as I posted something on this about a year ago?
I think it looks good.
I like Sammyc's collection but he needs to work on the storage as those chips are subject to the humidity, dust and being knocked off onto the floor. It looks like a cold clammy basement. Poor chips
You wouldn't put your dog down there would you Sam?
Lee |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CPUShack

Joined: 16 Jun 2003 Posts: 34259 Location: State of Jefferson, USA
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
skold

Joined: 30 Nov 2003 Posts: 960 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2006 1:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
thats not my shelf or my collection, right now all my chips are packed in a box...
i just happened to find a picture on google images that had cds that had been 're labelled' somehow so it looks pretty much exactly like what i was talking about
lee, im not sure if i got the idea from you or not, but i started using cd cases in early 2005, and was already doing it when you posted your 'best storage' thread:
http://www.cpu-world.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1457&highlight=case |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sammyc

Joined: 09 Dec 2005 Posts: 1668 Location: Scottish Borders
|
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 1:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| skold wrote: |
and if you store them like sammy does, they take up an entire room
no thanks, you crazy people can have your blue trays, ill keep my beautifully organized jewel cases. |
... I have a 5000 sq ft factory unit... space is not an issue - and it looks fooking cool! And is sooo easy to organise. _________________ 4000+ chips.
4004-P4. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sammyc

Joined: 09 Dec 2005 Posts: 1668 Location: Scottish Borders
|
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 1:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
CD cases:
Prob1: Heatsinks
Prob2: Slot A Athlons
Prob3: Slot 1's
Prob4: Especially Xeons LOL
Prob5: no sex appeal.. hehe
Prob6: small chips?
the list goes on.. my chips love that bench... I will do something more when I eventually move _________________ 4000+ chips.
4004-P4. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Marcin

Joined: 02 Jan 2005 Posts: 8519 Location: Poland
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|