If you buy something through eBay links below we may earn a small commission.
This will not cost you extra, and it will help us to keep the forum
operational and ad-free.
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
xrror
Joined: 23 Jan 2010
Posts: 83
Location: 61920-2262
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tetrium
Joined: 25 Apr 2010
Posts: 466
Location: The Netherlands
|
 Posted: Mon May 10, 2010 4:19 am Post subject: |
 |
|
Shipping only to North Amerika though.
Luckily I'm not looking for that chip (yet) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
D.8080
Joined: 03 Apr 2006
Posts: 1474
Location: Italy
|
| Posted: Mon May 10, 2010 4:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
Wasn't that i915p chipset for ddr2-400?
P4 range.
P4 1.3, to my understanding there are plenty but not showing too much up.
Not really interesting, but to have.
A little contradictory, but I haven't got one yet, and to me it has its appeal. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
g0b
Joined: 18 Jul 2006
Posts: 1385
Location: France
|
| Posted: Mon May 10, 2010 4:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
1.3 GHz P4 are very common.
But on the other side on the range, the 2.0 GHz is hard to find yet.
g0b
_________________
Life is a long lesson in humility |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
xrror
Joined: 23 Jan 2010
Posts: 83
Location: 61920-2262
|
| Posted: Mon May 10, 2010 4:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
Heh, I wish someone would scan a picture of a bi-color PCB 1.3Ghz Pentium4 then, so I don't just sound like a rambling crazy =)
| dume wrote: | | Wasn't that i915p chipset for ddr2-400? |
You're right of course. I'm not sure what Dell system I was looking at. I do remember it had a 2.4Ghz single core celeron that was LGA 775 which astounded me at the time. It had 256mb of DDR2-400... which made it too expensive to upgrade.
I do remember it had SATA, and the PCIe standard on it was too old for any "modern" vid card to run (radeon x800 would not run/too much powerdraw?).
It was such a strange system. Horribly slow. Unfortunately I didn't document it very well before it was dumped =( |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
D.8080
Joined: 03 Apr 2006
Posts: 1474
Location: Italy
|
| Posted: Mon May 10, 2010 8:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
I remember that move by intel, all the reviews were saying to not upgrade to ddr2 m/b unless buying a new system, and that ddr2-400 and ddr-400 were on par...
Amd were cheaper and better for the wallet. As of today I still have a 3000+ 754 w/ 2gb of ddr-400 and it works like a dream. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Neon
Joined: 04 Feb 2008
Posts: 1512
Location: Dallas, Texas, USA
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
![[ Hidden ]](https://cdn.cpu-world.com/forum/templates/CPUWorld/images/lang_english/icon_email.gif "[ Hidden ]"){kind=icon}