| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
skold
Joined: 30 Nov 2003
Posts: 960
Location: Canada
|
 Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2005 5:01 pm Post subject: 386 sl es? |
 |
|
i figured intel generally used Q-specs for ES chips.. so im wondering about this one:
http://www.cpudb.com/imgs/cpus/intel/386-sl-f.jpg
says ES but has an s-spec. did they start this practice after this chip, or is it not really an ES like those 486s i have 
if its not an es id feel a bit better about it. it'd be a shame for such a chip to be in such horrible condition.. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CPUShack
Joined: 16 Jun 2003
Posts: 34259
Location: State of Jefferson, USA
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mvortikar
Joined: 12 Oct 2003
Posts: 131
Location: NJ, USA
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2005 6:29 am Post subject: Re: 386 sl es? |
|
|
That looks familiar.
| skold wrote: | i figured intel generally used Q-specs for ES chips.. so im wondering about this one:
http://www.cpudb.com/imgs/cpus/intel/386-sl-f.jpg
says ES but has an s-spec. did they start this practice after this chip, or is it not really an ES like those 486s i have
if its not an es id feel a bit better about it. it'd be a shame for such a chip to be in such horrible condition.. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Minuteman
Joined: 21 May 2003
Posts: 331
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2005 6:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
| CPUShack wrote: | | Dayum looks like that CPU met the dremel tool in a dark alley. |
looooooll, so true  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
skold
Joined: 30 Nov 2003
Posts: 960
Location: Canada
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2005 8:28 am Post subject: Re: 386 sl es? |
|
|
| mvortikar wrote: | | That looks familiar. |
it was worth every penny |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
![[ Hidden ]](https://cdn.cpu-world.com/forum/templates/CPUWorld/images/lang_english/icon_email.gif "[ Hidden ]"){kind=icon}