| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Cpuswe
Joined: 15 Mar 2005
Posts: 2214
Location: Karlskrona, Sweden
|
 Posted: Fri Aug 07, 2009 4:06 am Post subject: MG80486DX2-50 5962-9310503QXA fake? |
 |
|
I had this 486 chip uploaded today and my little fake warninglight started blinking... Its just a feeling perhaps but 5962-9310503QXA is exactly the same as the famous 286 with a 486 military model number.
Is it a coincidence that these two have the same number or does they origin from the same "factory"?
Not the usual white print, a bit irregular and so on... (But as we never seen this chip before it COULD look this way and being from Intel, but im skeptic)
The 286 fake
_________________
My collection: http://www.cpucollection.se :::::: http://www.chipdb.org Photos of chips you never knew existed. Now over 6000 different chips in the database. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hugo929
Joined: 27 Oct 2006
Posts: 6163
Location: China
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
debs3759
Joined: 18 Jan 2006
Posts: 9477
Location: Northampton, Divided Kingdom
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 07, 2009 10:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
What price is that? I might be interested in one....
_________________
My graphics card database can be found at http://www.gpuzoo.com.
I can resist anything except temptation.
Debs |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mixeur
Joined: 06 Jan 2005
Posts: 4038
Location: Sochaux, France
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hugo929
Joined: 27 Oct 2006
Posts: 6163
Location: China
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 07, 2009 10:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Mixeur wrote: | | 2 different cpu type cannot have same military partnumber => fake. |
it is true when 5962-9310503QXA is for 286
but who is sure for 486?
_________________
My vintage CPU collection:www.cpumuseum.com
Chinese Forum: http://www.cpumuseum.com/forum |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mixeur
Joined: 06 Jan 2005
Posts: 4038
Location: Sochaux, France
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 07, 2009 10:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
In the military partnumber, there is a number corresponding to the military drwaing number. Here it is "93105".
A 286 and a 486 cannot have same drawing...
So, one of them is a fake, and because the military partnumber is written on 2 lines on the 486 (which is never the case), I would say that it is definitely the fake one...
_________________
Register on x86-guide.net to manage and share your collection on-line !
Need to find a x86 ? Go to http://www.x86-guide.net ! Over 12000 chips listed ! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CPUShack
Joined: 16 Jun 2003
Posts: 34259
Location: State of Jefferson, USA
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 07, 2009 12:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Mixeur wrote: | In the military partnumber, there is a number corresponding to the military drwaing number. Here it is "93105".
A 286 and a 486 cannot have same drawing...
So, one of them is a fake, and because the military partnumber is written on 2 lines on the 486 (which is never the case), I would say that it is definitely the fake one... |
5962-9310503QXA is a DX2-50 (the 286 has long known to be a fake obviously)
so its possible the DX2 IS correct, as it has the correct part number
_________________
New for 2025! The CPU Shack has a co-processor!
Visit The CPU Shack of microprocessor history and information. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mixeur
Joined: 06 Jan 2005
Posts: 4038
Location: Sochaux, France
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mixeur
Joined: 06 Jan 2005
Posts: 4038
Location: Sochaux, France
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hugo929
Joined: 27 Oct 2006
Posts: 6163
Location: China
|
| Posted: Sat Aug 08, 2009 6:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Mixeur wrote: | | But, I've never seen a military partnumber written on 2 lines. |
look at this
_________________
My vintage CPU collection:www.cpumuseum.com
Chinese Forum: http://www.cpumuseum.com/forum |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
![[ Hidden ]](https://cdn.cpu-world.com/forum/templates/CPUWorld/images/lang_english/icon_email.gif "[ Hidden ]"){kind=icon}
