VIDEO Editing! Whats more important? Clock Speed?Cache? Ram?

Post new topic   Reply to topic    CPU-World.com forums Forum Index -> Modern CPUs - upgrades, overclocking and troubleshooting
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Guest






PostPosted: Wed Aug 26, 2009 1:21 am    Post subject: VIDEO Editing! Whats more important? Clock Speed?Cache? Ram? Reply with quote

I do alot of video editing at home using Premire adobe elements 4.0 and on my current set up it runs a lil slow especailly while rendering media into a different format so later i can upload to the net.....there's so much to consider whats my prioritys win considering a new CPU FOR EDITING? Is clock speed more important? or is mb's of L2 cache more important? 45mn vs 65nm? duo vs quad? I read that for editing you want quad over duo is this true? and why? ive seen some duo's with faster clock speeds then quad's? dont i want the fastest clock speed? is a quad with a slower clock speed better than a dou with a faster clock speed for EDITING? Im very confused on which stat is more important for what i want........CAN ANYONE HELP?


INTEL CORE 2 DUO E6700 2.67 GHz, P5N-D MB, 2000GB RAM DDR2, 9800GT 512mb, 500gb hard dirve, 500w powersuply
Back to top
andamus



Joined: 06 Dec 2004
Posts: 1029

PostPosted: Wed Aug 26, 2009 4:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

For video-editing you need CPU (it's better to have more core than faster clock), a lot of ram and really fast hard-disk.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  
Wizzard1



Joined: 05 Nov 2006
Posts: 930
Location: Boston MA USA

PostPosted: Wed Aug 26, 2009 9:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I just purchased a Q9400 (2.66GHz 12MB L2, Quad) and it made a HUGE difference coming from a P-D 950, I can edit almost as fast as I can move my mouse around. Recoding still takes some time, but I'm coming from 30 minutes down to maybe 5-6-7.

All you need is fast RAM (DDR2-800 or DDR3 recommended) and some number-crunching cores- L2 helps, but it's really just computational ability thats the deciding factor.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message   AIM Address
NorcalFooter



Joined: 26 Aug 2009
Posts: 1

PostPosted: Wed Aug 26, 2009 12:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

so if i have two cpu's one is quad but with a slower clock speed and one is duo with faster clock speed id be better off going with the quad for video editing even though its clock speed is slower it will still be better for video editing over the duo? right? ddr3 i dont think my mb supports it its the P5N-5 750i
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  
Wizzard1



Joined: 05 Nov 2006
Posts: 930
Location: Boston MA USA

PostPosted: Thu Aug 27, 2009 8:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

750i is DDR2. You're going to want an older C2Q with a slower FSB, like a Q6700, over a newer Q9400 (price is much less for a Q6600, too, they are the cheapest Intel quad).

Adobe programs utilize 4 cores very efficiently, so we'll assume perfect:
2.33GHz x 4 cores = 9.33 Processing Ability
3.33GHz x 2 cores = 6.66 Processing Ability.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message   AIM Address
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    CPU-World.com forums Forum Index -> Modern CPUs - upgrades, overclocking and troubleshooting All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1
Jump to:  
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Powered by phpBB © 2001 phpBB Group