| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Omnius
Joined: 14 May 2009
Posts: 16
Location: Slovakia
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Marcin
Joined: 02 Jan 2005
Posts: 8519
Location: Poland
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Omnius
Joined: 14 May 2009
Posts: 16
Location: Slovakia
|
 Posted: Thu May 14, 2009 10:17 am Post subject: |
 |
|
| Marcin wrote: | Windows ME works on Pentium 90 ? Nice tests  |
Yes the 90 Cpu works good on W ME but I uset 150Mhz Pentium to instal Win because thats the minimum for instal and stops when I try lower frequency. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
johnorun
Joined: 04 Apr 2008
Posts: 3364
Location: Chicago, IL- US
|
| Posted: Thu May 14, 2009 11:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Thanks & Welcome the the group, Omnius. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
monoxrom
Joined: 05 Sep 2008
Posts: 357
Location: Ukraine. Ivano-Frankivsk
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 01, 2009 3:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
offtopic:
who faster intel penium 2 (100*3.5=350 Mhz)
or AMD K6-2 500 (100*5=500 Mhz)
_________________
retro-pc.blogspot.com - my blog |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hugo929
Joined: 27 Oct 2006
Posts: 6163
Location: China
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 01, 2009 5:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| monoxrom wrote: | offtopic:
who faster intel penium 2 (100*3.5=350 Mhz)
or AMD K6-2 500 (100*5=500 Mhz) |
K6 I believe
_________________
My vintage CPU collection:www.cpumuseum.com
Chinese Forum: http://www.cpumuseum.com/forum |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Alan sc
Joined: 06 Jun 2009
Posts: 9
Location: Bs As - Argentina
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 21, 2009 2:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
| monoxrom wrote: | offtopic:
who faster intel penium 2 (100*3.5=350 Mhz)
or AMD K6-2 500 (100*5=500 Mhz) |
A pentium 2 350.
Intel have a better fpu...
I haven't here a cinebench's score of my pentium 2 350, but it's better than a k6-2 400@600
I need run another test. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 6:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Itīs unfair. Run Win 98 and use 1999 benchmarks. And K6 will be definitelly better. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 6:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
| 384MB ? Most of the Super Socket 7 boards have 256 MB cacheable limit. I donīt fully understand to it, but if I install more then 256 MB in S7 boards, the performance drop by ~10%. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Marcin
Joined: 02 Jan 2005
Posts: 8519
Location: Poland
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 10:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
K6 don't have integrated cache memory and I believe there isn't any test where K6-2 500 is faster than PII 350. I think K6-III 450 or K6-III+ 500/550 can be comparatable with this Pentium.
VIA MVP III is one of the best chipsets to support K6 family but check on SIS 650 (propably) ... jeeezzee that is slower than you can imagine
_________________
Visit ABC CPU - Virtual CPU Museum. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Omnius
Joined: 14 May 2009
Posts: 16
Location: Slovakia
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2009 2:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Anonymous wrote: | | Itīs unfair. Run Win 98 and use 1999 benchmarks. And K6 will be definitelly better. |
Itīs Windows Milenium - Release date September 14, 2000  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
![[ Hidden ]](https://cdn.cpu-world.com/forum/templates/CPUWorld/images/lang_english/icon_email.gif "[ Hidden ]"){kind=icon}
