| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
JAC

Joined: 24 Jul 2005 Posts: 3469
|
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 2:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
yeah I read the thread but nothign there "caught" me. I think the one real problem is waiting until small sections are "complete". I'll never be complete now since I extended to sspecs. *sigh*  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
debs3759

Joined: 18 Jan 2006 Posts: 9477 Location: Northampton, Divided Kingdom
|
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 2:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| sammyc wrote: | CD cases:
Prob1: Heatsinks
Prob2: Slot A Athlons
Prob3: Slot 1's
Prob4: Especially Xeons LOL
Prob5: no sex appeal.. hehe
Prob6: small chips?
the list goes on.. my chips love that bench... I will do something more when I eventually move |
LOL
I agree with the first 3 problems, have yet to look at a Xeon (I guess they must be thick as well), but the sex appeal? Does that mean that when I have built a decent storage and display cabinet I'll have all the local dykes banging at my door? Hmm - maybe I should get to work on it...  _________________ My graphics card database can be found at http://www.gpuzoo.com.
I can resist anything except temptation.
Debs |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sammyc

Joined: 09 Dec 2005 Posts: 1668 Location: Scottish Borders
|
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 2:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LOL, Xeons are hooooowge!!!! - they are probably bigger than a CD case.
dykes??? really...? _________________ 4000+ chips.
4004-P4. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Marcin

Joined: 02 Jan 2005 Posts: 8519 Location: Poland
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mixeur

Joined: 06 Jan 2005 Posts: 4038 Location: Sochaux, France
|
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 2:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
As for me, I'm more than planning to do it, I'm making such a piece of furniture....
I will create a topic for this... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JAC

Joined: 24 Jul 2005 Posts: 3469
|
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 2:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I am not bothering with xeons.. too ugly. Not enough sex appeal for me. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sammyc

Joined: 09 Dec 2005 Posts: 1668 Location: Scottish Borders
|
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 2:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My first XEON was a ift, Wow, I tought it looked cool - I had 'for some reason' never sen one before! haha _________________ 4000+ chips.
4004-P4. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mixeur

Joined: 06 Jan 2005 Posts: 4038 Location: Sochaux, France
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
skold

Joined: 30 Nov 2003 Posts: 960 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2006 4:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
| sammyc wrote: | CD cases:
Prob1: Heatsinks
Prob2: Slot A Athlons
Prob3: Slot 1's
Prob4: Especially Xeons LOL
Prob5: no sex appeal.. hehe
Prob6: small chips?
the list goes on.. my chips love that bench... I will do something more when I eventually move |
1) the chips i have with heatsinks attached (overdrives, some cyrix, etc) i store seperately in a sheet of foam. those can go into trays like yours.
2, 3 & 4) slot chips, likewise, get stored seperately. i currentl stack them but ideally theyd be lined up beside eachother to reduce the chance of damage.
5) you lose that when you start collecting cpus.
6) i can imagine a 4004 falling out of the gap at the edge, but most chips stay inside. think of this, most of your trays hold 10 chips, and if you tip it up you drop 10 chips onto the floor. a cd case only holds a few of those, and they have a better chance of staying put.
as for additional benefits:
1) if youre showing them to someone, or looking at them, you can turn the case upside down to look at the underside of a chip without having to take it out or handle it
2) its protected on BOTH sides, not just the bottom. if something happened to fall on it accidentally it would scratch the case, maybe break it, but the chip would be fine, or at least would suffer less damage than if something fell directly on it, like with your exposed-top trays
3) theyre much easier to store. sure, you lose that 'everythings visible' effect, but if i want to fine a chip, i can go through an organized shelf full of chips like i would go through a library, find exactly what im looking for, and have it.. if i asked you to find a particular K6, its 4 rows back and youd have trouble getting back there to read the markings. since i can only fit 4 chips per case, i can be very specific about how theyre labelled, such as 'K6 166ALR'
everyones storage system has its own benefits. instead of arguing about whos is better, we should probably try to come up with some 'ultimate storage' that incorporates the best of everything. so i think ill start a new thread to that effect  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
You can post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You cannot download files in this forum
|
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001 phpBB Group
|