| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
el_gecko

Joined: 25 May 2005 Posts: 1553 Location: Nice, France
|
Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2008 2:11 pm Post subject: The Gecko's CPU Library: first (nice) updates of 2009 |
|
|
Hi all!
Last weeks I worked hard on the Documentation section of my website so now I'm proud to submit the last updates
* As usually, many new chips (now, more than 1200 chips in the collection), I also added some folders for odd chips and a plugin which add a "!" in front of newly updated folders.
* A DEC part number list
* A HP part number list
* An IBM part number list
* A SPARC part number list
* A lot of pages with some pictures (I tried to compile all die shots I found all around the web). Informations were mainly found on wikipedia and some books I have, but now accessible from a single page and sorted out by introduction date:
1971: Intel 4004 processors
1972: Intel 8008 processors
1974: Intel 8080 processors
1974: Intel 4040 processors
1975: MOS 6502 processors
1975: AMD 2901 and 2903 processors
1975: MOS 6510 processors
1975: Motorola 6800 processors
1976: Intel 8085 processors
1976: Zilog Z80 processors
1976: RCA 1802 processors
1976: Texas Instruments 9900 processors
1977: Mostek 3870 controllers
1978: Intel 8086 and 8088 processors
1979: DEC F-11 processors
1979: Motorola 68000 processors
1980: Intel 8087 coprocessors
1981: Intel iAPX 432 processors
1981: DEC T-11 processors
1982: Intel 80286 processors
1982: Intel 80186 and 80188 processors
1982: Motorola 68010 processors
1983: DEC J-11 processors
1983: Intel 80287 coprocessors
1984: Motorola 68020 processors
1984: NEC V20 processors
1984: NEC V30 processors
1984: NEC V40 processors
1985: Intel 80386 processors
1985: MIPS R2000 processors
1986: IBM 4341 processors
1986: IBM 4381 processors
1986: Hewlett Packard TS-1 processors
1987: Hewlett Packard NS-1 processors
1987: Intel 80387 coprocessors
1987: Motorola 68030 processors
1988: Intel 80960 processors
1988: AMD 29000 processors
1988: MIPS R3000 processors
1989: Intel 80860 processors
1989: Intel 80486 processors
1989: Hewlett Packard NS-2 processors
1989: Weitek 3167 coprocessors
1989: Weitek 4167 coprocessors
1990: IBM POWER1 processors
1990: Motorola 68040 processors
1991: Hewlett Packard PA-7000 (Cheetah) processors
1991: Intel 487SX coprocessors
1991: MIPS R4000 processors
1992: Cyrix 486SLC processors
1992: Cyrix 486DLC processors
1992: DEC Alpha 21064 (EV4) and Alpha 21066 (LCA4) processors
1992: Hewlett Packard PA-7100 and PA-7150 (Thunderbird) processors
1993: Intel Pentium (P5, P54, P54C, P55C, P54CS, Tillamook) processors
1993: IBM POWER2 processors
1993: IBM PowerPC 601 processors
1993: Hitachi SuperH (SH-1, SH-2, SH-3, SH-4, SH-5) processors
1993: IBM PowerPRS switches
1994: IBM PowerPC 604, 604e and 604ev processors
1994: DEC Alpha 21064A (EV45) and Alpha 21066A (LCA45) processors
1994: Hewlett Packard PA-7100LC (Hummingbird) processors
1994: IBM PowerPC 401, 403, 405, 440 and 460 processors
1994: MIPS R8000 processors
1994: Motorola 68060 processors
1995: DEC Alpha 21164 (EV5) processors
1995: IBM PowerPC 603, 603e and 603ev processors
1995: Cyrix 5x86 processors
1995: DEC Alpha 21164A (EV56) processors
1995: AMD 5x86 processors
1995: Intel Pentium Pro (P6) processors
1995: Hewlett Packard PA-7200 (Thunderbird') processors
1995: IBM PowerPC 602 processors
1995: MIPS R10000 processors
1996: Hewlett Packard PA-8000 (Onyx) processors
1996: AMD K5 (SSA/5, 5k86) processors
1996: Fujitsu Pentium processors
1996: IBM POWER2 Super Chip processors
1996: Cyrix 6x86 (M1, M2) processors
1996: Hewlett Packard PA-7300LC (Velociraptor) processors
1997: DEC Alpha 21164PC (PCA56) processors
1997: AMD K6 (Little Foot) processors
1997: Hewlett Packard PA-8200 (Vulcan) processors
1997: Intel Pentium II (Klamath) processors
1997: IBM RS64 (Apache) processors
1997: Cyrix MediaGX processors
1997: IBM PowerPC G3 (740, 750...) processors
1997: IDT WinChip C6 processors
1998: Intel Pentium II (Deschutes) processors
1998: DEC Alpha 21264 (EV6) processors
1998: Intel Celeron (Covington) processors
1998: AMD K6-2 and K6-2+ (Chompers) processors
1998: Intel Pentium II Xeon (Drake) processors
1998: Intel Celeron (Mendocino) processors
1998: Hewlett Packard PA-8500 (Vulcan) processors
1998: IBM POWER3 processors
1998: Rise mP6 processors
1998: AMD Elan SC400 and SC410 controllers
1998: IBM RS64-II (Northstar) processors
1999: AMD K6-III and K6-III+ (Sharptooth) processors
1999: Intel Pentium III (Katmai) processors
1999: Intel Pentium III Xeon (Tanner, Cascades) processors
1999: AMD Athlon (Argon, Pluton, Orion) processors
1999: Intel Pentium III (Coppermine, Coppermine-T) processors
1999: IBM PowerPC G4 (7400, 7410, 7450...) processors
1999: IBM RS64-III (Pulsar) processors
1999: Samsung Alpha 21264A (EV67) and Alpha 21264B (EV68) processors
2000: Hewlett Packard PA-8600 (Landshark) processors
2000: VIA Cyrix III (Joshua) processors
2000: VIA Cyrix III (Samuel) processors
2000: Intel Celeron (Coppermine-128) processors
2000: AMD Athlon (Thunderbird) processors
2000: AMD Duron (Spitfire, Morgan, Appaloosa, Applebred) processors
2000: Intel Pentium 4 (Willamette) processors
2000: IBM POWER3-II processors
2001: VIA C3 (Samuel 2) processors
2001: Intel Xeon DP/MP (Foster) processors
2001: Intel Itanium (Merced) processors
2001: VIA C3 (Ezra, Ezra-T) processors
2001: Intel Pentium III (Tualatin) processors
2001: Hewlett Packard PA-8700 (Piranha) processors
2001: AMD Athlon XP/MP (Palomino) processors
2001: VIA Eden ESP, Eden-N and Eden processors
2001: IBM POWER4 processors
2001: IBM RS64-IV (IStar, SStar) processors
2002: Intel Celeron (Tualatin-256) processors
2002: Intel Pentium 4 (Northwood) processors
2002: Samsung Alpha 21364 (EV7) processors
2002: Intel Xeon UP/DP (Prestonia) processors
2002: Intel XScale (PXA, IXC, IOP, IXP) processors
2002: Intel Pentium 4-M (Northwood) processors
2002: Intel Celeron (Willamette-128) processors
2002: AMD Athlon XP/MP (Thoroughbred) processors
2002: Intel Itanium 2 (McKinley) processors
2002: Intel Celeron (Northwood-128) processors
2003: VIA C3 (Nehemiah) processors
2003: AMD Athlon XP/MP (Barton, Thorton) processors
2003: Intel Pentium M (Banias) processors
2003: Intel Xeon DP/MP (Gallatin) processors
2003: AMD Opteron (Sledgehammer, Venus, Troy, Athens) processors
2003: IBM POWER4+ processors
2003: Intel Itanium 2 (Madison) processors
2003: AMD Athlon 64 (Clawhammer, Newcastle, Winchester, Venice, San Diego) processors
2003: AMD Athlon 64 FX (Sledgehammer, Clawhammer, San Diego) processors
2003: Intel Itanium 2 (Deerfield) processors
2003: Intel Pentium 4 Extreme Edition (Gallatin) processors
2004: Intel Pentium 4 (Prescott) processors
2004: Intel Itanium 2 (Hondo) processors
2004: Intel Pentium M (Dothan) processors
2004: Intel Celeron D (Prescott-256) processors
2004: Intel Xeon UP/DP (Nocona, Irwindale) processors
2004: AMD Sempron (Thoroughbred-B, Thorton, Barton) processors
2004: AMD Sempron (Paris, Palermo) processors
2004: Intel Itanium 2 (Fanwood) processors
2004: Hewlett Packard PA-8800 (Mako) processors
2004: IBM POWER5 processors
2005: Intel Pentium 4 (Prescott 2M) processors
2005: AMD Turion 64 (Lancaster, Richmond) processors
2005: Intel Xeon MP (Cranford, Potomac) processors
2005: AMD Athlon 64 X2 (Manchester, Toledo, Windsor, Brisbane) processors
2005: AMD Opteron (Denmark, Italy, Egypt, Santa Ana, Santa Rosa) processors
2005: Intel Pentium D (Smithfield) processors
2005: Intel Pentium Extreme Edition (Smithfield XE) processors
2005: VIA C7 (Esther) processors
2005: Intel Xeon DP/MP (Paxville) processors
2005: Hewlett Packard PA-8900 processors
2006: Intel Core (Yonah) processors
2006: Intel Pentium 4 (Cedar Mill) processors
2006: Intel Pentium D (Presler) processors
2006: Intel Pentium Extreme Edition (Presler XE) processors
2006: Intel Xeon UP/DP (Sossaman) processors
2006: AMD Sempron (Manilla) processors
2006: AMD Turion 64 X2 (Taylor, Trinidad, Tyler) processors
2006: Intel Celeron D (Cedar Mill-512) processors
2006: Intel Xeon UP/DP (Dempsey) processors
2006: Intel Xeon UP/DP (Woodcrest) processors
2006: Intel Core 2 (Conroe) processors
2006: Intel Core 2 Extreme (Conroe XE) processors
2006: Intel Core 2 (Merom) processors
2006: Intel Core 2 Extreme (Merom XE) processors
2006: Intel Itanium 2 (Montecito) processors
2006: Intel Xeon MP (Tulsa) processors
2006: Intel Xeon UP/DP (Conroe) processors
2006: Intel Core 2 (Kentsfield) processors
2006: Intel Core 2 Extreme (Kentsfield XE) processors
2006: Intel Xeon UP/DP (Clovertown) processors
2007: Intel Core 2 (Allendale) processors
2007: Intel Xeon UP/DP (Kentsfield) processors
2007: Intel Celeron (Conroe-L) processors
2007: Intel Xeon MP (Tigerton) processors
2007: Intel Xeon UP/DP (Harpertown) processors
2007: Intel Xeon UP/DP (Wolfdale) processors
Hope this will help the community... (don't hesitate to contact me if you find errors! )
Best regards,
Jérôme
PS: if you want to submit some part numbers, I'd be glad to add them in the lists  _________________ My microprocessor collection: The Gecko's CPU Library
Last edited by el_gecko on Tue Jan 13, 2009 1:47 pm; edited 6 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
iguana

Joined: 24 Apr 2007 Posts: 2456 Location: Ottawa, Canada
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
el_gecko

Joined: 25 May 2005 Posts: 1553 Location: Nice, France
|
Posted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 4:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
All part number lists updated! And also some fun adds:
Microsoft Xenon ES type 001 and 002:
Some IBM 486 BXL3, SLC, SLC2:
Some uncommon Intel stuff: PII THERM, PIII MECH, BGA PIII-S QS and Itanium 533 ES:
...and many other chips  _________________ My microprocessor collection: The Gecko's CPU Library |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cpuswe

Joined: 15 Mar 2005 Posts: 2214 Location: Karlskrona, Sweden
|
Posted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 5:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nice update! And really nice work on the parts list! More collectors should do this kind of research instead of just piling up on chips!
A suggestion on the images... They are pretty large in kb size but rather small in pixel size and takes some time to load. Try adding some compression to the .jpg when saving. I have added compression factor 10 (the scale is from 1-100) on one example below. In my eyes its the same image but its just one third in size. Instead use the size for larger images pixelwise. _________________ My collection: http://www.cpucollection.se :::::: http://www.chipdb.org Photos of chips you never knew existed. Now over 6000 different chips in the database. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
smithy

Joined: 27 Apr 2008 Posts: 2906 Location: Sydney, Australia
|
Posted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 7:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Really like your website & listings, but it is really slow to load. Is it just me on the other side of the world (my internet connection is 12Mb/s) or is the server you are on slow? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kosmokrator

Joined: 03 Jul 2008 Posts: 4085 Location: Athens-GR
|
Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 3:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
very nice site!!!!!
nice work!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
el_gecko

Joined: 25 May 2005 Posts: 1553 Location: Nice, France
|
Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 3:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Cpuswe wrote: |
A suggestion on the images... They are pretty large in kb size but rather small in pixel size and takes some time to load. Try adding some compression to the .jpg when saving. I have added compression factor 10 (the scale is from 1-100) on one example below. In my eyes its the same image but its just one third in size. Instead use the size for larger images pixelwise. |
You're absolutely right, in fact I took a bad habit with this 200ppp resolution
What do you use for your pics? JPG Optimizer?
| smithy wrote: | | Really like your website & listings, but it is really slow to load. Is it just me on the other side of the world (my internet connection is 12Mb/s) or is the server you are on slow? |
Unfortunately my provider is well known for that lol. But it's free. If somebody knows another quite good free FTP provider, I'll consider it  _________________ My microprocessor collection: The Gecko's CPU Library |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
michefe

Joined: 13 Feb 2008 Posts: 155 Location: Roma (Italy)
|
Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 4:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
I use IrfanView, it is free, simple and immediate.
I use 72pp of resolution for my jpgs and 70% of compression for web (90% for other uses when I need better quality).
Last edited by michefe on Wed Jul 09, 2008 9:37 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cpuswe

Joined: 15 Mar 2005 Posts: 2214 Location: Karlskrona, Sweden
|
Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 4:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
| el_gecko wrote: |
You're absolutely right, in fact I took a bad habit with this 200ppp resolution
What do you use for your pics? JPG Optimizer?
|
I think any modern software that can save .jpg will do fine for what we use it for. In my case i use Paintshop pro, but i think you must have this option in your software to. Its standard .jpg options. What do you use? _________________ My collection: http://www.cpucollection.se :::::: http://www.chipdb.org Photos of chips you never knew existed. Now over 6000 different chips in the database. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
el_gecko

Joined: 25 May 2005 Posts: 1553 Location: Nice, France
|
Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 9:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Cpuswe wrote: | | el_gecko wrote: |
You're absolutely right, in fact I took a bad habit with this 200ppp resolution
What do you use for your pics? JPG Optimizer?
|
I think any modern software that can save .jpg will do fine for what we use it for. In my case i use Paintshop pro, but i think you must have this option in your software to. Its standard .jpg options. What do you use? |
I use Photoshop, which use a JPEG quality scale from 0 to 12 (better). I began to record all my pictures at 12, thinking I could optimize them later (instead scanning them again because I have regrets). And I let my collection growing... Now I realize that the size difference between 10 and 12 is huge, a x2 ratio!
So now I'm searching a light software which will allow me to optimize my pictures by batches (sure without moving them). Automating this in Photoshop with a script would be too arduous IMHO  _________________ My microprocessor collection: The Gecko's CPU Library |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
el_gecko

Joined: 25 May 2005 Posts: 1553 Location: Nice, France
|
Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 1:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Some pictures of last months updates, among others:
Some Athlon unfinished chips:
Athlon XP mech sample:
Some Opteron samples:
The famous supposed early PII sample:
Another early PII sample:
Some P4 samples:
An unfinished P4:
A Timna sample:
Some early XBox 360 CPU samples:
Reveal and Xtend FPU:
Non-western-equivalent clones:
AMD 2901 and 2903 clones:
Intel 3002 and 3003 clones:
Intel 8085 clone:
Zilog Z80A clone:
...and more here: http://gecko54000.free.fr/
Any comment would be appreciated!  _________________ My microprocessor collection: The Gecko's CPU Library
Last edited by el_gecko on Sat Jan 24, 2009 7:29 am; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vezhlys

Joined: 01 Jun 2008 Posts: 411 Location: Lithuania, Vilnius
|
Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 2:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hey, you added 3AA2-2306 to HP numbers list. Where did you find out about its frequency? I have the one in my collection too and I want to add more information about it.
P.S. Very nice addition , lots of interesting CPUs. _________________ http://picasaweb.google.com/vezhlys/CPUsCollection |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cpuswe

Joined: 15 Mar 2005 Posts: 2214 Location: Karlskrona, Sweden
|
Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 3:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Niiiice update! Great to see that Q029 has been taken care of in a good home! _________________ My collection: http://www.cpucollection.se :::::: http://www.chipdb.org Photos of chips you never knew existed. Now over 6000 different chips in the database. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mixeur

Joined: 06 Jan 2005 Posts: 4038 Location: Sochaux, France
|
Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 4:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| el_gecko wrote: | I use Photoshop, which use a JPEG quality scale from 0 to 12 (better). I began to record all my pictures at 12, thinking I could optimize them later (instead scanning them again because I have regrets). And I let my collection growing... Now I realize that the size difference between 10 and 12 is huge, a x2 ratio! |
Setting quality to 9 in Photoshop should be OK. This is what I do for my online pictures. Of course, off-line pictures remains at highest quality level. _________________ Register on x86-guide.net to manage and share your collection on-line !
Need to find a x86 ? Go to http://www.x86-guide.net ! Over 12000 chips listed ! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
el_gecko

Joined: 25 May 2005 Posts: 1553 Location: Nice, France
|
Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 5:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Mixeur wrote: | | el_gecko wrote: | I use Photoshop, which use a JPEG quality scale from 0 to 12 (better). I began to record all my pictures at 12, thinking I could optimize them later (instead scanning them again because I have regrets). And I let my collection growing... Now I realize that the size difference between 10 and 12 is huge, a x2 ratio! |
Setting quality to 9 in Photoshop should be OK. This is what I do for my online pictures. Of course, off-line pictures remains at highest quality level. |
Yes I have to consider this point, pictures are still in max. quality  _________________ My microprocessor collection: The Gecko's CPU Library |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
You can post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You cannot download files in this forum
|
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001 phpBB Group
|